scholarly journals Bentuk Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan Setelah Dikeluarkannya Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 8 Tahun 2012 Tentang Ketentuan Pelaksana Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah

Acta Comitas ◽  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Selvyana Putri Pratamikha

The Power of Attorney of the Encumbrance Rights (SKMHT) is a special power of attorney which includes the power to impose the provision of encumbrance by the encumbrance grantor to the recipient of the encumbrance or other person authorized to it. The Power of Attorney of the Encumbrance Rights (SKMHT) must be made in two forms namely the notarial deed or the deed of the land deed official (PPAT) as stipulated by the provisions of Article 15 paragraph (1) of the Law Number 4 of 1996 on the Encumbrance Rights of the Land Along with Bodies Relating to Land. The enactment of the National Land Agency Regulation Number 8 of 2012 requires that the SKMHT shall be made ??in accordance with the format of the attachment of the Regulation. . While the SKMHT in the form of notarial deed shall be made ??in accordance with the provisions of Article 1868 of the Civil Code, the Article 38 of the Revised Law on the Position of the Land Deed Official (UUJNP), and the Article 15 of the Law on The Encumbrance Rights (UUHT). This results in the different arrangements resulting in the lack of uniformity of the SKMHT forms made ??by a notary or the land deed official (PPAT) which giving rise to the legal uncertainty of the form of the SKMHT and the legal effect of the SKMHT made in the form of a notarial deed. The study is a normative legal research, intended to examine the differences in the SKMHT arrangement between the provisions of Article 15 paragraph (1) of The Encumbrance Rights (UUHT) with the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency (Perkaban) Number 8 of 2012. The study uses the statutory approach that is supported by the literature, legal theory, the opinions of the scholars, as well as the legal dictionaries, as its legal materials. The findings of the study show that the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency (Perkaban) Number 8 of 2012 does not abolish the SKMHT  in the form of a notarial deed as provided in Article 15 paragraph (1) of The Encumbrance Rights (UUHT). the SKMHT in the form of a notarial deed shall be made ??in accordance with the provisions of Article 1868 of the Civil Code, the Article 38 of the Revised Law on the Position of the Land Deed Official (UUJNP), and the Article 15 of the Law on The Encumbrance Rights (UUHT), while the SKMHT in the form of the land deed official (PPAT) shall be made in accordance with the provisions of the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency (Perkaban) Number 8 of 2012 along with its attachments. It is expected that the firm provisions which regulate the SKMHT in the forms of the notarial deed should be enacted in order to create its legal certainty.

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-26
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Istri Agung ◽  
I Nyoman Sukandia

The inheritance and the division of inheritance that is felt to be unfair is often a source of dispute. The disputes that occur can sometimes be resolved by making a peace agreement between the disputing parties. The peace desired by the parties is, of course, expected to end disputes/conflict and to provide legal certainty among those in dispute. However, sometimes peace agreements that have been made between those in dispute are disputed again in court. This study aims to examine the settlement of Balinese traditional inheritance disputes through a binding peace agreement between the parties make it. The method used in this study is a normative legal research, using a statute approach and a case approach. The result of this study showed that the settlement of Balinese indigenous inheritance disputes through a binding peace agreement of the parties that make it if the peace agreement is made based on the validity of the agreement as stipulated in article 1320 of the Civil Code, based on good faith as the principles in the law of the agreement, and must be made in the form of a notary deed is in accordance with the provisions for conciliation in book III of the Civil Code.  


Solusi ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-265
Author(s):  
Asuan Asuan

 Type of research in doctrinal law or better known as normative legal research which is also called normative juridical (legal research) concerning the legal issues at hand. The approach to the law (statue approach) is carried out by examining the laws and regulations. In writing with primary and secondary data obtained from library materials namely Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees, Law No. 10 of 1998 concerning Banking, Government Regulations, Civil Code, KUH Trade and literature, lecture materials and other sources related to credit agreements with fiduciary guarantees and problems in particular. In granting credit with fiduciary guarantees through the stages of the procedure for credit application and the making of a fiduciary deed at the notary who is registered with the Office of Fiduciary Registration to provide legal certainty for creditors (banks). Credit settlement process if the debtor is malicious, the bank is based on a substitution power of attorney from the debtor made a notariil Fiduciary deed and registered with the Fiduciary Office, the debtor makes a sale under the hands, the sale of collateral is voluntary, the result is submitted to the bank to repay the loan, the bank can conduct the auction in general and through the Court.


