scholarly journals Legal Protection for Buyers in Buying and Selling with Counterfeit Certificate Object

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-144
Author(s):  
Putu Satria Fajar Purwanta ◽  
I Made Suwitra ◽  
Ketut Kasta Arya Wijaya

The lack of precision between the buyer and the land deed official is a factor in the emergence of the uncertainty of the law against the certificate issue. In addition, the seller also intentionally does not notify that there is a defect in the certificate that causes the buyer to suffer a loss. It needs the protection of the buyer acting in good faith so that in the future no longer appears dispute regarding the certificate of a double or false which is used as the object of buying and selling. This study aims to know the certainty of the law, the transfer of rights over the land and the form of the legal protection of the buyer acting in good faith in buying and selling with counterfeit certificate object. The method used in this study is normative legal research. In addition, the legal materials are obtained by using a literature study. The results of this study showed that the transfer of rights over the counterfeit certificate object causes legal uncertainty because there is a violation of article 1320 of the Civil Code, namely the agreement and skills that can be requested for cancellation, the form of the legal protection of the buyer acting in good faith in the form of protection repressive where such protection can be provided in the form of criminal sanctions, administrative and civil to the seller.

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-26
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Istri Agung ◽  
I Nyoman Sukandia

The inheritance and the division of inheritance that is felt to be unfair is often a source of dispute. The disputes that occur can sometimes be resolved by making a peace agreement between the disputing parties. The peace desired by the parties is, of course, expected to end disputes/conflict and to provide legal certainty among those in dispute. However, sometimes peace agreements that have been made between those in dispute are disputed again in court. This study aims to examine the settlement of Balinese traditional inheritance disputes through a binding peace agreement between the parties make it. The method used in this study is a normative legal research, using a statute approach and a case approach. The result of this study showed that the settlement of Balinese indigenous inheritance disputes through a binding peace agreement of the parties that make it if the peace agreement is made based on the validity of the agreement as stipulated in article 1320 of the Civil Code, based on good faith as the principles in the law of the agreement, and must be made in the form of a notary deed is in accordance with the provisions for conciliation in book III of the Civil Code.  


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-302
Author(s):  
Erlin Kusnia Dewi ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara

The 2008 ITE Law regulates fraudulent acts that are applied online. The researcher wrote a scientific article with the title Legal Impacts on the Implementation of Online Arisan Based on Law No. 19 of 2016. There are two formulations of this research problem How is the Legal Protection for Parties Conducting Online Arisan based on Law Number 19 of 2016? and What are the Criminal Sanctions Against BandarArisanOnlinein the event of Default? Normative legal research is a method applied by the author in this scientific article. The author carries out a literature study by collecting legal material to answer the formulation of research problems. The author carries out a literature study by collecting legal material to answer the formulation of research problems. This study's findings explain that there are legal protections for parties who carry out online social gathering criminal sanctions against online social gathering based on ITE Law No. 19 of 2016 against online social gathering fraud perpetrators focused on individual legal subjects. This finding is supported by Article 28 paragraph (1), which explains that consumers who get losses due to online transactions can obtain legal protection.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Ferdiansyah Putra ◽  
Ghansham Anand

<p>Pasal 15 ayat (2) huruf e Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) memberikan kewenangan bagi Notaris untuk memberikan penyuluhan hukum sehubungan dengan pembuatan akta, artinya Notaris berwenang memberikan penyuluhan hukum sehubungan dengan akta yang di buatnya. Berkaitan dengan kewenangan tersebut dapat terjadi permasalahan jika dikemudian hari penyuluhan hukum yang diberikan oleh Notaris tersebut kemudian di tindak lanjuti oleh para pihak dalam pembuatan akta namun ternyata akta tersebut dinyatakan batal dan bertentangan dengan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.</p><p>Penulis dalam penelitian ini ingin menelaah dan menganalisa lebih lanjut<strong> </strong>tentang bentuk penyuluhan hukum oleh Notaris serta tanggung gugat Notaris atas penyuluhan hukum yang merugikan para pihak</p><p>Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka atau bahan hukum sekunder sedangkan pendekatan masalah dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konseptual.</p><p>Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa bentuk penyuluhan hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh Notaris hanya sebatas pada hal yang berkaitan dengan pembuatan akta saja. Notaris dalam memberikan penyuluhan hukum harus memahami substansi permasalahan yang akan diberikan penyuluhan sehingga mampu memberikan solusi yang benar. Notaris hanya sebatas memberikan penyuluhan hukum kepada para pihak namun hasil akhirnya dikembalikan kepada para pihak untuk membuat perjanjian tersebut sehingga Notaris tidak dapat dimintakan tanggung gugat  atas kerugian para pihak.</p><p><em>Article 15 section 2e Legal Constitution of Notary Public Profession </em><em>(UUJN) provides authority for notary public to conduct legal counseling in related to publishing deed. In other words, notary public has authority to provide legal counseling about notarial deed. Concerning this authority, issue that might be occurred in the future is when the counseling given by notary public is regarded as breaching and the notarial deed is canceled by the court</em><em>.</em></p><p><em>The present study aims to examine and elaborate further about counseling material conducted by notary public coupled with accountability of notary public in related to legal protection of aggrieved parties in related to the legal counseling conducted by notary public. </em></p><p><em>The method used in the present study is a normative legal research, namely legal research which is conducted by examining the library materials or secondary law while in finding and collecting the data is done by two approaches, namely the law and conceptual approaches. </em></p><p><em>The present study concluded that notary public only has authorization in conducting legal counseling concerning publication of notarial deed. Notary public in providing legal counseling shall comprehend substantial issue that is discussed in order to provide proper solution concerning the issue. Despite the outcome of the counseling will be applied or not it depends on the parties that consult to the notary public. Notary public cannot be asked for accountability for all losses that are experienced by the parties. </em><em></em></p>


