scholarly journals The Right to Freedom of Express Opinions in Public Based on Pancasila

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Triwahyuningsih Triwahyuningsih
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Social Justice ◽  
Universal Declaration ◽  
Way Of Life ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Human Right ◽  
The West ◽  
The Right

Freedom to express opinions in public is a human right guaranteed by the 1945 Indonesian Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The concept of human rights originating from the West resulted in its application often causing problems. This problem arises because the values of freedom that are generally upheld in the West are different from the specific values based on the philosophy and way of life in each country.  The purpose of this study is to describe how the freedom to express opinions in public is in accordance with the values of Pancasila ideology. This research is normative legal research with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. Using primary and secondary legal materials also analyzed qualitatively descriptively. The results of the study conclude that the right to express freedom in public must be in accordance with the values of Pancasila, which is to fulfill the principle of balance between the rights and obligations of every citizen with the goal of responsible freedom being realized. Rights should not be understood only as claims on others, but also contain an obligation to respect the rights of others. Rights always have implications for obligations. All obligations, like all rights, derive from law, because all obligations are moral imperatives and all moral imperatives arise from law. Its application always upholds the values of divinity, humanity, unity, democracy and aims to realize social justice for all Indonesian people.Keywords: right of freedom, express opinion, Pancasila

scholarly journals APOSTASY: IS IT HUMAN RIGHTS OR/AND FREEDOM OF RELIGION?

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 208-215
Author(s):  
Adibah Sulaiman ◽  
◽  
Md Yazid Ahmad ◽  
Mohd Azmir Mohd Nizah ◽  
Ezad Azraai Jamsari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Content Analysis ◽  
Religious Freedom ◽  
Universal Declaration ◽  
Historical Research ◽  
Freedom Of Religion ◽  
Human Right ◽  
The West ◽  
Freedom Of Belief ◽  
The Right

This study investigates the issue of apostasy or riddahor as a human right to freedom of religion or belief, especially among the Muslims. The purpose is to examine the question of whether apostasy should be recognized by modern Muslim states and societies as a human right that must be guaranteed for their citizens. Or, should it strictly be denied, thus freedom of religion or belief should not be extended to apostasy for Muslims and Muslim converts? The method used to complete the study is historical research and content analysis. This study showed that the call for recognition of apostasy as a human right is indeed influenced by the West which extremely enjoys freedom of belief or religion. As for Islam, apostasy is indeed contradictory with its teachings. This article is meaningful as it highlights the Universal Islamic Declaration of Human Rights (UIDHR) which speaks on religious freedom with limitations. UIDHR invariably attempts to match the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) that recognizes the right to believe in whatever men want or to change their religion as they wish, at any time.

scholarly journals POSSIBILITY TO CORRECT THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN INDONESIAN LAW: COMPARISON BETWEEN SINGAPORE LAW AND INDONESIAN LAW ON BROADCASTING

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-63
Author(s):  
Dian Narwastuty ◽  
Christian Nugraha
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Hate Speech ◽  
Freedom Of Speech ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Sanction ◽  
The Right ◽  
Fear Of Retaliation

Freedom of speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or legal sanction. This principle is one of the Human Rights principles that are necessary for the progress of humanity itself. But its existence has always triggered a dispute because of the abuse of the right. The abuse of the rights consists of Hate Speech and Hoaxes. This research is normative legal research that uses a comparative approach and conceptual approach. And also, this research will compare the Freedom of Speech and Broadcasting laws in Indonesia and Singapore, especially law in the broadcasting sector. Theoretically, the benefits of this research are to answer the problem of correcting Freedom of Speech, especially in broadcasting law. Practically, it is helpful for society to know much more about hate speech and hoaxes also the possibility to correct the broadcasting law in Indonesia based on the same regulation in Singapore.

scholarly journals DISKURSUS PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA DI INDONESIA DALAM TINJAUAN UNIVERSALISME HAM DAN RELATIVISME BUDAYA

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Fitrawati Fitrawati
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Universal Declaration ◽  
Cultural Relativism ◽  
The Other ◽  
Freedom Of Religion ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Interfaith Marriage ◽  
Cultural Relativity ◽  
The Right

