scholarly journals KARAKTERISTIK PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN KORPORASI PADA TINDAK PIDANA PERUSAKAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DI INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1717
Author(s):  
Ni Kadek Eny Wulandari Putri ◽  
Kadek Agus Sudiarawan

Tujuan yang ingin dicapai dalam penelitian hukum ini adalah untuk mengetahui korporasi ketika menjadi subyek hukum pidana dalam Undang- Undang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup serta untuk mengetahui pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi terhadap perusakan lingkungan hidup yang disebabkan oleh pembuangan limbah produksi ke sungai. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan jurnal ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang- undangan. Penulisan jurnal ini menggunakan dengan cara mengkaji dari bahan hukum primer yakni peruu serta bahan hukum sekunder yaitu doktrin atau teori yang didapatkan dari literatur hukum dan penelitian ilmiah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan karakteristik korporasi sebagai subyek hukum pidana adalah di dirikan oleh perorangan, memiliki kekayaan sendiri terpisah dengan kekayaan yang mendirikan maupun pengurusnya, memiliki hak dan kewajiban disamping hak dan kewajiban pendiri dan pengurusnya. Bentuk dari pertanggungjawaban korporasi jika terbukti melanggar izin lingkungan dengan membuang limbah ke sungai akan dikenakan sanksi berupa sanksi administratif paksaan pemerintah, dibekukannya izin lingkungan atau dicabutnya izin lingkungan sesuai pasal 76 Undang- Undang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. The objective to be achieved in this legal research is to identify corporations when they become criminal law subject in Environmental Preservation and Management Constitution as well as to know corporate criminal liability for environmental destruction caused by disposal of production waste into rivers.  The method used in writing this journal is a normative legal research method using a statutory approach. The writing of this journal uses primary legal materials, namely peruu and secondary legal materials, namely doctrines or theories obtained from legal literature and scientific research. The results show that the characteristics of a corporation as a subject of criminal law are that it is established by individuals, has its own separate assets from the assets of the founder and management, has rights and obligations in addition to the rights and obligations of its founders and managers. The form of corporate responsibility if proven to have violated environmental permits by dumping waste into the river will be subject to sanctions in the form of administrative sanctions imposed by the government, freezing of environmental permits or revocation of environmental permits in accordance with Article 76 Environmental Preservation and Management Constitution.

Lentera Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Ayu Izza Elvany

This paper analyzes how formulation policy of lobster seeds smuggling regulated in Indonesian law to optimize the effectiveness of illegal fishing enforcement, considering penal policy is the basis of criminal law operationalization. This research uses both statute approach and conceptual approach as legal research methods to analyze the issued legal problem. Fishery law in Indonesia regulated in Law No. 45 of 2009 amending Law No. 31 of 2004 concerning Fishery, especially Articles 88 and 16 paragraph (1) which cover the formulation policy of lobster seeds smuggling enforcement. This study will be analyzed into three aspects which are the conduct (the criminal offense), criminal liability, and sentencing system. The result shows that law enforcement regarding the smuggling of lobster seeds in Indonesia is ineffective due to the nonexistence of corporate criminal liability in the fishery law and its sentencing system is lack of both the specific minimum penalty regulation and the penal measures as criminal punishment. However, the draft of the fishery law has already set corporate criminal liability; hence it also regulates the penal measures, in the form of secondary sanctions. Nevertheless, instead of enacting the specific minimum penalty, the draft only determined the maximum penalty as well. Keywords: Formulation Policy, Fishery Law, Lobster Seeds Smuggling.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 997-1021
Author(s):  
Ryan Long

This article provides a brief introduction to some contemporary challenges found in the intersection of bioethics and international criminal law involving genetic privacy, organ trafficking, genetic engineering, and cloning. These challenges push us to re-evaluate the question of whether the international criminal law should hold corporations criminally liable. I argue that a minimalist and Strawsonian conception of corporate responsibility could be useful for deterring the wrongs outlined in first few sections and in answering compelling objections to corporate criminal liability.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 500-504
Author(s):  
I Dewa Gede Pramana adhi ◽  
I Nnyoman Gede Sugiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara

Indonesia is a developing country where each region has its own natural wealth. This advantage cannot be used because there are many people who send out of the region without permission and vice versa, goods from outside countries are smuggled into Indonesia only to avoid the applicable taxes. This study aims to examine the regulation of smuggling in criminal law in Indonesia and reveal the responsibility of the director of PT. Garuda Indonesia, which carried out the act of smuggling luxury motorcycles. This research is a type of normative legal research conducted with research methods based on legal materials, while the problem approach used is a legislative and conceptual approach. Sources of data used are primary and secondary legal materials. Another bad example is shown by one of the people who has a big name in Indonesia, the smuggling case by the president of Garuda Indonesia is an illustration of how weak the law in Indonesia is and this incident has resulted in criminal and administrative sanctions. The results of the study indicate that the regulation of smuggling crimes in Indonesia is contained in Law Number 17 of 2006 concerning Customs. Handling of violations of customs provisions is more focused on the fiscal settlement, namely in the form of payment of a sum of money to the State in the form of a fine. The criminal liability of smugglers is regulated in Law No. 17 of 2006 the president director of PT. Garuda Indonesia is threatened with criminal and administrative sanctions


