scholarly journals Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Tindak Pidana Pungutan Liar (Pungli)

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-144
Author(s):  
I Wayan Arsa Yogi Wiguna ◽  
I Nyoman Sujana ◽  
I Nyoman Gde Sugiartha

In the community, it is often heard about illegal fees which are a form of criminal act. This study aims to determine the regulation of illegal levies (Pungli) based on Regional Regulation No. 8/2010 concerning levies, creations and sports and to determine the imposition of criminal sanctions against perpetrators who commit illegal extortion (Pungli). The research method used is the normative research method, primary and secondary legal material sources, records of statutory books and other literature are carried out to collect data, and analysis of legal materials using legal arguments. The results of this study indicate that the regulation of corruption is implied in the formulation of corruption in several articles including Article 423 of the Criminal Code referred to in Article 12 of Law Number 31 Year 1999 as a criminal act of corruption, which is then reformulated in Law Number. 20 of 2001 concerning the crime of corruption. Legal sanctions against extortion consist of social sanctions and criminal sanctions. The law on corruption is stated in it regarding the crime of extortion.

LEGALITAS ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Alex Subagyo Dan Irman Syahriar

Basically the damage to other people's belongings is very detrimental to the owner of the damaged goods only partially or completely so that the owner of the goods can no longer use his belongings, other than that the goods that have been damaged are valuable to the owner by damaging the goods very disturbing the peace of the owner of the goods . How is the application of the law to the crime of destruction of goods in a demonstration and how is the criminological point of view of the crime of destruction of goods in a demonstrationThis type of research used in this study is a type of normative legal research, which is a legal research method that uses a statutory approachThe results showed that the threat of punishment in article 170 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, regarding legal sanctions for perpetrators of violence against people or goods in public is threatened with imprisonment for five years and six months, whereas in Article 406 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code with the same result, namely violence against goods, the perpetrators were threatened with imprisonment for up to two years and eight months or a maximum fine of four Rp. 4,500 (four thousand and five hundred). Every human being has an interest, where interests are divided into three namely individual interests, group interests and general interests. Crime, violence and "mass vandalism" in Indonesia are products of social systems with various values that are not mutually harmonious, and are not always compatible, harmonious and balanced.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-260
Author(s):  
Kadek Agus Indra Ana Putra ◽  
I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani

The criminal act of embezzlement and fraud committed by deducting the Covid-19 social assistance funds, specifically the provisions in article 372 of the Criminal Code. Meanwhile, fraud is regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code. This research focuses on criminal or legal sanctions against the perpetrators of cutting Covid-19 social assistance funds based on the law, namely the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHP). The purpose of this research is to regulate legal sanctions against perpetrators of Covid-19 social assistance fund cutters. It applies the normative legal method by using a conceptual and a case approach.. The sources of legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary sources of law. The technique of collecting legal materials is done by recording, quoting, reading, and summarizing the literature related to the formulation of the problem which is then analyzed systematically. The result of the research shows that the criminal sanctions against the perpetrators of cutting Covid-19 social assistance funds based on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHP), are regulated in article 372 of the Criminal Code for embezzlement, while fraud is subject to article 378 of the Criminal Code. The perpetrator was charged in accordance with Article 372 regarding embezzlement and Article 378 of the Criminal Code regarding the criminal act of fraud.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 354-358
Author(s):  
Tia Nur Larasati ◽  
I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha ◽  
Diah Gayatri Sudibya

It can be said that the conviction of perpetrators of same-sex rape can be said to still contain obscure normsand that the Law of the Republic of Indonesia number 1 of 1946 concerning Criminal Law Regulations or the KUHP does not contain specific provisions that clearly regulate it. Article 292 of the Criminal Code is the only article of the Criminal Code that provides regulations regarding the crime of same sex rape. However, Article 292 of the Criminal Code only regulates the criminal act of same sex rape against minors as it can be categorized as an element of the crime of rape as stipulated in Article 285 of the Criminal Code, a criminal act of rape must be committed by men against women. The purpose of this study was to determine the criminal act of same sex rape according to Article 292 of the Criminal Code and to determine the legal sanctions against the perpetrator of the crime of same sex rape in Indonesia. The research method used is normative research, this type of normative research focuses on the collection and in-depth analysis of legal materials and also searches for their meaning in order to find solutions to the problem. Legal sanctions for perpetrators of the crime of rape of the same sex in Indonesia refer to the provisions of Article 292 of the Criminal Code, which is punishable by a maximum imprisonment of five years, as with the weight of the crime of a criminal act of rape whether committed against the opposite sex or of the same sex, punishment a maximum sentence of 5 (five) years is deemed not to contain a sense of justice, the formulation of criminal sanctions for rape in Articles 285 and 292 of the Criminal Code can be considered to be out of date or outdated.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 442-446
Author(s):  
Dinda Dian Pratiwi ◽  
I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani

