scholarly journals O Destino da Razão em uma Era de Pós-Verdade: Reflexões a Partir de O Futuro de uma Ilusão de Sigmund Freud

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 198
Author(s):  
Marcelo Da Costa Maciel
Keyword(s):  

Este ensaio reflete sobre as atuais condições de produção e difusão do conhecimento na área das Humanidades, explorando também as perspectivas que se abrem para o futuro. Tomando como ponto de partida O Futuro de uma Ilusão, avalia-se, à luz da contemporaneidade, o diagnóstico feito por Freud acerca da era moderna e do lugar nela desempenhado pela religião e pela ciência. Em seguida, discute-se o conceito de “pós-verdade” como uma chave-interpretativa para a compreensão da época atual, ressaltando-se suas implicações sobre o campo das Humanidades. Nesse ponto, são abordados temas tais como a crise da razão, o declínio das Humanidades e o império das tecnologias. Por fim, o artigo pretende apontar algumas possibilidades abertas para o ensino e a pesquisa nas Humanidades. Seguindo a reflexão feita por Max Weber em A Ciência como Vocação (1917), ressalta-se a necessidade da dedicação obstinada e da entrega apaixonada, sem otimismo exagerado, mas também sem resignação ou renúncia. Como conclusão, o artigo apresenta o ofício de professor e pesquisador das Humanidades como o ofício de um guardador e transmissor de um patrimônio extremamente valioso no presente e que poderá, mesmo, ser indispensável no futuro.

2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Alzira Lobo de Arruda Campos

As ciências humanas discutiram a questão da interdisciplinaridade ao longo do século XX. Mas, já no século anterior, figuras notáveis, como Wilhelm Dilthey e Karl Marx, questionavam-se sobre os paradigmas monistas da explicação e da compreensão. Interrogação reproduzida, entre muitos, por Sigmund Freud, Max Weber, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Fernand Braudel, Michel Serres. Em Educação, o grupo de Doutorado em Ciências da Educação, de Paris VIII, há 30 anos adotou a multirreferencialidade como metodologia hegemônica.


2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-154
Author(s):  
Dmitri Cerboncini Fernandes ◽  
Alexander Moreira-Almeida

We live in a contradictory world. Self-proclaimed “skeptics”, as the original meaning itself suggests, should first of all strive for proper scientific rationality, for reflective and objective distancing in the apprehension of reality, for methodological caution and for the extended ability to theoretical and philosophical understanding of intricate problems, in practice, too often have entrenched themselves in dogmatic groups. Inquisitors often endowed with the appearance of religious fanaticism, in the worst sense of the term, invest their energies in a crusade of attacks to everyone to whom they attribute mistakes, naivety or even bad intentions. In practice, the universe of those who do not fit in their often restricted, idealized and naïve views of scientific practice. With them, there is hardly any possibility of frank dialogue or opening to research fields that escape their conceptions of what science and philosophy can approach and how they should operate. Charlatans, backward, believers, superstitious; these are some disqualifications generally granted to researchers who dare to go beyond the limits they established for science and rationality. To substantiate their certainties, such self-proclaimed skeptics often claim to base their approach to science on the examples given by highly regarded scientists and philosophers of the past. We speak here of scholars of the stature of Giordano Bruno, Francis Bacon, René Descartes, Isaac Newton, the Encyclopedists, Immanuel Kant, Arthur Schopenhauer, Sigmund Freud, James Frazer, the Vienna Circle, Max Weber, etc. Despite their different approaches, we are talking about many of the very founders of modern Western knowledge. The self-proclaimed contemporary “skeptics” claim their inscriptions in the tradition inaugurated by these illustrious intellectual ancestors. They claim to defend with determination such a rationalist tradition against “pseudoscientists” and “mystic-religious" philosophers who, according to their opinions, wish to corrupt it through insidious insertions in a field that would not rightfully belong to them. This would be their main mission.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 336-344
Author(s):  
Silvia Rosa da Silva Zanolla ◽  
Márcia Ferreira Torres Pereira ◽  
Rômulo Fabriciano Gonzaga Pinto

