THE POSITION OF QANUN 6 OF 2014 ON JINAYAT LAW TOWARD ACT 11 OF 2012 ON JUVENILE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM RELATED TO CHILD CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Rifqi Qowiyul Iman

This paper aims to describe the differences and the position of the legal rules for juvenile crimes between Qanun 6 of 2014 and Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System.  This research is descriptive qualitative research. The results show that Qanun Number 6 of 2014 also regulates criminal sanctions for children, which are normatively regulated in Law Number 11 of 2012. In addition, Qanun, as Aceh Islamic criminal law legalizes canning punishment for children, as well as the double-track system adopted by The Law of Juvenile Criminal Justice System is not explicitly accommodated in Qanun. Qanun at the level of a Regional Regulation is part of the hierarchy of laws and regulations that should be in line with what generally applies at the national level. Law Number 11 of 2006 is being the basis of the authority to make Qanun, as long as there is no court decision invalidates it, Qanun Number 6 of 2014, which is a derivative of Law Number 11 of 2006, can be declared as "lex specialis" of The Juvenile Criminal Justice System law which regulates child crime. However, it does not rule out the possibility that in the future, the judicial review of the article can be conducted.

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-190
Author(s):  
Saut Parulian Manurung

AbstractIn this study aims to determine the legal phenomena that arise as a result of the criminal justice system, as a reflection of the development of criminal law both at the theoretical and practical level. The findings in this research are based on two approaches namely the statute approach as an approach based on the rule of law and the conceptual approach based on the conceptual approach. There are 3 (three) findings of legal phenomena in this study, namely: first, the presence of a double track system in the criminal mechanism in Indonesia. Secondly, there is a phenomenon of paradigm shifting the character of punishment in Indonesia and third, re-measuring restorative justice in the form of diversion mechanism based on the perspective of utilitarianism. In principle, crime is always closely related to criminal sanctions, but in the double track criminal system is directed at criminal actions. On the other hand, the phenomenon of paradigm shift in the character of punishment occurs in the juvenile justice system, namely the approach to criminal responsibility is done by bargaining an agreement between the perpetrators, victims and community involvement. Furthermore, measuring restorative justice based on a utility perspective, this finding found coherence between restorative justice in the form of diversion and utilitarianism. Therefore, the overall legal phenomena above are some manifestations of the legal reality that is present in the criminal system in Indonesia.Keywords: criminal paradigm shift; double track system; utilitarianismAbstrakPada penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui fenomena-fenomena hukum yang timbul akibat dari sistem peradilan pidana, sebagai suatu refleksi atas perkembangan hukum pidana baik pada tataran teoritis maupun praktik. Penemuan dalam penelitian didasari dengan dua pendekatan yaitu statute approach sebagai suatu pendekatan berdasarkan peraturan undang-undang dan conceptual approach yang didasari dengan pendekatan koseptual. Terdapat 3 (tiga) temuan fenomena hukum dalam penelitian ini yaitu: pertama, hadirnya double track system dalam mekanisme pemidanaan di Indonesia. Kedua, adanya fenomena pergeseran paradigma karakter pemidanaan di Indonesia dan ketiga, menakar kembali keadilan restoratif dalam bentuk mekanisme diversi berdasarkan perspektif utilitarianisme. Pada prinsipnya kejahatan tindak pidana selalu erat hubungannya dengan pidana sanksi namun dalam double track system pemidanaan diarahkan pada pidana tindakan. Di sisi lain, fenomena pergeseran paradigma karakter pemidanaan terjadi pada sistem peradilan pidana anak, yaitu pendekatan pertanggungjawaban pidana dilakukkan dengan cara bargaining kesepakatan antara pelaku, korban dan keterlibatan masyarakat. Selanjutnya menakar keadilan restoratif berdasarkan perspektif utilitis, dalam temuan ini ditemukan koherensi antara keadilan restoratif dalam bentuk diversi dengan aliran utilitarianisme. Oleh karena itu, keseluruhan fenomena-fenomena hukum tersebut diatas merupakan beberapa wujud kenyataan hukum yang hadir di sistem pidana di Indonesia.Kata kunci: double track system, pergeseran paradigma pidana, utilitarianisme