Lentera Hukum ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riko Sulung Raharjo ◽  
M. Khoidin ◽  
Ermanto Fahamsyah

Copyright recognizes a declarative system in which the state automatically protects a creation after it was born without having to be preceded by registration. Article 64 of Copyrights Act Number 28 of 2014 (Copyright Act) states the registration even though it is not a necessity for the creator. This study aims to examine and analyze the legal consequences, forms of legal protection, as well as the future conception of regulations relating to the recording of a work in common by using legal research as its method. The results of the study indicate that the legal consequences on the similar work to the registration, inter alia, the abolition of the power of law for the registration of works, compensation for the creator, and criminal threats. Based on the theory of legal certainty, a provision is a form of legal certainty provided by the Copyright Law. There is a form of legal protection against the creator of the registration of the similar creation, inter alia, the abolition of the power of the law for registration the work by the court, the creator has the right to compensation, and the creator has the right to sue criminal. Based on the theory of legal protection, a provision is a form of protection provided by the Copyright Law. The future conception of the regulation of registration of creation so that it can provide legal protection against the creator through the renewal related to the addition of authority and procedures in conducting checks for ministers in the case of the registration of creation since it was first realized and announced. Based on the theory of legal certainty and the benefits of law, change and renewal can provide legal certainty and legal benefit for the creator and his creation. Keywords: Creator, Recording of Creations, Same Creations


Acta Comitas ◽  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Selvyana Putri Pratamikha

The Power of Attorney of the Encumbrance Rights (SKMHT) is a special power of attorney which includes the power to impose the provision of encumbrance by the encumbrance grantor to the recipient of the encumbrance or other person authorized to it. The Power of Attorney of the Encumbrance Rights (SKMHT) must be made in two forms namely the notarial deed or the deed of the land deed official (PPAT) as stipulated by the provisions of Article 15 paragraph (1) of the Law Number 4 of 1996 on the Encumbrance Rights of the Land Along with Bodies Relating to Land. The enactment of the National Land Agency Regulation Number 8 of 2012 requires that the SKMHT shall be made ??in accordance with the format of the attachment of the Regulation. . While the SKMHT in the form of notarial deed shall be made ??in accordance with the provisions of Article 1868 of the Civil Code, the Article 38 of the Revised Law on the Position of the Land Deed Official (UUJNP), and the Article 15 of the Law on The Encumbrance Rights (UUHT). This results in the different arrangements resulting in the lack of uniformity of the SKMHT forms made ??by a notary or the land deed official (PPAT) which giving rise to the legal uncertainty of the form of the SKMHT and the legal effect of the SKMHT made in the form of a notarial deed. The study is a normative legal research, intended to examine the differences in the SKMHT arrangement between the provisions of Article 15 paragraph (1) of The Encumbrance Rights (UUHT) with the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency (Perkaban) Number 8 of 2012. The study uses the statutory approach that is supported by the literature, legal theory, the opinions of the scholars, as well as the legal dictionaries, as its legal materials. The findings of the study show that the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency (Perkaban) Number 8 of 2012 does not abolish the SKMHT  in the form of a notarial deed as provided in Article 15 paragraph (1) of The Encumbrance Rights (UUHT). the SKMHT in the form of a notarial deed shall be made ??in accordance with the provisions of Article 1868 of the Civil Code, the Article 38 of the Revised Law on the Position of the Land Deed Official (UUJNP), and the Article 15 of the Law on The Encumbrance Rights (UUHT), while the SKMHT in the form of the land deed official (PPAT) shall be made in accordance with the provisions of the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency (Perkaban) Number 8 of 2012 along with its attachments. It is expected that the firm provisions which regulate the SKMHT in the forms of the notarial deed should be enacted in order to create its legal certainty.