Resumo Com base na teoria crítica da sociedade do filósofo Theodor Adorno, este trabalho propõe refletir sobre elementos objetivos do âmbito da estrutura institucional e social que fundam ideias referentes à racionalidade e à dominação, considerando fatores subjetivos correlatos às ideias do sociólogo Max Weber. Nesse sentido, corrobora-se ideias acerca da formação complexa da identidade do sujeito diante das exigências de conservação humana, apresentadas à luz da psicanálise de Sigmund Freud; uma discussão controversa, porém fundamental para a teoria crítica, posto que considera contribuições da psicologia perpassadas por elementos que se ampliam para além de comportamentos determinados, conscientes ou alienados. Ou seja, almeja fatores culturais, históricos e sociológicos como bases primordiais para a análise da ideologia como fator racional o qual transcorre o período moderno.


Author(s):  
Gregorio Bettiza

As progress unfolded, religion was supposed to be consigned to the dustbin of history. So argued many of the 19th-century founding fathers of the modern social sciences such as Max Weber, Karl Marx, and Sigmund Freud. This insight became conventional wisdom as modernization and secularization theorists sought to systematize and theorize more explicitly God’s demise during much of the 20th century. This understanding of an ever more disenchanted world was increasingly challenged from the 1970s onward by a series of events and process that modernization and secularization theories could hardly explain let alone predict. These events included the Iranian revolution of 1979, the rise of the Christian Right in the United States since the late 1970s, the progressive emergence of religious fundamentalisms across most world religions, the role played by a Catholic pope in Europe and the Mujahidin in Afghanistan in the fall of Soviet Communism, a new post-Cold War security environment with its emphasis on the politics of identity, the so-called New Wars, the clash of civilization scenarios, and religious terrorism—all epitomized by the 11 September 2001 attacks—and, lastly but not least, mounting religious controversies in Europe around Christian values in the European Constitution, the hijab in schools, and enlargement to Turkey. These developments have led scholars to reconsider the role of religion in the modern world, reexamine the Eurocentric and universalist premises on which much secularization theory and the very same concept of religion had been based, and reflexively assess the secularist biases through which social scientists generally understand and explain world politics. The study of religion and its twin concept of the secular are thus currently going through a period of great vitality across the social sciences. This bibliography focuses on debates and scholarship within the field of international relations (IR). As the study of religion is by its very nature an interdisciplinary affair, a number of studies from cognate fields that make a direct and important contribution to ongoing debates in IR are also included. The bibliography is organized along six main sections. The first section is a general overview of key books and articles, journals, and online resources in the field. The second section, titled Understanding Religion in IR, explores why the sacred had long been overlooked in IR and a range of ongoing definitional debates in the discipline. The third section, titled Religion and IR Theory, presents three broad perspectives—non-paradigmatic, paradigmatic, and theological—seeking to integrate religion with IR theorizing. The fourth section briefly presents major studies and debates on the Secular and Postsecular in IR. In the fifth section, titled Religion and International Issues, readers are acquainted with work exploring the complex interaction between religion and a range of issues central to the field of IR, such as the sovereign state, war, and peace. The sixth and final section presents work surveying, promoting and critiquing the growing topic of Operationalizing Religion in International Policy.


2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-169
Author(s):  
Carlos Leone ◽  

This paper makes the case for the relevance of C. G. Hempel’s 1942 proposal of the usage of «covering laws» in History. To do so, it argues that such a proposal reflects how 18 and 19th centuries «philosophy of History» became methods or epistemology of History. This carried a change in meaning of «History»: no longer a succession of past events but the study of documented human action (including of scientific kind in general), its distinction vis-à-vis philosophy, sociology etc., becomes a minor matter as far as logic of research is concerned. Also present in this paper is the conception of theory as a conceptual mode of narrative, and the defense of a development of theories alongside their practice, not apart from them. Authors considered besides Hempel range from Max Weber to Sigmund Freud, from Arthur C. Danto to Albert O. Hirschmann.


