Results of Endoscopic Maxillary Mega-antrostomy in Recalcitrant Maxillary Sinusitis

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 658-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Do-Yeon Cho ◽  
Peter H. Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Revision Rate ◽  
Maxillary Sinusitis ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Inferior Turbinate ◽  
Symptomatic Improvement ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sinus Disease ◽  
Mucus Clearance ◽  
Maxillary Sinuses

Background In patients with chronically diseased maxillary sinuses, poor mucociliary clearance may result from long-standing inflammation or scarring from previous surgery. This subset of patients often has persistent sinus disease despite medical therapy and adequate antrostomy. Endoscopic maxillary mega-antrostomy (EMMA) is a mucosal sparing technique that facilitates mucus clearance and sinus irrigation in terminally dysfunctional maxillary sinuses. EMMA involves extending the antrostomy through the posterior half of the inferior turbinate down to the floor of the nose, creating a significantly enlarged antrostomy. This study describes our results of EMMA in recalcitrant maxillary sinusitis. Methods A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent EMMA for recalcitrant maxillary sinusitis between July 2005 and September 2007. We studied diagnoses, comorbid factors, clinical efficacy, revision rate, and complications. Results Twenty-eight patients (average age, 48 years) underwent 42 EMMAs for recalcitrant maxillary sinusitis. Average follow-up was 11 months. All patients had previous maxillary sinus surgery (mean = 2.3). Relevant comorbid factors included prior Caldwell-Luc or maxillofacial surgery (16/42), cystic fibrosis (11/42), asthma (11/42), and IgG deficiency (3/42). The most common symptoms reported were facial pain/pressure and purulent rhinorrhea. At the time of the most recent postoperative examination, 74% of patients reported complete resolution of symptoms while 26% reported partial symptomatic improvement. There were no complications and the revision rate was 0%. Conclusion Maxillary sinuses that appear to be terminally diseased may be rehabilitated surgically without the need for surgical stripping. EMMA is an effective and safe treatment option for the management of recalcitrant maxillary sinus disease.

Microbiology of the Maxillary Sinus in Adults with Chronic Sinus Disease

1996 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 347-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgit Winther ◽  
Christopher L. Vickery ◽  
Charles W. Gross ◽  
J. Owen Hendley
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Microbial Infection ◽  
Sinus Disease ◽  
Alternaria Sp ◽  
Oropharyngeal Flora ◽  
Bacteria And Fungi ◽  
Maxillary Sinuses

Antimicrobial therapy is a part of the care of patients with chronic sinus disease (CSD), but the etiologic role of microorganisms in this condition is unclear. Twenty patients with CSD undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery who had been off antibiotics for at least 1 week before surgery had a maxillary sinus aspirate for quantitative culture for aerobic bacteria and fungi and a semiquantitative culture from the antrostomy of the same maxillary sinus during endoscopic surgery. Six (30%) of the patients had infection of the maxillary sinus diagnosed by the presence of ≥ 103 cfu/mL of organisms in the sinus aspirate (Haemophilus influenzae in two patients and one patient each with Moraxella catarrhalis, α-streptococcus, mixed oropharyngeal flora, or Alternaria sp.). All antrostomy specimens obtained by nasal endoscopy during surgery were positive, but the antrostomy cultures did not correlate with the sinus aspirate cultures from the same sinus. Staphylococcus aureus and/or Gram negative rods in eight antrostomy cultures did not predict the presence of these pathogens in any of the maxillary sinus aspirates. Conversely, the bacteria detected with the quantitative aspirate culture in five of the six infected sinuses were not found in the antrostomy specimen; only the fungal sinus infection correlated with the antrostomy culture. Infection of the maxillary sinuses occurred in patients with both limited and severe disease by CT imaging. About one third of patients with CSD necessitating surgery had microbial infection of the maxillary sinus, but antrostomy cultures obtained via endoscopy did not predict the organisms infecting the sinus.

scholarly journals Reversible Endoscopic Medial Maxillectomy: Endonasal Approach to Diseases of the Maxillary Sinus

