scholarly journals Jaminan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Peristiwa Manak Salah di Bali

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 138
Author(s):  
Putu Endra Wijaya Negara ◽  
A.A. Gede Oka Parwata
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Housing Facilities

This study aims to determine the arrangement of customary traditions based on Indonesian law and to understand the guarantee of Human Rights in the Manak Salah Tradition in Bali. The method used in research related to human rights assurance in the Manak Salah Tradition in Bali uses normative juridical legal research, using a statutory approach or a statute approach to analyze legal issues in this study. Sources of legal materials in this study consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of this study found that human rights guarantee in the Manak Salah Tradition in Bali basically have to be uniform. This is because a tradition will be very difficult to erase, this is because customary law is recognized in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Article 18B paragraph (2) even though customary law cannot conflict with national law. So that in order to guarantee human rights from the wrong tradition, special arrangements are needed in the form of proper housing facilities, visited by other village krama, provision of MCK facilities, assisted with readiness by all village manners as a whole so as to help ease the burden on the family who is subject to sanctions, help ease the family. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaturan tradisi adat berdasarkan Hukum Indonesia serta memahami jaminan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) dalam Tradisi Manak Salah di Bali. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian terkait jaminan HAM dalam Tradisi Manak Salah di Bali ini mempergunakan jenis penelitian hukum yuridis normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan atau statute approach dan pendekatan konseptual atau conceptual approach untuk menganalisis isu hukum dalam penelitian ini. Hasil dari studi ini menemukan jika jaminan HAM dalam Tradisi Manak Salah di Bali pada dasarnya harus dilakukan penyeragaman. Hal ini dikarenakan suatu tradisi akan sangat sulit untuk dihapuskan, hal ini dikarenakan hukum adat diakui dalam UUD NRI 1945 Pasal 18B ayat (2)  meskipun hukum adat tidak boleh berlawanan dengan hukum positif Indonesia. Sehingga untuk menjamin HAM dari tradisi manak salah diperlukan pengaturan secara khusus berupa fasilitas perumahan yang layak, dikunjungi oleh krama desa yang lain, penyediaan fasilitas MCK, dibantu kesiapannya oleh seluruh krama desa secara keseluruhan sehingga membantu meringankan beban pihak keluarga yang terkena sanksi, membantu meringankan keluarga.

scholarly journals Hukum Internasional sebagai Alat Interpretasi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Umbu Rauta ◽  
Ninon Melatyugra
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Constitutional Tradition ◽  
The Relationship

Tulisan ini ingin menjawab dua isu utama mengenai hubungan hukum internasional dan pengujian undang-undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi RI (MKRI). Isu pertama adalah legitimasi penggunaan hukum internasional sebagai alat interpretasi dalam pengujian undang-undang, sedangkan isu kedua adalah urgensi penguasaan hukum internasional oleh hakim MKRI. Tulisan ini merupakan penelitian hukum yang menggunakan pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan historis dalam menjelaskan perkembangan pengujian undang-undang di Indonesia sekaligus menemukan legitimasi penggunaan hukum internasional oleh MK RI. Kesimpulan dari tulisan ini menegaskan bahwa hukum internasional memiliki sumbangsih yang penting dalam perannya sebagai alat interpretasi dalam proses pengujian undang-undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi, khususnya terkait hak asasi manusia. Justifikasi keabsahan praktik penggunaan hukum internasional tersebut ditarik dari tradisi ketatanegaraan yang secara implisit dikehendaki UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Manfaat positif yang diberikan hukum internasional nyatanya harus disertai juga dengan penguasaan hukum internasional oleh hakim MK RI supaya hukum internasional dapat digunakan secara tepat. Pembahasan dalam tulisan ini dibagi ke dalam empat sub bahasan inti yakni, pengujian undang-undang, penggunaan hukum internasional sebagai the interpretative tool dalam pengujian undang-undang oleh MK, legitimasi penggunaan hukum internasional sebagai the interpretative tool dalam pengujian undang-undang, pentingnya penguasaan hukum internasional oleh hakim MK.This article intentionally answers two principal issues regarding the relationship between international law and judicial review by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The first issue is the legitimacy of international use as an interpretative tool in judicial review. The second issue talks about the necessity of urgent international law mastery by the Constitutional Court’s judges. This legal research utilizes both a conceptual approach and a historical approach to explain the development of judicial review in Indonesia, and to find legitimacy of international law by the Constitutional Court. The analysis in this article affirms that international law positively contributes as an interpretative tool in judicial review by the Constitutional Court, particularly pertaining to human rights. A justification of a legitimate international law use is withdrawn from constitutional tradition which is implicitly desired by the Indonesian Constitution (UUD NRI 1945). Since international law has provided better insights into norms, a mastery of international law should be encouraged. There are four main discussions in this article: judicial review, application of international law in judicial review process, legitimacy of international law application in judicial review, and the importance of international law mastering by Constitutional Court judges.

