Akibat Hukum serta Sanksi Pemalsuan yang Dilakukan Notaris Kepada Penghadap Ketika Pembuatan Akta Otentik

Abstract This study was intended to give an understanding regarding Notary responsibility arrangements of the Notary who commits violation in carrying out the position as well as provides legal protection that is obtained by the party against the data falsification by a Notary. The research of this normative law examined the norm that happens, such as a norm vacuum that does not regulate criminal sanctions in Laws of Notary. This research contained several sources, such as premier, secondary, and tertiary laws. Furthermore, the research approach was done by the conceptual approach that analyzes the concept of organizing violations by the notary. The result of this research was the Notary deed can be requested for the deed to be annulled based on the legally binding decisions determined by the District Court, then, the Notary Deed can be disqualified and can be avowed as the non-binding deed for the parties who made it. The sanctions of the Notary who falsified the data in making the authentic deed are, administrative sanction or the notary code of ethics, the sanction based on The Civil Law Code, and the sanction based on Criminal Code. The Notary can also be sued for compensation if the violation that is done by the notary causes a deed becomes an inauthentic deed and be relegated to the deed for who made it. This is the protection that can be given to the party if a Notary does not carry out the duties and obligations. Abstrak Tujuan penulisan ialah memberikan pemahaman terkait pengaturan ”tanggung jawab Notaris yang melakukan pelanggaran dalam menjalankan jabatannya serta” memberikan perlindungan hukum yang diperoleh penghadap atas pemalsuan data yang dilakukan Notaris. Penelitian hukum normatif ini menelaah persoalan norma yang terjadi yaitu suatu kekosongan norma tidak diaturnya mengenai sanksi pidana dalam UUJN. Penelitian ini memuat sumber-sumber yaitu hukum bahan hukum primer, sekunder serta tersier. Selanjutnya, pendekatan penelitian dilakukan melalui pendekatan konseptual yang menganalisa konsep penyelenggaraan pelanggaran oleh Notaris. Hasil penulisan menunjukkan akta Notaris dapat dimintakan untuk akta dibatalkan, berdasarkan keputusan yang sudah berkuatan hukum tetap yang ditetapkan oleh pengadilan negeri tersebut maka akta Notaris dapat dibatalkan dan dinyatakan sebagai akta yang tidak mengikat bagi para pihak yang membuatnya. Adapun sanksi bagi Notaris yang melakukan pemalsuan data dalam pembuatan akta otentik ialah sanksi administratif atau Kode Etik Notaris, sanksi menurut hukum KUH Perdata, sanksi menurut KUH Pidana. Notaris juga dapat digugat ganti rugi apabila pelanggaran atau kesalahan yang dilakukan Notaris mengakibatkan suatu akta menjadi tidak otentik dan terdegradasi menjadi akta di bawah tangan. Inilah bentuk perlindungan yang diberikan kepada penghadap jika seseorang Notaris tidak melaksanakan tugas dan kewajibannya.

Download Full-text

ASPEK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PASIEN KORBAN MALPRAKTIK DILIHAT DARI SUDUT PANDANG HUKUM DI INDONESIA

Justitia et Pax ◽

10.24002/jep.v33i1.1417 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 33 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Sabungan Sibarani

Keyword(s):

Operating Procedure ◽

Code Of Ethics ◽

Civil Law ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Standard Operating Procedure ◽

