scholarly journals Perbedaan Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Berkirim Salam dan Soal dengan Think Pair Share di SMP Swasta Imelda Medan

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sri Wahyuni Tampubolon ◽  
Edi Syahputra

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat bahwa terdapat perbedaan peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe berkirim salam dan soal dengan model pembelajaran kooperratif tipe Think Pair Share pada materi luas permukaan dan volume kubus dan balok di kelas VIII SMP Swata Imelda Medan T.A 2016/2017. Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII Semester II SMP Swasta Imelda Medan yang terdiri dari 4 kelas dengan jumlah keseluruhan siswa 136 orang. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cara simple random sampling dengan mengambil 2 kelas dari 4 kelas secara acak yaitu kelas eksperimen 1 yang berjumlah 30 orang dan kelas eksperimen 2 yang berjumlah 34 orang. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengetahui kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa adalah tes kemampuan berpikir kreatif yang telah divalidasi dalam bentuk uraian. Dari hasil penelitian yang diberikan perlakuan yang berbeda, kelas eksperimen 1 dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe berkirim salam dan soal dan kelas eksperimen 2 dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif kooperratif tipe Think Pair Share diperoleh nilai rata-rata kelas eksperimen 1 sebesar 34,375 dan nilai rata-rata kelas eksperimen 2 sebesar 25,368. Hasil uji t 2 arah dengan dk = 62 dan a = 0,05, diperoleh thitung = 2,073 dan ttabel = 1,669 sehingga - ttabel < thitung < ttabel yaitu  maka Ha diterima, dengan demikian  diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa terdapat perbedaan peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe berkirim salam dan soal dengan model pembelajaran kooperratif tipe Think Pair Share pada materi luas permukaan dan volume kubus dan balok di kelas VIII SMP Swata Imelda Medan T.A 2016/2017. Kata Kunci : Model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe berkirim salam dan soal, Think Pair Share, berpikir kreatif     ABSTRACT This study aims to see that there are differences in the improvement of students' mathematical creative thinking ability using cooperative learning model type greeting and problem with cooperative learning model Think Pair Share type on surface and volume material of cube and beam in class VIII SMP Swata Imelda Medan TA 2016 / 2017. The research is a quasi-experiment. The population in this study is all students of class VIII Semester II of Private Junior High School Imelda Medan consisting of 4 classes with total students 136 people. Sampling is done by simple random sampling by taking 2 classes from 4 classes randomly, that is experiment class 1 which is 30 people and experiment 2 class which is 34 people. The instrument used to determine students' mathematical creative thinking ability is a test of creative thinking ability that has been validated in the form of a description. From the results of the research given different treatment, experimental class 1 with cooperative learning model type send greetings and the problem and experiment class 2 with cooperative cooperative learning model Think Pair Share type obtained average grade experiment 1 of 34.375 and the average grade Experiment 2 of 25,368. Result of t test 2 direction with dk = 62 and a = 0,05, obtained tcount = 2.073 and ttable = 1,669 so - ttable <t count <ttabel that is -1,669 <2,073 <1,669 then Ha is accepted, thus obtained the conclusion that there are differences in the improvement of students' mathematical creative thinking ability using cooperative learning model type send greetings and problems with cooperative learning model Think Pair Share type on surface material and volume of cube and beam in class VIII SMP Swata Imelda Medan FY 2016/2017. Keywords : Cooperative learning model type sends regards and matter, Think Pair Share, creative thinking

Alotrop ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evi Elyani ◽  
Sumpono Sumpono ◽  
Hermansyah Amir

The purpose of this research is to measuring the comparison of students creative thinking ability between cooperative learning model type Stuctured Numbered Heads (SNH) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) on nomenclatur of chemical compounds material in curriculum 2013 of grade X MIPA SMA Negeri 6 Bengkulu city school year 2017/2018. This research is a quasi-experimental research with total population 118 students and sample 57 students with class X MIPA D as experiment class I that apply cooperative learning model type SNH and class X MIPA B as experiment class II applying cooperative learning model type NHT. Analysis of the data used are mean values, Percentage Indicator, normality test, homogeneity test, and hypothesis test (t test). The students' creative thinking ability in this study is seen from the difference between pretest and posttest. In the experimental class I, the average value of students creative thinking ability was 51,851 while the experimental class II was 46,916. The result of t test (? = 0,05) obtained tcount> ttable is 2,645> 2,0040 indicates the accepted hypothesis  means that there is a significant difference between students' creative thinking ability using cooperative learning model type SNH and NHT, where the model of cooperative learning type SNH is more influential on students’ creative thinking ability compared with cooperative learning type model NHT. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 308
Author(s):  
Veronika Yusnita Andriani Prastika ◽  
Riyadi Riyadi ◽  
Siswanto Siswanto

