Um esboço da teoria da comunicação de Alfred Schütz

Phainomenon ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-96
Author(s):  
João Carlos Correia
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Max Weber ◽  
Alfred Schutz ◽  
Life World ◽  
Alfred Schütz ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Intellectual Journey

Abstract Throughout about three decades of incessant research, the Austrian phenomenologist Alfred Schutz tried to specify the concept of meaning presented in an insufficient way by Max Weber in his famous definition of subjective action. Quickly, Schutz exceeded the methodological questions related with the foundation of Social Sciences, developing an elaborated reflection on the relations between Communication and Society. Along this text, are presented some particularly significant moments of this intellectual journey, such as the schtuzian reflection on intersubjectivity; the question of communication as condition of possibility of the life-world, and, finally, the analysis of appresentational reference and the set of linguistic artefacts (marks, indications, signs and symbols) that allows man to deal with the experience of transcendence.

scholarly journals La noción de “Mundo de la vida” en el proyecto de Alfred Schutz para una fundamentación fenomenológica de las ciencias sociales

2021 ◽  
pp. 349
Author(s):  
Daniela Griselda López
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Social Reality ◽  
Austrian School ◽  
Alfred Schutz ◽  
Life World ◽  
Austrian School Of Economics ◽  
Scientific Reason ◽  
Alfred Schütz

El tema de la prioridad conceptual del mundo de la vida con relación a cualquier especulación científica abstracta es el tema recurrente en los escritos tempranos de Alfred Schutz. En ellos, la reflexión en torno al mundo de la vida se constituye como la base y el fundamento para la posterior formación de conceptos en ciencias sociales. Particularmente inten-tamos recuperar lo puede denominarse como “reivindicación epistémica” (epistemic claim) de una sociología del mundo de la vida. Esa reivindicación se enmarca en el proyecto schutziano de fundamentación fenomenológica de las ciencias sociales, cuyos orígenes pueden rastrearse en las discusiones entabladas en el marco de la Escuela Austríaca de Economía. La reconstrucción de este debate nos permitió pensar el vínculo entre mundo de la vida y razón científica, de modo tal de evitar la sustitución de la realidad social por las idealidades y abstraccio-nes creadas por la ciencia.The question of conceptual priority of the life-world in relation to any abstract scientific speculation is a recurrent topic in Alfred Schutz´s early writings. There, the reflection on the life- world is constituted as the basis and the foundation for the posterior formation of concepts in social sciences. In particular, we will try to regain something that we could name “an epistemic claim” of a sociology of the life-world. This claim is part of Schutz’s project of phenomenological foundation of social sciences, which origins can be found in discussions among the members of Austrian School of Economics. The reconstruction of this debate has enabled us to think the link between the life-world and the scientific reason, in order to avoid the substitution of social reality by idealizations and abstractions created by the science.

Auslegung des Alltags - Der Alltag der Auslegung

2004 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Max Weber ◽  
Alfred Schutz ◽  
Alfred Schütz

Der Autor greift die Ansätze von Max Weber, Alfred Schütz und Thomas Luckmann auf und verknüpft diese mit der hermeneutischen Tradition. Zugleich entwirft Soeffner die Programmatik einer "verstehenden Soziologie" und zeigt anhand von Beispielen, wie sich diese operationalisieren lässt. Unter anderem stellt der Autor die Grundlagen und die Methodologie einer visuellen Soziologie vor und befasst sich in dem Beitrag "Authentizitätsfallen und mediale Verspiegelungen" mit einer Anthropologie des Darstellens, Inszenierens und der Performance.

scholarly journals PANDANGAN WARTAWAN TELEVISI PADA PELIPUTAN KERUSUHAN AKSI 22 MEI

MEDIUM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-65
Author(s):  
Lisna Nurpadillah ◽  
Ujang Saepullah ◽  
Khoiruddin Muchtar
Keyword(s):  
Phenomenological Study ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Alfred Schutz ◽  
Study Methods ◽  
Alfred Schütz ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Television Journalists

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pemahaman, pemaknaan serta pengalaman wartawan televisi pada saat peliputan kerusuhan Aksi 22 Mei. Teori yang digunakan adalah teori fenomenologi Alfred Schutz. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dan menggunakan paradigma konstuktivis dengan metode studi fenomenologi. Informan dalam penelitian ini merupakan wartawan televisi INews TV, Net TV, Kompas TV, RTV, Jawa Pos TV, TVOne, dan CNN Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukan,bahwa wartawan televisi memahami peliputan kerusuhan Aksi 22 Mei yaitu definisi peliputan kerusuhan Aksi 22 Mei, etika peliputan kerusuhan dan posisi peliputan wartawan. Wartawan televisi juga memaknai peliputan kerusuhan Aksi 22 Mei yaitu pentingnya peran wartawan televisi dan mendahulukan humanisme. Berdasarkan pengalamannya yaitu adanya hambatan peliputan, intimidasi dan diskriminasi serta keselamatan peliputan. This study aims to determine the understanding, interpretation, and experience of television reporters during the rioting of the May 22 Action. The theory used is Alfred Schutz's phenomenology theory. This research uses a qualitative approach and uses a constructivist paradigm with phenomenological study methods. The informants in this study were television reporters from INews TV, Net TV, Kompas TV, RTV, Jawa Pos TV, TVOne, and CNN Indonesia. This study concludes that television journalists understand the May 22 riots coverage, namely the definition of May 22 riots coverage, the ethics of riot reporting, and the position of journalists covering. Television reporters also interpreted the reporting of the May 22 riots, namely the importance of the role of television journalists and prioritizing humanism. Based on his experience, there are barriers to coverage, intimidation, and discrimination, as well as safety of coverage.