Health Law ◽

Criminal Sanction ◽

Criminal Offense ◽

Standard Operating ◽

Administrative Sanction

Malpractice case is a criminal offense that is very common in Indonesia. Malpractice is essentially an action of the professional personnel which is contrary to the standard operating procedure (SOP), the code of ethics, and the laws that apply, whether intentional or due to negligence that resulted in harm or death to others. The aspects of legal protection towards the patients as the victims of malpractice by a doctor under the laws of Indonesia are namely: (1) in a preventive manner: using the regulations that govern the malpractice actions, namely in the Book of the Law of Civil Law (Civil Code), Act on Health, Law Consumer protection Law Medical Practice and the Penal Code, and (2) in a repressive manner: the existence of action that resulted in a loss, the person who performed the action shall be imposed sanctions in the form of civil sanctions, namely by giving compensation, either administrative sanction and criminal sanction. Keywords: Legal Protection, Patient, Malpractice Victims. INTISARI Kasus malpraktik merupakan tindak pidana yang sangat sering terjadi di Indonesia. Malpraktik pada dasarnya adalah tindakan tenaga profesional yang bertentangan dengan standard operating procedure (SOP), kode etik, dan undang-undang yang berlaku, baik disengaja maupun akibat kelalaian yang mengakibatkan kerugian atau kematian pada orang lain. Aspek perlindungan hukum terhadap pasien korban malpraktik oleh dokter berdasarkan hukum Indonesia, yaitu: (1) secara preventif: dengan adanya peraturan-peraturan yang mengatur mengenai tindakan malpraktik, yaitu dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUH Perdata), Undang-Undang Kesehatan, Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen, Undang-Undang Praktik Kedokteran, dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP), (2) dan secara represif: dengan adanya tindakan yang mengakibatkan kerugian, maka seseorang yang melakukan tindakan tersebut dijatuhkan sanksi berupa sanksi perdata, yaitu dengan mengganti kerugian, baik sanksi administratif dan sanksi pidana. Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum, Pasien, Korban Malpraktik.

Download Full-text

PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN NOTARIS DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA BERDASARKAN PEMALSUAN SURAT OLEH PARA PIHAK

Acta Comitas ◽

10.24843/ac.2017.v02.i01.p15 ◽

2017 ◽

pp. 161

Author(s):

Putu Vera Purnama Diana ◽

I Ketut Mertha ◽

I Gede Artha

Keyword(s):

Code Of Ethics ◽

Civil Law ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Administrative Law ◽

False Information ◽

Legal Study ◽

Research Results ◽

Criminal Sanctions ◽

Legal Sanctions

Law No. 30 of 2004 (UUJN) as well as in Law No. 2 of 2014 about Amendment of the Notary position law (UUJN Amendment) have not set the presence of legal sanctions on delinquency of article 15 of the UUJN Amendment in relation to the criminal aspect which is when the notary is not applying the article provisions will lead to the acts of falsifying letters or certificates as referred in article 263, 264, and 266 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) that will give disadvantage to the concerned parties. Therefore, this study attempts to analyze and answer issues concerning the responsibility of a notary in the case of letter forgeries committed by the parties on making deed according to the Notary law. And could notary asked to held for accountability when there disadvantages of either party as a result of false documents from other party This research qualified as a normative legal study that starts from the nonexistent norm. The research source was obtained from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Legal materials that have been gathered up later been systematized, analyzed and given argumentation to obtain conclusions on the issues discussed in this thesis. The research results showed that the responsibility of Notary in case of letter forgeries committed by the parties to making notary deed according to UUJN and UUJN Amendment is when the notary running their duty proved to have violated, notary have to responsible in accordance with the action in terms of accountability of the Administrative Law, Civil Law, which is in accordance with the sanction provision set forth in Article 84 and 85 of UUJN Amendment and code of ethics, but in UUJN and UUJN Amendment did not yet provide criminal sanctions. In practice it is found the fact that this violation is classified as a crime act committed by a Notary. Notaries can not be asked to held the resposibilities when there is disadvantage of either party as a result of false documents from other party, because Notary only record what was presented by the parties to be poured into the deed. False information that submitted by the parties is the responsibility of the parties. In other words, which can be accounted for by a notary is fraud or trickery when it comes from notary own.

Download Full-text

Tanggung Jawab Anak dalam Memelihara Orang Tua Terkait Ketentuan Pasal 46 Ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan

Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan ◽

10.17977/um019v5i2p226-232 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 5 (2) ◽

pp. 226

Author(s):

Rahdinal Fathanah ◽

Rachmi Sulistyarini

Keyword(s):

Islamic Law ◽

Civil Law ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Customary Law ◽

District Court ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Legal Perspective ◽

Civil Lawsuits

The purpose of this writing is to analyze the form of responsi-bility of children in caring for parents related to the provisions of Article 46 paragraph (2) of Law number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage accord-ing to the perspective of Civil Law, Customary Law especially Balinese Customs and Islamic Law and analyze the form of legal protection for parents who does not get care by children. The method used is the legal approach and conceptual approach. The results of this study are a form of children's responsibility in looking after parents, according to the per-spective of civil law, to be material. Meanwhile, according to the per-spective of customary law, especially Balinese custom and Islamic legal perspective, it is material and immaterial. The form of preventive legal protection for parents who do not receive care by children in the form of a District Court stipulation regarding the inability of children to provide for their parents, and the form of repressive legal protection for parents who do not get care by children in the form of civil lawsuits reg