scholarly journals PIDANA MATI BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI MENURUT SISTEM HUKUM DI INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Muhammad Afdhal Askar
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Adverse Impact ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Religious Law ◽  
The Republic

The development of Corruption Crimes has a widespread adverse impact on the lives of Indonesian people life. To stop this, it is needed to be taken a variety of extraordinary efforts including by implementing capital punishment for perpetrators, especially related to criminal acts of corruption that concern to many people that occur when the country is in danger. Even so, not all people agree with the application of capital punishment because it is considered to be conflict with Human Rights, the Constitution of the Republic Indonesia and Pancasila. To analyze these legal issues, various efforts can be taken such as seeing the meaning of the nature of human rights in the perspective of national and international law, interpreting legal norms using appropriate interpretation methods and seeing the existence of capital punishment in the perspective of religious law and customary law. Writing in this study uses a normative juridical approach with the type of data in the form of secondary data which comes from primary legal material and secondary legal material. The writing is done descriptively.

scholarly journals Persetujuan Keluarga sebagai Syarat dalam Pemberian Pembebasan Bersyarat kepada Narapidana

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-110
Author(s):  
Gusti Ngurah Agung Tresna Wangsa ◽  
I Ketut Sukadana ◽  
I Made Budiyasa
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Economic Condition ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Mandatory Requirement ◽  
The Family

One of the rights of convict is obtaining parole. To get his right as a convict in order to get parole requires the consent of the convict's family as a guarantor. The aims of the research are to know the arrangement of parole to the convicts and to know the role of the family as a guarantor in granting parole to convicts. The method of research is the type of normative legal research. Approach of problem is approach of conceptual approach and legislation. Source of primary and secondary legal materials. Collection of legal materials by reading or studying books of legislation and other literature and added with the results of interviews. The analysis of legal materials is done by analytical descriptive. Results and discussion is the regulation of parole shall be granted to a convict who has served a criminal offense of at least 2/3 (two-thirds) with the provisions of 2/3 (two-thirds) of the criminal period not less than 9 (nine) months. it is regulated in Government Regulation no. 99 of 2012, Regulation of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights, Regulation of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights Number M.01.PK.04-10 of 2007, Ministerial Regulation no. 21 of 2013 which contains conditional pretrial conditions and procedures for convicts. Approval of the family as a guarantor is one of the mandatory requirement in granting conditional exemption to the convict because the family will be responsible in guiding and supervising the convict if they have obtained the Conditional Paragraph, providing information about the circumstances of the convicts and the family is also obliged to assist the economic condition because in general the convicts the newly acquired parole has not had a job yet.

scholarly journals Konsep Pluralisme Hukum Khas Indonesia sebagai Strategi Menghadapi Era Modernisasi Hukum

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-36
Author(s):  
Fradhana Putra Disantara
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Legal Pluralism ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Scientific Development ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
National Legal System ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Materials Used

The purpose of this legal research is to describe the concept of Indonesian legal pluralism or Indonesian legal pluralism in facing the era of legal modernization; as well as describing the Indonesian legal pluralism strategy in integrating customary courts into the national legal system. This legal research uses a statute approach and a conceptual approach. In this legal research, the primary and secondary legal materials used are inventoried in order to obtain proper legal review; and provides a conceptual analysis of the legal issues discussed. The results of the study stated that as a novelty concept; The concept of typical Indonesian legal pluralism provides equality for the enactment of state law, transnational law and customary law so that they can run together based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in the era of legal modernization. Then, the concept of typical Indonesian legal pluralism can be used as a strategy to integrate customary justice into the national legal system through aspects of legal development. Thus, this research is expected to be useful theoretically; namely as a scientific development of customary law, and practical benefits; namely as a reference for drafting regulations on customary villages by local governments. Therefore, researchers recommend that the Indigenous Peoples Bill be a priority in the 2021 National Legislation Program (Prolegnas).

scholarly journals Tanggung Jawab Notaris Menggunakan Layanan Ditjen Ahu Online Dalam Hal Pendaftaran Akta Dan Pengesahan Badan Hukum

Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 492
Author(s):  
I Gede Agus Yudi Suryawan ◽  
Dewa Nyoman Rai Asmara Putra
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Data Entry ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Administration System ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Administration ◽  
Legal Entities

In accordance with the Decree of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights Number M-05 HT.01.01 of 2002 concerning the Enforcement of the Legal Entity Administration System at the Directorate General of General Legal Administration of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia, determines that all legal entity settlements include the ratification of the deed of establishment PT, application for approval and submission of deed reports, amendments to articles of association, fiduciary registration, will registration, are carried out with the online Legal Entity Administration System. So the notary has the authority to register all these legal acts online. The purpose of this research is to find out the role of the Notary in registering deeds and legalization of legal entities through the Directorate General of AHU Online services and to find out the responsibilities of the Notary if there are problems in registering deeds and legal entity approval through the services of the Directorate General of AHU Online. This study uses a normative juridical research method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the research, namely, the role of the notary in registering deeds and ratifying legal entities is entering deed data, checking all deed data to avoid data entry errors and the notary has the responsibility if there is an error from the notary's office, the notary will make corrections at a cost of Notary, however in this regard there is still cooperation from the applicant regarding the required data.

scholarly journals The Position of Constitutional Complaint in the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-78
Author(s):  
Agsel Awanisa ◽  
Yusdianto Yusdianto ◽  
Siti Khoiriah
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
South Korea ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Case Number

The purpose of this research is to determine the constitutional complaint mechanism based on comparisons in other countries, practices, and adaptation of constitutional complaints under the authority of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Many cases with constitutional complaint substance have been submitted to the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia even though they don’t have this authority. This research uses a normative legal research method using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, a comparative approach, and a case approach. This research indicates that the constitutional complaint mechanism in Germany, South Korea, and South Africa has been well implemented. In practice, cases with constitutional complaint substance are filed to the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia by changing the form by using the legal means of a judicial review, such as case number 16/PUU-VI/ 2008, case number 140/PUU-XIII/2015 and case number 102/PUU-VII/2009. Due to the consideration of the structure, substance, and culture of law, adaptation of constitutional complaint within the authority of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia needs to be carried out by amending Law Number 24 of 2003 jo. Law Number 7 of 2020 concerning the Constitutional Court.

scholarly journals EKSISTENSI OTONOMI DESA PAKRAMAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF PLURALISME HUKUM

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Istri Ari Atu Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Pluralism ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Interpretation ◽  
State Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Local Regulation ◽  
Traditional Institution ◽  
The Republic

The purpose of this research is to discover the existence of autonomy of Desa Pakraman in legal pluralism perspective. Related with that purpose, there are two issues that will be discussed, first, how does the existence of the autonomy of Desa Pakraman in Indonesia’s legal system?,Second, how does the existence of the autonomy of Desa Pakraman in legal pluralism perspective?. The research method is normative legal research using statue approach, concept approach and analytical approach and law analysis by using legal interpretation. Based on the problems, the results of discussion are : first, the existence of the autonomy of Desa Pakraman within the Indonesia’s legal system has regulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, national and local Regulations. In the Constitution, specifically Article 18 B of paragraph (2), declare that the states recognizes Desa Pakraman and their traditional rights. In regulation of Law No.5 of 1960 concerning basic Agrarian Law (UUPA), regulation of Human Rights, and regulation of Desa (Village) are clearly recognize Desa Pakraman as traditional institution has traditional rights, one of it is the autonomy of Desa Pakraman. At the local regulation, autonomy Desa Pakraman has regulated in Local Regulation about Desa Pakraman. Second, that existence of autonomy Desa Pakraman in perspective legal pluralism is that the existence autonomy Desa Pakraman is a weak legal pluralism. In perspective weak legal pluralism the state law as a superior and the customary law as an inferior, its position in the hierarchy under State law. As a theory, the semi-autonomous social field from Sally Falk Moore perspectives that Desa Pakraman is semi-autonomous. Desa Pakraman has capacity to hold their village based on the customary law and outomaticly Desa Pakraman to be in framework of state law.

scholarly journals RELEVANSI KONSEP NEGARA HUKUM PANCASILA DENGAN WELFARE STATE DALAM IMPLEMENTASINYA DENGAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK DI INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
I Ketut Cahyadi Putra
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Social Justice ◽  
Welfare State ◽  
The State ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Public Welfare ◽  
Basic Formula ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
The Republic