Humans need money to be able to meet their needs. Money has a very important role, this causes some people to try to have money in a way that is against the law. With the help of science and technology, it can make it easier for humans to do counterfeiting rupiah banknotes. The purpose of this research is to reveal the regulation of the criminal act of counterfeiting rupiah banknotes in Indonesia and criminal sanctions against the criminal act of counterfeiting rupiah banknotes in Indonesia. The type of research is normative legal research with a conceptual approach that is outlined descriptively with legal arguments. The collection of legal materials is done by means of a literature research. Sources of data used are primary, secondary and tertiary sources of legal material and analyzed systematically. The results of the research reveal that the regulation of criminal acts of counterfeiting rupiah banknotes in Indonesia is regulated in Article 11 of Law Number 7 of 2011 concerning Currency concerning Bank Indonesia is an institution authorized to manage rupiah currency and Article 26 paragraph (1) of Law Number 7 The year 2011 concerning Currency regulates the prohibition against counterfeiting rupiah currency. In addition, it is regulated in Article 244 of the Criminal Code which prohibits criminal acts of counterfeiting money, if violated, sanctions will be imposed according to applicable regulations. Criminal sanctions for counterfeiting rupiah banknotes in Indonesia are contained in Article 36 paragraph (1) of Law Number 7 of 2011 concerning Currency and Article 244 of the Criminal Code


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Jurna Petri Roszi

This article aims to describe the problems of the application of criminal sanctions against polygamy committed illegally in the middle of society. Regardless of the controversy of agreeing and disagreeing, the issue of polygamy is a reality that occurs in society. The purpose of polygamy is the same as the purpose of marriage itself, that is worship. However, when the issue of marriage, that in is fact private law, violates the provisions, then the perpetrators may be subjected to criminal sanctions. Criminal sanctions imposed on illegal polygamists are very diverse. This is supported by the attitude of government's ambiguity in viewing illegal polygamy. The Government's doubt and uncertainty in viewing the illegal act of polygamy has implications for the inherent criminal sanctions against the act, strangely the criminal sanction inherent in the law depends on the degree to which the regulations are looked at. This research uses normative law research method whith normative juridical approach. The results of illegal polygamy research is not seen as overspel acts that can be threatened with criminal provisions Article 284 of the Criminal Code because the element of overspel is not the same as polygamy. Polygamy remains a legitimate marriage as the norms contained in the Law No.1 of 1974 onmarriage.Nevertheless the marriage of polygamy must still fulfill the terms and conditions as determined by the Law No.1 of 1974.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 388-392
Author(s):  
I Komang Oka Raharja ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani

Every neglected children must be given protection from institutions or laws which aims at protecting their rights. Children have often been victims of crimes, one of which is kidnapping. Regarding the kidnapping of children, Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection stipulates that the incidents of kidnapping and neglected children by parents can cause physical and psychological harms to those neglected children and the unfulfillment of their rights. Therefore, it is necessary to impose criminal sanctions on parents or other people who neglect children. Grounded by this, the problems examined in the present research are: How is the legal protection for children from kidnapping by parents regulated? What are the legal sanctions against parents who commit kidnapping over their children? The research method used in this research is normative juridical, with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Data were analysed using a qualitative-normative method. Based on the results of data analysis, the regulation of legal protection for children from kidnapping committed by parents is that every parent shall ensure the fulfillment of children’s rights so that they can live, grow and develop and participate optimally in accordance with human dignity, so that they receive protection from violence and discrimination for the sake of the realisation of Indonesian children who are qualified, noble and prosperous. The legal sanctions against parents kidnapping their children are regulated in Article 330 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code jo. Article 55 paragraph (1) to 1 KUHP with due observance of Article 330 paragraph (2) KUHP jo. Article 55 paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code and Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law and applicable laws and regulations.


Jurnal Hukum ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 1721
Author(s):  
Muhammad Aziz Syamsuddin

AbstractThe spirit of the eradication of corruption is running continually. Various efforts or strategies were arranged to sharpen the power of corruptions’ eradication. One of the strategies is legislation support or comprehend and effective legislation. It was proved by the enactment of Law No. 28 of 1999 on State Implementation of Clean and Free from Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism and also Law No. 31 of 1999 as amended by Law No. 20 of 2001 on Corruption Eradication. The other related legislation such as Law No. 30 of 2002 on Corruption Eradication Commission and the Law 8 of 2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering.  Those Supporting legislations show that there is a shared commitment to eradicate corruption. Indonesia has also ratified the UNCAC (United Nations Convention against Corruption) by Law No. 7 of 2006 on the UN Convention (United Nations) Anti-Corruption. Support legislation is expected to provide a deterrent effect for offenders and protecting the rights of citizens has a whole. Keywords: Legislative Support, Criminal Code Draft, Eradication, Crime of Corruption, Pros and Cons    AbstrakSemangat pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi terus bergulir. Berbagai upaya atau strategi dibangun untuk mempertajam kekuatan pemberantasan korupsi. Salah satunya adalah dengan dukungan legislasi atau peraturan perundang-undangan yang komprehensif dan efektif. Dibuktikan dengan lahirnya Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 1999 tentang Penyelenggaraan Negara yang Bersih dan Bebas dari Korupsi, Kolusi, dan Nepotisme dan Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 1999 sebagaimana diubah dengan Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Adapun undang-undang terkait lainnya seperti UU No. 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan UU No. 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Dukungan legislasi tersebut menunjukkan adanya komitmen bersama untuk memberantas tindak pidana korupsi. Indonesia juga  telah meratifikasi UNCAC (United Nations Convention Against Corruption) dengan UU No. 7 Tahun 2006 tentang Konvensi PBB (Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa) Anti Korupsi. Dukungan legislasi ini diharapkan memberikan efek jera bagi pelaku sekaligus melindungi hak-hak warga negara secara keseluruhan. Kata Kunci: Dukungan Legislatif, RUU KUHP, Pemberantasan, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Pro dan Kontra


