scholarly journals Patient with disseminated malignant tumor of the pancreas. Application of liposomal irinotecan as a new option of palliative treatment

Oncoreview ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3(43)) ◽  
pp. 73-76
Author(s):  
Bogumiła Galińska ◽  
Rafał Becht
Keyword(s):  
Young Patient ◽  
Malignant Tumor ◽  
Pancreatic Neoplasms ◽  
Palliative Treatment ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Treatment Choice ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan

In palliative treatment of pancreatic neoplasms, chemotherapy regimens with gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil or combinations of these drugs are used. The registration of liposomal irinotecan in the treatment of stage IV disease in patients with progression after gemcitabine creates new options for the treatment choice. The described case concerns a relatively young patient in whom the use of liposomal irinotecan in the registration indication turned out to be a safe and well-tolerated treatment.

Trends in real-world clinical outcomes among patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) treated with liposomal irinotecan based regimens in the United States (US).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16751-e16751
Author(s):  
Jim M. Koeller ◽  
Paul Cockrum ◽  
Bruce Belanger ◽  
Frank A. Corvino ◽  
Andy Surinach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Community Setting ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
The United States ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan ◽  
Third Line

e16751 Background: The NAPOLI-1 study, a randomized phase 3 study in pts with mPDAC previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy, demonstrated an improvement in overall survival (OS) with liposomal irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil/ leucovorin (5-FU/LV) vs. 5-FU/LV. In this analysis we describe the trends in pt characteristics, real-world OS (rwOS), and real-world time to-treatment failure (rwTTF) among pts with mPDAC treated with liposomal Irinotecan based regimens overall and stratified by tx initiation prior to 2018 (pre-2018) or after 2018 (post-2018). Methods: This retrospective observational study used de-identified data from Flatiron Health EHR database from over 280 cancer clinics in the US. Pt characteristics, rwOS, and rwTTF were assessed in adult pts diagnosed with mPDAC who received liposomal irinotecan treatment (tx) between January 1, 2016 and October 31, 2019. Results: Of the 590 pts treated with liposomal irinotecan based regimens, 53% were male, 56% were initially diagnosed with Stage IV disease, 92% were treated in the community setting, and median age at tx initiation was 69 (IQR: 62 – 75) years. Among pts with available ECOG scores (N = 435), 77% had a score of 0 or 1. 43% (n = 254) initiated tx pre-2018 and 57% (n = 336) post-2018. Pre-2018, 106 (42%) pts initiated liposomal irinotecan in the third line metastatic setting or later (3rd line+), 125 (49%) had ECOG score of 0-1, and median age was 68 (62–74) years. Post-2018, 36% of pts initiated tx in 3rd line+, 211 (63%) had ECOG score of 0-1, and median age was 70 (63 – 75) years. Median rwOS was 4.4 months [95% CI: 4.3–6.2] pre-2018 and 5.2 mos [4.3–6.2] post-2018. rwTTF was 1.6 mos [1.4–1.9] pre-2018 and 2.1 mos [1.6–2.5] among pts post-2018. Among pts treated in first- or second-line, pre-2018 rwOS was 5.3 mos [3.9–6.4] and post-2018 rwOS was 6.3 mos [5.0– 7.6]. Conclusions: In this descriptive real-world study of pts with mPDAC receiving liposomal irinotecan based regimens, pts initiating treatment post-2018 appear to be less pre-treated, older, and have better performance status than pts pre-2018. Pts treated post-2018 experienced numerically longer rwTTF and rwOS than pts treated pre-2018.