In the development of material law in Indonesia, it is known both registered objects and unregistered objects that by analogy, registered objects are categorized as immovable objects. In Indonesia, aircraft are being classified as a registered object that can be guaranteed in the form of the mortgage as a debt settlement. Along with the development of law and society, the mortgage regulations are only mentioned briefly in the Indonesian Law of Fiduciary and the Law of Notary Position which state that an aircraft can be guaranteed in the form of a mortgage. However, until recently, any particular regulations regarding aircraft mortgage in Indonesia are not yet available. This research is a normative study that uses historical, statute, and comparison approaches. The problems examined in this study: firstly, how the mortgage as a material guarantee institution in Indonesia is being regulated. Secondly, does the mortgage institution have the potential as an alternative object of material guarantee for aircraft? The result of the study shows that the regulations on aircraft mortgage in Indonesia still refer to the ones in the Indonesian Civil Code. Meanwhile, the institution that has the potential as an alternative object of material guarantee for aircraft is in the form of mortgage because an airplane is a registered object which is analogous to an immovable object. It can be concluded, therefore, that there is a weakness in aircraft mortgage stipulation in Indonesia which may create legal uncertainty and weaken the position of the creditor. Therefore, along with the development of the community and the existence of legal certainty, it is necessary to make an aircraft mortgage law immediately.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 314
Author(s):  
Andi Pratono ◽  
Tjempaka Tjempaka

Indonesia is the law of state or law state, as a law state country, Indonesia must have 3(three) important element such as legal certainty, justice, and expediency. Those main elements represent all the law state. In community, people everyday acts always relate to legal act, such as contract, buying or selling object that promised. To ensure those legal act have the ability perfect proof power, those legal act poured in the form of deed. In buying and selling land, a deed of sale and purchase must be made in front authorized official like land deed officer. However land deed officer as public official do make mistake on duty, with the result that party at a disadvantage. Party that loss because of mistake land deed officer, do ask for responsibility by suing the land deed officer to compensate the losses. Land deed officer in carrying out their duties must apply the precautionary principle so as to minimize any mistakes in making the deed. Author is using normative legal research methods, supported by a data which is theory and interviews some expert in land deed officer and Code of Ethics. The legal consequences to the land deed officer due the legal acts are against the law, which is a sanction will be given. The sanction will divided in three types such as sanction according to the Civil Law, Criminal Law and Code of Ethics or Government Regulation about land deed officer.


Acta Comitas ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (02) ◽  
pp. 275
Author(s):  
Ketut Nurcahya Gita ◽  
I Made Udiana

Abstract   The purpose of this writing is to find out about legal certainty and comparison of power of attorney to impose mortgage rights stipulated in the Notary Position Law No.2 of 2014 with the form stipulated by the Head of Land Agency Regulation No.8 of 2012. This research uses normative legal research methods. The results of this study show that the comparison of authentic deeds according to the Law of Notary Position No.2 of 2014 and the Regulation of the Head of the Land Agency No.8 of 2012 regarding the creation of a power of attorney to impose mortgage rights made before a notary there are differences in the head and end of the deed. The form of power of attorney imposes a security right issued by the State Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia which is different and not in accordance with the provisions stipulated in the Law of Notary Position No.2 of 2014. Second, the legal certainty of the power of attorney imposes a security right made by a Notary by following format of the Head of the Land Agency Regulation No.8 of 2012, the deed cannot provide legal certainty. The deed will be degraded into a letter under the hand, so that it cannot be used as a basis in making the deed of mortgage imposition, however, the Notary is given the right to add deficiencies to the blank so that it remains an authentic deed.   Abstrak   Tujuan penulisan ini untuk mengetahui mengenai kepastian hukum serta perbandingan surat kuasa membebankan hak tanggungan yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris No.2 Tahun 2014 dengan Blanko yang ditentukan Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan No.8 Tahun 2012. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan perbandingan akta autentik menurut Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris No.2 Tahun 2014 dan Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan No.8 Tahun 2012 dalam mengenai pembuatan surat kuasa membebankan hak tanggungan yang dibuat dihadapan Notaris terdapat perbedaan pada kepala dan akhir akta. Blanko surat kuasa membebankan hak tanggungan yang diterbitkan Badan Pertanahan Negara-Republik Indonesia berbeda dan tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan yang telah ditetapkan dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris No.2 Tahun 2014. Kedua, kepastian hukum surat kuasa membebankan hak tanggungan yang dibuat oleh Notaris dengan mengikuti format Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan No.8 Tahun 2012 maka akta tersebut tidak dapat memberikan kepastian hukum. Akta tersebut akan terdegradasi menjadi surat dibawahtangan, sehingga tidak bisa dijadikan dasar dalam pembuatan akta pembebanan hak tanggungan, akan tetapi Notaris diberikan hak untuk menambahkan kekurangan pada blangko tersebut agar tetap menjadi akta autentik.  


