scholarly journals SANKSI YANG DITERIMA OLEH PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTE TANAH DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA AUTENTIK YANG CACAT HUKUM (STUDI PUTUSAN: PN JAKSEL NO. 124/PDT.G/2017/PN.JKT.SEL)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 314
Author(s):  
Andi Pratono ◽  
Tjempaka Tjempaka
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Community People ◽  
Is Theory ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Made In

Indonesia is the law of state or law state, as a law state country, Indonesia must have 3(three) important element such as legal certainty, justice, and expediency. Those main elements represent all the law state. In community, people everyday acts always relate to legal act, such as contract, buying or selling object that promised. To ensure those legal act have the ability perfect proof power, those legal act poured in the form of deed. In buying and selling land, a deed of sale and purchase must be made in front authorized official like land deed officer. However land deed officer as public official do make mistake on duty, with the result that party at a disadvantage. Party that loss because of mistake land deed officer, do ask for responsibility by suing the land deed officer to compensate the losses. Land deed officer in carrying out their duties must apply the precautionary principle so as to minimize any mistakes in making the deed. Author is using normative legal research methods, supported by a data which is theory and interviews some expert in land deed officer and Code of Ethics. The legal consequences to the land deed officer due the legal acts are against the law, which is a sanction will be given. The sanction will divided in three types such as sanction according to the Civil Law, Criminal Law and Code of Ethics or Government Regulation about land deed officer.

scholarly journals PERBUATAN MALADMINISTRASI DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA JUAL BELI OLEH PPAT DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA MENURUT PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 24 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PERATURAN JABATAN PPAT Jo. PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 37 TAHUN 1998 TENTANG PERATURAN JABATAN PPAT (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA SELATAN NOMOR: 129/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel.)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1378
Author(s):  
Cecyllia Tamara B. Schouten ◽  
Hanafi Tanawijaya
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Abuse Of Power ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ministerial Decree ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Poor Management

The Land Deed Official (the PPAT) is a Public Official who is granted part of the authorities by the State in the implementation of land registration and the making of an authentic deed. The certificate must be made based on the deeds of the law by the parties. The deeds of the law based on Article 2 of the Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998, a sale and purchase, swap, gift, inbreng, granting right of building/right of use based on the land property rights, and granting of land mortgage. Based on the ordinance, the authentic deed can be used as evidence in case of dispute. In this case is usually a lot of the contempt of court. This act is called the Maladministration. Maladministration is poor management or regulation, especially in an offical capacity. Maladministration is bias, neglect, inattention, delay, incompetence, ineptitude, arbitrariness and so on and would be long and interesting list. Including abuse of power, unlawful procedures, unfairness and malfunction or incompetence. The author examines the problem using normative legal research methods supported by some interviews with some who are experts in the field of the land and maladministration. This act resulted in the existence of legal consequences. Due to the law could by law or may be cancelled. The sanctions awarded againts to the Land Deed Official who did this deed contained in Ministerial Decree of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial/Head of National Land Authority Number 112/Kep-4.1/iv/2017 Article 6 paragraph (1) include reprimand, warning, skorzing, onzetting even fired from The Land Deed Official membership.

scholarly journals DISPUTES SETTLEMENT OF BALI TRADITIONAL INHERITANCE THROUGH PEACE AGREEMENT

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-26
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Istri Agung ◽  
I Nyoman Sukandia
Keyword(s):  
Civil Code ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Peace Agreement ◽  
Peace Agreements ◽  
The Law ◽  
Made In

The inheritance and the division of inheritance that is felt to be unfair is often a source of dispute. The disputes that occur can sometimes be resolved by making a peace agreement between the disputing parties. The peace desired by the parties is, of course, expected to end disputes/conflict and to provide legal certainty among those in dispute. However, sometimes peace agreements that have been made between those in dispute are disputed again in court. This study aims to examine the settlement of Balinese traditional inheritance disputes through a binding peace agreement between the parties make it. The method used in this study is a normative legal research, using a statute approach and a case approach. The result of this study showed that the settlement of Balinese indigenous inheritance disputes through a binding peace agreement of the parties that make it if the peace agreement is made based on the validity of the agreement as stipulated in article 1320 of the Civil Code, based on good faith as the principles in the law of the agreement, and must be made in the form of a notary deed is in accordance with the provisions for conciliation in book III of the Civil Code.  

scholarly journals Legal Consequences of the Deed of Sale by PPAT Containing Non Actual Transaction Price