Real-world patterns of care among patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 666-666
Author(s):  
Eileen Mary O'Reilly ◽  
Andy Surinach ◽  
Zheng Wu ◽  
Paul Cockrum
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
The Third ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Treatment Gaps ◽  
The Us ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan ◽  
Third Line

666 Background: Pancreatic cancer is the third deadliest cancer in the US and mPC has a 2.9% 5-year survival. The analyses herein describe treatment patterns, trends in usage, and overall survival (OS) in mPC. Methods: Using the Flatiron Health EHR-derived database, data were extracted and analyzed for patients with mPC (pts) between Jan 1, 2014 and Jun 30, 2019. The database includes de-identified data from over 280 cancer clinics (~800 sites of care) representing more than 2.2 million U.S. cancer patients available for analysis, with 80% of pts from community centers and 20% from academic centers. Lines of therapy in the metastatic setting are derived from structured medication records. OS from metastatic diagnosis was reported using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: 7,666 pts with mPC were identified. 5,687 (74.2%) received therapy in the metastatic setting. Pts who didn’t receive therapy in the metastatic setting were more likely to be older (p < 0.0001) and less likely to have been diagnosed initially with stage IV disease (p < 0.0001) than pts who were treated. The frequency of (1L) regimens were gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) 46.8%, FOLFIRINOX (FFX) 24.1%, gemcitabine monotherapy 9.3%, and FOLFOX 3.8%. Gemcitabine monotherapy use was 12.9% in 2014 and 7.3% in 2018. GnP (31.4%), FFX (12.3%), FOLFOX (11.4%), and liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) + 5-FU/LV (10.2%) were the most frequent second line (2L) regimens. Between 2015 and 2018 nal-IRI based regimens increased from 6% to 17.6% in 2L. In the third line (3L) setting nal-IRI + 5FU/LV (19.3%), GnP (12.1%), FOLFOX (11.4%), and FFX (9.1%) were the most common treatments. Aggregate median OS (mOS) for treated pts was 8.1 mos (95% CI 7.8 – 8.4), and mOS for untreated pts was 2.8 mos (2.6 – 3.0), p < 0.0001. Conclusions: Survival for mPC is improving and practice patterns are changing. GnP is the most commonly used 1L regimen, followed increasingly by nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV in 2L and 3L. Further studies are necessary to understand the treatment gaps for pts with mPC. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with liposomal irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as a II line chemotherapy

Oncoreview ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2(42)) ◽  
pp. 44-47
Author(s):  
Leszek Kraj ◽  
Maciej Gryziak ◽  
Ewa Żurawińska-Grzelka ◽  
Krzysztof Woźniak
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Tumor ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
Better Than

The paper presents a case of a 54-year-old man with pancreatic tumor and intraperitoneal dissemination. The patient received treatment with gemcitabine in combination with nab-paclitaxel. After 18 months, the disease progressed, therefore the line of treatment was applied in the form of liposomal irinotecan with 5-FU/LV. This therapy provided progression-free survival for 7 months. The obtained results are better than the median progression-free survival obtained in the studies. This case demonstrates that liposomal irinotecan in the treatment of stage IV disease in patients progressing after gemcitabine opens up new treatment options.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Revisional Surgery After Failed Heller Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia: Long-Term Outcome at a Single Tertiary Center

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Capovilla ◽  
Renato Salvador ◽  
Luca Provenzano ◽  
Michele Valmasoni ◽  
Lucia Moletta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heller Myotomy ◽  
Revisional Surgery ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Eckardt Score ◽  
Stage Iv Disease

Abstract Background Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (HM) has gained acceptance as the gold standard of treatment for achalasia. However, 10–20% of the patients will experience symptom recurrence, thus requiring further treatment including pneumodilations (PD) or revisional surgery. The aim of our study was to assess the long-term outcome of laparoscopic redo HM. Methods Patients who underwent redo HM at our center between 2000 and 2019 were enrolled. Postoperative outcomes of redo HM patients (redo group) were compared with that of patients who underwent primary laparoscopic HM in the same time span (control group). For the control group, we randomly selected patients matched for age, sex, FU time, Eckardt score (ES), previous PD, and radiological stage. Failure was defined as an Eckardt score > 3 or the need for re-treatment. Results Forty-nine patients underwent laparoscopic redo HM after failed primary HM. A new myotomy on the right lateral wall of the EGJ was the procedure of choice in the majority of patients (83.7%). In 36 patients (73.5%) an anti-reflux procedure was deemed necessary. Postoperative outcomes were somewhat less satisfactory, albeit comparable to the control group; the incidence of postoperative GERD was higher in the redo group (p < 0.01). At a median 5-year FU time, a good outcome was obtained in 71.4% of patients in the redo group; further 5 patients (10.2%) obtained a long-term symptom control after complementary PD, thus bringing the overall success rate to 81.6%. Stage IV disease at presentation was independently associated with a poor outcome of revisional LHD (p = 0.003). Conclusions This study reports the largest case series of laparoscopic redo HM to date. The procedure, albeit difficult, is safe and effective in relieving symptoms in this group of patients with a highly refractory disease. The failure rate, albeit not significantly, and the post-operative reflux are higher than after primary HM. Patients with stage IV disease are at high risk of esophagectomy.

