scholarly journals PENGATURAN PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PECANDU DAN PENYALAH GUNA NARKOTIKA DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1504
Author(s):  
Gst Ngurah Arya Dharma Susila ◽  
Ida Bagus Surya Dharma Jaya
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Medical Rehabilitation ◽  
Analysis Approach ◽  
Drug Addicts ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Social Rehabilitation ◽  
Track System ◽  
Double Track

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaturan tentang pecandu dan penyalahguna narkotika di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika dan juga menganalisis tentang pemberian sanksi pidana bagi pecandu dan penyalah guna narkotika. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan analisis. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah Pecandu dan penyalahguna narkotika diatur di dalam tujuan pembuatan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika, tepatnya pada Pasal 4 huruf d yang mewajibkan pecandu dan penyalahguna narkotika untuk direhabilitasi medis dan rehabilitasi sosial. Walaupun, Pasal 134 dan 127 ayat (1) mengatur bahwa pecandu dan penyalahguna dapat dikenakan sanksi pidana baik berupa pidana penjara, pidana kurungan, ataupun pidana denda. Namun, karena undang-undang ini menganut double track system yang artinya ada sanksi pidana dan juga sanksi tindakan maka pecandu dan penyalahguna seharusnya diberikan sanksi tindakan berupa rehabilitasi medis dan rehabilitasi sosial. This paper aims to analyze the regulation of narcotics addicts and abusers in Law Number 35 Year 2009 regarding Narcotics and elaborate the provision of criminal sanctions for drug addicts and abusers. The research method used is a normative legal research method and the statutory approach and analysis approach. The results of this study were narcotics addicts and abusers arranged in the purpose of making Law Number 35 of 2009 regarding Narcotics, precisely in Article 4 letter d which requires drug addicts and abusers to be rehabilitated medically and socially rehabilitated. Although, Articles 134 and 127 paragraph (1) regulate that addicts and abusers may be subject to criminal sanctions in the form of imprisonment, confinement, or fines. However, because this law adheres to a double track system which means there are criminal sanctions and also sanctions for actions, addicts and abusers should be given sanctions in the form of medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation.

scholarly journals Penjatuhan Pidana oleh Hakim Terhadap Prajurit Tentara Nasional Indonesia sebagai Pelaku Penyalahguna Narkotika

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 165
Author(s):  
Sugiarto Sugiarto
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Medical Rehabilitation ◽  
Criminal Punishment ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Social Rehabilitation ◽  
Track System ◽  
Double Track

Sanctions stipulated in the Narcotics law adheres to double track system in the form of criminal sanctions and action sanctions. Rehabilitation is one form of action sanction, in accordance with the provisions of Article 54 of Law Number 35 Year 2009 on Narcotics. The purpose of this study is to analyze the judge's consideration in dropping criminal punishment against the soldier of Indonesian National Army as narcotics abusers. This study uses normative research methods with statute approach and case approach. The results of the study indicate that Narcotics addicts and narcotics abuse victims in the case of proven or proven as victims of narcotics abusers as regulated in Article 127 paragraph (3) of Narcotics Law shall undergo medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation. Consideration of the judges of Military Court III-14 Denpasar through its decree Number: 33-K / PM. III-14 / AD / VIII / 2015, which states that the defendant has been proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing a criminal act of narcotics perpetrator to impose criminal sanctions, appears to be inconsistent with the provisions of the Narcotics Act because the judge does not consider the provisions of Article 127 paragraph (3) Law Number 35 Year 2009, namely compulsory rehabilitation in case it can be proven or proven as a victim of narcotics abuser, the abuser shall undergo medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation. Therefore, the judge in deciding the perpetrators of narcotics abuse should be guided by the provisions set forth in Law Number 35 Year 2009 on Narcotics. Sanksi yang diatur dalam undang-undang Narkotika menganut double track system yaitu berupa sanksi pidana dan sanksi tindakan. Rehabilitasi merupakan salah satu bentuk sanksi tindakan, sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam Pasal 54 Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis tentang pertimbangan Hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana penjara terhadap prajurit TNI sebagai pelaku penyalah guna narkotika. Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa Pecandu Narkotika dan korban penyalahgunaan narkotika dalam hal dapat dibuktikan atau terbukti sebagai korban penyalahguna narkotika  sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 127 ayat (3) UU Narkotika wajib menjalani rehabilitasi medis dan rehabilitasi sosial. Pertimbangan hakim Pengadilan Militer III-14 Denpasar melalui putusanya Nomor :33-K/ PM. III-14/AD/ VIII /2015, yang menyatakan terdakwa telah terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan bersalah melakukan tindak pidana penyalahguna narkotika menjatuhkan sanksi pidana,  tampak tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam Undang- tentang Narkotika karena hakim tidak memperhatikan ketentuan Pasal 127 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009, yaitu wajib rehabilitasi dalam hal dapat dibuktikan atau terbukti sebagai korban penyalahguna narkotika, penyalahguna tersebut wajib menjalani rehabilitasi medis dan rehabilitasi sosial. Oleh karena itu hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan terhadap pelaku penyalah guna narkotika harus berpedoman pada ketentuan yang sudah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika.

