scholarly journals TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN KASUS PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN SOSIAL MEDIA INSTAGRAM DITINJAU DARI PASAL 310 AYAT (3) KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 120
Author(s):  
Danny Putera Christian ◽  
Dian Andriawan Daeng Tawang
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Cyber Crime ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Electronic Transactions

The regulation of defamation is stated in the Indonesia Criminal Code, specifically it’s stated on the article 310. However, the legal rules of defamation by using social media are specifically regulated in Undang-UndangNo.19 Year 2016 About the Amendment of Undang-Undang No.11 Year 2008 About Information And Electronic Transactions. In a thesis that written by the author, the author did an analysis of the actions that have been done by a defendant who deliberately perform an action that meets the element of offense in Article 27 Paragraph (3) of Undang-Undang No.19 Year 2016 on Amendment to Law No. 11 Year 2008 About Information And Electronic Transactions. The acts committed by the defendant shall not be subject to juridical sanctions, since the criminal law also applies the reasons for the criminal offense both for justification and for reasons of forgiveness. The act committed by the defendant in Decision No.1047 / Pid.Sus / PN.JKT.SEL was analyzed as justification because the defendant committed the act to defend himself, as regulated in Article 310 Paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code . The research method whichused by the author is normative research supported by conducting interviews to cyber crime experts.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Penghinaan Citra Tubuh (Body Shaming)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 537-541
Author(s):  
Ni Made Yeni Sukmawati ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Body Image ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Victim Protection

Body Shaming is a term that is currently trending, where criticizing or commenting on someone's physical in a negative way or with speech that intends to mock or insult someone's physical or appearance falls into this category. Legal protection for victims of body shaming needs to get very serious attention in order to deal with the phenomena that are currently happening on social media in particular. This study examines the regulation of the criminal act of insulting body image (body shaming) in terms of positive law and explains the legal protection provided to victims in the crime of insulting body image (body shaming). This study uses a normative research method by applying the legislation approach which refers to primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The regulation of criminal acts of insulting body image (body shaming) in terms of positive law in general can be seen from the element of humiliation which is regulated in Chapter XVI of the Criminal Code and is grouped into 6 parts, namely from article 310 to article 318 and besides that, there are also other legal rules that regulate it implicitly in Article 27 paragraph (3). Article 45 paragraph (3) of the ITE Law. With sanctions in the form of criminal sanctions. The form of legal protection given to victims in the crime of body shaming is the making of policies by the State regarding prohibitions and strict sanctions for violators such as criminal sanctions and fines, through the established witness and victim protection institution

scholarly journals PERKEMBANGAN KEJAHATAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI (CYBER CRIME) DAN ANTISIPASINYA DENGAN PENAL POLICY

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supanto ,
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Cyber Crime ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Policy Information ◽  
The Law ◽  
No Innovation

