scholarly journals The Differences in Influence of Approaches and Learning Styles on Learning Outcomes in the Matter Material of Class IV Students at SD IT Tadzkia, Langsa

Author(s):  
Kamal Fahlevi ◽  
KMS Amin Fauzi ◽  
Sumarno Sumarno

In mathematics learning, the determination of the approach greatly determines student learning outcomes, because mathematics subjects are assessed for students as quite difficult subjects, this assessment appears due to the discomfort experienced by students during the learning process in class. The method used in this research is an experimental method with two-way ANOVA test analysis. This study aims to determine differences in learning outcomes through the PMR and PMR approaches based on the Math App game in terms of student learning styles. The research was conducted at SD IT Tadzkia Langsa with a total sample of 34 students. The data collection technique uses the distribution of learning style questionnaires and by conducting tests (pre-test and post-test). This study found that there were differences in learning income between PMR and PMR based on the Math App game based on a significant value of 0.045 <0.05. Then there were also differences in learning styles based on the results of the SPSS calculation with a significant value of 0.049 <0.05. Whereas in the interaction section between the learning style approach and learning style, it was found that there was an interaction between the learning style approach and the learning style with a significant value of 0.018 <0.05.

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewi Sri Wahyuni

This study aims to determine whether or not there is an influence of student learning styles on learning outcomes of mathematics. In addition, this study aims to determine how much influence students learning styles about the learning outcomes of mathematics in SMK JANUR PERSADA SIGI. This type of research is Expost Facto's research. The population in this study were all students of the SMK JANUR PERSADA SIGI,  the number of students is 80 students consisting, students of class X as many as 25 students, class XI as many as 20 students and class XII as many as 35 students. The sample in this study was all students in the SMK JANUR PERSADA SIGI. The research instruments used were questionnaires on learning styles and Mathematics Learning Outcomes Test. Analysis of the results of the research data was carried out using the SPSS version 20.0 computer program. The results of the study show that: (1) Most students of the SMK JANUR PERSADA SIGI have learning styles in the moderate category with an average score of 38.50 with a standard deviation of 5.4321 from a minimum score of 14 to maximum 56; and mathematics learning outcomes in the very low category with an average score of 29.31 with a standard deviation of 7.833 from a minimum score of 0 to maximum 100. (2) The learning styles the SMK JANUR PERSADA SIGI is in the moderate category. (3) The mathematics learning outcomes of the SMK JANUR PERSADA SIGI are in the very low category. (4) the influence of The way to study with mathematics learning outcomes is 51.1%. While 48.9% of student learning outcomes are influenced by other variables not examined


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Bq. Malikah Hr ◽  
Sukandi Sukandi ◽  
Ni Putu Ety Lismaya Dewi

The research aims to know the effect of realistic mathematics learning in mathematics-II courses seen from the learning styles of Civil Engineering students. This type of research uses a quasi-experimental with a 2 x 3 factorial design. The sample consists of 30 second-semester students of Civil Engineering of Mandalika university of Education. The instruments in the research were a learning style questionnaire and an essay test that contained questions for mathematics II courses. The test of data analysis using two-way analysis of variance. The results showed that the learning method and learning style had a significant effect on student learning outcomes in mathematics II courses. The influence of learning methods was 26.8% and the influence of student learning styles was 37.8%. Based on the marginal average, the average of students with realistic mathematics learning methods was 70.73 and the average of students with conventional methods was 65.93. In a class that was treated with realistic mathematics learning, the average of students with visual learning styles was 75.80, the average of students with auditory learning styles was 70.80 and the average of students with kinesthetic learning styles was 65.60. It was concluded that in mathematics II courses, the application of realistic mathematics learning was effective in improving student learning outcomes and students with visual learning styles had better learning outcomes than students with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles and students auditory learning styles had better learning outcomes than students with kinesthetic learning styles.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Meifi Sufanti ◽  
Cecep Anwar Hadi Firdos Santosa