scholarly journals REHABILITASI TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA DI TINJAU DARI SISTEM PEMIDANAAN INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Syafruddin Syafruddin
Keyword(s):  
Medical Rehabilitation ◽  
Primary Sources ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Role Of Government ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Track System ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Double Track

ABSTRACT This research is motivated by the increasingly widespread use of narcotic in Indonesia, while the illegal use of narcotics can be viewed as a crime that can be imposed criminal sanctions in accordance with the provisions of Law of 35 of 2009. This narcotic law, in the case of punishment to the narcotic user, adheres to double track system, namely repressive sanction and action sanction. Medical rehabilitation is one of the framework of action sanction. On that basis, this research refers to two objectives: Analyzing the existence of rehabilitation for narcotic user in the perspective of the Indonesian punishment system and Analyzing the consequences for rehabilitation in cases of narcotic crime.This research is a legal research with normative law research type. The analytical approach uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials used in this study are primary and secondary legal materials. Primary sources of law relate to written legal products and secular sources of law covering other relevant literature.The results of research show that the existence of rehabilitation for narcotic user in the perspective of the Indonesian punishment system, is basically one of the forms of sanction which must be undertaken by the user of narcotic who is not the category of dealer, because the philosophy of Law of 35 on 2009 on Narcotic adheres to double track system in the case of sanction for the narcotic user, namely a repressive witness and action sanction, so it can be argued that  rehabilitation is a manifestation of the sanction of such action. Furthermore, the determination of rehabilitation for narcotic user based on a judge's ruling may have consequences for drug user to undergo medical rehabilitation as a duty.. Furthermore, the role of government is very important through the National Narcotics Agency (BNN) to streamline community participation in the framework of medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation procedures that are very urgent for the recovery of health and mental recovery of those who have become victims of narcotics. Keywords : Rehabilitation, Criminal Sanction, and Narcotic User 

scholarly journals Implementasi Model Double Track System: Sanksi Pidana dan Tindakan sebagai Sistem Pemidanaan terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas II A Kabupaten Langkat

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-105
Author(s):  
Sri Sulistyawati ◽  
Iwan Setiawan ◽  
Bambang Hermanto
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
District Court ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Drug Addicts ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The People ◽  
Track System ◽  
The Government ◽  
Double Track

Narcotics abuse is a danger that can destroy the next generation and hinder the development of the Indonesian nation in carrying out development in every sector of life. The narcotics problem is very much a concern of the people of Indonesia and especially the Province of North Sumatra because this province is ranked second after the Special Capital Region of Jakarta in the number of narcotics users. This research is very important in order to help the government program in order to avoid the youth of the nation's successors of narcotics users and provide a deterrent effect to the perpetrators of criminal acts of narcotics abuse. That the application of Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics has set about a double track system where narcotics addicts can be punished with actions in the form of rehabilitation. But in its application the judge always imposes criminal sanctions in the form of prison for drug addicts. So that more and more drug addicts in prison. The problems discussed in this study are the implementation of the double track system model, criminal sanctions and actions as a criminal system for the perpetrators of narcotics abuse crimes in Langkat Class II Penitentiary, whether this double track system can be implemented and whatever is an obstacle in the implementation of this double track system, by using the socio-legal research approach. Conclusions from the results of the study up to now the criminal system that was handed down in the Langkat District Court against narcotics criminals still used a single track system, so that all prisoners who served their sentences in Class II A Narcotics Lap Langkat were sentenced in the form of imprisonment.