<p>Abstract<br />The research conducted to inventory of the various laws (the legislative products) relating to the regulating in the field of information technology crime, to identify its adjustment in globalization, to describe the conduct proscribed as a crime of the Information and Electronic Transaction, as well as reviewing the formulation of criminal sanctions. Studies based on the idea that regulation Law Number 11 of 2008 is aimed at setting the utilization of information technology, particularly the information and electronic transactions, in order to be implemented properly and maintain the safety and benefit of humanity. However, their use potentially criminal, which must be addressed, including the use of criminal law, therefore there is a provision in the law of criminal sanctions, in this case defined the prohibited acts and penalties specified criminal, offense. Conclusions obtained, In line with an information technology and The Law of Infromation and Transaction of electronic (The Law No. 11 of 2008/UU ITE), inventoried some legislation which can be understood as an attempt arrangement of information technology, especially as a crime, as in the Criminal Code (KUHP), the Law on Telecommunications, the Law on Copyright / patent, the law of terrorism . The adjustment of The Law Number 11 of 2008 on the Information and Electronic Transactions with global regulation and a comparative assessment of the demands that must be met in order to harmony especially on the cyber crime law. In addition, the formulation of a threatened criminal sanctions in offenses under the Act remain as types of criminal sanctions prescribed in the Penal Code,<br />which is a kind of imprisonment sanction fines and criminal sanctions, but not formulated an additional  criminal sanction. Therefore, its system is no innovation typical types of criminal sanctions for offenses in the field of information and electronic transactions.<br /><em>Keywords: Cyber crime, criminal policy,information technology</em></p><p><br />Abstrak<br />Penelitian yang dilakukan bertujuan untuk menginventarisasi berbagai undang-undang (produk legislatif) yang berkaitan dengan bidang kejahatan teknologi informasi, untuk mengidentifikasi penyesuaian dalam era globalisasi, untuk menggambarkan perilaku terlarang sebagai kejahatan Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik , serta meninjau perumusan sanksi pidana. Studi didasarkan pada gagasan bahwa UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 bertujuan untuk pengaturan pemanfaatan teknologi informasi, khususnya informasi dan transaksi elektronik, agar dapat dilaksanakan dengan baik dan menjaga keamanan dan kepentingan kemanusiaan, namun penggunaannya berpotensi pidana, termasuk penggunaan hukum pidana, karena ada ketentuan dalam hukum sanksi pidana, dalam hal ini didefinisikan tindakan yang dilarang dan hukuman yang ditentukan pidana. Kesimpulan yang diperoleh, Perlu penyesuaian UU Nomor 11 Tahun</p><p>2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dengan regulasi bersifat global dan penilaian komparatif dari tuntutan yang harus dipenuhi untuk keharmonisan terutama pada hukum kejahatan cyber. Dalam UU ITE, terhadap perbuatan yang dilarang diancam sanksi pidana. Adapun jenis sanksi pidananya adalah sanksi pidana penjara dan sanksi pidana denda. Jenis sanksi ini sudah dikenal dalam Pasal 10 KUHP,   dan tidak ditentukan jenis pidana tambahan. Dengandemikian tidak ada pengembangan mengenai jenis pidana khusus yang ditujukan bagi pelaku tindak pidana di bidang informasi dan transaksi elektronik.<br /><em>Kata Kunci: Kejahatan Dunia Maya, Hukum Pidana,Teknologi Informasi</em></p>

scholarly journals PERKEMBANGAN KEJAHATAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI (CYBER CRIME) DAN ANTISIPASINYA DENGAN PENAL POLICY

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Supanto
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Cyber Crime ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Policy Information ◽  
The Law ◽  
No Innovation

<div class="WordSection1"><p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>Th</em><em>e research conducted to inventory of the various laws (the legislative products) relating to the regulating in the field of information technology crime, to identify  its adjustment   in globalization, to describe the conduct proscribed as a crime of the Information and Electronic Transaction, as well as reviewing the formulation of criminal sanctions. Studies based on the idea that regulation Law Number 11 of  2008 is aimed at setting the utilization of information technology, particularly the information and electronic transactions, in order to be implemented properly and maintain the safety and benefit of humanity. However, their use potentially criminal, which must be addressed, including the use of criminal law, therefore there is a provision in the law of criminal sanctions, in this case defined the prohibited acts and penalties specified criminal, offense. Conclusions obtained, In line with an information technology and The Law of Infromation and  Transaction  of electronic (The Law No. 11 of 2008/UU ITE), inventoried some legislation which can be understood as an attempt arrangement of information technology, especially as a crime, as in the Criminal Code (KUHP), the Law on Telecommunications, the Law on Copyright / patent, the law of terrorism . The adjustment of The Law Number 11 of 2008 on the Information and Electronic Transactions with global regulation and a comparative assessment of the demands that must be met in order to harmony especially on the cyber crime law. In addition, the formulation of a threatened criminal sanctions in offenses under the Act remain as types of criminal sanctions prescribed in the Penal Code, which is a kind of imprisonment sanction fines and criminal sanctions, but not formulated an additional criminal sanction. Therefore, its system is no innovation typical types of criminal sanctions for offenses in the field of information and electronic transactions.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em>Cyber crime, criminal policy,information technology</em></p><p> </p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Penelitian yang dilakukan bertujuan untuk menginventarisasi berbagai undang-undang (produk legislatif) yang berkaitan dengan bidang kejahatan teknologi informasi, untuk mengidentifikasi penyesuaian dalam era globalisasi, untuk menggambarkan perilaku terlarang sebagai kejahatan Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik , serta meninjau perumusan sanksi pidana. Studi didasarkan pada gagasan bahwa UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 bertujuan untuk pengaturan pemanfaatan teknologi informasi, khususnya informasi dan transaksi elektronik, agar dapat dilaksanakan dengan baik dan menjaga keamanan dan kepentingan kemanusiaan, namun penggunaannya berpotensi pidana, termasuk penggunaan hukum pidana, karena ada ketentuan dalam hukum sanksi pidana, dalam hal ini didefinisikan tindakan yang dilarang dan hukuman yang ditentukan pidana. Kesimpulan yang diperoleh, Perlu penyesuaian UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dengan regulasi bersifat global dan penilaian komparatif dari tuntutan yang harus dipenuhi untuk keharmonisan terutama pada hukum kejahatan <em>cyber</em>. Dalam UU ITE, terhadap perbuatan yang dilarang diancam sanksi pidana. Adapun jenis sanksi pidananya adalah sanksi pidana penjara dan sanksi pidana denda. Jenis sanksi ini sudah dikenal dalam Pasal 10 KUHP, dan tidak ditentukan jenis pidana tambahan. Dengan demikian tidak ada pengembangan mengenai jenis pidana khusus yang ditujukan bagi pelaku tindak pidana  di bidang informasi dan transaksi elektronik.</p><p><strong>Kata Kunci:  </strong>Kejahatan Dunia Maya<em>,  </em>Hukum Pidana<em>,</em>Teknologi Informasi</p></div>