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (02) ◽  
pp. e247-e252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Soares Tepedino ◽  
Ana Clara Miotello Ferrão ◽  
Hana Caroline Morais Higa ◽  
Leonardo Lopes Balsalobre Filho ◽  
Enrique Iturriaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Maxillary Sinusitis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Inferior Turbinate ◽  
Lateral Wall ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Sinus Disease ◽  
Patient Series ◽  
Medial Maxillectomy ◽  
Maxillary Diseases

Abstract Introduction The endoscopic access has reduced the morbidity associated with external approaches in diseases of the maxillary sinus. A reversible endoscopic medial maxillectomy (REMM) is presented as an alternative for treatment of benign maxillary diseases. Objective To describe the REMM technique and report four cases of patients with benign maxillary sinus conditions treated through this approach. Methods The present study was divided into two parts: anatomical and case series. Two cadaveric dissections confirmed the feasibility of the REMM approach. The same technique was performed on four consecutive patients with benign maxillary sinus disease. Results The cadaveric dissections confirmed wide exposure to the maxillary cavity, preserving the anatomy of the maxillary sinus. In the patient series, one patient presented with an antrochoanal polyp, one had a silent sinus syndrome, one had a chronic maxillary sinusitis secondary to a gunshot, and the last one had an inverted papilloma in the maxillary sinus. In all of the cases, the REMM approach provided excellent access and adequate resection, as well as preservation of the inferior turbinate, nasolacrimal duct, and lateral wall of the nose (including its osteomucosal component). Finally, all of the patients had an uneventful postoperative course. Conclusion The REMM technique is an excellent surgical approach to benign conditions of the maxillary sinus. It has few limitations and appears to be associated with less morbidity than conventional techniques.

Endonasal endoscopic surgery with combined middle and inferior meatal antrostomies for fungal maxillary sinusitis

2015 ◽  
Vol 129 (S2) ◽  
pp. S52-S55 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Sawatsubashi ◽  
D Murakami ◽  
T Umezaki ◽  
S Komune
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Maxillary Sinusitis ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Fungus Ball ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Middle Meatal Antrostomy ◽  
Mucosal Thickening ◽  
Fungus Balls ◽  
Maxillary Sinuses

AbstractObjective:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination of inferior and middle meatal antrostomies for treatment of a maxillary sinus fungus ball by functional endoscopic sinus surgery.Methods:A retrospective analysis including 28 patients with non-invasive fungal maxillary sinusitis was performed. Fourteen patients underwent FESS with both middle and inferior meatal antrostomies (combined group). The remaining 14 patients were treated with FESS through only the middle meatal antrostomy (control group).Results:Post-operative computed tomography showed normal maxillary sinuses in all patients in the combined group. In contrast, in the control group, five patients (36 per cent) exhibited a normal maxillary sinus, seven (50 per cent) showed maxillary mucosal thickening and two (14 per cent) had persistent fungus balls in the maxillary sinus.Conclusion:FESS with a combination of middle and inferior meatal antrostomies proved more effective for treating fungal maxillary sinusitis.

scholarly journals Evaluating Endoscopic Ipsilateral Endonasal Corridor Approaches to the Anterolateral Wall of the Maxillary Sinus: A Computerized Tomography Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Navarat Vatcharayothin ◽  
Pornthep Kasemsiri ◽  
Sanguansak Thanaviratananich ◽  
Cattleya Thongrong
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Inferior Turbinate ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Sinus Wall ◽  
Nasal Floor ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anterolateral Wall ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Maxillary Sinuses