THE POSITION OF QANUN 6 OF 2014 ON JINAYAT LAW TOWARD ACT 11 OF 2012 ON JUVENILE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM RELATED TO CHILD CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Rifqi Qowiyul Iman
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Justice System ◽  
National Level ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Track System ◽  
Double Track ◽  
Rule Out

This paper aims to describe the differences and the position of the legal rules for juvenile crimes between Qanun 6 of 2014 and Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System.  This research is descriptive qualitative research. The results show that Qanun Number 6 of 2014 also regulates criminal sanctions for children, which are normatively regulated in Law Number 11 of 2012. In addition, Qanun, as Aceh Islamic criminal law legalizes canning punishment for children, as well as the double-track system adopted by The Law of Juvenile Criminal Justice System is not explicitly accommodated in Qanun. Qanun at the level of a Regional Regulation is part of the hierarchy of laws and regulations that should be in line with what generally applies at the national level. Law Number 11 of 2006 is being the basis of the authority to make Qanun, as long as there is no court decision invalidates it, Qanun Number 6 of 2014, which is a derivative of Law Number 11 of 2006, can be declared as "lex specialis" of The Juvenile Criminal Justice System law which regulates child crime. However, it does not rule out the possibility that in the future, the judicial review of the article can be conducted.

scholarly journals Penyelenggaraan Pariwisata Olahraga: Perspektif Rekomendasi Pemerintah Daerah

Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
Aditya Putra Thama ◽  
Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
The People ◽  
Sports Tourism ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Sports Activities

Current sports activities are quite closely related to tourism. Tourism is the main source of livelihood for the people of Bali. Along with the development of sports in Bali, the implementation of sports tourism was also developed as an option in the development of local tourism. Bali Provincial Sports Regulation regulates sports tourism in Bali. However, the provisions of Article 14 paragraph (2) of the regulation require regional government recommendations prior to the implementation of sports tourism, which if not fulfilled can be subject to criminal sanctions in contravention of the SKN Law and the implementing regulations give rise to norm conflicts. The purpose of this study is to study the implementation of sports tourism based on the Bali Province Sports Regulations and analyze criminal sanctions for not being given the recommendations of the regional government by the organizers. The method used in this study is a normative legal research method with a statutory approach. The results of the study show that based on the Bali Provincial Sports Regulations the implementation of sports tourism must obtain recommendations from the regional government as Article 14 paragraph (2) of the Provincial Regulation on Sport in Bali. However, higher legal provisions related to sports, namely the SKN Law does not regulate this. The SKN Law which is a reference for organizing sports only requires a recommendation from the relevant organization of sports branch as Article 51 paragraph (2). The criminal provisions as Article 65 paragraph (1) of the Bali Province Sports Regulations for organizers who do not have a recommendation from the regional government are irrelevant and seem excessive considering the recommendation is an administrative requirement for an activity, it will be more relevant if administrative sanctions are imposed rather than criminal sanctions. In the event that this occurs, it will refer to the provisions of the SKN Law as well as the implementation rules. Kegiatan olahraga saat ini cukup erat kaitannya dengan pariwisata. Pariwisata merupakan sumber mata pencaharian utama bagi masyarakat Bali. Seiring dengan berkembangnya olahraga di Bali, penyelenggaraan pariwisata olahraga juga dikembangkan sebagai salah satu pilihan dalam pengembangan pariwisata lokal. Perda Keolahragaan Provinsi Bali mengatur pariwisata olahraga di Bali. Namun ketentuan Pasal 14 ayat (2) pada perda tersebut yang mewajibkan rekomendasi pemerintah daerah sebelum penyelenggaraan pariwisata olahraga, yang apabila tidak dipenuhi dapat dikenakan sanksi pidana bertentangan dengan UU SKN maupun peraturan pelaksanaannya memunculkan konflik norma. Tujuan studi ini yakni untuk mengkaji penyelenggaraan pariwisata olahraga berdasarkan Perda Keolahragaan Provinsi Bali dan menganalisis sanksi pidana atas tidak dikantonginya rekomendasi pemerintah daerah oleh penyelenggara. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan Perda Keolahragaan Provinsi Bali penyelenggaraan pariwisata olahraga wajib mendapatkan rekomendasi dari pemerintah daerah sebagaimana Pasal 14 ayat (2) Perda Keolahragaan Provinsi Bali. Namun ketentuan perundang-undangan yang lebih tinggi terkait dengan keolahragaan, yakni UU SKN tidak mengatur demikian. UU SKN yang merupakan acuan dari penyelenggaraan keolahragaan hanya mewajibkan adanya rekomendasi dari induk cabang olahraga yang bersangkutan sebagaimana Pasal 51 ayat (2). Adapun ketentuan pidana sebagaimana Pasal 65 ayat (1) Perda Keolahragaan Provinsi Bali bagi penyelenggara yang tidak mengantongi rekomendasi dari pemerintah daerah tidaklah relevan dan terkesan berlebihan mengingat rekomendasi adalah sebuah syarat administrasi dari sebuah penyelenggaraan kegiatan, maka akan lebih relevan jika dikenakan sanksi administratif daripada sanksi pidana. Dalam hal itu terjadi, maka akan mengacu pada ketentuan UU SKN maupun aturan pelaksanaannya.