scholarly journals Akibat Hukum Bagi Prajurit TNI Melakukan Tindak Pidana Desersi yang Diputus In Absentia dalam Praktek Pengadilan Militer Iii-14 Denpasar

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-127
Author(s):  
I WAYAN KUSUMA PURWANTA ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Research ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Military Service ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Legal Consequence ◽  
Army Soldiers ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Special Rules

  The Republic of Indonesia is a State based on Law. Every Indonesian citizen is obedient and submissive to the law including Indonesian National Army Soldiers (TNI). Soldiers of  the Indonesian National Army besides submitting to general legal rules such as the Criminal Code (KUHP) and also subject to special rules that only apply to soldiers of the Indonesian National Army namely the Criminal Law Code Military (KUHPM) and Military Disciplinary Law  (KUHDM). Discipline is  a  basic  milestone for  Indonesian National Army  Soldiers in carrying out their duties. If a Indonesian National Army Soldiers lacks discipline in his life order it can be the cause of a crime. Based on this matter the following issues will be discussed (1) What are the factors that cause Indonesian National Army Soldiers to commit a crime of desertion (2) What is the legal consequence of the In Absentia ruling for Indonesian National Army Soldiers who commit a crime of desertion. The method used is a juridical- empirical research method. The results of the study stated that due to the In absentia law a Indonesian National Army Soldiers committing a Desertion criminal act would remain on trial without the presence of the defendant and be sentenced to prison with additional punishment in the form of dismissal from military service.

scholarly journals KONSTRUKSI HUKUM DALAM PEMBUKTIAN TERHADAP KEJAHATAN MAYANTARA

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1202
Author(s):  
Ni Luh Ketut Dewi Yani Putri
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Cyber Crime ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Cyber Space

Tujuan penulisan ini untuk memenuhi dan melengkapi persyaratan untuk memperoleh gelar Magiter Ilmu Hukum pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana. Tujuan khusus dari penulisan ini yaitu untuk mengetahui pembuktian serta yurisdiksi kejahatan mayantara dalam persidangan dan konstruksi hukum dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan merupakan metode penelitian hukum normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Teknik yang digunakan melalui studi kepustakaan yang diperoleh langsung dari bahan hukum primer berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dan literatur hukum yang terkait. Hambatan proses pembuktian dan yurisdiksi cyber crime yakni belum diaturnya alat bukti elektronik secara sah dalam KUHAP, masih diperdebatkannya kesaksian de auditu, serta sulit menemukan saksi yang berkompeten dalam menyaksikan kegiatan cyber crime. Mengenai yurisdiksi dalam kegiatan cyber crime juga perlu diatur kembali mengingat sangatlah sukar untuk memastikan dimana kejadiannya, kapan dilakukannya dan bagaimana perbuatan pelakunya, mengingat kejahatan ini merupakan global crime yang tidak jelas yurisdiksinya di samping berkaitan dengan cyber space yang pelakunya tidak kasat mata. Adapun Kebijakan Terhadap Kejahatan Mayantara (Cyber Crime) yakni melalui  modernisasi hukum pidana adapun beberapa alternative seperti Menghilangkan beberapa pasal- pasal pada Undang- Undang Cyber Crime yang tidak dipakai lagi (usang), Mengamandemen KUHP, Mengamandemen KUHAP, Mengamandemen Undang-Undang Teknologi Informasi, Dalam Pembuktian cyber crime aparat penegak hukum terutama hakim harus berani melakukan “rechtsvinding”. The purpose of this writing is to fulfill and supplement the requirements for the Magiter degree of legal sciences at the Faculty of Law of Udayana University. The specific purpose of this writing is to know the evidence and the jurisdiction of crime between the law in the trial and the construction of laws in Indonesia's laws and regulations. The method used is a normative legal research method through a statutory approach and a concept approach. Techniques used through literature studies obtained directly from the primary legal material in the form of legislation and related legal literature. The barriers to the proving process of cyber crime and jurisdiction are not in the legitimate electronic proof tool in the criminal CODE, still in the testimony of De Auditu, and difficult to find witnesses who are competent in witnessing cyber crime activities. Regarding the jurisdiction in cyber crime activities also need to be rearranged considering that it is difficult to ensure where the event, when it does and how the perpetration, considering this crime is a global crime that is unclear its jurisdiction in addition to the cyber space that the perpetration of invisible eyes. The policy on Cyber Crime is through the modernization of criminal law as some alternative such as eliminating some of the articles on Cyber Crime laws that are not used anymore (obsolete), amend KUHP, amend KUHAP, amend the Information Technology law, in proving Cyber Crime law enforcement officials, especially the judges must dare to do "rechtsvinding".

