scholarly journals INSTITUTIONAL DISPUTES SETTLEMENT MECHANISM OF SUCCESSION IN NGAYOGYAKARTA HADININGRAT SULTANATE

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-83
Author(s):  
Iwan Satriawan ◽  
Faishal Aji Prakosa
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Royal Family ◽  
Executive Leaders ◽  
Female Figure ◽  
Settlement Mechanism ◽  
Special Region

The Constitutional Court Decision No. 88/PUU-XIV/2016 grants a possibility for a woman to be a candidate for Governor and Vice-Governor in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. As the only province in Indonesia where the executive leaders are only able from the royal family of the Ngayogyakarta Hadiningrat, the decision then triggers a polemic among people in the region. This is due to the current governor, Sri Sultan Hamengku Buwono X, does not have a son as his successor to the throne. Thus, this paper reveals institutional disputes’ settlement mechanism in the Ngayogyakarta Hadiningrat Sultanate if any disputes ever appear. The outcome finds that the Sultanate has yet clear mechanism of dispute settlement among the royal family and no official institution which possesses authority to settle royal disputes. Insofar, the Sultanate has had a customary law or paugeran adat in which a female figure might taking the throne to be the Sultanah and the governor of the province. Nevertheless, the authors recommend to establish an institution to settle royal disputes for the continuation of the Ngayogyakarta Hadiningrat Sultanate. Abstrak: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 88/PUU-XIV/2016 meniscayakan adanya kemungkinan untuk seorang perempuan menjadi kandidat Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur di provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Sebagai satu-satunya pronvisi di Indonesia dimana pemegang kekuasaan eksekutif daerah hanya boleh berasal dari keturunan kerajaan Ngayogyakarta Hadiningrat, keputusan tersebut nyatanya memicu polemic diantara masyarakat di daerah. Hal ini disebabkan oleh tidak adanya keturunan laki-laki dari gubernur atau sultan yang sedang menjabat saat ini, yaitu Sri Sultan Hamengku Buwono X, untuk melanjutkan tahta kepemimpinan. Oleh sebab itu, artikel ini bertujuan untuk melihat mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa institusi di Keraton Ngayogyakarta Hadiningrat jika terjadi sengketa. Hasil yang ditemukan adalah tidak adanya mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa di dalam Keraton serta tidak adanya institusi resmi yang dapat memutus dan menyelesaikan sengketa tersebut. Hingga saat ini, Keraton hanya menerapkan hukum adat atau paugeran adat dimana mengizinkan untuk seorang perempuan mengambil alih tahta dan menjadi seorang Sultanah sekaligus gubernur. Namun demikian, penulis menyarankan untuk tetap dibentuknya sebuah lembaga yang memiliki otoritas untuk menyelesaikan sengketa antar anggota Keraton guna keberlanjutan Keraton Ngayogyakarta Hadiningrat kedepannya. Kata Kunci: Sengketa Institusi, Keraton Ngayogyakarta Hadiningrat, Sultanah

scholarly journals KONSEKUENSI YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 TERHADAP KEDUDUKAN ANAK ASTRA DALAM HUKUM ADAT BALI

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Gede Pasek Pramana
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Systematic Evaluation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Normative Study ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Law

This research aims to analyze about the significance of the Constitutional Court Decision No.46/PUU-VIII/2010 the position of anak astra in Bali customary law. The research method used is a normative study by selecting the type of statue approach and the conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials that were examined in this study consisted of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials and techniques were analyzed with the description, systematic, evaluation and argumentation. Based on the perspective ( review ) Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010, anak astra have a civil relationship with her biological father and his family along can be proved by science and technology and / or other evidence according to the law. The juridical consequences of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 to the norms of Bali customary law about anak astra Bali is must conform to the directions of law in the Decision of the Constitutional Court.

scholarly journals Pelaksanaan Klausul Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Akad Perbankan Syariah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor : 93/PUU-X/2012 Pada Bank Syariah Mandiri KCP Indramayu

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Mahpudin Mahpudin ◽  
Akhmad Khisni
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Dispute Resolution Mechanism

ABSTRAKPutusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor : 93/PUU-X/2012 Tanggal 29 Agustus 2013 telah membatalkan Penjelasan Pasal 55 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perbankan Syariah adalah soal kepastian hukum. Hal ini dikarenakan dalam Penjelasan pasal 55 ayat (2) menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum antara pilihan hukum dalam lingkup peradilan umum dengan pilihan hukum dalam lingkup peradilan agama. Kepastian hukum secara normatif adalah ketika suatu peraturan dibuat dan diundangkan secara pasti karena dapat memberikan pengaturan secara jelas dan logis. Jelas dalam arti tidak menimbulkan keragu-raguan atau multi tafsir, dan logis dalam arti hukum tersebut menjadi suatu sistem norma dengan norma lain sehingga tidak berbenturan atau menimbulkan konflik norma ataupun adanya kekaburan dan kekosongan norma. Asas ini dapat dipergunakan untuk dapat mengatasi persoalan dalam hal konsep mekanisme dan pilihan hukum dalam penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah;Pilihan forum penyelesaian sengketa Perbankan Syariah berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor : 93/PUU-X/2012 Tanggal 29 Agustus 2013 yang membatalkan Penjelasan Pasal 55 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perbankan Syariah harus dinyatakan secara tegas menyatakan dan menyepakati apakah memilih forum Arbitrase Syariah atau menentukan pilihan forum Pengadilan Agama dalam rumusan klausula Penyelesaian Perselisihan atau Sengketa dalam Akad Perbankan Syariahnya. Artinya memilih atau menentukan salah satu forum mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa syariah yaitu forum BASYARNAS atau Pengadilan Agama, bukan menggabungkan keduanya dalam satu rangkaian rumusan klausula penyelesaian sengketa.Kata kunci : klausul penyelesaian sengketa, akad perbankan syariah, putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi ABSTRACTDecision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 93 / PUU-X / 2012 dated August 29, 2013 has annulled the Elucidation of Article 55 paragraph (2) of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 Year 2008 concerning Sharia Banking is a matter of legal certainty. This is because in the Elucidation of article 55 paragraph (2) raises legal uncertainty between the choice of law within the scope of general justice with the choice of law within the scope of religious court. Normative legal certainty is when a rule is created and enacted as it can provide clear and logical arrangements. Clearly in the sense that there is no doubt or multi-interpretation, and logical in the sense that the law becomes a system of norms with other norms so as not to clash or cause conflict of norms or the existence of vagueness and void norms. This principle can be used to solve the problem in terms of the concept of mechanism and choice of law in solving the dispute of sharia banking;The choice of dispute resolution forum of Sharia Banking pursuant to Decision of Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 93 / PUU-X / 2012 dated August 29, 2013 which annul the Elucidation of Article 55 paragraph (2) of Law of Republic of Indonesia Number 21 Year 2008 concerning Sharia Banking must be stated expressly declare and agree on whether to vote for a Shari'ah Arbitration Forum or to determine the choice of Religious Court forums in the formulation of a Clause or Dispute Settlement clause in its Sharia Banking Agreement. It means choosing or determining one of the forums of dispute resolution mechanism of sharia namely BASYARNAS or Religious Court, not merging the two in a series of dispute settlement clause formulas.Keywords: clause of dispute settlement, syariah banking contract, Constitutional Court decision

scholarly journals Reconstruction of Indigenous Forests Planning Policy in Way Kanan Regency Following the Ruling of the Constitutional Court on Traditional Forest

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Erina Pane
Keyword(s):  
Forest Management ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Forest Planning ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Planning Policy ◽  
Indigenous Forest

Constitutional Court Decision No.35/ PUU-X/2012 restored the function of indigenous forests to be managed by the indigenous peoples. The ruling establishes that indigenous forest is no longer a part of the state forest but part of the forest rights. Forest rights no longer only include forests on lands of the natural/legal entity but also are located in the area of indigenous peoples. The problem in this research is how the reconstruction of indigenous forest planning policy in Way Kanan regency after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 35 / PUU-X / 2012 on Traditional Forest. The research used here is normative juridical-empirical. The data used is secondary data and primary data, and then is performed by juridical qualitative data analysis. Based on the research results, the arrangement of indigenous forests done by Way Kanan District Government is started with the assistance and mediator, data collection, research conduct and the confirmation of the existence of customary law communities along with indigenous areas, cooperating with the partnership between indigenous peoples and the concessionaires of Forest Management Rights (HPH), and accelerate the formation Regional Regulation on the Recognition of Indigenous Peoples. Indigenous forest planning policy was blocked because Way Kanan Regional Regulation that specifically related to customary law communities has not been established, there is something confusing associated with the administration of indigenous forests and the intervention of interests of the party holding Forest Management Rights (HPH).  Keyword: Reconstruction, Regulation, Indigenous Forest

EKSISTENSI PENERAPAN HUKUMAN MATI DI INDONESIA

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Ahmad Muhammad Mustain Nasuha
Keyword(s):  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The State ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Draft Bill

This study aims the death penalty in Indonesia. We know where the death penalty is contrary or not in terms of the constitution and Islamic law, then we can conclude that if the legal implementation of the death penalty in Indonesia continue to be done or should be abolished. Based on research and the analysis conducted, conclude that Indonesia According to the Indonesian Constitution that the death penalty in Indonesia is constitutional. Constitutional Court Decision No. 2-3 / PUU-V / 2007 states that the imposition of the death penalty was constitutional. Any law governing capital punishment is not contrary to the Constitution of the State of Indonesia. However the legislation in Indonesia death penalty is still recognized in some legislation. There are three groups of rules, namely: Criminal Dead in the Criminal Code, Criminal die outside the Criminal Code, Criminal die in the Draft Bill. According to Islamic law that the death penalty could be applied to some criminal act or jinazah, either hudud qishahs, diyat or ta'zir among others to: Apostate, Rebel, Zina, Qadzaf (Allegations Zina), Steal (Corruption), Rob (Corruption), Murder.

Traditional and Customary Law: Adat

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Butt ◽  
Tim Lindsey
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Small Proportion ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
The State ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Past ◽  
Statutory Protection ◽  
Traditional Communities

Many Indonesians—primarily those living in rural areas—still follow customary law (adat). The precise rules and processes of that adat differ significantly from place to place, even within short distances. This chapter shows that for many decades, adat has been subservient to national law. State-made law overrode it, leaving it applicable only in a very small proportion of cases where no national law applied, where judges could apply it as ‘living law’. Even in these cases, many judges ignored adat or distorted it when deciding cases. The 1945 Constitution was amended in 2000 to require the state to formally recognize and respect customary law, as practised in traditional communities. The Constitutional Court has given effect to this in various judicial review cases, as have some statutes enacted in the past decade or so. However, this constitutional and statutory ‘protection’ has been impeded in practice by requirements for traditional communities to be formally ‘recognized’ by their local governments, many of whom have been unresponsive to calls for recognition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document