Author(s):  
Soniardhi Soniardhi

The development of military law as part of the national law for the security of order, justice and legal certainty within the military. The divestment development is implemented through the renewal of the law of military discipline stamped in Law Number 25 the Year 2014 on Military Discipline Law. Act No. 25 of 2014, it can be understood that the laws of military discipline other than applied to the military, are also applied to every person who is based on the law equated with the military, while also applied to prisoners of war. The enforcement of military discipline laws against prisoners of war may be too late, given the abolition of military discipline for the perpetrators of legal offenses must be committed by an Excusing Superior (Ankum), but acts, Act No. 25 of 2014 does not provide complete and clear arrangements on the authority of Ankum in upholding disciplinary law against prisoners of war. Based on normative legal research with the approach of legal concept and legislation, it can be obtained a conclusion about the norms and regulation of war tactics in Law Number 25 the Year 2014 is important, because the form of legal vagueness can result to the situation of legal uncertainty, especially the enforcement law against prisoners of war. In the next note, a more complete and clear arrangement is needed to enforce the legal provisions of military discipline against prisoners of war. Pengembangan hukum militer sebagai bagian dari hukum nasional ditujukan untuk menjamin terciptanya ketertiban, keadilan dan kepastian hukum di lingkungan militer. Pengembangan tersebut diantaranya diimplementasikan melalui pembaharuan hukum disiplin militer sebagaimana tertuang dalam UU Nomor 25 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Disiplin Militer. Mencermati ketentuan Pasal 6 ayat (1) UU Nomor 25 Tahun 2014, maka dapat diperoleh pemahaman bahwasannya hukum disiplin militer selain diberlakukan kepada militer, juga diberlakukan kepada setiap orang yang berdasarkan undang-undang dipersamakan dengan militer, adapun diantaranya adalah diberlakukan bagi tawanan perang. Pemberlakuan hukum disiplin militer kepada tawanan perang dapat dianggap terlampau dini, mengingat bahwa penjatuhan hukuman disiplin militer bagi pelaku pelanggaran hukum disiplin militer harus dilakukan oleh seorang Atasan Yang Berhak Menghukum (Ankum), namun kenyataannya, UU Nomor 25 Tahun 2014 tidak memberikan pengaturan secara lengkap dan jelas tentang kewenangan Ankum dalam menegakkan hukum disiplin terhadap tawanan perang. Berdasarkan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konsep hukum dan perundangan-undangan, dapat diperoleh suatu kesimpulan bahwa kajian tentang kekaburan norma dan pengaturan tawanan perang dalam UU Nomor 25 Tahun 2014  merupakan hal yang penting, oleh karena bentuk kekaburan hukum tersebut dapat berakibat kepada situasi ketidakpastian hukum, khususnya penegakan hukum terhadap tawanan perang. Dalam tinjauan selanjutnya, hendaknya diperlukan pengaturan-pengaturan tertentu yang lebih lengkap dan jelas untuk menerapkan ketentuan hukum disiplin militer terhadap tawanan perang.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 646
Author(s):  
Imelda Septy Febrian ◽  
Hanafi Tanawijaya

In practice, borrowing money is one of the means to get funds needed by humans. However, with the development of the era of borrowing and borrowing, there must be strong evidence to prove that there has been a loan lending event. in practice the agreement is carried out either in writing or by word of mouth or written under the hand, in accordance with the demand for it must be made in the presence of good faith and legal certainty. In making an agreement usually given a predetermined period of time based on the agreement of the parties. And if the agreement has expired the time period has been set then in the agreement the debt is past its term. But in this case the agreement was expired and the creditor had only collected the debt to the debtor for 34 years. What if the creditor collects the debt that has passed this time and in the Islamic law the debt must be paid even though the person who has the debt has died. The author examines this problem by using normative legal research methods supported by interviews with people who are experts in the field of Islamic law and law. In this agreement, it can cause losses to the creditor. As a result, in Article 1362 of the Civil Code, it is said that if a default occurs, there is a compensation.


Acta Comitas ◽  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ida Ayu Putu Swandewi