Download Full-text

Pertanggung Jawaban Notaris Berkenaan Dengan Kebenaran Substansi Akta Otentik

Rechtidee ◽

10.21107/ri.v12i2.2872 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 12 (2) ◽

pp. 267

Author(s):

Wayan Paramarta Jaya

Keyword(s):

Rule Of Law ◽

Criminal Responsibility ◽

Code Of Ethics ◽

Criminal Liability ◽

Criminal Code ◽

General Purpose ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

The Rule Of Law ◽

Criminal Sanctions ◽

Legal Consequences

<p>Notary as a position has its own authority which is regulated with the rule of law to make an authAentic deed. This authority is described in Article 15 of Law Number 2 Year 2014 as amendments from UUJN. However, this authority is unperfect due to not arranged authority to Notary's for investigation, so the notary is unable to investigate the thruth of material document data fom confrontist is true or not. Condition like that often drag the Notary into legal issues in both criminal and civil problems. The purpose of this thesis research is divided into two, that is general purpose of an academic and special purpose is to examine and analyze how the notary accountability in making authentic deeds and to know and understand the legal consequences of authentic deeds made by the notary when the parties provide false data. This study is a normative juridical research using statute approach and conceptual approach. Based on the analysis of legal material obtained, basically a notary has responsibility for the formalities of an authentic deed and has no responsibility for the material of the contents the authentic deed except in the<em> relass </em>deed. Notaries can be requested of accountability if the Notary is proven to have committed administrative, civil and criminal violations. Notary must be responsible in terms of Administrative Law, Civil Law, that is in accordance with the provisions of sanctions contained in Article 84 and 85 on Amendment of UUJN and code of ethics, but in UUJN and UUJN Change Law does not regulate the existence of criminal sanctions. Notary cant be sought for criminal liability if there is a loss to one of the parties as a result of false documents from another party, since the notary only records what the parties have submitted to the deed. Such false statements shall be the responsibility of the parties, not the responsibility of the notary, unless such fraud or deceit originates from the Notary itself, a notary may be sought for criminal responsibility in accordance with article 263, 264, 266 of the Criminal Code.</p>

Download Full-text

Pemidanaan bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perkosaan terhadap Penyandang Disabilitas

Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum ◽

10.22225/jkh.1.1.2121.7-12 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 7-12

Author(s):

A.A. Kompiang Dhipa Aditya ◽

I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha ◽

Ni Made Sukaryati Karma

Keyword(s):

Legal Protection ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Rape Victims ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Persons With Disabilities ◽

Criminal Sanctions ◽

Normal People ◽

Poor Treatment ◽

Article 5

Persons with disabilities refer to people who have physical, intellectual, mental, or sensory deficiencies so that in living their lives they find hindrances, as an opposite to normal people. Oftentimes the persons with disabilities receive poor treatment in society, be it discriminatory treatment or criminal acts, one of which is rape. Unfortunately, criminal sanctions for perpetrators of rape against persons with disabilities in Indonesia have not been explicitly regulated. Grounded with this phenomenon, this study examines the legal protection for persons with disabilities as victims of the criminal act of rape and sanctions for the perpetrators of the said criminal acts. To achieve these goals, this study was conducted using a normative legal research method with a conceptual approach and a case approach. Legal protection for persons with disabilities is contained in Article 3 and Article 5 Paragraph (2) of Law Number 8 of 2016 which regulates the rights and legal protection for persons with disabilities as victims of criminal acts. Protection for the rape victims takes the form of restitution and rehabilitation assistance. Sanctions for the perpetrators of the criminal act of rape against persons with disabilities have not been regulated strictly. In the Criminal Code, the criminal acts of rape are regulated in general sphere that is in Articles 285, 286, 287, 288. Thus, the legal protection for persons with disabilities aims to safeguard and maintain the persons with disabilities from the criminal acts of rape. In the Cassation Decision Number 736K/PID/2013 PN Cn, the sanction for perpetrators of rape against persons with disabilities is the imposition of sanctions in the provisions of Article 285 of the Criminal Code.