Abstract Introduction The endoscopic access to lesions in the anterolateral wall of the maxillary sinus is a challenging issue; therefore, the evaluation of access should be performed. Objective To assess the accessibility of three endoscopic ipsilateral endonasal corridors. Methods Three corridors were created in each of the 30 maxillary sinuses from 19 head cadavers. Accessing the anterolateral wall of the maxillary sinus was documented with a straight stereotactic navigator probe at the level of the nasal floor and of the axilla of the inferior turbinate. Results At level of the nasal floor, the prelacrimal approach, the modified endoscopic Denker approach, and the endoscopic Denker approach allowed mean radial access to the anterolateral maxillary sinus wall of 42.6 ± 7.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39.9–45.3), 56.0 ± 6.1 (95%CI: 53.7–58.3), and 60.1 ± 6.2 (95%CI: 57.8–62.4), respectively. Furthermore, these approaches provided more lateral access to the maxillary sinus at the level of the axilla of the inferior turbinate, with mean radial access of 45.8 ± 6.9 (95%CI: 43.3–48.4) for the prelacrimal approach, 59.8 ± 4.7 (95% CI:58.1–61.6) for the modified endoscopic Denker approach, and 63.6 ± 5.5 (95%CI: 61.6–65.7) for the endoscopic Denker approach. The mean radial access in each corridor, either at the level of the nasal floor or the axilla of the inferior turbinate, showed a statistically significant difference in all comparison approaches (p < 0.05). Conclusions The prelacrimal approach provided a narrow radial access, which allows access to anteromedial lesions of the maxillary sinus, whereas the modified endoscopic Denker and the endoscopic Denker approaches provided more lateral radial access and improved operational feasibility on far anterolateral maxillary sinus lesions.

scholarly journals Association between Odontogenic and Maxillary Sinus Conditions: A Retrospective Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 2849
Author(s):  
Piotr Kuligowski ◽  
Aleksandra Jaroń ◽  
Olga Preuss ◽  
Ewa Gabrysz-Trybek ◽  
Joanna Bladowska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Mucous Membrane ◽  
Maxillary Sinusitis ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Odontogenic Infections ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Periodontal Bone Loss ◽  
Maxillary Sinuses

Odontogenic infections can directly trigger maxillary sinusitis. CBCT is an excellent choice for precise examination of maxillary sinuses and hard tissues within the oral cavity. The objective of this retrospective and the cross-sectional study was to analyze the influence of odontogenic conditions on the presence and intensity of maxillary sinus mucous membrane thickening using CBCT imaging. Moreover, periodontal bone loss and anatomic relationship between adjacent teeth and maxillary sinuses were assessed to evaluate its possible impact on creating maxillary thickening. The study sample consisted of 200 maxillary sinuses of 100 patients visible on CBCT examination with a field of view of 13 × 15 cm. The presented study revealed a significant influence of periapical lesions, inappropriate endodontic treatment, severe caries, and extracted teeth on the presence of increased thickening of maxillary sinus mucous membrane. In addition, an increase in the distance between root apices and maxillary sinus floor triggered a significant reduction of maxillary sinus mucous membrane thickening. The presence of periodontal bone loss significantly increases maxillary sinus mucous membrane thickening.

Radiography and Ultrasonography in Paranasal Sinusitis

1987 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Jensen ◽  
C. von Sydow
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Maxillary Sinusitis ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Paranasal Sinusitis ◽  
Reasonable Degree ◽  
Degree Of Confidence ◽  
Sinus Radiography ◽  
Maxillary Sinuses

In order to analyze whether ultrasonography with a reasonable degree of confidence can replace radiography in the diagnosis of sinusitis, 138 patients with clinical signs of sinusitis were examined with both methods. It was found that maxillary sinus fluid was recognized ultrasonographically with a confidence that increased with the amount of fluid, judged from radiographic examinations. In a sub-group of 45 cases, fluid confirmed by maxillary sinus puncture was detected by ultrasonography in 35/45 sinuses (78%) and by radiology in 38/45 sinuses (84%). In patients with radiographically normal maxillary sinuses, the correlation to ultrasound was good. However, mucosal swelling and polyps or cysts observed at radiography were poorly demonstrated by ultrasonography. In addition, the ultrasound method was not reliable for frontal sinus diagnosis. It was concluded that ultrasonography can be recommended in maxillary sinusitis for follow-up of treatment and as a screening method before sinus radiography.

A Comparison of Near-Infrared Imaging and Computerized Tomography Scan for Detecting Maxillary Sinusitis

2021 ◽  
pp. 000348942110606
Author(s):  
Mehdi Abouzari ◽  
Brooke Sarna ◽  
Joon You ◽  
Adwight Risbud ◽  
Kotaro Tsutsumi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Computerized Tomography ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
Maxillary Sinusitis ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Pixel Intensity ◽  
Sinus Disease ◽  
Nir Imaging ◽  
Average Pixel Intensity