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-338
Author(s):  
Rahmat Fadli ◽  
Mohd. Din ◽  
Mujibussalim Mujibussalim

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji perlindungan hukum terhadap korban pencemaran nama baik melalui media online dan menjelaskan pemenuhan restitusi yang seharusnya diterima korban pencemaran nama baik melalui media online. Pencemaran nama baik merupakan perbuatan melawan hukum, dikarenakan telah menyerang kehormatan atau nama baik seseorang. Rumusan tindak pidana pencemaran nama baik melalui media online diatur dalam Pasal 27 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Infomasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Sanksi pidananya diatur dalam Pasal 45 ayat (3) Undang-Undang ini. Dalam Undang-Undang ini belum diatur sanksi pidana yang berbentuk restitusi, sehingga kurang melindungi korban pencemaran nama baik melalui media online. Metode penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier, Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa ancaman pidana pada Pasal 45 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Infomasi dan Transaksi Elektronik belum memenuhi rasa keadilan dan memberi manfaat kepada korban. Karena pada pasal ini belum mengatur sanksi pidana yang bersifat ganti rugi terhadap korban. Reformulation of  Criminal Sanctions on Defamation Through Online Media This study aims to examine the legal protection of victims of defamation through online media and explain the fulfillment of restitution that should be received by victims. Defamation is an act against the law, because it has attacked someone's honor or reputation. The formulation of criminal defamation through online media is regulated in Article 27 paragraph (3) of the Information and Electronic Transactions Law. The criminal sanctions are regulated in Article 45 paragraph (3). This law has not yet regulated criminal sanctions in the form of restitution, so it does not protect victims of defamation through online media. The research method is a normative juridical by using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results found that the criminal threat in Article 45 paragraph (3) of the Law on Information and Electronic Transaction had not fulfilled a sense of justice and benefited for victims. It is because this article does not yet regulate criminal sanctions that are compensation for the victim.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 537-541
Author(s):  
Ni Made Yeni Sukmawati ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Ni Made Sukaryati Karma

Body Shaming is a term that is currently trending, where criticizing or commenting on someone's physical in a negative way or with speech that intends to mock or insult someone's physical or appearance falls into this category. Legal protection for victims of body shaming needs to get very serious attention in order to deal with the phenomena that are currently happening on social media in particular. This study examines the regulation of the criminal act of insulting body image (body shaming) in terms of positive law and explains the legal protection provided to victims in the crime of insulting body image (body shaming). This study uses a normative research method by applying the legislation approach which refers to primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The regulation of criminal acts of insulting body image (body shaming) in terms of positive law in general can be seen from the element of humiliation which is regulated in Chapter XVI of the Criminal Code and is grouped into 6 parts, namely from article 310 to article 318 and besides that, there are also other legal rules that regulate it implicitly in Article 27 paragraph (3). Article 45 paragraph (3) of the ITE Law. With sanctions in the form of criminal sanctions. The form of legal protection given to victims in the crime of body shaming is the making of policies by the State regarding prohibitions and strict sanctions for violators such as criminal sanctions and fines, through the established witness and victim protection institution


2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 5398-5407
Author(s):  
Ishaq, Maratun Saadah

This study aims to contribute to Islamic law regarding the criminal sanction of abortion in the Criminal Code (KUHP) as an effort to reform Indonesian criminal law. The method used is comparison, with data collection carried out by library research, by studying Islamic legal literature, interpretation of the Quran (tafsir), hadith, Criminal Code, and the Draft of Criminal Code. The sanctions for abortion in articles 346, 347, 348 and 349 of the Criminal Code are only imprisonment, not accompanied by fines. According to Islamic law these sanctions are not sufficient, because they tend to make the perpetrators not deterred, as a result the purpose of punishment is not achieved. Therefore, it needs to be updated by including the value of Islamic legal sanctions in the form of fines (diat), so that the purpose of punishment can be achieved.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document