The State of Pancasila Law essentially stems from the principle of kinship, deliberation of consensus based on customary law, and protection of human rights with the principle of balance between the rights and obligations and the function of the law of auxiliary. As contained in the Fifth Precept of Pancasila that is social justice for all Indonesian people, and the opening of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia related to the phrase "advancing public welfare" is the basic formula of welfare state ideology then manifested into the constitution of the state of Indonesia to be made Guidance of nation life and state administration. Negara Hukum Pancasila esensinya berpangkal pada asas kekeluargaan, musyawarah mufakat berlandaskan hukum adat, dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia dengan prinsip keseimbangan antara hak dan kewajiban dan fungsi hukum pengayoman. Sebagaimana yang terkandung dalam Sila Kelima Pancasila yaitu keadilan sosial bagi seluruh rakyat Indonesia, dan pembukaan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 terkait frase “memajukan kesejahteraan umum” merupakan rumusan dasar ideologi welfare state kemudian dimanifestasikan ke dalam batang tubuh konstitusi negara Indonesia untuk dijadikan pedoman hidup berbangsa dan penyelenggaraan kenegaraan.

scholarly journals Customary Institutions in the Kei Indigenous Community Against Criminal Case Resolution

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-35
Author(s):  
Rudini Hasyim Rado
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Family ◽  
Family Level ◽  
Traditional Institutions

This research is focused on exploring the values of Kei customary law on the settlement of criminal cases that are resolved through customary institutions, by proposing 2 (two) problems, First, how is the existence of the law customary criminal Kei? Second, what is the role of customary institutions in the settlement of criminal cases? This research uses non-doctrinal legal research methods with interviews and observations as primary data. Meanwhile, data analysis is inductive and qualitative. It can be concluded that (1) the formal customary law of Kei is the values that live in the community that are agreed upon and are binding on the community, where the settlement of customary Kei crimes is taken in stages starting from the family level, customary institutions (Soa, Orang Kai and the last tier of Rat). (2) the role of traditional institutions in the settlement of criminal cases is starting to strengthen in society, this is indicated by the level of compliance with decisions and sanctions that are stipulated. People believe that customary cases are resolved by “insiders” (customary institutions) through deliberation (dok Tasdov) with a local wisdom approach to create social justice.

scholarly journals Eksistensi Hak Ulayat Pasca Berlakunya Peraturan Menteri Agraria Nomor 18 Tahun 2019

Notaire ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 489
Author(s):  
Wimba Roofi Hutama
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Management Control ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Customary Rights ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
Binding Power ◽  
Land Community

The Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia recently issued Ministerial Regulation of ATR No. 18 of 2019 concerning Procedures for Administration of Customary Land Community Units of Customary Law. However, the reality is that until now there are still ulayat lands of customary law community units whose management, control and use are based on local customary law provisions and are recognized by the members of the customary law community unit concerned. The research uses normative research, namely normative juridical research, namely research based on applicable laws and legal norms and has binding power to answer the legal issues faced. The results obtained are that the characteristics of customary rights of customary law communities, that customary rights to land are controlled by customary law communities, namely people who live in groups, hereditary based on ties of origin/ancestor or similarity of residence, have the same culture, live in a certain area, have customary property that is jointly owned, have customary institutions containing sanctions, as long as they are still alive according to developments and do not conflict with national law.Keywords: Existence; Customary Rights; Minister of Agrarian Regulation.Menteri Agraria Dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia baru-baru ini menerbitkan Permen ATR No. 18 Tahun 2019 Tentang Tata Cara Penatausahaan Tanah Ulayat Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat. Namun kenyataannya hingga kini masih terdapat tanah ulayat kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat yang pengurusan, penguasaan dan penggunaannya didasarkan pada ketentuan hukum adat setempat dan diakui oleh para warga kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat yang bersangkutan”. Penelitian dengan menggunakan penelitian normatif, yaitu penelitian yuridis normatif, yaitu penelitian didasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan atau norma-norma hukum yang berlaku dan mempunyai kekuatan mengikat guna manjawab isu hukum yang dihadapi. Diperoleh hasil bahwa Karakteristik hak ulayat masyarakat hukum adat, bahwa hak ulayat atas tanah tersebut dikuasai oleh masyarakat hukum adat, yakni masyarakat yang hidup berkelompok, turun menurun berdasarkan ikatan asal usul/leluhur atau kesamaan tempat tinggal, berbudaya sama, hidup dalam satu wilayah tertentu, memiliki harta benda adat milik bersama, mempunyai pranata adat mengandung sanksi, sepanjang masih hidup sesuai perkembangan dan tidak bertentangan dengan hukum nasional.Kata Kunci: Eksistensi; Hak Ulayat; Peraturan Menteri Agraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document