This research aims to 1) which learning model that supports students’ creative thinking ability whether discovery, CORE, or conventional learning model, 2) which model that supports creative thinking ability the most to high, moderate, and low level students, 3) know if there is interaction between learning model and students’ logical mathematical intelligence, and creative thinking ability. This is a quasi-experimental research with the population of eighth graders of junior high schools in Madiun Regency. The research design used a group pretest-posttest control design. The sample was determined using stratified cluster random sampling. This research uses two-way unequal ANOVA. This research concluded that 1) students’ creative thinking skill is developed better using Discovery than CORE and conventional learning model, 2) students with high logical mathematical intelligence have higher creative thinking ability than those with moderate and low logical mathematical intelligence,3) there is no interaction between learning model and logical mathematical intelligence with creative thinking ability.Keywords: Creative Thinking; Learning Model; Logical Mathematical Intelligence. AbstrakTujuan dari penelitan ini untuk mengetahui 1) model pembelajaran manakah yang memberikan kemampuan berpikir kreatif yang lebih  antara model pembelajaran discovery learning, CORE atau konvensional, 2) manakah yang memberikan kemampuan berpikir kreatif yang lebih baik siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis tinggi, sedang, atau rendah, 3) apakah terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan keceredasan logis matematis dengan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian adalah eksperimen semu, dengan populasi siswa kelas VIII SMP N Se-Kabupaten Madiun. Desain penelitian menggunakan group pretest-posttest control design Pemilihan sampel dengan menggunakan stratified cluster random sampling. Teknik analisis penelitian ini menggunakan anava dua jalan dengan sel tak sama. Kesimpulan pada penelitian ini 1) kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa yang kenai model discovery learning lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran CORE dan konvensional, 2) Kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis tinggi lebih baik daripada siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis sedang dan rendah, , 3) tidak ada interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan kecerdasan logis matematis dengan kemampuan berpikir kreatif.Kata kunci: Berpikir kreatif; kecerdasan logis matematis; model pembelajaran.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-28
Author(s):  
Cut Ardhilla Putri ◽  
Said Munzir ◽  
Zainal Abidin

The students' mathematical creative thinking ability is still low and lacks attention in the implementation of mathematics learning. This issue requires an attempt to address the problem. One of the efforts that can be done by teachers to develop creative thinking ability is by applying a Brain-Based Learning model of learning. This study aims to describe the development of students' mathematical creative thinking ability through Brain-Based Learning model. This research employed a qualitative approach. Participants were six students selected from 30 students of class VIII-1 in SMP Negeri 19 Percontohan Banda Aceh. The instruments used in this research are creative thinking ability test and interview guide. The results showed that the ability of students' mathematical creative thinking through Brain-Based Learning model developed. The development of students' creative thinking ability in each indicator is different. The students' mathematical creative thinking abilities for indicators of fluency and flexibility develop at each session. For indicators of originality and elaboration, there was a decrease in the second session but increased for the next one.


Author(s):  
Suci Lupita Sari ◽  
Destia Wahyu Hidayati ◽  
Arie Wahyuni

<p>The purpose of this study is to determine the average mathematical creative thinking ability of students by using Geogebra-assisted Brain-Based Learning strategies more than KKM (70) and to find out the average mathematical creative thinking ability of students using more Brain-Based Learning strategies assisted by Geogebra higher than students' creative mathematical thinking abilities using conventional methods. This research uses quantitative methods. The sample of this study was students of class VIII-A as many as 16 students as the experimental class and class VIII-B as many as 18 students as the control class. The results of this study indicate that students' creative thinking abilities using Geogebra-assisted Brain-Based Learning strategies are more than 70 and there are significant differences between the abilities of students who obtain conventional learning with students who learn with the Geogebra-Aided Brain-Based Learning model.</p><p class="JRPMAbstractBody" align="center"><strong><em> </em></strong></p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sri Susilawaty