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 385-407
Author(s):  
Renata Amalia

Abstract: This article highlights a corporate responsibility in the crime of money laundering in accordance with Islamic law. Corporate criminal liability set forth in article 6 of Law No. 8 of 2010 which states that in the case of money laundering as defined in Article 3, Article 4 and Article 5 committed by a corporation, crime laid against and/or personnel controlling corporation. Islamic law also recognize the existence of the legal entity or corporation. This is evidenced by the jurists who introduced treasury as the legal agency. It has rights and can take legal action but can not be burdened with responsibility because they do not have the knowledge and choice. So that if a legal agency has committed a crime then a person who should be accountable are administrators or managers of the legal agency. But there are also penalties for legal entities, such as the punishment of dissolution, destruction, eviction and foreclosure.Keywords: Corporate, money laundering, Islamic criminal law. Abstrak: Artikel ini membahas tentang pertanggungjawaban korporasi dalam tindak pidana pencucian uang menurut hukum Islam. Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi diatur dalam pasal 6 UU No. 8 tahun 2010 yang menyebutkan bahwa dalam hal tindak pidana pencucian uang sebagaimana dimaksud dalam pasal 3, pasal 4, dan pasal 5 dilakukan oleh korporasi, pidana dijatuhkan terhadap dan/atau personil pengendali korporasi. Hukum Islam juga mengenal adanya badan hukum atau korporasi, hal ini dibuktikan dengan para fuqaha yang mengenalkan baitul mal (perbendaharaan negara) sebagai badan hukum. Badan hukum ini mempunyai hak dan dapat melakukan tindakan hukum tetapi tidak dapat dibebani pertanggungjawaban karena tidak memiliki pengetahuan dan pilihan. Sehingga apabila badan hukum melakukan suatu tindak pidana maka yang dapat dimintakan pertanggungjawaban adalah pengurus atau pengelola badan hukum tersebut, tetapi ada pula hukuman bagi badan hukum, seperti hukuman pembubaran, penghancuran, penggusuran dan penyitaan.Kata Kunci: Korporasi, pencucian uang, hukum pidana Islam


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 156
Author(s):  
H Radea Respati PARAMUDHITA ◽  
H. Sigid SUSENO ◽  
Lies SULISTIANI

This research aims to analyze: (1) the corporate liability as a law subject in terms of human trafficking criminal act; and (2) the concept of restitution application as a form of corporate criminal liability in the case of law enforcement towards human trafficking criminal act. This research is categorized as normative legal research through the statue and conceptual approaches. The result of the research found that: (1) in terms of criminal law, both seen from the Law of Human Trafficking or theories of corporate liability, corporate is one of law subject in terms of human trafficking criminal act whose liability can be asked regarding human trafficking criminal act. The corporate liability which conducts human trafficking criminal act can be determined through the fulfillment of general criminal liability terms (subjective terms) including the presence of liability, the presence of guilt both intentionally and negligence, and the absence of reasons to omit the criminal law. The form of liability of corporate criminal in terms of human trafficking criminal act can be decided precisely using vicarious liability; and (2) restitution application concept, as a form of corporate criminal liability in law enforcement towards the human trafficking criminal act so that justice principle, legal certainty and benefit for the victim of human trafficking. Therefore, the concept offered is first, fulfillment of material rights. Second, the availability of legal protection accompanied with its implementing which is a very urgent matter. Third, the availability of structure (in the form of institution/entity) and infrastructure is an essential thing in process managing, deciding and executing the human trafficking criminal act.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wawan Septiawan ◽  
Abdul Patah Muzakir ◽  
Yudi Permana Saputra ◽  
Abdul Muflihun

The purposes of this research are to know the decisionpublic policy by the government-related corporate responsibility in Indonesia’s Criminal Law, to know the corporate responsibility special laws in Indonesia, and also the mechanism to find out the corporate’s fault. The applied method in this research is normative-legal research. From the research result, it can be concluded that the Government of the Republic of Indonesia has to determine the latest version of Indonesia’s Criminal Law or revised several laws related to corporate criminal responsibility. In Indonesia’s Criminal Law, corporate criminal responsibility is not recognized, but the corporate responsibility is dispersed in special laws such as Law on Economy Crimes and Consumer Protection. To determined the corporate fault was taken from the manager or member of Board of Directors.


