scholarly journals Comparison of surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin polished by aluminum oxide and diamond particle paste

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yolanda Y. ◽  
Dudi Aripin ◽  
Opik Taofik Hidayat
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Aluminum Oxide ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Diamond Particle ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Optical Microscope ◽  
Composite Surface ◽  
Color Retention ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite

Introduction: The adequate finishing and polishing procedures might occur the restoration longivity, the color retention, and the good integrating with the surrounding environment. Methods: This study was conducted to determine the surface roughness of the nanofill composite with the nanohybrid composite polished by the aluminum oxide pastes and diamond polishing paste. This study was a pure experimental-in vitro study. The results of polishing on the resin composite surfaces was observed using the optical microscope at 500x magnification and given the score. The Krusskal-Wallis test was conducted to depict the data analysis. Result: The results showed that the resin composite group of the nanohybrid polished by both aluminum oxide and diamond particle had smoother surface than the resin composite of the nanofill. Conclusion: The conclusions of this study depicted that there were differences of polishing results using the aluminium oxide and diamond particle paste between the nanofill and nanohybrid resin composite surface roughness.

Comparative evaluation of surface roughness and texture of polished nanofill and nanohybrid composites using profilometer and scanning electron microscope: in - vitro study

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 4-10
Author(s):  
Krishna Prasada L ◽  
Jyothsna S Jathanna ◽  
Naveen Kumar ◽  
Ramya M.K ◽  
Elizabeth Issac
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscope ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Three Samples ◽  
Group B ◽  
Scanning Electron

BACKGROUND: To determine the effectiveness of three polishing systems on three different composite materials by evaluating surface roughness using a Profilometer and Scanning electron microscope. METHODOLOGY: A total of Sixty-three resin composite disks were prepared in rectangular acrylic mould of 8×2mm dimension, with 4mm thickness. Specimens were made of light activated resin composite Filtek Z-250-XT, Tetric-N-Ceram bulkfill, Ceram X Duo. The sixty-three samples were divided into three groups of twenty-one samples each i.e. Group A (Filtek Z-250-XT), Group B (TetricN-Ceram bulkfill) and Group C (Ceram-X-Duo).Out of 21 samples of each of the material, 7 specimens were polished with multi enhance polishing agents, 7 specimens were polished with super snap polishing agents and 7 specimens were polished with sof-lexdiscs.Surface roughness of each sample after polishingwasevaluatedusingProfilometer and Scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: One-way anova and kruskalwallis test was used for statistical analysis. Ceram-X-Duo gave least roughness average value with Super snap polishing system when compared to multi enhance and sof-lex polishing system. CONCLUSION: Super snap polishing system is a better polishing system than multi enhance and soflex and Ceram-X-Duo composite material offers better polishability compared to Filtek Z-250-XT and Tetric-N-Ceram bulk fill.

Comparative evaluation of surface roughness of novel resin composite Cention N with Filtek Z350 XT: In vitro study

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyothi Nagesh ◽  
Amith Setty ◽  
JayashankaraChatra Marigowda ◽  
Anilkumar Shivanna ◽  
SharathKumar Paluvary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Vitro Study

Influence of Material and Surface Roughness of Resin Composite Cements on Fibroblast Behavior

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 528-536
Author(s):  
N Rohr ◽  
N Bertschinger ◽  
J Fischer ◽  
A Filippi ◽  
NU Zitzmann
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Cell Morphology ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Gingival Fibroblasts ◽  
Viability Assay ◽  
Flat Cell ◽  
Composite Cements ◽  
Resin Composite Cement

