scholarly journals Current treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 85-99
Author(s):  
V. M. Durleshter ◽  
S. R. Genrikh ◽  
A. V. Makarenko ◽  
D. S. Kirakosyan

Background. Pancreatic pseudocysts stand among current challenges in modern medicine. Their treatment uses variant instrumental techniques and implies a multispecialty approach. Trials in surgery and gastroenterology have aimed to identify an optimal strategy to tackle pancreatic pseudocysts for reducing complications and the recurrence rate, suggesting ultrasound-guided percutaneous, laparoscopic and flexible endoscopic drainage as promising treatment choices.Objectives. A summarising review of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for pancreatic pseudocyst treatment and comparison of ultrasound-guided percutaneous vs. surgical and endoscopic drainage techniques.Methods. The review examines the classification, epidemiology and methods for diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Only comparative full-text studies published within 2014–2021, as well as selected impactive publications within 2002–2013, have been included. The eLibrary, Elsevier and PubMed resources were queried for the article or journal title fields against the keywords (separate or combined) “pancreatic pseudocyst” [псевдокиста поджелудочной железы], “pseudocyst drainage” [дренирование псевдокисты], “surgical drainage” [хирургическое дренирование], “endoscopic drainage” [эндоскопическое дренирование], cystogastrostomy [цистогастростомия], gastrojejunostomy [гастроеюностомия], “duodenal-cystic anastomosis” [цистодуоденоанастомоз], “transpapillary drainage” [транспапиллярное дренирование], “transmural drainage and esophagogastroduodenoscopy” [трансмуральное дренирование и эзофагогастродуоденоскопия]. Records have been selected for topic-related scientific value.Results. The review systematically surveys 68 scientific papers in the focus area and summarises the most common surgical methods for pancreatic pseudocyst treatment. Based on the main principle, the methods are classified into three categories, ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage, surgical drainage and flexible endoscopic drainage. The major classifications and treatment techniques are highlighted for their advantages and disadvantages.Conclusion. There exist no generally adopted strategy for pancreatic pseudocyst treatment in current clinical practice and no evidence on a particular method application in a large patient cohort. The publication survey identifies the techniques of percutaneous, surgical and endoscopic drainage with ultrasound control as highly effective overall among other surgical treatments.

2021 ◽  
pp. 5-7
Author(s):  
Ganesh Chandra Karan ◽  
Kumar Akash

Background: Pancreatic pseudocysts belong to a large and hetero-geneous group of cystic pancreatic lesions and represent a complication of acute or chronic pancreatitis. This is a prospect Material and Methods: ive study conducted in the department of General surgery, at darbhanga medical college and Hospital, Darbhanga, Laheriasarai, Bihar. Study duration on One year. Conclusion: Ultrasound guided aspiration is equally safe compared to conventional surgery, It not only cures but provides palliation of symptoms and gives enough time needed for maturation of the cyst.


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mircea Beuran ◽  
Ionut Negoi ◽  
Fausto Catena ◽  
Massimo Sartelli ◽  
Sorin Hostiuc ◽  
...  

Case report: A 37 year-old woman was admitted three months after an episode of severe acute pancreatitis with a large tumor mass located in her left abdomen, abdominal tenderness and asthenia. Abdominal Computed Tomography (CT) revealed a giant pancreatic pseudocyst of 23/15/12 centimeters. We performed an anterior laparoscopic transgastric cystogastrostomy. The postoperative clinical course was uneventful, and she was discharged nine days later. After another month she was re-admitted for general malaise and fever. We performed endoscopic evaluation of the cystogastrostomy patency followed by lavage of the pseudocyst cavity. After five days of broad spectrum antibiotic therapy the clinical course started to improve and the patient was discharged after another eight days. One- and two-year follow-ups revealed no remnant cavity. Conclusions: Laparoscopic transgastric cystogastrostomy is a feasible option for selected patients with pancreatic pseudocysts. Careful patients’ evaluation in a multidisciplinary team, including imaging specialists, dedicated gastroenterologists with experience in advanced interventional techniques and pancreatic surgeons, balancing between watchful waiting and step-up minimally invasive approach offers the best tailored approach for a specific patient.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Krittin J. Supapannachart ◽  
Christopher R. Funk ◽  
Lauren M. Gensler ◽  
Matthew P. Butters