Lentera Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Fitriani Rahmadia

In Indonesia, the development of the corporation as the subject to criminal acts takes place outside the Criminal Code, regulated in special legislation. While the Criminal Code itself still adheres to the subject of criminal acts in the form of people, the corporation (juridical person) appears as a subject that can commit a crime and should also be accountable in criminal law. However, this condition has not been realized concretely in our Criminal Code. The formulation policy regarding corporate criminal liability for victims of corporate crime that exists or is currently in force has not been able to realize the corporate criminal liability. Although there are sanctions that can be imposed on corporations, most of these provisions only protect potential victims and are not responsible for actual or real victims. In other words, the current formulation policy has not been able to ensnare and impose criminal sanctions on corporations who commit crimes, especially criminal sanctions which are oriented to the fulfillment or restoration of victims' rights in the form of compensation payments after the crime. This paper will discuss the position and the responsibility of the corporation as a subject of criminal law in Indonesia and analyze policy formulation of the Criminal Code and the draft of the Criminal Code that related to corporate responsibility as a legal subject. Keywords: Corporate Criminal Responsibilities, Criminal Law, Corporate Responsibility.


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Michelle Kristina

The development of human life nowadays cannot be separated from various aspects such as economy, politics, and technology, including the impact of the coronavirus outbreak (Covid-19 or SARS-CoV-2) which emerged at the end of 2019. Responding to this Covid-19 pandemic outbreak In Indonesia, the government has issued various policies as measures to prevent and handle the spread of Covid-19. One of these policies is to limit community activities. These restrictions have implications for the fulfilment of the economic needs of the affected communities. Responding to the urgency of this community's economic situation, the government held a social assistance program as a measure to ease the community's economic burden. However, the procurement of the program was used as a chance for corruption involving the Ministry of Social Affairs and corporations as the winning bidders. This study uses a qualitative methodology with a normative juridical approach and literature. The approach is carried out by conducting a juridical analysis based on a case approach. The results of the study show that the corporations involved cannot be separated from corporate responsibility. However, the criminal liability process against the corporation is deemed not to reflect justice for the current situation of Indonesia is experiencing. The crime was not carried out in a normal situation but in a situation when Indonesia was trying hard to overcome the urgent situation, the Covid-19 pandemic. Corporate crimes committed by taking advantage of the pandemic situation are deemed necessary to prioritize special action or the weight of criminal acts committed by corporations. The weighting of criminal sanction is the right step as a law enforcement process for corporate crimes during the pandemic.


Lentera Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jazau Elvi Hasani

Indonesia has various natural resources, including a diversity of natural and biological wealth. Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution outlines that the state should control natural resources for national prosperity. Biological natural resources can appropriately situate with the conservation effort and the government plays a vital role in maintaining biological natural resources and ecosystems. The development of biological natural resources and ecosystems is essentially an integral part of sustainable national development, and efforts to conserve biological natural resources and their ecosystems are realized by analyzing and evaluating the existing legislation. This paper aims to discuss the corporate criminal liability in Indonesia in the case of the conservation of biological natural resources and ecosystems. Then, it suggests the possible revisions regarding the biological national resources legislations. Revision of the Act on the conservation of biological natural resources has started since 2018 as it is prioritized under the national legislation program. As the revision put the crucial part of the legal creation, the protection of biological natural resources and their ecosystem becomes the government's primary concern because the existing regulation still has no deterrent effect for violators. KEYWORDS: Corporate Criminal Liabilities, Biological Natural Resources and Ecosystems, Criminal Provisions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-154
Author(s):  
Muchammad Chasani

The regulation of corporate criminal liability in Indonesia's criminal justice system is basically a new and still debatable issue. It is said that because in the Criminal Code is not recognized and regulated explicitly about the corporation as a subject of criminal law. This is a natural thing since the WvS Criminal Code still adheres to the principle of "societas delinquere non potest" or "non-potest university delinquere", that is, a legal entity can not commit a crime. Thus, if in a society there is a criminal offense, then the criminal act is deemed to be done by the board of the corporation concerned. Regarding the corporate criminal responsibility system in Indonesia, in the corruption law Article 20 paragraph (1), if the corporation committed a criminal act of corruption, then those responsible for the criminal act shall be the corporation only, the management only, or the corporation and its management. Thus, it can be said that the regulation of corporate criminal liability in the legal system in Indonesia is expressly only regulated in special criminal legislation, because the Criminal Code of WvS still adheres to the principle of "societas delinquere nonpotest" so it is not possible to enforce corporate criminal liability in it.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document