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Nidya Kartika Sari ◽  
Rembrandt Rembrandt ◽  
Yasniwati Yasniwati
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
High Price ◽  
The Law ◽  
Transaction Value ◽  
Transaction Price ◽  
Actual Price ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Made In

The transfer of rights to land and buildings is legally made in the Sale and Purchase Deed (AJB), in the Sale and Purchase Deed (AJB) must also contain the actual price of the sale and purchase transaction, but the fact there are many people influence the PPAT to be able to help make prices / the value of buying and selling transactions in the Sale and Purchase Deed (AJB) is lower and non actual price, this is to avoid the high price of buying and selling tax, this is of course very contrary to the Perka BPN 1/2006, with the existence of such fraud will certainly be a problem for the parties and also for PPAT who makes the Deed of Sale and Purchase (AJB) at a later date. The focus of the problem in this study is how the legal consequences of the act of Land Purchase Deed (AJB) Land by the Land Deed Making Official (PPAT) which contains the value of the transaction that is not actually. The research method used in this paper is sociological juridical and this research is analytical descriptive. From the results of the research, it can be concluded that the PPAT that made AJB with containing the transaction value that was not actually violated the rules of the law, especially violated PPAT profession code of ethics and will be penalized.

scholarly journals Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Ketidaksesuaian Akta Salinan Dengan Minuta Akta

Kosmik Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Tyas Fidelia
Keyword(s):  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The Difference

Notary is a public official who has the authority to make authentic deeds and has other powers as referred to in this Law or based on other laws, as described in Article 1 number 1 of the Law on the Position of Notary Public. In carrying out his position, a Notary is required to act trustworthy, honest, thorough, independent, impartial, and safeguarding the interests of the parties concerned as well as making a Deed in the form of a Minute Deed. In addition, a Notary is required to issue a Grosse Akta, a Copy of the Deed, or a Quotation of the Deed based on the Minuta Deed. These matters are regulated in Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public. By looking at these provisions, it is fitting for a Notary to carry out his obligations. But in reality, you can still find Notaries who do not carry out the obligations as stipulated in the Law on Notary Position. Starting from negligence in maintaining the Minuta Akta to differences between the Deed of Copy and the Minuta Akta. Of course, the difference between the Deed of Copy and the Minuta of the Deed will give losses to the parties who entered into an agreement. Regarding the responsibilities of a Notary Public, in general, it can be reviewed on a civil, criminal basis, the Law on the Position of Notary Public, and the responsibility for carrying out his / her duties based on the Notary's code of ethics. By looking at this raises a problem regarding, "What is the responsibility of the Notary for the non-conformity of the Copy Deed with the Minuta Deed?". The method used in this research is a normative or juridical legal research method.Keywords: Notary, Deed, and Notary Responsibilities

scholarly journals TANGGUNG JAWAB PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH (PPAT) DALAM PENANDATANGANAN AKTA JUAL BELI YANG DIDASARI ATAS BLANGKO KOSONG (CONTOH KASUS: PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 1201/K/PDT/2016)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 375
Author(s):  
Arlene . ◽  
Hanafi Tanawijaya
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
The State ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Abuse Of Power ◽  
The Law ◽  
Ministerial Decree ◽  
Legal Consequences

PPAT or The Land Deed Official is a Public Official who is granted part of the authorities by the State in the implementation of land registration and the making of an authentic deed. The certificate that is made by PPAT must be made based on the deeds of the law by the parties. The authentic certificate can be used as evidence in case of dispute based on the ordinance. According to Article 22 Regulation Number 37 of 1998, the certificate must be read by The Land Deed Official in front of the parties along with two witnesses. However, in this case, The Land Deed Official asked one party to sign on the blank certificate, as a result the certificate wasn’t being read in front of the parties. This deed is accused of maladministration that includes unlawful procedures, abuse of power, malfunction and unfairness or incompetence. The author examines the problem using normative legal research methods which supported by some interviews with the ones who are experts in the field of the land and maladministration. This deed resulted in the existence of legal consequences. The sanctions awarded againts to the Land Deed Official who did this deed contained in Ministerial Decree of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial/Head of National Land Authority Number 1 year of 2006 Article 28 paragraph (1) includes firing from The Land Deed Official membership.

scholarly journals Kewajiban Pemberian Jasa Hukum Secara Cuma-Cuma Oleh Notaris Pada Orang Tidak Mampu

Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 446
Author(s):  
Claudia Verena Maudy Sridana ◽  
I Ketut Westra
Keyword(s):  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Assistance ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Social ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Legal Consequences