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 165
Author(s):  
Rafika Nur ◽  
Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar

In the children criminal justice system in Indonesia, there are two systems of sanctions namely criminal sanctions and sanctions actions. A child who commits a criminal offense may be subject to criminal sanctions or sanctions. Imposing sanctions for children becomes something oriented towards coaching and protecting children. However, the imposition of sanctions for children can not be effective because of conflicting legal rules, law enforcement officials who have different paradigms in guarding the legal process against children, facilities and infrastructure that are incomplete and inadequate, making it difficult to enforce sanctions on children as well as the poor stigmatization of society against children in conflict with the law.


2015 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rusmilawati Windari ◽  
Ermania Widjajanti

In light of the various legal responses addressing juvenile offenders, the purpose of this article is to review the formulation of a new sentencing system in Indonesia, regulated by the Juvenile Criminal Justice Act 2012 (JCSA 2012) through the examination of the integration of the equilibrium idea of the double track system in JCJSA 2012. The paper uses normative studies, relevant legislation, as well as the concept of sentencing and the double track system to analyse interrelated issues. All data was analysed in order to gain insight and comprehension of the double track system formulated in a legislation. The results indicate that the sentencing system for juvenile offenders in Indonesia is designed to give priority to divertive, restorative and rehabilitative measures than punitive ones. As a reflection of equilibrium idea, the concept of double track system is still partially reflected in JCJSA 2012. Although the equitable position of sentencing is reflected by categorising various types of sentences and treatment, the functions of both remain unclear and overlap one another. Thus, both sentence and treatment may be executed carelessly and the administration of both may not be geared towards the determined goals. In order to prevent crimes, the effectiveness of the double track system greatly depends on the appropriateness of formulating the equilibrium idea through legislation. The analysis of the double track system is worthy for the policy maker to evaluate the existing legislation and to suggest possibilities for law reform.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
Mansour Rahmdel

<em>Normally, the right to compensation refers to the victim’s compensation. The legislator also typically refers to the right to it, as the Iranian Criminal Procedure Code has done so in articles 14 and 15. But the present paper, refers not to the victim’s, but the accused right. The Criminal Procedure Code of 1912 and 1999 referred to the possibility of compensating the accused by the iniquitous private complainant. However, none of them referred to the government’s obligation to compensate to the innocent accused. In contrast, the Penal Code of 2014 stipulates the government’s obligation to compensate the defendant for damages, but does not rule out the possibility of compensation by iniquitous complainant. Certainly, it does not exempt the complainant to compensation. Reaffirming the responsibility of the government to offset the losses of innocent accused, in line with international conventions, is one of the highlights of the new code. But the lack of compensation for unjustified detention is one of the gaps in the new code. This paper proposes that the Iranian new code of criminal procedure, serves as a development in respecting the accused right in creating comprehensive compensation schemes.</em>


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-62
Author(s):  
Agatha Jumiati

The development of law in Indonesia is carried out based on the noble values contained in the precepts of Pancasila. These noble values are actually an inseparable part of transcendental values. Transcendental thought is an alternative to answer the failure of the positivistic view in solving legal problems in society. Regarding the implementation of juvenile criminal sanctions which commit criminal acts as regulated by Law number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, it turns out that in its regulation it has implemented transcendental values by placing child as noble creatures created by God who must always be guided and protected even though they have been or have committed a mistake or crime. Regulations on diversion, restorative justice, strengthening the role of the correctional center and the types of crimes that are humane are evidence that the implementation of juvenile criminal sanctions in Indonesia has contained transcendental values. Keywords: Implementation of Sanctions, Transcendental, Juvenile Crime 


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 252-260
Author(s):  
Eko Iswahyudi ◽  
◽  
I. Nyoman Nurjaya ◽  
Nurini Aprilianda ◽  
Bambang Sugiri ◽  
...  