scholarly journals Konsepsi Hukum Progresif dalam Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Efraim Mbomba Reda ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Role Models ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Positivism ◽  
Sociology Of Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Descriptive Method

Progressive law puts forward the sociology of law rather than legal certainty which is the focus of legal positivism. In Indonesia, this law was coined by Satjipto Rahardjo. This study aims to determine the formulation of progressive law in future criminal law, and to determine the actualization of the concept of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative legal research method with statute and conceptual approaches. The technique of collecting legal materials in this study is a descriptive method that aims to obtain the meaning of reality related to the problems to be discussed and solved in this study. The results show that in the current Criminal Code Bill, progressive law has been regulated, to be precise in Article 2 paragraph (1) and (2). Progressive law is also regulated in Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Then, the actualization of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia is a judge with the powers that take into account the sociological context of society in making decisions. Judges, prosecutors and lawyers can certainly discuss together in eradicating corruption. Efforts are also being made to reconstruct and redefine the power of law enforcement. This arrangement can also encourage the KPK to be more progressive in eradicating corruption, as well as building law enforcers who have morality so that they can become role models and increase public participation, for example by forming NGOs in preventing or fighting corruption in various agencies.

scholarly journals CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN INDONESIA ON THE PERSPECTIVE OF COMPARISON

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-154
Author(s):  
Muchammad Chasani
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Legislation ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability ◽  
Responsibility System

The regulation of corporate criminal liability in Indonesia's criminal justice system is basically a new and still debatable issue. It is said that because in the Criminal Code is not recognized and regulated explicitly about the corporation as a subject of criminal law. This is a natural thing since the WvS Criminal Code still adheres to the principle of "societas delinquere non potest" or "non-potest university delinquere", that is, a legal entity can not commit a crime. Thus, if in a society there is a criminal offense, then the criminal act is deemed to be done by the board of the corporation concerned. Regarding the corporate criminal responsibility system in Indonesia, in the corruption law Article 20 paragraph (1), if the corporation committed a criminal act of corruption, then those responsible for the criminal act shall be the corporation only, the management only, or the corporation and its management. Thus, it can be said that the regulation of corporate criminal liability in the legal system in Indonesia is expressly only regulated in special criminal legislation, because the Criminal Code of WvS still adheres to the principle of "societas delinquere nonpotest" so it is not possible to enforce corporate criminal liability in it.

scholarly journals The Criminal Enforcement Of The Fraud Mode Of Multiple Money (Case study Decision No.61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora)

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 237
Author(s):  
Sumaryono Sumaryono ◽  
Sri Kusriyah Kusriyah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public