2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-204
Author(s):  
Mikko Immanen

Abstract This article addresses the controversial question of Theodor W. Adorno’s debt to right-wing Zivilisationskritik by a close reading of his essay “Spengler after the Decline” (1950). The article shows that despite Adorno’s harsh polemics against Oswald Spengler’s Decline of the West (1918, 1922), he sought to make Spengler’s analysis of Weimar Germany’s undemocratic tendencies—“Caesarism”—serve progressive ends. However, Adorno’s essay was not just an effort at “coming to terms with the past” in Adenauerian West Germany. Reading the essay’s original 1941 version together with Adorno’s correspondence with Max Horkheimer sheds light on Spengler as an overlooked key (next to Max Weber, Sigmund Freud, and Walter Benjamin) to their Dialectic of Enlightenment, written in 1941–44. Adorno’s daring effort to appropriate Spengler’s analysis of Caesarism makes Adorno’s critical theory an asset in understanding today’s authoritarian populism.


2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 349-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
FELIX RÖSCH

AbstractHans Morgenthau's concept of power is widely debated among scholars of International Relations. Superficial accounts present Morgenthau's concept of power in the Hobbesian tradition as a means of self-preservation; however, more thorough investigations demonstrate Morgenthau's psychogenic and praxeological understanding. By referring to Sigmund Freud and Max Weber, such accounts identify Morgenthauian power as the ability to dominate others. This article contributes to this discourse by demonstrating that Morgenthau separated power into two dualistic conceptualisations. Although analytically Morgenthau worked with a concept of power understood as domination, normatively – in reference to Friedrich Nietzsche and Hannah Arendt – he promoted a concept of power that focused on the will and ability to act together. Elaborating this dualistic concept has wider implications for current International Relations because it reminds scholars to be self-reflexive. In addition, it is argued that a Morgenthauian scholarship helps scholars to gain a more profound understanding of depoliticising tendencies in Western democracies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 38952
Author(s):  
Douglas Tadeu da Silva Facci ◽  
Maria Terezinha Bellanda Galuch
Keyword(s):  

Nossa época pode ser caracterizada como a Era da Indiferença – com a generalização e a globalização da frieza burguesa em todas as dimensões da vida social. A metáfora da frieza e o seu termo correlato, a indiferença, tornaram-se lugar comum na cultura contemporânea, em diversos diagnósticos para caracterizar as distorções morais e expressar o mal-estar pelo estado moral da sociedade. Gruschka defende que a frieza burguesa constitui o tópos moral-filosófico central nos escritos de Horkheimer a Adorno, buscando no pensamento desses autores os elementos fundamentais para o desenvolvimento de uma teoria da frieza. Com base na tese do autor, buscamos as raízes teóricas do pensamento dos frankfurtianos sobre esse tema em três vertentes do pensamento ocidental sobre a civilização moderna, mediante três conceitos: a razão instrumental, na perspectiva sociológica de Max Weber; a racionalidade da autoconservação, que emerge na psicologia de Sigmund Freud; e a lei da equivalência, conceito capital no pensamento de Karl Marx. Em Horkheimer e Adorno, esses conceitos são associados em sua estrutura a um mesmo princípio que fundamenta a sociedade burguesa. Os apontamentos para uma teoria da frieza burguesa contribuem para a compreensão sobre o seu recrudescimento na sociedade contemporânea à beira de uma recaída na barbárie extrema.


1969 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guenther Roth

More than any other man of his generation Max Weber remains today influential as well as controversial. Neither intellectually nor politically are scholars done with the man and his work. However, his impact has not been steady over the five decades since his death. At various times Emile Durkheim, Georg Simmel, Ferdinand Tönnies, Robert Michels, Vilfredo Pareto, and Sigmund Freud have attarcted more attention and approbation. Among these members of the “generation of 1890”—as H. S. Hughes has called them—Durkheim emerges, in the long run, as Weber's closest rival in sociology. In one respect his reception has outstripped Weber's: he was incorporated with less strain into stuctural functionalism, the only contemporary “school” in American sociology that may deserve the lable. It is indicative of this difference that the Parsonian or Durkheimian approach is often contrasted with the Weberian, usually as a juxtaposition of an integration versus a conflict model of society. However, the Weberian approach has not given rise to a comparable school, perhaps because its practitioners are concerned less than functionalists with a general systems theory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document