scholarly journals Can artificial intelligence reduce the interval cancer rate in mammography screening?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Lång ◽  
Solveig Hofvind ◽  
Alejandro Rodríguez-Ruiz ◽  
Ingvar Andersson
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Mammography Screening ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Interval Cancer ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
True Negative ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
Interval Cancer Rate ◽  
Screening Mammograms

Abstract Objectives To investigate whether artificial intelligence (AI) can reduce interval cancer in mammography screening. Materials and methods Preceding screening mammograms of 429 consecutive women diagnosed with interval cancer in Southern Sweden between 2013 and 2017 were analysed with a deep learning–based AI system. The system assigns a risk score from 1 to 10. Two experienced breast radiologists reviewed and classified the cases in consensus as true negative, minimal signs or false negative and assessed whether the AI system correctly localised the cancer. The potential reduction of interval cancer was calculated at different risk score thresholds corresponding to approximately 10%, 4% and 1% recall rates. Results A statistically significant correlation between interval cancer classification groups and AI risk score was observed (p < .0001). AI scored one in three (143/429) interval cancer with risk score 10, of which 67% (96/143) were either classified as minimal signs or false negative. Of these, 58% (83/143) were correctly located by AI, and could therefore potentially be detected at screening with the aid of AI, resulting in a 19.3% (95% CI 15.9–23.4) reduction of interval cancer. At 4% and 1% recall thresholds, the reduction of interval cancer was 11.2% (95% CI 8.5–14.5) and 4.7% (95% CI 3.0–7.1). The corresponding reduction of interval cancer with grave outcome (women who died or with stage IV disease) at risk score 10 was 23% (8/35; 95% CI 12–39). Conclusion The use of AI in screen reading has the potential to reduce the rate of interval cancer without supplementary screening modalities. Key Points • Retrospective study showed that AI detected 19% of interval cancer at the preceding screening exam that in addition showed at least minimal signs of malignancy. Importantly, these were correctly localised by AI, thus obviating supplementary screening modalities. • AI could potentially reduce a proportion of particularly aggressive interval cancers. • There was a correlation between AI risk score and interval cancer classified as true negative, minimal signs or false negative.

Juvenile Granulosa Cell Tumors of the Ovary

2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (5) ◽  
pp. 635-644
Author(s):  
Yuhong Ye ◽  
Chengyu Lv ◽  
Songhua Xu ◽  
Yupeng Chen ◽  
Ru Qian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Granulosa Cell ◽  
Correct Diagnosis ◽  
Pelvic Mass ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Abdominal Distension ◽  
Granulosa Cell Tumors ◽  
Pathologic Features ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
Sclerosing Stromal Tumor

Abstract Objective To explore the clinical and pathologic features of ovarian juvenile granulosa cell tumors (JGCTs). Methods Clinical data, histopathologic observations, immunohistochemical results, FOXL2 mutation status, and follow-up information of 7 JGCT cases were studied. Results The patients most commonly presented with abdominal distension and pain (5 cases), followed by precocious puberty (1 case) and a pelvic mass (1 case). Six patients had stage I disease, and 1 had stage IV disease. The microscopic examinations typically showed lobular growth punctuated by variably sized and shaped follicles. Rare features included a reticular-cystic appearance mimicking a yolk sac tumor (2 cases), a lobular appearance similar to a sclerosing stromal tumor (1 case), strands and cords (1 case), pseudopapillary appearance (2 cases), spindle cell appearance (1 case), microcystic appearance (1 case), hobnail cells (1 case), and rhabdomyoid cells (1 case). No FOXL2 mutation was encountered. After a median follow-up of 53 months, only 1 patient with a strongly diffuse TP53-positive tumor died of the disease, and 2 successfully had babies. Conclusions JGCT is a rare neoplasm with a wide morphologic spectrum and is easily confused with other tumors. Familiarity with the characteristics, rare atypical appearances, and immunohistochemical results may aid in obtaining a correct diagnosis.