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui : hasil belajar Keterampilan jahit dan sulam yang diajar dengan menggunakan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw dibandingkan siswa yang diajarkan dengan menggunakan  strategi pembelajaran ekspositori; hasil belajar Keterampilan jahit dan sulam siswa yang memiliki kemampuan berpikir kreatif tinggi dengan dari siswa yang memiliki kemampuan berpikir kreatif rendah; mengetahui interaksi penggunaan strategi pembelajaran dengan kemampuan berpikir kreatif dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Keterampilan jahit dan sulam. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuasi eksperimen. dengan sampel penelitian sebanyak 2 kelas yang ditentukan secara cluster random sampling terdiri dari kelas ekperimerimen yang diajarkan dengan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw dan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori. Hasil pengujian menunjukan :  hasil belajar Keterampilan siswa yang di ajar dengan strategi pembelajaran jigsaw lebih tinggi dari pada siswa yang diajarkan dengan strategi ekspositori; hasil belajar Keterampilan siswa dengan Kemampuan berpikir kreatif tinggi lebih tinggi dari pada siswa dengan Kemampuan berpikir kreatif rendah; dan terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan kemampuan berpikir kreatif terhadap hasil belajar Keterampilan jahit dan sulam. Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, kemampuan berpikir kreatif, hasil belajar, keterampilan jahit dan sulam Abstract: This research aimed to determine: the results of learning sewing and embroidery skills are taught using cooperative learning strategies jigsaw than students taught using expository teaching strategy, the results of learning sewing and embroidery skills of students who have a high ability to think creatively than students who have the ability to think creatively low,  the interaction use learning strategies with creative thinking ability in influencing the outcomes of learning sewing and embroidery skills. Method is a mettod of quasi-experimental studi with a sampel of 2-class research ttah determined clucter random sampling exsperiment consists of classes taught cooperative learning strategies jigsaw and expository teaching strategy. The results showed: learning skills in teaching students with learning strategies jigsaw higher than students taught by expository strategy; Skills learning outcomes of students with high creative thinking ability is higher than the students with low ability to think creatively; and (3) there is interaction between Intructional strategy and creative thinking skills to the outcomes of learning sewing and embroidery skills. Keywords: intructional strategy, creative thinking skills, outcomes of learning, sewing and embroidery skills


EDUSAINS ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-318
Author(s):  
Henni Riyanti ◽  
Suciati Suciati ◽  
Puguh Karyanto

KEEFEKTIFAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN GENERATIF UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR LOGIS SISWA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN IPAAbstractOne of the important 21st-century competencies that should be empowered is logical-thinking ability. Logical-thinking ability is one of the aspects in domain cognitive science that could not be implemented effectively in teaching and learning in the class. Then, this study was aimed to know the effectiveness of generative learning model to enhance students' logical-thinking ability. This research was also conducted by using a quasi-experimental study with pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. The sample was taken by using simple random sampling technique. The research involved two classes which were 67 participants consist of 34 students in Class VIII.9 as an experimental group and 33 students in Class VIII.7 as a control group. The researcher used the instruments of logical-thinking ability, they were multiple choice tests with five alternative answers that have been tested for its validity and reliability. The used analysis of data is t-test by SPSS 21. The result obtained t-count value is 2.44, t-table on significant level 0.05 is 1.99, and p-value = 0.017 (p <0.05). It can be concluded that the t-count > t-table, so H0 refused. This also indicates that the application of generative learning models provides a significant impact on students' logical-thinking ability. AbstrakSalah satu kemampuan penting abad 21 yang harus diberdayakan adalah kemampuan berpikir logis. Kemampuan berpikir logis adalah salah satu aspek dalam domain kognitif sains yang belum dapaat diimplementasikan dengan efektif dalam pembelajaran di kelas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui keefektifan model pembelajaran generatif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir logis siswa. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan jenis penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan menggunakan teknik simple random sampling. Penelitian ini melibatkan dua kelas yang terdiri dari 67 partisipan dengan distribusi 34 siswa di Kelas VIII.9 sebagai kelompok eksperimen dan 33 siswa di Kelas VIII.7 sebagai kelompok kontrol. Peneliti menggunakan instrumen kemampuan berpikir logis yaitu tes pilihan ganda dengan lima alternatif jawaban yang telah diuji validitas dan reliabilitasnya. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah Uji-t menggunakan SPSS 21. Hasil yang diperoleh yaitu nilai thitung adalah 2.44, ttabel dengan nilai signifikansi 5% adalah 1.99 dan p-value = 0.017 (p < 0.05). Dengan demikia dapat disimpulkan bahwa nilai thitung > ttabel, sehingga H0 ditolak. Hal ini juga menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran generatif memberikan pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kemampuan berpikir logis siswa.