This paper tries to examine the right to freedom of interfaith marriage in Indonesia from the perspective of Human Rights Universalism and Cultural Relativism. The purpose of this paper is to explain how universalism and cultural relativity view interfaith marriage in Indonesia. This research is a normative legal research. This study uses a literature approach. The findings of this study indicate that interfaith marriage in Indonesia is still not well accepted and has always been controversial news in the community, even considered to have exceeded or violated the provisions of marriage, but there are still followers of different religions who decide to marry. In fact, many of them are smuggling laws so that their marriages are recognized by the state, namely by registering marriages abroad and then continuing the registration in Indonesia. Meanwhile, on the other hand, Indonesia already has a law on Marriage, namely, Article 2 paragraph 1. It is also contained in the article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, namely the right to freedom of marriage (article 16 UDHR) which includes the right to marry between religions (different religions), and the right to freedom of religion (article 18 UDHR) which includes the right to change religions. Meanwhile, in cultural realivism, it rejects everything that is universal.

scholarly journals El derecho humano a participar: Estudio del artículo 21 de la Declaración Universal de Derechos Humanos = The human right to participate: Study of article 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

2019 ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Jorge Castellanos Claramunt
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Political Participation ◽  
International Law ◽  
International Development ◽  
Universal Declaration ◽  
Human Right ◽  
Citizenship Rights ◽  
Derechos Humanos ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact

RESUMEN: El derecho a la participación política se encuentra en el artículo 21 de la Declaración Universal de Derechos Humanos como un derecho humano. Este derecho ha seguido un desarrollo a nivel internacional desde una perspectiva global, así como continental, por lo que se analiza su evolución en los últimos 70 años y el impacto que ha tenido dentro del desarrollo del Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos. Por último se subraya el carácter fundamental del derecho a participar así como una proyección de su desarrollo en el futuro.ABSTRACT: The right to political participation is found in article 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a human right. This right has followed an international development from a global as well as a continental perspective, so its evolution over the last 70 years and the impact it has had on the development of the International Law of Human Rights is analyzed. Finally, the fundamental character of the right to participate is stressed, as well as a projection of its.PALABRAS CLAVE: derechos humanos, participación política, democracia, ciudadanía, derechos.KEYWORDS: human rights, political participation, democracy, citizenship, rights.

Working for social justice: community, activism and academia

Housing Shock ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 87-106
Author(s):  
Rory Hearne
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Social Justice ◽  
Trade Unions ◽  
Rental Housing ◽  
National Policy ◽  
Housing System ◽  
Policy Debate ◽  
Participatory Action ◽  
Human Right ◽  
The Right

This chapter explores the author’s housing journey, from living in private rental housing, to working with disadvantaged communities on housing and human rights, campaigning on homelessness and the right to housing, to being a publically engaged academic researching and engaging in the national policy debate on housing. It details the everyday impact of austerity on disadvantaged social housing communities and their response through a successful ‘Rights-in-action’ human right to housing campaign. It also details participatory action research with homeless families, the Participatory Action Human Rights and Capability Approach. In then discusses the role of academics, policy makers and researchers in social change, empowerment and participation in relation to social justice and housing issues. It interrogates the concept of knowledge production – who’s interest does it serve? Drawing on Freire and Gramsci the Chapter outlines five areas, for the academic researcher (and this can be applied to policy analysts and researchers, NGOs, human rights organisations, trade unions and community activists) to contribute to achieving an egalitarian, socially and environmentally just, and rights-based housing system.

scholarly journals TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA TERHADAP KERUGIAN WISATAWAN BERKAITAN DENGAN PELANGGARAN HAK BERWISATA SEBAGAI BAGIAN DARI HAK ASASI MANUSIA

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Putu Eva Laheri
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
State Responsibility ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Indonesian Government ◽  
The Right

This is a research after state responsibility for the damages suffered by tourists in relation with the violation of the right to tourism as a part of Human Rights, aims to describe and analyze about the liability of Indonesian Government to respect, protect and fulfill the right of every individual toward to enjoy his/her rights to tourism under Article 28I (4) of the Indonesian Constitution Year 1945 and Article 8 Statute Number 39 Year 1999 regarding Human Rights. Furthermore this research is willing to assess the circumstances that might create a possibility for tourists to file a claim of compensation against the Indonesian Government for the losses suffered as a result of the failure/the negligence of Indonesian Government to fulfill its responsibilities. Based on statement mentioned above, the question arises, whether in concept, tourists are able to file a claim of compensation against the Indonesian Government in relation with the recognition of the right to tourism as a part of Human Rights? And also in terms of how tourists can possibly file a claim of compensation against the Indonesian Government? The method used in this research is the method of normative legal research using the statute approach, the comparative approach as well as the conceptual approach. Based on the research that has been done, the conclusion is that in concept tourists can file a claim of compensation against the Indonesian Government, if they can prove that the damage or loss is caused by a violation of Human Rights conducted by the Indonesian Government and the result of this research further shows that the claim should be filed together with stating prove that the Indonesian Government has conducted a violation of the rights to tourism as a part of Human Rights.