This study aims to determine the effect of STAD learning strategies assisted by teaching aids and multimedia assisted PowerPoint with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles on mathematics learning outcomes. Sampling was chosen randomly (random class). This type of research used quasi-experimental with a 2x2 factorial research design. The instruments use a test of learning outcomes in the form of multiple-choice questions and a questionnaire for student learning styles. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and multiple comparison tests. Based on the data analysis, it is concluded that: (1) there are differences in the mathematics learning outcomes of students in classes who receive STAD learning assisted by teaching aids between STAD learning assisted by multimedia PowerPoint (2) there are differences in learning outcomes between students with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles students with audio learning styles, student mathematics learning outcomes are not higher when taught with STAD learning assisted by PowerPoint multimedia compared to STAD learning assisted by teaching aids (4) For students with kinesthetic learning styles student mathematics learning outcomes are higher when taught with STAD learning assisted by teaching aid, compared to PowerPoint multimedia-assisted STAD learning and (5) there is an interaction between STAD learning strategies and auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. Therefore, it is concluded that with there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles, student learning outcomes are not only influenced by learning strategies. In this case, the STAD learning strategy assisted with teaching aids and STAD assisted with multimedia PowerPoint is not the only factor in making students understand mathematical concepts but must be based on learning styles. For auditory student learning styles, the appropriate learning strategy is to use STAD assisted by Power Point multimedia, while for students who have a kinesthetic learning style using STAD assisted by teaching aids.


Author(s):  
Dede Irawan ◽  
Amin Harahap

This study aims to determine differences in mathematics learning outcomes of students in terms of level of motivation learning styles of students and How students ' mathematics learning Outcomes in terms of level of motivation and learning styles of students. This research experiments. The research Data consists of the initial test and final test about the material that has been delivered using the approach of learning motivation and learning styles with the dependent variable is learning outcomes. In this study, the researchers obtained data from the results of pre-test and post-test conducted in the experimental class(the class that viewed from learning motivation) and class control(class in terms of learning styles). Based on the above analysis, it has been proven that there are significant differences between the learning outcomes in terms of learning motivation and learning styles in enhancing student learning outcomes in Mathematics learning in the SMK Kesehatan Imelda Ritonga.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 142
Author(s):  
Muhammad Miftah Farid

This study aims to analyze the influence of learning motivation, learning styles and learning environments on learning outcomes economy partially or simultaneously. The population in this study is IPS students a total of 314 people and a total sample of 153 students in SMA Negeri 1 Wringinanom Gresik. The data collection techniques used were questionnaires and documentation. Analysis method using multiple linear regression techniques. The results showed that the learning motivation, learning style and learning environment partially positive significant effect on learning outcomes. Learning motivation, learning style and the learning environment simultaneously positive significant effect on learning outcomes


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 133
Author(s):  
Kadek Suryati ◽  
I Gede Adnyana

The research aims to describe the influence of telegram-assisted blended learning strategies on mathematics learning outcomes in terms of learning styles. This research is a quasi-experimental research using 2x3 factorial design. The respondents taken is the second semester students majoring in informatics engineering at the STMIK STIKOM Indonesia campus. The sampling procedure in this study was a random sampling technique that was started by carrying out the equivalency test of 4 classes taken using the one-way ANOVA test. After that randomly selected, two classes as an experimental class and two classes as a control class. To get instruments that have validity before use, questionnaires and tests are first tested and validated by experts who are experts in their fields. Normality and homogeneity tests are needed as a prerequisite before analyzing the data. The method used to analyze data is two-way ANOVA. The results showed that (1) student mathematics learning outcomes taught with telegram-assisted blended learning strategies were better than conventional mathematics learning outcomes of students taught, (2) the effect of telegraph-assisted blended learning strategies on student mathematics learning outcomes in learning styles. Based on the results of the research that has been carried out, it is recommended that further researchers or educators be able to develop a blended learning strategy as a way to convey learning material so that they can pay more attention to the learning styles of each student and can develop telegrams with more attractive features so that the telegram becomes one of online application for learning media.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leny Hartati

<p>This study aims to determine the effect of learning styles and attitudes of <br />students in math on math learning outcomes. The method used is the method Expose Facto. The study sample drawn from a population with affordable proportional random technique, as many as 60 students. The instrument used in this study is a questionnaire instrument to measure learning style variables and variable attitudes of students in math, and test instruments, to measure the outcomes of learning mathematics. The research design used in this study is a 3 x 2 factorial design with three variables consisting of two independent variables, namely cognitive learning styles and attitudes of students in math, as well as the dependent variable, which is the result of learning mathematics. From the <br />data processing obtained the following results: (1) There are differences in mathematics learning outcomes of students who have a visual learning style, auditory and kinesthetic. It is in the show by the price of the F - count of 2,494 with a probability of 0.047 sig (sig &lt; 0.05) at significance level ? = 5 %. (2) The results of the mathematical learning of students who have a positive attitude at a higher math than students who have a negative attitude on math. It is in the show by the price of the F - count of 3,124 with a probability <br />of 0.018 sig (sig &lt; 0.05) at significance level. (3) There is no interaction between the learning styles of students in math attitudes toward math learning outcomes. It is in the show by the price of the F - calculated interaction probability value was 1.621 while sig. for interaction (learning styles * attitude of students in math) of 0.140 (sig &gt; 0.05). </p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Winner Macson Pandiangan ◽  
Sahat Siagian ◽  
Harun Sitompul