Author(s):  
Suci Lupita Sari ◽  
Destia Wahyu Hidayati ◽  
Arie Wahyuni

<p>The purpose of this study is to determine the average mathematical creative thinking ability of students by using Geogebra-assisted Brain-Based Learning strategies more than KKM (70) and to find out the average mathematical creative thinking ability of students using more Brain-Based Learning strategies assisted by Geogebra higher than students' creative mathematical thinking abilities using conventional methods. This research uses quantitative methods. The sample of this study was students of class VIII-A as many as 16 students as the experimental class and class VIII-B as many as 18 students as the control class. The results of this study indicate that students' creative thinking abilities using Geogebra-assisted Brain-Based Learning strategies are more than 70 and there are significant differences between the abilities of students who obtain conventional learning with students who learn with the Geogebra-Aided Brain-Based Learning model.</p><p class="JRPMAbstractBody" align="center"><strong><em> </em></strong></p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariati Dara Anindita ◽  
Humuntal . Banjarnahor

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS dengan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT, dan untuk mengetahui apakah kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa dengan  pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS lebih tinggi daripada tipe NHT SMP Negeri 2 Hinai. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian quasi experimental dengan populasi seluruh siswa SMP Negeri 2 Hinai kelas VIII, sebagai sampel diambil dua kelas secara acak yaitu siswa kelas VIII-A yang berjumlah 34 siswa sebagai kelas eksperimen 1 dan siswa kelas VIII-D yang berjumlah 34 siswa sebagai kelas eksperimen 2. Kelas eksperimen 1 diberikan pembelajaran matematika dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS dan kelas eksperimen 2 dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT. Penelitian ini menggunakan satu jenis instrument yaitu  post-test only yang telah divalidasi dalam bentuk uraian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata nilai kemampuan komunikasi matematis  (post-test) siswa di kelas eksperimen 1 sebesar 67,01 dan nilai rata-rata tes kemampuan komunikasi matematis (post-test) siswa di kelas eksperimen 2 sebesar 60,54. Untuk uji hipotesis digunakan uji t pihak kanan , dari hasil perhitungan diperoleh  thitung = 1,913 dan ttabel = 1,669, sehingga thitung > ttabel yaitu 1,913 > 1,669 maka yang berarti bahwa H0 ditolak dan Ha diterima. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS lebih tinggi daripada kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT SMP Negeri 2 Hinai.Kata Kunci: eksperimen semu, Think Pair Share , Numbered Head Together  ABSTRACTThis research to determine students 'mathematical communication ability using cooperative learning model of TPS type with students' mathematical communication ability using NHT type cooperative learning model, and to know whether the mathematical communication ability of students with cooperative learning type of TPS is higher than NHT type SMP Negeri 2 Hinai. This research is a quasi experimental research with population of all students of SMPN 2 Hinai Class VIII, as sample taken by two classes randomly that is student of class VIII-A which amounted to 34 students as experiment class 1 and student of class VIII-D Amounted to 34 students as experiment class 2. Experiment class 1 was given mathematics learning with cooperative type model of TPS type and experiment class 2 with cooperative learning model type NHT. This study uses one type of instrument that is post-test only that has been validated in the form of a description. The results showed that the average score of mathematical communication ability (post-test) of students in experiment class 1 was 67.01 and the mean score of students' mathematical communication ability (post-test) in experimental class 2 was 60,54. To test the hypothesis used t right side test, from the calculation result obtained tcount = 1.913 and ttable = 1.669, so tcount> ttable is 1.913> 1.669 then that means that H0 rejected and Ha accepted. Based on the results of this study can be concluded that the mathematical communication skills of students using cooperative learning model of TPS type higher than students' mathematical communication skills using cooperative learning model type NHT SMP Negeri 2 Hinai.Keywords: Quasi Experiments,Think Pair Share, Numbered Head Together 