Treatment Outcomes and Relative Dose Intensity of Chemotherapy in Slovene Patients With Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samo Rozman ◽  
Nina Ružić Gorenjec ◽  
Barbara Jezeršek Novaković
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Relative Dose Intensity ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Stage Disease ◽  
Stage Iv Disease

Abstract This retrospective study was undertaken to investigate the association of relative dose intensity (RDI) with the outcome of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients with advanced stage disease receiving ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) and escalated BEACOPP regimen (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone). A total of 114 HL patients treated between 2004 and 2013 were enrolled for evaluation. RDI calculations were based on a Hryniuk's model. The association of variables with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was analysed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. The median age of patients was 39 years, majority of patients were males and had stage IV disease. Fifty-four patients received ABVD and 60 received BEACOPP chemotherapy with 24 and 4 deaths, respectively. Patients in BEACOPP group were significantly younger with lower Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) in comparison with ABVD group, making the comparison of groups impossible. In ABVD group, RDI was not significantly associated with OS (p=0.590) or PFS (p=0.354) in a multivariate model where age was controlled. The low number of events prevented the analysis in the BEACOPP group. Patients' age was strongly associated with both OS and PFS: all statistically significant predictors for OS and PFS from univariate analyses (chemotherapy regimen, CCI, RDI) lost its effect in multivariate analyses where age was controlled. Based on our observations, we can conclude that RDI is not associated with the OS or PFS after the age is controlled, neither in all patients combined nor in individual chemotherapy groups.

Uptake of genetic counseling and testing in a clinic based population of women with breast cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10524-10524
Author(s):  
Alexandra Wehbe ◽  
Mark A. Manning ◽  
Hadeel Assad ◽  
Kristen Purrington ◽  
Michael S. Simon
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
White Women ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Early Stage Disease ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility Genes ◽  
Counseling And Testing ◽  
Stage Iv Disease

10524 Background: Carriers of pathogenic variants in cancer susceptibility genes have an elevated risk of developing breast, ovarian, and other cancers.We conducted a medical record review to determine the uptake of genetic counseling and testing in a clinic-based population of women with breast cancer. Methods: Medical records of 150 women with breast cancer seen at the Karmanos Cancer Institute between January-December 2018 were reviewed to determine the proportion eligible for genetic testing according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. We also assessed genetics referral rates, appointment completion and results of genetic testing. Using chi-square and ANOVA tests, we analyzed the association of demographic and clinical factors with eligibility and referral to genetic counseling. Results: The average age of diagnosis was 57.1 years old, with 68.7% of women diagnosed with stage I-III disease, and 31.3% diagnosed with stage IV disease. There were 91 (60.7%) women who met NCCN criteria for genetic testing, of which 46.2% ultimately underwent genetic testing. Eligible women were more likely to be younger (52.6 vs. 64.0 years old), White (75.0% vs. 54.5%), and have Medicaid (75.0%) or private insurance (72.9%) vs. Medicare (44.8%). Women who met NCCN criteria were 3.5 times more likely to be referred for genetic counseling than those that did not meet eligibility criteria. Women were also more likely to be referred if they had early-stage disease compared to stage IV (67.8% vs. 48.3%), and Medicaid or private insurance compared to Medicare (71.4%, 72.0% and 40.0%, respectively). Of eligible women, 59.3% had a genetic counseling appointment scheduled, and of those, 78.0% attended their appointment. There were no apparent differences in appointment completion based on race with similar percentages of Black and White women completing their appointments (74.0% and 77.0% respectively). Women with stage IV disease were more likely to complete their appointments (83.0%) compared to women with stages I-III (74.0%) and fewer women with Medicare completed their genetic counseling appointment (56.0%) compared to women with Medicaid (83.0%) and women with private insurance (83.0%). Among women who attended their appointment, 95.9% underwent genetic testing. Of women who had genetic testing, 8.5% had a pathogenic variant and 30.4% had a variant of unknown significance. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that lack of genetic counseling referrals contribute to a gap between the need for and completion of genetic testing. By understanding barriers to genetic counseling and testing, future clinical initiatives could effectively improve accessibility to genetic counseling services.