Download Full-text

Penormaan dan Pelaksanaan Kewajiban Ingkar Notaris

Perspektif Hukum ◽

10.30649/ph.v20i2.23 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 113-138

Author(s):

Qonitah Annur Aziza ◽

Aprilia Trisanti ◽

Kiki Aristyanti

Keyword(s):

Research Method ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Research Approach ◽

Limit Set ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Legal Norms ◽

Existing Problems ◽

Criminal Sanctions ◽

Administrative Sanctions

The notary is obliged to keep all legal deeds outlined in the contents of the deed and all information given to the notary in making the deed. the appointment of a notary as a witness in a case causes the violation of this obligation to be violated a lot. Strong legal protection is needed from the Honorary Board of Notaries (MKN) so that investigators and prosecutors are not arbitrary. The formulation of the problem taken by the author is the normalization of notary liability based on UUJN. And the application of sanctions from the notary obligation in the community.The writing of this thesis uses a normative juridical research method, namely by reviewing the legal norms contained in legislation, legal theories and jurisprudence related to the issues discussed. This research approach uses a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The purpose of this study is to explain more deeply about the norms of denial obligations in the UUJN and their application in the community with the existence of permission from MKN. Based on the results of the study, the author obtained answers to existing problems, namely the notary has a broken obligation that must be obeyed and regulated in Article 4 paragraph (2) and Article 16 paragraph (1) letter f UUJN-P. This breach obligation has a limit set out in UUJN in Article 66 paragraph (1) concerning a notary appointed as a witness can talk about the deed with the approval of the permit from MKN. But it also needs to be known if the broken obligation is violated without permission, the notary may be subject to administrative sanctions in the form of termination of employment, civil sanctions in the form of compensation and criminal sanctions in the form of prison sentences.

Download Full-text

Perspektif Kode Etik Jabatan Notaris terhadap Publikasi dan Promosi Jabatan Notaris melalui Aplikasi Android

Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal ◽

10.32801/lamlaj.v5i1.117 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. 1

Author(s):

Nadia Imanda

Keyword(s):

Research Methods ◽

Code Of Ethics ◽

Civil Law ◽

Supervisory Board ◽

Electronic Media ◽

Public Official ◽

Android Application ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Legal Provisions

Abstract: The era of technology brings people to the development of sophisticated computers and smartphones in which the applications of various types and purposes are. Notary as a public official appointed by the state to take care of most countries and communities in the context of civil law, has legal provisions related to what may and may not be done by a Notary. In this case, the Notary Code of Ethics of the Indonesian Notary Association (INI) states that notaries are denied publication and self-promotion of their positions through writing media as well as electronic media, but the category of advertising on publicity and self-promotion does not provide clear interpretation on android application that indicates to violate the Article 4 paragraph (3) Notary Code of Ethics. This legal research uses normative research methods using the statute approach and conceptual approaches. The use of an android application by a notary who indicates committing violation must be studied and supervised from the Notary Honorary Board and Notary Supervisory Board so that the inteniont and the purpose of the UUJN and the Notary Code of Ethics can be realized and the office of notary as a profession cannot be dishonored. Abstrak: Era teknologi membawa manusia pada perkembangan komputer dan smartphone canggih yang di dalamnya terdapat fasilitas aplikasi berbagai macam jenis dan tujuan. Notaris sebagai pejabat umum yang diangkat oleh negara untuk mengurusi sebagian urusan negara dan masyarakat dalam lingkup hukum perdata, memiliki ketentuan hukum terkait apa yang boleh dan tidak boleh dilakukan oleh seorang Notaris. Dalam hal ini, Kode Etik Notaris Ikatan Notaris Indonesia (I.N.I) menyatakan bahwa notaris dilarang melak ukan publikasi dan promosi diri terhadap jabatannya melalui media tulis mau pun media elektronik, namun kategori batasan terhadap publikasi dan promosi diri dinilai kurang memberikan kejelasan hukum bahwasanya ditemukan aplikasi android yang berindikasi pelanggaran Pasal 4 ayat (3) Kode Etik Notaris. Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan berdasarkan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach). Penggunaan aplikasi android oleh notaris yang berindikasi melakukan pelanggaran harus dilakukan pengkajian dan pengawasan dari Dewan Kehormatan Notaris dan Majelis Pengawas Notaris agar maksud dan tujuan UUJN serta Kode Etik Notaris dapat terwujud dan tidak mencederai jabatan notaris sebagai profesi yang mulia.