Abstract Background Many pancreatic pseudocysts spontaneously resolve, but larger or symptomatic pseudocysts may require procedural management. Though endoscopic ultrasound guided approaches are standard of care and have high success rates, complications can include bleeding, infection, and splenic perforation. This patient case report details an unusual series of complications of endoscopic cystogastrostomy that should encourage clinicians to evaluate for anatomic disruptions caused by mass effects of pancreatic pseudocysts prior to endoscopic pseudocyst drainage. Case presentation A 53-year-old African American male with a past medical history notable for alcohol use disorder, chronic pancreatitis, and insulin dependent diabetes presented with a 4-day history of left upper quadrant abdominal pain. Computed tomography imaging with contrast revealed enlargement of a known pancreatic pseudocyst to 15.9 × 10.4 cm. Due to pseudocyst size and the patient’s symptoms, endoscopic cystogastrostomy stent placement was performed. However, postprocedurally, he developed leukocytosis to 19,800 cells/m3 (from 14,100 cells/m3 preoperatively) as well as acute hypoxemic respiratory failure with a large left pleural effusion. Postprocedural computed tomography with contrast demonstrated a new large subcapsular splenic hematoma in communication with a new subdiaphragmatic fluid collection. Due to suspicion of endoscopic procedural complication, he underwent open laparotomy which revealed grade 4 splenic laceration, septic splenic hematoma, and a subdiaphragmatic abscess. Conclusions While endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst was technically successful, this case demonstrates complications from mass effect of a large pancreatic pseudocyst which putatively tore the splenorenal ligament, leading to excessive separation of the left kidney and spleen. If anatomic disruptions caused by mass effect from a pancreatic pseudocyst are recognized through preprocedural abdominal imaging, such cases may be considered for early open repair versus cystogastrostomy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Hussam I. A. Alzeerelhouseini ◽  
Muawiyah Elqadi ◽  
Mohammad N. Elqadi ◽  
Sadi A. Abukhalaf ◽  
Hazem A. Ashhab

Introduction. A pancreatic pseudocyst (PP) with major diameter equal to 10 cm or more is called a giant pseudocyst. The ideal management for giant PPs is controversial. Endoscopic drainage is an alternative nonsurgical approach for PP management. Only a few cases of giant PPs were reported to be managed by endoscopic drainage. Case Presentation. We reported two cases of giant PPs following an episode of acute pancreatitis. Both were resolved following endoscopic cystogastrostomy using metallic and double-pigtail stents with excellent outcomes. There was no history of recurrence or complications on follow-up. In addition, we extensively reviewed all available literature studies of giant pancreatic pseudocyst presentation, management, and complications. We summarized all reported cases and presented them in a comprehensive table. Conclusion. The endoscopic cystogastrostomy approach is cost saving, can avoid surgical complications, and offers an early hospital discharge.


Author(s):  
Yu. G. Starkov ◽  
R. D. Zamolodchikov ◽  
S. V. Dzhantukhanova ◽  
M. I. Vyborniy ◽  
K. V. Lukich ◽  
...  

Aim.To compare immediate and long-term results of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst by using of endosonography-assisted and open surgical approaches.Material and methods.EUS-assisted internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst was performed in 32 patients in 2011–2016. Open drainage procedures were carried out on the other 32 patients.Results.In the group of endoscopic drainage, technical success rate, clinical success rate and complication rate were 97%, 85% and 26%, respectively. There were no recurrent pseudocysts in long-term period. Comparison with open surgery confirmed advantages of endoscopic technique regarding time of operation (p< 0.01), intraoperative blood loss (p< 0.01) and length of hospital-stay (p< 0.01).Conclusion.EUS-assisted internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis is characterized by high rate of technical and clinical success, small postoperative morbidity and low incidence of longterm recurrences.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 2577
Author(s):  
Wormi Sharon

Background: Pancreatic pseudocyst is a well-known complication of acute or chronic pancreatitis, with a higher incidence in the latter. It represents 80-90% of cystic lesions of the pancreas. Benign and malignant cystic neoplasms constitute 10-13%, congenital and retention cysts comprising the remainder. Diagnosis is accomplished most often by computed tomographic scanning, by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, or by ultrasound, and a rapid progress in the improvement of diagnostic tools enables detection with high sensitivity and specificity. Endoscopic drainage provides a good alternative or supplement to a surgical treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts.Methods: This is a prospective study of 26 patients diagnosed to have Pancreatic Pseudocyst and treated by endoscopic drainage from 1st June 2008 to 30th September 2010 in St. John’s Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore. Transabdominal and endoscopic ultrasound, CT scan were used to determine the number, size, volume, wall thickness, location of pancreatic pseudocysts, the extent of pancreatic parenchymal disease, the nature of the main pancreatic duct and its relationship to the cyst, the presence of portal hypertension, venous occlusion, arterial anomalies and pseudoaneurysm. The indications for endoscopic drainage were symptomatic and/or bigger than 6 cm in major diameter pancreatic pseudocysts with a close opposition to the gastric or duodenal wall.Results: There were 26 patients with pancreatic pseudocyst and all of them are located in lesser sac. It mainly affects the middle-aged males with alcohol as the main etiology. Out of 26 patients 24 underwent endoscopic drainage and 2 patients were abandoned in view of vessel between the cyst wall and stomach which was picked up by EUS. Out of 26 patients, 5 developed infection which was proven by culture. Endoscopic cystogastrostomy was performed in 21 patients (80.8%), endoscopic cystogastrostomy with nasocystic drainage performed in 3 patients (11.5%), and abandoned in 2 patients. 2 patients developed bleeding, and managed conservatively. No intervention done. 5 patients underwent re-procedure (3 underwent nasocystic drainage, 1 aspiration, and the other cystogastrostomy), in view of recollection.Conclusions: Endoscopic drainage is safe and effective in experienced hand, less morbidity, cost effective, short hospital stay, can be repeated.