Lentera Hukum ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 133
Author(s):  
Fransiska Novita Eleanora ◽  
Andang Sari

The concept of the agreement is accorded to Article 1313 of the Civil Code (KUHPdt). According to the Civil Code, what is said as an act is an agreement with one person with another person and can be said more and in mutual binding. The scope of the agreement is too broad, including the marriage agreement regulated in the field of family law. A unilateral agreement is an agreement that is not allowed which is indeed not only coming or popping up from various parties or parties, and also not permitted between the two or the other parties. In the agreement there should be an element of binding to each other, meaning that the party from the other agreement maker can always tie themselves to the other party and the other party also binds themselves to those who are different or different. The agreement is evident between the two parties. Without stating the purpose in an agreement by the parties that make the agreement and for what the agreement was made, moreover the contents of the agreement are unclear and prohibited by law. This study uses a research method that is literature study where by referring to literature or books and the rules of existing or normative legislation. The results achieved are then it can be said that the agreement is null and void. According to these reasons, the concept of agreement can be formulated with an agreement in which in the field called assets occurs something or things and material things that are mutual to always bind themselves from the seller or buyer to implement the agreement. Agreements that have been implemented must be carried out in accordance with the rights and obligations of each party and there is no default or negligence in carrying out their obligations so that they can be said to have good intentions in the agreement. Keywords: Legal Protection, Seller, Good Faith


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1783
Author(s):  
I Gusti Ayu Trisna Komala ◽  
Desak Putu Dewi Kasih

Tujuan penulisan jurnal ini untuk mengetahui konsekuensi yuridis terkait kredit bank yang diperoleh dari tindakan pemalsuan tanda tangan dan mengetahui perlindungan hukum terhadap kreditur atas pelepasan kredit dengan pemalsuan dokumen. Metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual digunakan dalam penulisan artikel ini. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan kreditur dan debitur telah melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum dalam pasal 1365 KUHPer karena kreditur lalai dalam kegiatan perbankan dan debitur melakukan penipuan dan pemalsuan dokumen dengan menggadaikan benda milik orang lain sebagai agunan di bank, yang mengakibatkan kerugian terhadap pihak yang bersangkutan yaitu pemegang hak milik benda tersebut. Konsekuensi yuridis terkait kredit bank yang diperoleh dari pemalsuan tanda tangan adalah kredit tersebut batal demi hukum karena tidak memenuhi syarat sahnya suatu perjanjian yang diatur dalam pasal 1320 KUHPer dan pasal 1321 yang menjelaskan tidak ada kesepakatan jika perjanjian terjadi karena adanya kekhilafan dan tipuan. Perlindungan hukum terhadap kreditur karena lalai dalam kegiatan pencairan kredit adalah pihak kreditur terdapat dalam pasal 1265 syarat pengembalian keadaan seperti semula. The aims of study to find out the juridical consequences related to bank credit that obtained from the act of signature forgery and knowing the legal protection of creditors for the release of credit by falsifying documents. The normative legal research method with the legistlavite approach and conceptual approach were used in writing this article. The results of this study are that creditors and debtors have committed acts against the law in article 1365 of the civil code because creditors are negligent in banking activities and debtors commit fraud and falsification of documents by mortgaging other people's property as collateral in the bank, resulting in losses to the parties concerned is that the owner of the propert right . Juridical consequences related to bank credit obtained from falsification of signatures is that the credit is null and void because it does not meet the legal requirements for an agreement provided for in article 1320 of the civil code and article 1321 which explains that there is no agreement if the agreement occurs because of an error and deception. Legal protection for creditors due to negligence in the activities of credit disbursement is the creditor contained in article 1265 conditions of returning the original condition.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Ferdiansyah Putra ◽  
Ghansham Anand