The article 44 paragraph (1) of Law Number 2 of 2014 on the Amendment of the Law on the Position of Notary Public (hereinafter referred UUJN-P) provision a duty for the appearer to sign the notarial deed after having been read by the notary public, with the exception when the appearer is unable to put his or her signature then the appearer should mention the reason and it will be stated explicitly at the end part of the notarial deed. On the other hand, there is a difference in the arrangement of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter c of the UUJN-P namely the existence of an obligation that the notary public must affix the letters and documents as well as the fingerprint of the appearer on the minutes of the deed. The problem that arises is what if the appearer is illiterate, having handicapped or paralyzed hand so that he or she could not put his or her signature on the notarial deed, whether he or she is required to put his or her fingerprints on the minutes of the notarial deed as a form of his/her personal authentication on the notarial deed or as a form of his/her approval, weather the fingerprint can replace a signature, whereas what is meant by the fingerprint here also raises different interpretations. The study is a normative legal research, it is as a result of a vacuum of norm about the signing of notarial deed when the appearer have physical disabilities that he or she cannot sign a notarial deed and to perform validation on an authentic notarial deed that he/she made. In addition, there is a duty of the notary to affix the fingerprint of the appearer on the minutes of the notarial deed, whether this provision also applies to the appearer who cannot sign the notarial deed because of his/her disability. The materials used are the primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study indicate that the legal arrangements for the legalization of the notarial deed for the appearer who has a physical disability, especially in his or her hands, as well as the obligation to attach fingerprints on the minutes of the notarial deed has not been expressly stipulated in the Law Number 30 of 2004 (UUJN) and the UUJN-P. In particular to Article 44 paragraph (1), (2) and Article 16 Paragraph (1) c. that stipulate the appearer who has a physical disability condition can authenticate the notary deed, on condition that, the deed is eligible and conforms to the rules in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, Article 1868 of the Civil Code of the authentic deed and the Law Number 30 of 2004 of the Law on Notary Position in conjunction with the Law Number 2 of 2014 on the Amendment of the Law on the Position of Notary Public.


Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Made Dita Widyantari

Article 43 UUJN-P opens the opportunity for sworn translators to be involved in making notary deeds because of the provision that the deed can be made in a foreign language if it is desired by the parties and in the case of a notary being unable to translate or explain it. However, the existence of Article 43 UUJN-P which contradicts Article 31 of UUBBLNLK has resulted in legal uncertainty related to the mechanism of deed making which affects the function and position of the sworn translator. Responsibility in the event of an error of the translation has also not been clearly regulated so as not to protect the interests of the clients. This research aims to find out the function and position of sworn translator in making notary deeds and reviewing the responsibilities of sworn translators in the event of errors in translating the contents of the notary deed. This study uses a normative legal research method which concludes that the sworn translator serves to translate a copy of the deed that has been made by a notary into the language desired by the parties and translate orally in a language that is understood by the parties. In the event of an error in translating the content produced resulting in a loss, the sworn translator may be prosecuted under Article 1365 of the Civil Code. Pasal 43 UUJN-P membuka peluang bagi penerjemah tersumpah untuk ikut terlibat dalam pembuatan akta notaris karena adanya ketentuan bahwa akta dapat dibuat dalam bahasa asing jika para pihak menghendaki dan notaris tidak dapat menerjemahkannya. Namun keberadaan Pasal 43 UUJN-P yang bertentangan dengan Pasal 31 UUBBLNLK mengakibatkan adanya ketidakpastian hukum terkait mekanisme pembuatan akta yang berdampak pula terhadap fungsi dan kedudukan penerjemah tersumpah dalam pembuatan akta notaris. Tanggung jawab penerjemah tersumpah dalam hal adanya kesalahan atas terjemahan yang dihasilkan oleh penerjemah tersumpah juga belum diatur secara jelas sehingga tidak melindungi kepentingan pengguna jasa penerjemah tersumpah. Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengelaborasi fungsi dan kedudukan jasa penerjemah tersumpah dalam pembuatan akta notaris dan mengkaji tanggung jawab penerjemah tersumpah dalam hal terjadinya kesalahan dalam menerjemahkan isi akta notaris. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa penerjemah tersumpah berfungsi untuk menerjemahkan salinan akta notaris ke dalam bahasa yang diinginkan oleh para pihak dan menerjemahkan isi akta secara lisan pada saat pembacaan akta oleh notaris dalam hal notaris tidak dapat menerjemahkannya. Dalam hal terjadi kesalahan dalam menerjemahkan isi akta yang mengakibatkan kerugian, penerjemah tersumpah dapat dituntut untuk mengganti kerugian tersebut berdasarkan Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-144
Author(s):  
Putu Satria Fajar Purwanta ◽  
I Made Suwitra ◽  
Ketut Kasta Arya Wijaya

The lack of precision between the buyer and the land deed official is a factor in the emergence of the uncertainty of the law against the certificate issue. In addition, the seller also intentionally does not notify that there is a defect in the certificate that causes the buyer to suffer a loss. It needs the protection of the buyer acting in good faith so that in the future no longer appears dispute regarding the certificate of a double or false which is used as the object of buying and selling. This study aims to know the certainty of the law, the transfer of rights over the land and the form of the legal protection of the buyer acting in good faith in buying and selling with counterfeit certificate object. The method used in this study is normative legal research. In addition, the legal materials are obtained by using a literature study. The results of this study showed that the transfer of rights over the counterfeit certificate object causes legal uncertainty because there is a violation of article 1320 of the Civil Code, namely the agreement and skills that can be requested for cancellation, the form of the legal protection of the buyer acting in good faith in the form of protection repressive where such protection can be provided in the form of criminal sanctions, administrative and civil to the seller.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document