scholarly journals Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Pidana terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Pemberatan yang Dilakukan oleh Anak

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-213
Author(s):  
Ida Bagus Agung Pariama Manuaba ◽  
I Nyoman Sujana ◽  
Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Criminal Sanctions

Judge's considerations are matters which are the basis or are considered by the judge in deciding a crime case. Crime Theft is an act that is classified as a general crime in which a crime against the property of another person. Theft with weighting is a criminal act of theft which in its implementation is accompanied by certain elements so that it is more severe and threatened with higher penalties. Child is a person who is not yet eighteen (18) years old, including those who are still in the womb. In settling a child case, the judge must consider the report in the trial regarding the child concerned. This study aims to determine the criminal considerations and sanctions imposed by the judge on criminal theft with weighting carried out by children. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach. The legal materials studied are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The results of this study indicate the judge's judgment in imposing a crime against a child who commits a crime of theft by weighting it based on the elements of the crime committed as well as things that alleviate and incriminate the crime against the child. Criminal sanctions imposed by a judge against a child who commits an act of theft by weighting based on the Court's Decision and the provisions of Article 363 paragraph (1) of the 4th KtoP Jungto Article 65 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and other laws relating to the case state that the child is proven legally and convincingly guilty as well as convicting a child of seven months in prison.

scholarly journals The Employment Cluster of Omnibus Law: Embodiment the Concept of Nachtwakerstaat or Welfarestate?

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-118
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Gede Duwira Hadi Santosa ◽  
Kadek Agus Sudiarawan ◽  
I Made Marta Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Job Creation ◽  
Concept Analysis ◽  
The State ◽  
Analysis Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Labour Law ◽  
Legal Concept ◽  
The Government

The presence of the omnibus law of the Employment Cluster of Job Creation Law haven’t consider to solve the crucial problems in the Manpower Law, but its further away from the purpose of the welfarestate concept  and leads to the purpose of the nachtwakerstaat. The aims of this research to determine position omnibus law of the Job Creation Law after it’s passed within in the scope of welfarestate concept or nachtwakerstaat concept and to analyse the construction of labour law concept in accordance to concept of welfarestate in the future. This research used a normative legal research method with a statute approach and elaborated with a legal concept analysis approach. The results show there are crucial problems in the Employment Cluster of the Job Creation Law such as the elimination of several principal provisions in Manpower Law that indicates the role and presence of the state in labour law is getting minimum and also the Job Creation Law point out many things that returned the agreement mechanism by the parties. This show that, Employment Cluster of the Job Creation Law tends to the nachtwakerstaat concept and far away from welfarestaat concept. The solutions of the issues by doingrevision to the Employment Chapter of the Job Creation Law by adjusted the welfarestate concept, alsorestore and strengthen the function of the government as a part of industrial relations as a regulator and supervisor

scholarly journals Pengaturan Pengawasan Peraturan Daerah oleh Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 539
Author(s):  
I Putu Indra Prasetya Wiguna ◽  
Ni Luh Gede Astariyani
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Concept Analysis ◽  
Analysis Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Concept ◽  
Historical Approach ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
Legal Uncertainty