Download Full-text

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Penghinaan Citra Tubuh (Body Shaming)

Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum ◽

10.22225/jkh.2.3.3638.537-541 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2 (3) ◽

pp. 537-541

Author(s):

Ni Made Yeni Sukmawati ◽

Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽

Ni Made Sukaryati Karma

Keyword(s):

Social Media ◽

Body Image ◽

Research Method ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Criminal Code ◽

The State ◽

Legal Rules ◽

Criminal Sanctions ◽

Positive Law ◽

Victim Protection

Body Shaming is a term that is currently trending, where criticizing or commenting on someone's physical in a negative way or with speech that intends to mock or insult someone's physical or appearance falls into this category. Legal protection for victims of body shaming needs to get very serious attention in order to deal with the phenomena that are currently happening on social media in particular. This study examines the regulation of the criminal act of insulting body image (body shaming) in terms of positive law and explains the legal protection provided to victims in the crime of insulting body image (body shaming). This study uses a normative research method by applying the legislation approach which refers to primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The regulation of criminal acts of insulting body image (body shaming) in terms of positive law in general can be seen from the element of humiliation which is regulated in Chapter XVI of the Criminal Code and is grouped into 6 parts, namely from article 310 to article 318 and besides that, there are also other legal rules that regulate it implicitly in Article 27 paragraph (3). Article 45 paragraph (3) of the ITE Law. With sanctions in the form of criminal sanctions. The form of legal protection given to victims in the crime of body shaming is the making of policies by the State regarding prohibitions and strict sanctions for violators such as criminal sanctions and fines, through the established witness and victim protection institution

Download Full-text

Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana dari Perspektif Kemerdekaan Pers

Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum ◽

10.22225/jkh.2.2.3212.233-237 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2 (2) ◽

pp. 233-237

Author(s):

Kadek Mahadewi ◽

I Wayan Rideng ◽

Ida Ayu Putu Widiati

Keyword(s):

Child Protection ◽

Negative Impact ◽

Code Of Ethics ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Children's Rights ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Children’S Rights ◽

Press Freedom ◽

The Press ◽

Negative Impacts

Legal protection for children who consider the law is one important aspect that must be considered by all parties to avoid negative impacts felt by children and children. This research has two problemformulations, namely: 1) How is legal protection against children as a crime? 2) What are the implications of press freedom which violates children's rights as a crime? The method used is nonnative legal research. The implementation of press freedom in reporting is not in accordance with the regulations regarding child protection and the journalistic code of ethics because efforts are still being made by the press in reporting about children as a crime whose identity is published in both print and electronic media so that it has a negative impact both physically. and psychologically to children. This requires accountability from the press and sanctions given to the press who violate children's rights are regulated in the Criminal Code.

Download Full-text

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Perantara Narkotika (Study Putusan No.14/Pid.Sus Anak.2015/PN.Dps)

Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum ◽

10.22225/juinhum.2.1.3108.195-199 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

pp. 195-199

Author(s):

Rezky Ayu Saraswati ◽

I Nyoman Sujana ◽

Diah Gayatri Sudibya

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Child Protection ◽

Justice System ◽

Juvenile Justice System ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Best Interests ◽

District Court ◽

Criminal Sanctions ◽

The Government ◽

The Moment

The rise of drug trafficking involving children as narcotics couriers is a problem that needs serious attention from both the government, law enforcement and the community. Children who commit crimes must continue to obtain legal protection in the best interests of the child. Child protection is contained in Law number 11 of 2012 concerning the juvenile justice system, where at the moment children can become narcotics abuse even as narcotics brokers with the rampant abuse of narcotics for all circles both in Indonesia and in the international world. The formulation of the problem raised is how is the basis for judges' consideration in imposing criminal sanctions on children as intermediaries for narcotics? And what is the legal protection of children as an intermediary for narcotics? The problems to be discussed will be examined based on normative perspectives and the legislative approach to the decisions of the Denpasar District Court No. 14 / Pid.Sus Anak / 2015 / PN. Dps, that the judge considers that the accused child has committed narcotics crimes by being charged Law number 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics, which can be sentenced to a minimum of 5 years and a maximum of 20 years and can be subject to fines. Legal protection for children is carried out by judges by imposing criminal training on employment in a generation of Indonesian foundations, solely so that children can carry out their activities as usual when they return to the community and do not disturb their psychic rights and can increase their skills in children. The child does not return to committing a crime.

Download Full-text