As a public official who works as a notary public has the authority to be able to make an authentic deed. As a notary in carrying out his commitment to make an authentic deed, the Notary gets approval to provide his services for free or voluntarily to people who are not capable in the financial field. How can you ask for legal assistance by a notary in the free notary area for people who can't afford it? Problems related to legal notifications to notaries who refuse to provide legal assistance in the field of notary to those who are unable? The purpose of the discussion is to analyze and discuss the request for legal assistance by a notary in the notary sector not providing legal assistance in the notary sector for people who cannot afford. This research uses empirical legal research methods, primary data and secondary data obtained were analyzed qualitatively and arranged systematically, which was collected by literature study and interview techniques. The conclusion of this research is the notary in providing his services without collecting honorariums is not only given to people who can not afford it, but notaries can provide free services to those who want to make a foundation or activities in the social, social and dialogue. The legal consequences of notaries who are reluctant to provide legal assistance to people who are not in accordance with the provisions of the sanctions provided for in Article 37 paragraph (2) of the UUJN are also in accordance with the provisions in the Code of Ethics I.N.I.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pencipta atas Pencatatan Suatu Ciptaan yang Sama

Lentera Hukum ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riko Sulung Raharjo ◽  
M. Khoidin ◽  
Ermanto Fahamsyah
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Similar Work ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Consequences

Copyright recognizes a declarative system in which the state automatically protects a creation after it was born without having to be preceded by registration. Article 64 of Copyrights Act Number 28 of 2014 (Copyright Act) states the registration even though it is not a necessity for the creator. This study aims to examine and analyze the legal consequences, forms of legal protection, as well as the future conception of regulations relating to the recording of a work in common by using legal research as its method. The results of the study indicate that the legal consequences on the similar work to the registration, inter alia, the abolition of the power of law for the registration of works, compensation for the creator, and criminal threats. Based on the theory of legal certainty, a provision is a form of legal certainty provided by the Copyright Law. There is a form of legal protection against the creator of the registration of the similar creation, inter alia, the abolition of the power of the law for registration the work by the court, the creator has the right to compensation, and the creator has the right to sue criminal. Based on the theory of legal protection, a provision is a form of protection provided by the Copyright Law. The future conception of the regulation of registration of creation so that it can provide legal protection against the creator through the renewal related to the addition of authority and procedures in conducting checks for ministers in the case of the registration of creation since it was first realized and announced. Based on the theory of legal certainty and the benefits of law, change and renewal can provide legal certainty and legal benefit for the creator and his creation. Keywords: Creator, Recording of Creations, Same Creations

scholarly journals Legal Protection of Notaries Related to Living Certificate of Binding Agreement

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 597
Author(s):  
Sonya Praminda Yona Mandela ◽  
Ismansyah Ismansyah ◽  
Azmi Fendri
Keyword(s):  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Empirical Methods ◽  
Entire Process ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Binding Agreement ◽  
Made In ◽  
Land Sale

A notary, as a public official, has given an authority to make sales and purchase agreement with freehold titles. However, it is not allowed for a notary to make land sale deed because the freehold titles stands to land deed official authority. In the notary code of ethics in Indonesia, there is no explicit and written statement whether the notary may accept the ownership of the parties or not. Some cases happened. There were several alleged cases and fraud committed by a notary during the process of sales and purchase agreement at a notary's office. In addition, one of two parties, who are committed to custody the certificate in notary’s office, changes his mind and reports to the authorities. In accordance to the reason above, the researcher concludes problems; 1. Why a certificate custody against the sale and purchase agreement (PPJB) to Notary (PPJB) could be happened? 2. What is the effect of custody a certificate against the sale and purchase agreement to notary? 3. What is the legal protection according to safekeeping an ownership certificate against the PPJB? This study is conducted through juridical empirical methods, it shows: 1.The safekeeping of a certificate by person to a notary is happened because those parties have a sales and purchase agreement before contract of sale is done.2.The legal consequences of custody of certificates in sales and purchase agreement (PPJB) are made in front of a Notary. Even though they are not tied directly but the parties have been convinced and entrusted before the entire process is completed from PPJB, AJB, or until the name is returned by the notary office. 3. To avoid such matters, the Notary does not conduct or domicile as a recipient for letters / documents from the appellants, both of which are confirmed in the deed or not.

scholarly journals Bentuk Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan Setelah Dikeluarkannya Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 8 Tahun 2012 Tentang Ketentuan Pelaksana Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah

Acta Comitas ◽  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Selvyana Putri Pratamikha
Keyword(s):  
Legal Theory ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Effect ◽  
Special Power ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
The Law ◽  
Made In