Supervision of regional regulations is a new authority possessed by the Regional Representative Council. The purpose of writing this article is to examine the implications of regional regulation oversight arrangements by the Regional Representative Council. This article uses a normative legal research method with a statue approach, a legal concept analysis approach, and a historical approach. The results of the study show that the implications of regional regulation oversight by the Regional Representative Council as Article 249 paragraph (1), letter j, Law number 2 of 2018, namely: cause legal uncertainty due to unclear regulation; raises legal problems if related to article 31 of Law number 3 of 2009, article 245 of Law number 9 of 2015, articles 15 and 16 of Law number 6 of 2014; and raises the problem of constitutionality. Pengawasan terhadap peraturan daerah merupakan wewenang baru yang dimiliki oleh Dewan Perwakilan Daerah. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji implikasi pengaturan  pengawasan peraturan daerah oleh Dewan  Perwakilan  Daerah. Artikel ini memakai metode penelitian hukum normative sebagai jenis penelitian, yang dikaji melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan,  analisis konsep hukum, dan juga sejarah. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa Implikasi pengaturan pengawasan peraturan daerah oleh Dewan Perwakilan Daerah sebagaimana tertuang pada  Pasal 249 ayat (1), huruf j, Undang-Undang nomor 2 tahun 2018, yakni: menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum karena pengaturannya yang tidak jelas; menimbulkan masalah hukum apabila dikaitkan dengan pasal 31 Undang-Undang nomor 3 tahun 2009, pasal 245 Undang-Undang nomor 9 tahun2015,  pasal  15 dan 16 undang-undang no. 6 tahun 2014; serta menimbulkan problem konstitusionalitas.

scholarly journals ZAKAT MANAGEMENT POST OF BIRTH UU NO. 23 OF 2011 CONCERNING MANAGEMENT OF ZAKAT

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-66
Author(s):  
Rahmadi Indra Tektona ◽  
Ikarini Dani Widiyanti ◽  
Tiya Ningrum Rahayu
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Community Organizations ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Planning Implementation ◽  
The Government

Management of zakat after birth No. 23 of 2011, zakat management is the planning, implementation, and supervision of the collection and distribution and utilization of zakat. The purpose of this study is to find out and understand the substantial differences in the management of zakat in Law No.38 of 1999 with Law no. 23 of 2011. The research method used is the type of juridical normative research (legal research). The results of this study there are some differences in the previous and present laws, namely the naming change, the abolition of BAZDA to BAZNAS and formed directly by the minister, the former Amil Zakat Institute formed by the community now formed by Islamic community organizations and its arrangements are increasingly complex, the Government now has the highest position in managing zakat compared to the community and only people who have permission to manage zakat. There are administrative and criminal sanctions.

scholarly journals Penegakan Hukum terhadap Penyalahgunaan Tindak Pidana Narkotika

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 286-290
Author(s):  
I Gede Darmawan Ardika ◽  
I Nyoman Sujana ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Drug Abuse ◽  
External Factors ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Track System ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
Legal Arguments ◽  
Internal And External Factors ◽  
Double Track

Drug abuse from year to year has always been increasing, not only in adults but also among adolescents and children. The cause of this abuse consists of two factors, namely internal and external factors. With these problems, this study aims to determine the regulation of criminal sanctions against narcotics abuse and to find out the application of criminal sanctions against narcotics abuse. This research uses the normative method. Sources of data used are sources of secondary legal materials obtained through document, and analysis of legal materials using legal arguments. The results of the study show that the sanctions against narcotics abuse are regulated in Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics Articles 111 to 148. Then, criminal sanctions against narcotics abuse are in the form of imprisonment and fines. The criminal system against narcotics abusers uses a double track system, namely implementing criminal sanctions and sanctions for action at once

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document