Fraudulent criminal acts that have been regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) with various modes, one of which is fraud by shamans with a multiplied money mode has made law enforcers increasingly have to rack their brains to be able to prove it. This study aims to examine and analyze law enforcement by the judge in decision No.61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora with consideration of the criminal elements. The research method used is a sociological juridical approach. The specifications of the study were conducted using descriptive analytical methods. The data used for this study are primary and secondary data. The data consists of primary data and secondary data using field research methods, interviews, and literature studies. Based on the research it was concluded that the case ruling number 61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN Bla with a fraud case with shamanism practices in the mode of duplicating the judge's money considering that the Defendants have been indicted by the Public Prosecutor with alternative indictments, so the Panel of Judges paid attention to the facts The aforementioned law decides on the first alternative indictment as regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code Jo Article 55 paragraph (1) of the 1st Criminal Code by considering the elements of that article.Keywords: Criminal Law Enforcement; Fraud; Multiple Money.

scholarly journals Grounds and Conditions for the Application of Restrictive Measures Applied to Persons who have Committed Domestic Violence

2021 ◽  
pp. 100-110
Author(s):  
Tetiana NIKIFOROVA
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Restrictive Measure ◽  
The Law ◽  
Restrictive Measures ◽  
National Police

The grounds and conditions for the application of restrictive measures applied to persons, who have committed domestic violence, are provided in Art. 911 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. It is established that in the science of criminal law there is a unanimous position that the basis for the application of restrictive measures under Art. 911 of the Criminal Code is the commission by a person of a crime related to domestic violence, and the conditions are: 1) sentencing a person not related to imprisonment; 2) release of a person from criminal liability on the grounds provided by the Criminal Code; 3) release of a person from punishment on the grounds provided by the Criminal Code. These conditions are alternative. The content of the concept of «crime related to domestic violence» is analyzed and it is established that it should be understood more broadly than the act provided for in Art. 1261 of the Criminal Code «Domestic Violence». It is proposed to add to Art. 911 of the Criminal Code a note explaining the meaning of the term «criminal offense related to domestic violence», where it is necessary to note that this concept is broader than the crime under Art. 1261 of the Criminal Code. The content of each of the conditions of application of restrictive measures is analyzed. It has been established that in the application of restrictive measures during the imposition of non-custodial sentences in practice there are problems with the interpretation of the relevant concept. It is proposed to clarify the meaning of the concept of «punishment not related to imprisonment» in Art. 911 of the Criminal Code. It is also established that the application of restrictive measures in releasing a person from criminal liability is a declarative norm and is subject to exclusion from the conditions of application of restrictive measures due to the incompatibility of the latter with the nature of exemption from criminal liability. The legislation clearly regulates the procedure for applying restrictive measures to persons released from serving a probation sentence. A number of problems that arise during the control over the behaviour of persons to whom restrictive measures have been applied by the probation authorities have also been identified. The solution to these problems is possible by harmonizing the provisions of the Criminal Code and the Law of Ukraine «On Probation», as well as other regulations governing the activities of probation bodies. It is proposed to refer the application of restrictive measures to supervisory probation, which will lead to a number of changes to the articles of the Law of Ukraine «On Probation» in terms of regulation of supervisory probation, to refer to probation subjects persons subject to restrictive measures, and to exclude the fact that it is assigned to a person released from serving a probation sentence, and in the regulations governing the development and implementation of probation programs to provide for their application to persons to whom restrictive measures have been applied. It is concluded that the probation body should be endowed with a coordinating function to implement all restrictive measures and it is necessary at the level of bylaws to establish a clear procedure for interaction of the probation body with the National Police, local state administrations and local governments to control the behaviour of individuals, which the appropriate restrictive measure is applied.

scholarly journals Health-Related Activities in Turkish Football Law

2021 ◽  
pp. 247-258
Author(s):  
Yener Ünver ◽  
◽  
Jocelyne Alayan ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Health Problem ◽  
Football Player ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Legitimate Reason ◽  
Health Field

Unlawful action cannot be justified even when it is committed in sport or the health field. Although character-wise, both fields are covered by different legal rules, both of them lie under the discipline of law and must be conducted within the rule of law. Theoretically, doping can be considered as fraud, although to this date, no doping actions were incriminated. It is regulated as a disciplinary offense (Turkish Football Federal Disciplinary Directive, art. 61). The usage and possession of drugs by athletes is considered a criminal offense (Turkish Criminal Code, art. 18 & ors.) and a legitimate reason for an athlete’s contract termination. A football player who organizes or uses a counterfeit report concealing a health problem or represents a fraudulent statement to the official authority is considered to have committed a fraud crime (Turkish Criminal Code, art. 24 & ors.) as well as a disciplinary offense (Turkish Football Federal Disciplinary Directive, art. 47-48).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document