<p>Pasal 15 ayat (2) huruf e Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) memberikan kewenangan bagi Notaris untuk memberikan penyuluhan hukum sehubungan dengan pembuatan akta, artinya Notaris berwenang memberikan penyuluhan hukum sehubungan dengan akta yang di buatnya. Berkaitan dengan kewenangan tersebut dapat terjadi permasalahan jika dikemudian hari penyuluhan hukum yang diberikan oleh Notaris tersebut kemudian di tindak lanjuti oleh para pihak dalam pembuatan akta namun ternyata akta tersebut dinyatakan batal dan bertentangan dengan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Penulis dalam penelitian ini ingin menelaah dan menganalisa lebih lanjut<strong> </strong>tentang bentuk penyuluhan hukum oleh Notaris serta tanggung gugat Notaris atas penyuluhan hukum yang merugikan para pihak Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka atau bahan hukum sekunder sedangkan pendekatan masalah dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa bentuk penyuluhan hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh Notaris hanya sebatas pada hal yang berkaitan dengan pembuatan akta saja. Notaris dalam memberikan penyuluhan hukum harus memahami substansi permasalahan yang akan diberikan penyuluhan sehingga mampu memberikan solusi yang benar. Notaris hanya sebatas memberikan penyuluhan hukum kepada para pihak namun hasil akhirnya dikembalikan kepada para pihak untuk membuat perjanjian tersebut sehingga Notaris tidak dapat dimintakan tanggung gugat  atas kerugian para pihak.</p><p><em>Article 15 section 2e Legal Constitution of Notary Public Profession </em><em>(UUJN) provides authority for notary public to conduct legal counseling in related to publishing deed. In other words, notary public has authority to provide legal counseling about notarial deed. Concerning this authority, issue that might be occurred in the future is when the counseling given by notary public is regarded as breaching and the notarial deed is canceled by the court</em><em>. The present study aims to examine and elaborate further about counseling material conducted by notary public coupled with accountability of notary public in related to legal protection of aggrieved parties in related to the legal counseling conducted by notary public. The method used in the present study is a normative legal research, namely legal research which is conducted by examining the library materials or secondary law while in finding and collecting the data is done by two approaches, namely the law and conceptual approaches. The present study concluded that notary public only has authorization in conducting legal counseling concerning publication of notarial deed. Notary public in providing legal counseling shall comprehend substantial issue that is discussed in order to provide proper solution concerning the issue. Despite the outcome of the counseling will be applied or not it depends on the parties that consult to the notary public. Notary public cannot be asked for accountability for all losses that are experienced by the parties. </em><em></em></p><p> </p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asnu Fayakun Arohmi

This research examines the legal protection provided for illegal Indonesian workers in Malaysia and the obstacles to perform it. Malaysia are the largest number compared to another country in Asia in receiving migrant workers from Indonesia. In total there are 73.178 migrant workers. A large number of Indonesian migrant workers is caused by the lack of jobs vacancy in the country, so citizens look for a job abroad. The requirements to become Indonesian migrant workers are not easy, therefore many of them went abroad illegally. Illegal Indonesian workers often get inhuman treatment. Indonesian goverment should protect every citizen, even though they are illegal workers, since they are still Indonesian citizen. This paper is based on normative-empirical legal research with the data obtained from interviews, as well as from secondary sources provided in laws governing these matters, journals or from trusted sites of internet. The results of this study show that: first, the Law No. 18 of 2017 on Protection of Migrant Worker does not differentiate the protection for illegal and legal Indonesian migrant workers. Second, there are two obstacles faced by the Indonesian government: lack of data regarding the illegal Indonesian workers and lack of state budget to handle the protection of illegal Indonesian workers.


Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 436
Author(s):  
Wulan Wiryantari Dewi ◽  
Ibrahim R

The notary's role is to provide legal protection to the people who use his services. The presence of a Notary is indispensable for the community concerned to hold a legal relationship with other individuals so that the Notary may also be liable. In the provisions of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter c of the Amendment Law, it is stipulated that in carrying out his position, the Notary is required to attach fingerprints on the minutes of the deed, giving rise to various polemics, because the said provisions do not stipulate further if in this case the smoker suffers from finger defects or events that result in damage to fingerprints which makes the investigator unable to put his fingerprint. The purpose of this research is to find out how the efforts that can be done by a notary against those who are unable to put fingerprints and the legal consequences of the absence of fingerprints against the strength of the deed. This research is a type of normative legal research. The results of this study indicate that efforts can be made by a notary if there are those who suffer from finger defects or experience events that cause fingerprint damage so that they cannot attach their fingerprints to the minutes of the deed, the relevant Notary can explain the matter at the end of the deed. he made it because the fingerprints attached to the address are an act that is required to a notary that can lead to administrative sanctions as contained in the Amendment Law. Due to the legal absence of fingerprints attached to the strength of the deed that is the deed made by the relevant Notary Public remains an authentic deed even though the fingerprints of the tappers are not attached based on Article 1869 of the Civil Code and the deed is valid and legally binding as long as the provisions contained in Article 1320 are fulfilled Civil Code.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document