Repressing The Fanatism in Madurese Society Through Legal Culture Strengthening

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-76
Author(s):  
Achmad - Fauzi ◽  
Achmad Faidi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Religious Affiliation ◽  
Minority Group ◽  
Social Institutions ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Universal Declaration ◽  
Human Right ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

The strong fanaticism of Madurese society to issues of diversities on religious, beliefs, opinions to socio-religious affiliation makes it prone to any conflict like what occurred between Shiite-Sunni in Sampang. The minority group finds it hard to express their belief, such as building worship houses. This hegemony requires the right way to foster attitudes and understanding on values of tolerance and diversity. This article argues the importance of building public legal awareness through legal culture strengthening. The historical normative approach becomes the main foundation including the conception of tolerance in religious texts (the Qur'an and hadith), the Medina Charter, the conception of human rights in the Cairo Declaration, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and several other laws governing religious tolerance and human rights in Indonesia. It reveals the importance of legal culture strengthening because public legal awareness can’t only be built through legal substance and legal structure. Furthermore, legal culture strengthening also functions to maximize several existing legal products on the tolerance building. The strengthening program can be through massive socialization instruments in public spaces both in academic areas, such as universities and other social institutions.(Kuatnya fanatisme masyarakat Madura terhadap isu-isu perbedaan agama, keyakinan, pandangan, hingga afiliasi sosial keagamaan menyebabkan kerawanan munculnya konflik seperti konflik Syi’ah-Sunni di Sampang. Kelompok minoritas cenderung kesulitan mengekspresikan keyakinannya, seperti saat akan membangun tempat ibadah. Hegemoni semacam ini mengharuskan adanya cara yang tepat guna menumbuhkan sikap dan pemahaman tentang nilai-nilai toleransi dan keberagaman. Artikel ini memperlihatkan pentingnya membangun kesadaran hukum masyarakat melalui penguatan legal culture. Pendekatan normatif historis menjadi pijakan utama meliputi konsepsi toleransi dalam teks-teks keagamaan (al-Qur’an dan al-hadits), Piagam Madinah (Madinah Charter), konsepsi HAM dalam Deklarasi Kairo, Universal Declaration of Human Right (UDHR), Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945 serta beberapa Undang-Undang lain tentang toleransi beragama dan HAM di Indonesia. Artikel ini mengungkapkan pentingnya penguatan legal culture di masyarakat sebab kesadaran hukum tidak bisa dibangun hanya dengan legal substance dan legal structure. Selain itu, penguatan legal culture juga berfungsi untuk memaksimalkan beberapa produk hukum yang ada terkait upaya membangun toleransi. Penguatan legal culture dapat dilakukan dengan berbagai instrument sosialiasi yang masif melalui ruang-ruang publik, baik di lingkup akademik, seperti perguruan tinggi maupun lembaga-lembanga sosial kemasyarakatan lainnya.)

Dignity

2021 ◽  
pp. 107-160
Author(s):  
William A. Schabas
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Universal Declaration ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Human Right ◽  
Per Se ◽  
The Right

Human dignity is not necessarily treated as a human right per se, but it may describe in particular several of the most fundamental rights that concern physical and psychological integrity: the right to life, the prohibition of torture and ill treatment, the prohibition of slavery and servitude, the right to liberty and security, and the recognition as a person before the law. Within these rubrics, some quite specific issues are addressed including the resort to capital punishment and other extreme penalties, the criminalisation of genocide, and the imposition of medical treatment. The references to dignity in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights appear to make up for the absence of any recognition of a supreme being,

The Human Right to Water from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to the New Agenda for Sustainable Development