Objective: To investigate the use of near-infrared (NIR) imaging as a tool for outpatient clinicians to quickly and accurately assess for maxillary sinusitis and to characterize its accuracy compared to computerized tomography (CT) scan. Methods: In a prospective investigational study, NIR and CT images from 65 patients who presented to a tertiary care rhinology clinic were compared to determine the sensitivity and specificity of NIR as an imaging modality. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of NIR imaging in distinguishing normal versus maxillary sinus disease was found to be 90% and 84%, normal versus mild maxillary sinus disease to be 76% and 91%, and mild versus severe maxillary sinus disease to be 96% and 81%, respectively. The average pixel intensity was also calculated and compared to the modified Lund-Mackay scores from CT scans to assess the ability of NIR imaging to stratify the severity of maxillary sinus disease. Average pixel intensity over a region of interest was significantly different ( P < .001) between normal, mild, and severe disease, as well as when comparing normal versus mild ( P < .001, 95% CI 42.22-105.39), normal versus severe ( P < .001, 95% CI 119.43-174.14), and mild versus severe ( P < .001, 95% CI 41.39-104.56) maxillary sinus disease. Conclusion: Based on this data, NIR shows promise as a tool for identifying patients with potential maxillary sinus disease as well as providing information on severity of disease that may guide administration of appropriate treatments.

Enophthalmos secondary to maxillary sinus disease: single-stage operative management

1995 ◽  
Vol 109 (9) ◽  
pp. 868-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. J. P. Beasley ◽  
N. S. Jones ◽  
R. N. Downes
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Orbital Floor ◽  
Sinus Disease

AbstractMaxillary sinus disease can lead to dehiscence of the orbital floor. Using endoscopic sinus surgery it is possible to simultaneously reconstruct the orbital floor and to assess and treat underlying sinus disease.

APPROACH TO UNCINECTOMY BY SWING DOOR TECHNIQUE VS STANDARD TECHNIQUE – A COMPARATIVE STUDY

2021 ◽  
pp. 37-39
Author(s):  
Praveen Singh ◽  
Tarun Ojha ◽  
Shreya Prasad
Keyword(s):  
Complication Rate ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Maxillary Sinusitis ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Standard Technique ◽  
Symptomatic Improvement ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Minor Complication ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Uncinectomy is the most important step in endoscopic sinus surgery which can be performed by various methods. The present study aimed to compare the results and complications of performing uncinectomy and middle meatus antrostomy using the standard and swing door techniques during FESS. Methods: In this study, 50 patients of both gender (aged 18–50 years) suffering from chronic maxillary sinusitis underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) from January 2019 to December 2019 at a tertiary care centre. The patients were divided on random basis into two groups of 25. Group Apatients underwent uncinectomy using standard technique while Group B underwent uncinectomy using swing door technique. Results:The mean VAS scores for Group Aand Group B were 78.50 ± 16.63 and 80.58 ± 14.34, respectively, suggesting that Group B patients have better symptomatic improvement. No major complications were observed in both groups. At the end of Week 2, minor complications were observed in 8 (26.7%) of the patients from Group Aand 2 (6.7%) from Group B. By the sixth week, the minor complication rate was 1 (3.3%) and 0 in Group A and Group B, respectively. When compared statistically during the second week using chi-square test, the difference in minor complication rate was found to be statistically signicant (p < 0.05, 2 = 4.81), with lower incidence of complications in Group B. Conclusion: Uncinectomy performed by swing door technique produces better postoperative results, with lesser complications, when compared to the standard technique.

Antroscopy in maxillary sinus disease associated with nasal polyposis

1989 ◽  
Vol 103 (9) ◽  
pp. 861-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. G. Gilbert
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Nasal Polyps ◽  
Nasal Polyposis ◽  
Maxillary Sinusitis ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Sinus Disease ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Satisfactory Method ◽  
Careful Assessment

AbstractAlthough the association of maxillary sinusitis with nasal polyps is widely recognized little has been written on its precise incidence and degree. Antroscopy of 70 antra with ipsilateral polyps showed a high incidence of mucosal abnormalities, retained secretions and ostial narrowing. Comparison of these findings with pre-operative X-rays showed the latter were unreliable in detecting retained antral fluid. It is concluded that in nasal polyposis the antra warrant careful assessment and that antroscopy is a highly satisfactory method for this purpose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document