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan hasil belajar Matematika antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi TGT dan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki Gaya Belajar Kinestetik dan Gaya Berpikir Visual (3) interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika siswa. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI SMK Pharmaca Medan sebanyak 3 kelas dengan jumlah 122 orang. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan disain penelitian faktorial 2x2, sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Syarat ANAVA adalah data berdistribusi normal dengan Lilifors dan data harus memiliki varians populasi homogen dengan uji Bartlett dan uji Fisher. Hasil penelitian diperoleh: (1) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran TGT lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang memiliki Gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan Gaya belajar Visual dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dengan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar matematika Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using the TGT Strategy and Expository Strategy, (2) knowing the differences in learning outcomes of students who have Kinesthetic Learning Styles and Visual Thinking Styles (3) interactions between uses Learning strategies and learning styles in influencing students' mathematics learning outcomes. The population of this study were 3 class students of Pharmaca Medan Vocational High School as many as 3 classes with a total of 122 people. The sampling technique was carried out by cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with 2x2 factorial research design, while the data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significance level a = 0.05. ANOVA requirements are normally distributed data with Lilifors and data must have homogeneous population variance with the Bartlett test and Fisher's test. The results of the study were obtained: (1) the students 'mathematics learning outcomes that were learned using the TGT Learning Strategy were higher than using the Expository Strategy, (2) the students' mathematics learning outcomes who had a Kinesthetic Learning Style were higher than the Visual learning styles and (3) there were interaction between the use of learning strategies and learning styles in influencing mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, mathematics learning outcomes


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (01) ◽  
pp. 12-26
Author(s):  
Ana Theriana

The problem in this research was whether there is the effect of the Probing Prompting Learning model on student learning outcomes in the10thgradersof SMANurulAmal Palembang. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of the Probing Prompting Learning model on student learning outcomes at SMA NurulAmal Palembang. The method used in this study was the experimental method using two classes, namely the experimental class, and the control class. Meanwhile, the data collection technique was done by tests, and documentation techniques, then the data were analyzed by the data analysis technique using t-test analysis. The results showed that the average value of the experimental class was more than 80.24 compared to the control class of 63.6 and the calculations resulted tcountedtableie, 7.02 ≥ 1.667 then Ho was rejected and Ha was accepted. In other words, there was the influence of the Probing Prompting Learning model on learning outcomes.


Author(s):  
Siti Halimah ◽  
Zulfahmi Lubis ◽  
Saidatun Nisa Nasution

The purpose of this study was to determine: (1) the influence of the value clarification technique (VCT) learning model on student learning result. (2) Knowing the influence of learning styles on student learning result. (3) Knowing the interaction between learning models and learning styles on student learning result.   The population of this study were students of class VIII MTs Al-Hasanah Tanjung Leidong Labuhan Batu Utara consisting of three classes. The sample chosen for the class with the VCT learning model was class VIII-3 with 30 students, while students who were taught using the expository model were 32 students. The cluster random sampling technique is influenced by analysis of variance at a significant level (α = 0.05) followed by Scheffe. The results of this study are: (1) the average value of students taught with the VCT learning model (= 33.6) is higher than students taught with the expository learning model (= 24.68) with Fcount 0.0023 < Ftable 3,988. (2) The average value of learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak with visual learning styles (= 27.5), auditory (= 29.56) and kinesthetic (= 28.26) with Fcount = 0.068 < Ftable = 3,988. (3) There is an interaction between learning models and learning styles on students' learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak with Fcount 28.96 < Ftable 3,988. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that students with visual and auditory characteristics, the appropriate learning model is the VCT, while students with the kinesthetic learning style are expository. The implication is that teachers must be trained in how to understand student learning styles. Thus it is suggested that in planning the learning process the characteristics of students must be considered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document