The Power of Attorney of the Encumbrance Rights (SKMHT) is a special power of attorney which includes the power to impose the provision of encumbrance by the encumbrance grantor to the recipient of the encumbrance or other person authorized to it. The Power of Attorney of the Encumbrance Rights (SKMHT) must be made in two forms namely the notarial deed or the deed of the land deed official (PPAT) as stipulated by the provisions of Article 15 paragraph (1) of the Law Number 4 of 1996 on the Encumbrance Rights of the Land Along with Bodies Relating to Land. The enactment of the National Land Agency Regulation Number 8 of 2012 requires that the SKMHT shall be made ??in accordance with the format of the attachment of the Regulation. . While the SKMHT in the form of notarial deed shall be made ??in accordance with the provisions of Article 1868 of the Civil Code, the Article 38 of the Revised Law on the Position of the Land Deed Official (UUJNP), and the Article 15 of the Law on The Encumbrance Rights (UUHT). This results in the different arrangements resulting in the lack of uniformity of the SKMHT forms made ??by a notary or the land deed official (PPAT) which giving rise to the legal uncertainty of the form of the SKMHT and the legal effect of the SKMHT made in the form of a notarial deed. The study is a normative legal research, intended to examine the differences in the SKMHT arrangement between the provisions of Article 15 paragraph (1) of The Encumbrance Rights (UUHT) with the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency (Perkaban) Number 8 of 2012. The study uses the statutory approach that is supported by the literature, legal theory, the opinions of the scholars, as well as the legal dictionaries, as its legal materials. The findings of the study show that the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency (Perkaban) Number 8 of 2012 does not abolish the SKMHT  in the form of a notarial deed as provided in Article 15 paragraph (1) of The Encumbrance Rights (UUHT). the SKMHT in the form of a notarial deed shall be made ??in accordance with the provisions of Article 1868 of the Civil Code, the Article 38 of the Revised Law on the Position of the Land Deed Official (UUJNP), and the Article 15 of the Law on The Encumbrance Rights (UUHT), while the SKMHT in the form of the land deed official (PPAT) shall be made in accordance with the provisions of the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency (Perkaban) Number 8 of 2012 along with its attachments. It is expected that the firm provisions which regulate the SKMHT in the forms of the notarial deed should be enacted in order to create its legal certainty.

scholarly journals Kepastian Hukum Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah Dalam Pola Kemitraan Sebagai Penerima Waralaba

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 547
Author(s):  
I Made Bagus Suardana ◽  
I Wayan Wiryawan
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Small And Medium Enterprises ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law ◽  
Medium Enterprises ◽  
Regional Governments

The legal certainty for micro, small and medium enterprises in a partnership scheme is as a franchisee. Economic growth is so fast and advanced that many regulations by the central government and regional governments issue policies that cannot be implemented and result in no guarantee of legal certainty for the community. The purpose of this paper is to review the regulation of the minister of trade regarding franchising in 2019 related to legal certainty for micro, small and medium enterprises in the framework of a franchise business. The method used in this paper is a normative legal research method by analyzing the provisions of statutory regulations. The results of this study explain that based on the principle of lex superior derogate legi inferiori, the law with a higher position removes the laws that are under it, namely in the MSME partnership pattern in the franchise business, it should still use the rules in Government Regulation No. 17 of 2013 concerning the Implementation of Law Number 20 of 2008 concerning Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. Kepastian hukum usaha mikro, kecil dan menengah dalam pola kemitraan adalah sebagai penerima waralaba. Pertumbuhan ekonomi yang demikian cepat dan maju, menyebabkan banyak regulasi oleh pemerintah pusat maupun pemerintah daerah menerbitkan kebijakan–kebijakan yang belum dapat dilaksanakan dan berakibat tidak adanya jaminan kepastian hukum yang berkeadilan bagi masyarakat. Tujuan dari penulisan ini, untuk mengkaji peraturan menteri perdagangan tentang waralaba tahun 2019 terkait kepastian hukum bagi usaha mikro, kecil dan menengah dalam rangka bisnis waralaba. Metode yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menganalisa dari ketentuan peraturan perundang–undangan. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa  berdasarkan asas lex superior derogate legi inferiori mengakibatkan hukum yang kedudukannya lebih tinggi menghapus hukum yang ada di bawahnya yaitu dalam pola kemitraan UMKM dalam bisnis waralaba sudah seharusnya tetap menggunakan aturan dalam Peraturan Pemerintah No. 17 Tahun 2013 Tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2008 Tentang Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document