Clinical Relevance A well-polished cement surface increases the viability and spreading of gingival fibroblasts. The tested resin composite cements did not reveal any cytotoxic effects. SUMMARY Objective: This in vitro study aimed to investigate the effect of cement type and roughness on the viability and cell morphology of human gingival fibroblasts (HGF-1). Methods and Materials: Discs of three adhesive (Panavia V5 [PV5], Multilink Automix [MLA], RelyX Ultimate [RUL] and three self-adhesive (Panavia SA plus [PSA], SpeedCem plus [SCP], RelyX Unicem [RUN]) resin composite cements were prepared with three different roughnesses using silica paper grit P180, P400, or P2500. The cement specimens were characterized by surface roughness and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic mapping. A viability assay was performed after 24 hours of incubation of HGF-1 cells on cement specimens. Cell morphology was examined with scanning electron microscopy. Results: The roughness of the specimens did not differ significantly among the different resin composite cements. Mean Ra values for the three surface treatments were 1.62 ± 0.34 μm for P180, 0.79 ± 0.20 μm for P400, and 0.17 ± 0.08 μm for P2500. HGF-1 viability was significantly influenced by the cement material and the specimens’ roughness, with the highest viability for PSA ≥ RUN = MLA ≥ SCP = PV5 > RUL (p<0.05) and for P2500 = P400 > P180 (p<0.001). Cell morphology did not vary among the materials but was affected by the surface roughness. Conclusion: The composition of resin composite cements significantly affects the cell viability of HGF-1. Smooth resin composite cement surfaces with an Ra of 0.2–0.8 μm accelerate flat cell spreading and formation of filopodia.

scholarly journals Surface Roughness of Bulk Fill Composite after Simulated Toothbrushing with Different Dentifrices

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (D) ◽  
pp. 166-172
Author(s):  
Ahmed Mohamed Elmarakby ◽  
Mahmoud Darwish ◽  
Yasser R. Souror ◽  
Ahmed Waly
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Chemical Composition ◽  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Composite Surface ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations

AIM: The aim of the current in vitro study was to evaluate the changes in surface roughness of bulk fill composites after simulated toothbrushing with different dentifrices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three types of bulk fill resin composites were used in this study; 27 specimens of each composite resin were randomly divided into three main groups (n = 9). Each main group was further subdivided into three subgroups (n = 3). Each group was subjected to simulated toothbrushing with three different dentifrices. One-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate the effect of brushing using dentifrices on the surface roughness of each type of composite resin, followed by Tukey’s test at a significance level of p ≤ 0.5%. RESULTS: Results revealed that different effects on composite surface roughness were detected after simulating toothbrushing with different dentifrices. Lacalut toothpaste abrades more with Filtek Bulk Fill, Tetric N-Ceram then Bulk Fill SDR. Crest 3D toothpaste abrades more with Tetric N-Ceram, Bulk Fill SDR then Filtek Bulk Fill. BlanX toothpaste abrades more with Tetric N-Ceram, Bulk Fill SDR then Filtek Bulk Fill. CONCLUSION: Chemical composition of both resin composites and dentifrices plays an important role in influencing the degree of surface roughness of bulk fill composite resin restorations.

scholarly journals Press-On Force Effect on the Efficiency of Composite Restorations Final Polishing—Preliminary In Vitro Study

Coatings ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 705
Author(s):  
Anna Lehmann ◽  
Kacper Nijakowski ◽  
Natalia Potempa ◽  
Paweł Sieradzki ◽  
Mateusz Król ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Major Influence ◽  
Composite Surface ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Subsequent Step ◽  
Optical Profilometer ◽  
Applied Forces

The surface texture of dental restorations has a major influence on plaque accumulation and aesthetical appearance. The study aimed to evaluate the surface roughness of composite resins depending on the varying polishing sequences and applied forces. A total of 60 samples from two composite resins (Boston and Charisma) were polymerized using a lamp with 1200 mW/cm2 intensity and covering celluloid strip. The polishing sequence consisted of 12.6 mm OptiDisc (Kerr) – with increased disc per each subsequent step. Half of the samples were polished at 1N force, with the other half at 2N. The surface roughness examination was performed using a WYKO NT930 (Veeco) optical profilometer. The selected roughness parameters were compared by ANOVA with the significance level α = 0.05. The more complex polishing sequence affected on the composite smoothness. Higher roughness was identified in Charisma samples as compared to Boston. The specimens polished with 2N force contained a slightly rougher surface than those polished with 1N. However, these differences were not statistically significant. Despite the satisfactory visual effect obtained by polishing the composite samples, the profilometric examination revealed the roughness. Finishing is crucial for providing a smooth composite surface, allowing it to function properly in the oral environment.