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Nur Indah Lestari

This research aims to investigate the influence of instructional models and creative thinking ability toward history learning outcomes of students at SMA Negeri 30 Jakarta. This research is quantitative research using design treatment by level 2x2. The instrument used to assess student’s achievement is in the multiple choice form, while the instrumen used to assess students creative thinking’s ability is in questionnaire form. The result of the research show that: history learning outcomes of students using sinektik learning models are higher than those history learning outcomes of students using cooperative learning tipe group investigation models, here is interaction effect between learning model and creative thinking on history learning outcomes of students, history learning outcomes of students who has high creative thinking and using sinektik learning model are higher than students using cooperative learning tipe grup investigation model, history learning outcomes of students who has creative thinking and using sinektik model are lower than students using the cooperative learning tipe grup investigation models.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rizka . Aulia ◽  
Waminton . Rajagukguk

AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat bahwa kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa pada pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS berbeda dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS di kelas VIII SMP Negeri 27 Medan. Jenis penelitian ini adalah kuasi-eksperimen. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII semester genap yang terdiri dari 9 kelas dengan jumlah keseluruhan siswa 362 orang. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cara cluster sampling dengan mengambil 2 kelas dari 9 kelas secara acak, maka terpilih kelas VIII-7 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1 yang berjumlah 40 orang dan kelas VIII-8 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2 yang berjumlah 40 orang. Penelitian ini menggunakan instrumen dalam bentuk uraian yaitu posttest yang digunakan untuk mengetahui kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa. Instrumen tes tersebut telah divalidasi oleh tiga orang validator kompeten yaitu dua validator merupakan dosen pendidikan matematika dan satu validator merupakan guru matematika dan telah dinyatakan valid. Dari hasil penelitian setelah diberikan perlakuan yang berbeda yaitu kelas eksperimen 1 dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS dan kelas eksperimen 2 dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS diperoleh nilai rata-rata kelas eksperimen 1 sebesar 72,5000 dan nilai rata-rata kelas eksperimen 2 sebesar 63,9060. Hasil uji t dua pihak dengan dk = 78 dan  = 0,05, diperoleh thitung = 1,7489 dan ttabel = 1,667 sehingga thitung tidak berada dalam interval –ttabel<thitung<ttabel maka Ha diterima, dengan demikian diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa pada pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) berbeda dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) di kelas VIII SMP Negeri 27 Medan.Kata kunci: Model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Think Pair Share (TPS), Model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), kemampuan komunikasi matematisAbstrak This research aims to see that the mathematical communication skills of students incooperative learning types Think pair share (TPS) different cooperative learning with types Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) in class VIII SMP Negeri Medan 27. This type of research is quasi-experiments. The population in this research is all students of SMP Negeri 27 Medan consist of 9 class with the number of overall students 362 people. Sampling is done by means of cluster sampling taking 2 classes from grade 9 at random, then elected to class VIII-7 as a class experiment 1 of 40 people and class VIII-8 experiments as a class 2 that add up to 40 people. This research uses the instrument in the form of exposé i.e. posttest are used to figure out the mathematical communication skills of students. The test instrument has been validated by three competent two validator the validator is a Professor of mathematics education and a validator is a mathematics teacher and has been declared invalid. From the results of the study after being given different treatment experimental class 1 with cooperative learning model type TPS and experimental class 2 with cooperative learning model type TSTS obtained average value of experimental class 1 for 72.5000 and the average value of experimental class 2 of 63.9060. T test result two parties with dk = 78 and =0,05 , retrieved thitung = 1.7489 and ttabel = 1.667 so that thitung are not in interval – ttabel< thitung < ttabel and then Ha received, thus obtained the conclusion that mathematical communication skills of students in cooperative learning types Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learning with different types of Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) in class VIII SMP Negeri Medan 27.Keywords: Cooperative learning model types Think Pair Share (TPS), cooperative learning Model types of Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), communication skills matematis


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document