In the Act No. 11 of 2012 about the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, it explains the age limit for juvenile criminal responsibility for those who commit criminal acts, as regulated in Article 1 point 3. The children between 12 (twelve) years old and 18 (eighteen) years old are suspected of committing a crime. The purpose of this study was to analyze the construction of the regulation of children under the age of 12 in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2021 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. This type of normative legal research uses a statute approach and a case approach through a literature study. The results of the research on the Construction of Regulations for Children under the Age of 12 in Act Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System as Children in Conflict with the Law. There is a need for additional rules or amendments to the provisions of criminal sanctions for children, where criminal sanctions will be given to children aged at least 10 years, where these rules consist of basic criminal sanctions, such as community service or supervision, job training, coaching in institutions. This sanction is carried out by considering the rights of children as perpetrators, children as victims and children as witnesses who are underage, without eliminating the implementation of applicable legal obligations.


Cepalo ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-120
Author(s):  
Mashuril Anwar

Criminal sanctions are more popular than action sanctions at the application level. Action sanctions formulation is regulated in Articles 82 and 83 of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law, while criminal sanctions are the last resort. However, criminal sanctions are still the "prima donna" in law enforcement practices against children in conflict. This condition raises various problems such as the overcapacity of correctional institutions, burdens the state budget, and creates a stigma against children in conflict with the law. Because the purpose of implementing the juvenile criminal justice system is in the child's best interests, action sanctions should be prioritised, even though criminal sanctions are needed in law enforcement against children in conflict with the law. Therefore, an idea emerged to restore criminal sanctions as ultimum remedium and strengthen action sanctions as primum remedium. The problem discussed in this study is how to implement primum remedium action sanctions against children in conflict with the law? And how to strengthen primum remedium action sanctions against children in conflict with the law? This study uses a normative juridical, an empirical juridical, and a comparative methods. The data in this article are sourced from primary and secondary data processed through description, prescription, and system. The results indicate that criminal sanctions still dominate judges' decisions in children in conflict with the law, and action sanctions are complementary sanctions because it is rarely applied.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2S9) ◽  
pp. 1011-1015

This study aims to look at the imposition of sanctions that govern Pancasila for juvenille deliquency. This study uses a historical approach on the grounds that there are changes and developments in the meaning and purpose of punishment from a view that was originally oriented towards traditional retributive views that saw criminal sanctions as punitive towards a more human or humanist conception of punishment by emphasizing the element of corrective action. crimes, namely children and a comparative juridical approach that is focused on the formulation of alternatives to child criminal sanctions in several KUHPs of foreign countries. The results showed that the strategy of developing sanctions against children who committed crimes had been carried out through the enactment of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System three principles of punishment recognized in UUSPPA, namely the principle of criminal responsibility, the principle of the best interes of the child and the ultimum principle remidium. The three principles of punishment are also the basis of the formation of UUSPPA so that two punitive conditions apply for children in conflict with the law, namely the terms of absolute punishment and the conditions for relative punishment. The imposition of sanctions that affect the Pancasila for children who commit criminal acts in the form of verbal sanctions is considered more humanistic because with children's verbal sanctions avoid negative stigma that can affect the future of the child.


2021 ◽  
pp. 169-184
Author(s):  
Snežana Soković ◽  

The juvenile nature of the criminal offence perpetrator, due to its psychophysical characteristics, makes the phase of execution of criminal sanctions additionally delicate and very important and implies a system of execution based on special principles and special organization. The aim of this paper is to analyze the activities of the competent guardianship authorities, both in the phase of issuing educational orders and educational measures, and in the phase of their execution. The paper emphasizes that the realization of the "internal dynamics" of the system of educational measures, from the choice of a concrete measure to its suppression, with all intermediate modalities of cumulation, replacement and adjustment to changed execution conditions or achieved success, is made possible to the competent court through the cooperation with guardianship authorities. It is precisely in the field of application of educational measures, as the basic type of criminal sanctions for juvenile offenders, that the exceptional connection of the juvenile criminal justice system with the social protection system is most clearly seen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document