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 162-170
Author(s):  
Marianna Pace
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Universal Declaration ◽  
International Treaties ◽  
Human Right ◽  
2030 Agenda ◽  
International Water Law ◽  
International Water ◽  
The One ◽  
The Right

The article explores the evolutionary path that led to the emergence of the right to water as human rights, since the Universal Declaration of Human Rights till to its inclusion in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. In particular, on the one hand the paper analyses the definition and the content of the right to water, as well as the obligations stemming for contracting States to the international treaties recognizing this right. On the other one, it focuses specifically on how to ensure an effective guarantee of the right to water. Finally, the analysis assesses the contribution of Goal 6, included in 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, to the international water law regime.

scholarly journals Aturan Pembebasan Narapidana dengan Program Asimilasi dan Integrasi di Tengah Wabah Covid-19 di Tinjau Dari Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Ham Nomor 10 Tahun 2020

INICIO LEGIS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-182
Author(s):  
Halim Dimas Ferdiansyah ◽  
Syamsul Fatoni
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Government ◽  
Release Program ◽  
The Right ◽  
Occupancy Rates

ABSTRAKDasar pertimbangan dikeluarkannya Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 10 Tahun 2020 tentang Persyaratan Pemberian Hak Asimilasi dan Integrasi bagi Narapidana dan Anak dalam rangka pencegahan dan penanggulangan penyebaran COVID-19. dengan banyaknya tingkat hunian di penjara, hal ini telah menimbulkan kekhawatiran bagi pemerintah. Namun, terpidana yang dibebaskan mengulangi kejahatannya lagi dan menimbulkan kecemasan publik. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan antara Permenkumham Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 dengan Permenkumham Nomor 20 Tahun 2020 dan kesesuaian prinsip pembinaan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 1995 tentang pemasyarakatan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perbedaan pemberian hak asimilasi dan integrasi narapidana dalam Permenkumham Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 diberikan sesuai dengan persyaratan substantif dan administratif secara lengkap. Namun dalam Permenkuham Nomor 10 Tahun 2020 terdapat beberapa perbedaan dalam hal pemberian hak asimilasi dan integrasi, baik persyaratan substantif maupun administratif, sehingga Permenkumham Nomor 10 Tahun 2020 memudahkan narapidana mendapatkan hak asimilasi dan integrasi. serta pelaksanaan ketentuan pemberian asimilasi dan integrasi dalam Permenkumham Nomor 10 Tahun 2020 tidak sesuai dengan prinsip pembinaan dalam undang-undang pemasyarakatan. Ketidaksesuaian tersebut dikarenakan adanya narapidana yang kembali melakukan tindak pidana, hal ini menunjukkan kegagalan dalam melakukan pembinaan terhadap narapidana. Pasalnya, program pembebasan hanya berfokus pada pencegahan penularan COVID-19 di lapas Kata kunci: asimilasi, integrasi, narapidana, perbedaan dan kesesuaian Permenkumham ABSTRACTThe basis for the consideration of the issuance of Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 10 of 2020 concerning the Requirements for Granting Assimilation and Integration Rights for Prisoners and Children in the context of preventing and overcoming the spread of COVID-19. with many occupancy rates in prisons, it caused a concern of the government. However, the convict who was released repeated the crime again and caused public anxiety. The purpose of this research was to find out the difference between Permenkumham (Regulation of the minister of Law and human righs) Number 3 of 2018 and Permenkumham Number 20 of 2020 and the suitability of the principles of development with Law Number 12 of 1995 concerning correctionalism. The method used in this research was a type of normative legal research using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach. The results of this study indicated that the differences in the provision of assimilation rights and integration of prisoners in Permenkumham No.3 of 2018 were given in accordance with the complete substantive and administrative requirements. However, in Permenkuham No.10 of 2020 there are several differences in terms of granting assimilation and integration rights, both substantive and administrative requirements, so that Permenkumham No.10 of 2020 made it easier for inmates to get the right of assimilation and integration. and the implementation of the provisions for assimilation and integration in Permenkumham No.10 of 2020 is not in accordance with the principles of guidance in the correctional law. This mismatch was due to the presence of prisoners who had returned to committing criminal acts, this indicated a failure to provide guidance to prisoners. This was because the release program only focuses on preventing transmisfsion of COVID-19 in prisons. Keywords: Assimilation, Integration, Prisoners, Differences and suitability of Permenkumham

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document