HPB Surgery ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 333-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Della Libera ◽  
E. S. Siqueira ◽  
M. Morais ◽  
M. R. S. Rohr ◽  
C. Q. Brant ◽  
...  

Background: Pancreatic pseudocyst endoscopic drainage has been described as a good treatment option, with morbidity and mortality rates that are lower than surgery. The aim of our study is to describe the efficacy of different forms of endoscopic drainage and estimate pseudocyst recurrence rate after short follow up period.Patients and Methods: We studied 30 patients with pancreatic pseudocyst that presented some indication for treatment: persistent abdominal pain, infection or cholestasis. Clinical evaluation was performed with a pain scale, 0 meaning absence of pain and 4 meaning continuous pain. Pseudocysts were first evaluated by abdominal CT scan, and after endoscopic retrograde pancreatography the patients were treated by transpapillary or transmural (cystduodenostomy or cystgastrostomy) drainage. Pseudocyst resolution was documented by serial CT scans.Results: 25/30 patients could be treated. Drainage was successful in 21 (70% in an ‘intention to treat’ basis). After a mean follow-up of 42±35.82 weeks, there was only 1 (4.2%) recurrence. A total of 6 complications occurred in 37 procedures (16.2%), and all but 2 were managed clinically and/or endoscopically: there was no mortality related to the procedure. Patients submitted to combined drainage needed more procedures than the other groups. There was no difference in the efficacy when we compared the three different drainage methods.Conclusions: We concluded that pancreatic pseudocyst endoscopic drainage is possible in most patients, with high success rate and low morbidity.


2017 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Krajewski ◽  
Gustaw Lech ◽  
Marcin Makiewicz ◽  
Andrzej Kluciński ◽  
Monika Wojtasik ◽  
...  

Postinflammatory pancreatic pseudocysts are one of the most common complications of acute pancreatitis. In most cases, pseudocysts self-absorb in the course of treatment of pancreatitis. In some patients, pancreatic pseudocysts are symptomatic and cause pain, problems with gastrointestinal transit, and other complications. In such cases, drainage or resection should be performed. Among the invasive methods, mini invasive procedures like endoscopic transmural drainage through the wall of the stomach or duodenum play an important role. For endoscopic transmural drainage, it is necessary that the cyst wall adheres to the stomach or duodenum, making a visible impression. We present a very rare case of infeasibility of endoscopic drainage of a postinflammatory pancreatic pseudocyst, impressing the stomach, due to cyst wall calcifications. A 55-year-old man after acute pancreatitis presented with a 1-year history of epigastric pain and was admitted due to a postinflammatory pseudocyst in the body and tail of pancreas. On admission, blood tests, including CA 19-9 and CEA, were normal. An ultrasound examination revealed a 100-mm pseudocyst in the tail of pancreas, which was confirmed on CT and EUS. Acoustic shadowing caused by cyst wall calcifications made the cyst unavailable to ultrasound assessment and percutaneous drainage. Gastroscopy revealed an impression on the stomach wall from the outside. The patient was scheduled for endoscopic transmural drainage. After insufflation of the stomach, a large mass protruding from the wall was observed. The stomach mucosa was punctured with a cystotome needle knife, and the pancreatic cyst wall was reached. Due to cyst wall calcifications, endoscopic drainage of the cyst was unfeasible. Profuse submucosal bleeding at the puncture site was stopped by placing clips. The patient was scheduled for open surgery, and distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy was performed. The histopathological examination confirmed the initial diagnosis of postinflammatory pancreatic pseudocyst. Endoscopic transmural drainage is a highly effective procedure for treating postinflammatory pancreatic pseudocysts. In some patents, especially with large pseudocysts, pseudocysts with calcified walls, and cysts of primary origin, resection should be performed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document