scholarly journals Predictors of Survival in Adrenocortical Carcinoma: An Analysis From the National Cancer Database

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (9) ◽  
pp. 3566-3573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sri Harsha Tella ◽  
Anuhya Kommalapati ◽  
Subhashini Yaturu ◽  
Electron Kebebew
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Adrenocortical Carcinoma ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
National Cancer Database ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
Comorbidity Index

Abstract Context Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is rare; knowledge about prognostic factors and survival outcomes is limited. Objective To describe predictors of survival and overall survival (OS) outcomes. Design and Patients Retrospective analysis of data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2015 on 3185 patients with pathologically confirmed ACC. Main Outcome Measures Baseline description, survival outcomes, and predictors of survival were evaluated in patients with ACC. Results Median age at ACC diagnosis was 55 (range: 18 to 90) years; did not differ significantly by sex or stage of the disease at diagnosis. On multivariate analysis, increasing age, higher Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index score, high tumor grade, and no surgical therapy (all P &lt; 0.0001); and stage IV disease (P = 0.002) and lymphadenectomy during surgery (P = 0.02) were associated with poor prognosis. Patients with stage I-III disease treated with surgical resection had significantly better median OS (63 vs 8 months; P &lt; 0.001). In stage IV disease, better median OS occurred in patients treated with surgery (19 vs 6 months; P &lt; 0.001), and postsurgical radiation (29 vs 10 months; P &lt; 0.001) or chemotherapy (22 vs 13 months; P = 0.004). Conclusion OS varied with increasing age, higher comorbidity index, grade, and stage of ACC at presentation. There was improved survival with surgical resection of primary tumor, irrespective of disease stage; postsurgical chemotherapy or radiation was of benefit only in stage IV disease.

scholarly journals Survey of UK practice for management of breast cancer metastases to the neck

2012 ◽  
Vol 94 (7) ◽  
pp. 484-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Bisase ◽  
C Kerawala
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Dissection ◽  
Current Practice ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Cervical Metastases ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
The Uk

INTRODUCTION Cervical metastases from breast carcinoma are rare and their management is controversial. Between 1987 and 2002 the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staged patients with supraclavicular fossa nodal disease as M1 but the subsequent demonstration that patients with regional stage IV disease had better outcomes than visceral stage IV disease led to a reclassification of the former to stage IIIC in 2003. The literature remains inconsistent regarding the fate of these patients. Despite the attendant morbidity of treatment and lack of knowledge regarding long-term survival, we hypothesised that current practice varies in the UK and a unified approach does not exist. The aim of this study was therefore to determine current practice and opinion of both head and neck specialists and breast cancer clinicians in the UK. METHODS Questionnaires were disseminated to 185 head and neck surgeons, breast surgeons and their oncology counterparts. These outlined a clinical scenario of a patient with a history of T3 primary breast cancer presenting with cervical and supraclavicular nodal metastases, with opinion being sought regarding the significance of this status and the individual’s practical approach to the problem. The extent of any proposed neck dissection was also explored. RESULTS Of the 117 respondents, a noticeable variation in opinion was evident. Contrary to the current AJCC staging, 61% of clinicians felt that both level V and III metastases represented stage IV disease. There was a tendency towards aggressive surgical treatment with a third recommending comprehensive neck dissection despite a lack of evidence base. A disparity was noted between adjuvant treatments offered and the final pN stage. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that at present there is widespread inconsistency in the management of breast carcinoma cervical metastases in the UK. There is a need to unify practice with an evidence base in order to improve informed multidisciplinary decision making and, ultimately, patient care. This study goes some way to supporting multicentre collaboration in order to achieve that aim.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document