scholarly journals Schütz, Seebobm e a Ciência da Cultura

Phainomenon ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-24
Author(s):  
Lester Embree
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Phenomenological Theory ◽  
Alfred Schutz ◽  
Alfred Schütz

Abstract Alfred Schutz emphasizes the methods of interpretative social sciences. Thomas Seebohm emphasizes the interpretation of texts and traces essential to the historical sciences. There their accounts are, in the main, mutually complementary, and together they advance the constitutive phenomenological theory of the generically cultural sciences.

Alfred Schutz on Phenomenological Psychology and Transcendental Phenomenology

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis Emanuel Gros
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Transcendental Phenomenology ◽  
Alfred Schutz ◽  
Phenomenological Psychology ◽  
Phenomenological Philosophy ◽  
Human And Social Sciences ◽  
Alfred Schütz ◽  
Do So

AbstractAlfred Schutz is, without a doubt, one of the phenomenologists that contributed the most to the reflection on how to apply insights from phenomenological philosophy to the, empirical and theoretical, human and social sciences. However, his work tends to be neglected by many of the current advocates of phenomenology within these disciplines. In the present paper, I intend to remedy this situation. In order to do so, I will systematically revisit his mundane and social-scientifically oriented account of phenomenology, which, as I shall show, emerges from a theoretical confrontation with the Husserlian distinction between transcendental phenomenology and phenomenological psychology.

Alfred Schutz and ethnomethodology: Origins and departures

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martyn Hammersley
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Social Science ◽  
Alfred Schutz ◽  
Theory Formation ◽  
Harold Garfinkel ◽  
Social Inquiry ◽  
The Social ◽  
Early Influence ◽  
Alfred Schütz ◽  
The Relationship

The work of Alfred Schutz was an important early influence on Harold Garfinkel and therefore on the development of ethnomethodology. In this article, I try to clarify what Garfinkel drew from Schutz, as well as what he did not take from him, specifically as regards the task of social inquiry. This is done by focusing in detail on one of Schutz’s key articles: ‘Concept and Theory Formation in the Social Sciences’. The aim is thereby to illuminate the relationship between Schutz’s views on the character of social science and Garfinkel’s radical proposal for a re-specified focus of investigation. This is further pursued by examining an important debate about the link between Schutz and ethnomethodology.

scholarly journals The Phenomenon of Common Sense and the Thinking of Alfred Schutz

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joaquin Trujillo
Keyword(s):  
Common Sense ◽  
Human Sciences ◽  
Alfred Schutz ◽  
Natural Attitude ◽  
Life World ◽  
Hermeneutic Phenomenological ◽  
Alfred Schütz

This article deconstructs Alfred Schutz’s thinking to its ownmost (Wesen) meaning: the rendition of the phenomenon of common sense. It discerns the exposition of the meaning of common sense as the foundational movement (ἀρχὴ κινήσεως) that runs through the course of Schutz’s constitutive phenomenology of the natural attitude. It predicates this thesis on Schutz’s elucidation of the phenomena of the life-world (Lebenswelt), typification and common sense as a single phenomenon: κοινἠ πρᾶξῐς (common praxis). The analysis includes hermeneutic-phenomenological considerations. It proposes to enhance the interpretability of Schutz’s thinking and its availability to the human sciences.

scholarly journals La noción de ciencia de la cultura en Alfred Schutz según la visión de Lester Embree

2021 ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Roberto J. Walton
Keyword(s):  
Alfred Schutz ◽  
Main Constituent ◽  
Theory Of Science ◽  
Rules Of Procedure ◽  
Alfred Schütz ◽  
Basic Concepts ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Historical World

El artículo expone la interpretación y ampliación realizada por Embree respecto de las ideas de Schutz sobre las ciencias de la cultura. Se ocupa en primer lugar de las características generales de todas las ciencias de la cultura en su tarea de analizar el mundo de la vida como un mundo intersubjetivo e histórico estructurado de acuerdo con coasociados, contemporáneos, predecesores y sucesores. Luego examina los tres partes constituyentes principales que Embree destaca en cada una de ellas: la definición de la disciplina, sus conceptos básicos y sus reglas de procedimiento. Por último, se consideran los puntos de vista de Embree sobre la relación entre metodología y filosofía. Su tesis es que científicos y filósofos pueden encontrarse en una interacción mutua en el ámbito de la teoría de la ciencia que puede ser a la vez filosófica y científica.The article is a presentation of Embree’s interpretation and development of Alfred ideas on the cultural sciences. It deals first with the general characteristics of all cultural sciences in their task of analyzing the lifeworld as an intersubjective and historical world structured according to consociates, contemporaries, predecessors, and successors. Then it examines the three main constituent parts that Embree highlights in each of them: the definition of the discipline, its basic concepts, and its rules of procedure. Finally, Embree’s views on the relationship between methodology and philosophy are considered. His thesis is that scientists and philosophers can meet in a mutual interplay in the realm of a theory of science that can be both philosophic and scientific.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document