Inappropriate Toothbrushes Selection Alter Composite Dental Material Restoration Surface Roughness: A Preliminary Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 696 ◽  
pp. 108-112
Author(s):  
Elylla Oktaviana ◽  
Retno Ardhani ◽  
Heribertus Dedy Kusuma Yulianto
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Dental Plaque ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Surface Damage ◽  
Dental Material ◽  
Secondary Caries ◽  
Group A ◽  
Preliminary Study

Introduction. Regular dental plaque control by means of chemically and mechanically methods are among efforts to improve oral health and hygiene. Mechanical cleansing using toothbrush is still the gold standard for continually removing of dental plaque. But on the other hand, inappropriate selection of toothbrushes type selection promotes alteration on dental material restoration surface. Toothbrushes with different degree of stiffness are readily available on market and are classified as hard, medium, and soft. Mechanical friction due to regular movement of the toothbrush with various degree of stiffness was predicted as factor that related with surface roughness alteration on dental material restoration. Nowadays, resin composite material is still declared as the material of choice to repair dental hard tissue damage due to caries activity. However, it has been found that the irregularity of surface promotes bacterial adhesion and biofilm deposition, whereas the smooth surface does not favor bacterial deposition. The progress of bacterial deposition promotes secondary caries on the margin between material restoration and teeth. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of brushing treatment by means of three different toothbrushes on the surface of resin-based compositesExperimental. Specimens were prepared from experimental RBCs with 5 mm diameter and 2 mm thick. Specimens were divided equally into 3 different groups (group A, B, and C). Each group has 5 numbers of specimens. Group A was treated with hard toothbrush, and group B as well as C were treated with medium and soft toothbrush respectively. The toothbrush was mounted in the customized mechanically brushing machine to control the force and number of cycle during specified time. Brushing cycle and time for all groups was conducted for 1000 times of brushing in 60 minutes. Surface roughness resulted from mechanically brushing is evaluated by means of profilometer device.Results and Discussion. The results of the preliminary study shows that there is a differences of surface roughness between groups. The value of roughness varied among all group, and the highest number of roughness were found in group A (> 0.2 micrometres).Conclusions. This result implies brushing with hard toothbrush preferentially has greater risk of surface damage and become pronounce factor of secondary caries.

scholarly journals The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of novel resin composites

2012 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 198-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ugur Erdemir ◽  
Hande Sar Sancakli ◽  
Esra Yildiz
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Step ◽  
Wet Ground ◽  
Post Hoc

ABSTRACTObjectives: The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the surface roughness and microhardness of three novel resin composites containing nanoparticles after polishing with one-step and conventional multi-step polishing systems.Methods: A total of 126 specimens (10 X 2 mm) were prepared in a metal mold using three nanocomposites (Filtek Supreme XT, Ceram-X, and Grandio), 21 specimens of each resin composite for both tests (n=63 for each test). Following light curing, seven specimens from each group received no polishing treatment and served as controls for both tests. The specimens were randomly polished using PoGo and Sof-Lex systems for 30 seconds after being wet-ground with 1200-grit silicon carbide paper. The mean surface roughness of each polished specimen was determined with a profilometer. The microhardness was determined using a Vickers hardness measuring instrument with a 200-g load and 15 seconds dwell time. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the post hoc Dunn's multiple comparison tests at a significance level of .05.Results: Among all materials, the smoothest surfaces were obtained under a matrix strip (control) (P<.05). There were no statistically significant differences among polishing systems in the resin composites for surface roughness (P>.05). The lowest hardness values for the three resin composites were obtained with a matrix strip, and there was a statistically significant difference compared with other polishing systems (P<.05) whereas no statistically significant differences were observed between the polishing systems (P<.05).Conclusion: The current one-step polishing system appears to be as effective as multi-step systems and may be preferable for polishing resin composite restorations. (Eur J Dent 2012;6:198-205)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document