Import Substitution in the Engineering Industry under the condition of Growing Demand

Author(s):  
Olga Pochukaevа ◽  
Kirill Pochukaev
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-195
Author(s):  
M. M. Balashov

This article discusses the issues of dependence of power engineering in the Russian Federation on imported equipment in general and in the field of gas turbine technologies. The paper describes the features of foreign-made equipment that is operated at the power facilities of the Russian Federation, identifies the countries that produce the installed foreign equipment in the power industry. Possible economic consequences for the energy-intensive industry from the implementation of the program for the modernization of generating equipment within the framework of the import substitution program are estimated. The forecast scenario of the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on power consumption in the UNEG and the program for the modernization of generating equipment is also presented.


Author(s):  
I. V. Grigoryev ◽  
◽  
O. A. Kunitskaya ◽  

The fall in the ruble exchange rate and the fall in demand for wood led to significant financial difficulties for logging companies. The situation was also affected by the abnormally warm winter of 2019—2020, as a result of which considerable amounts of harvested wood simply could not be exported. These situations aggravated the problems associated with the death of domestic forest engineering, and even more acutely raised the question of the need to create logging complexes based on domestic machines. In recent years, after the introduction of sanctions against Russia, our country localized the production of road and agricultural machines. Unfortunately, this has not been done for the forest engineering industry, which, in fact, has ceased to exist in Russia. For a relatively quick partial import substitution in forest engineering, it is advisable to use well-developed road and agricultural machines as basic machines, applying the principle of modular construction of complexes to them.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Shelgunov

Subject: the subject of the study are low-power generator sets with a power of up to 30 kW.Materials and methods: in this paper, the main domestic legislative documents regulating the requirements for products. An assessment is made of the current state of Russian engine building.Results: the detailed analysis of the modern domestic market of power generating units with a capacity of up to 30 kW is made, the main problems in the field of domestic production of  electric power generators in the range up to 30 kW are revealed, and the prospects for import substitution of gasoline and diesel engines are noted.Conclusions: almost complete absence of the market of domestic low-power generating sets is established, insufficient measures taken to support domestic producers are noted, measures are  proposed for the development of domestic production of power units in the range of up to 30 kW.


2015 ◽  
pp. 5-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Zamaraev ◽  
T. Marshova

The article examines the state of production capacity of Russian industry. It is shown that in spite of certain positive shifts, the rate of technological modernization in recent years has been insufficient for marked progressive changes in the capacity structure and quality. In contrast to the industrial growth after the crisis of 1998 that took place in the presence of significant reserves of capacity, the current level of idle capacity is much lower. The lack of mass input of modern and high-tech industries objectively limits the possibilities of import substitution and economic growth.


2015 ◽  
pp. 20-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Afontsev

Economic sanctions against Russia form a completely new context for public and private efforts to cope with crisis trends in Russian economy. With limited access to global goods, capital, and technology markets, it can at best minimize costs of the crisis but not come back to the normal growth path. Strategies to find new trade partners and sources of capital outside the group of countries that have introduced economic sanctions against Russia are welcome, but their potential is rather limited. Under these circumstances, crisis management should be centered neither on the alleged ‘Russia’s pivot to the East’ nor on the wide-scale import substitution but on normalization of economic relations with key country partners, regaining currency stability, and structural reforms aimed at moving national economy away from commodity specialization.


2019 ◽  
pp. 74-89
Author(s):  
Boris A. Kheyfets ◽  
Veronica Yu. Chernova

The paper analyzes the possibilities of improving the Russian policy of import substitution using the potential of the EAEU. A concrete analysis was carried out for the branches of the agro-industrial complex, where the greatest success was achieved in import substitution. There is a need for smart selective import substitution, the most important direction of which is the export-oriented one. This will improve the competitiveness of Russia and the EAEU as a whole in the global economy and will also promote the deepening of mutual ties of the EAEU countries. The main ways of solving this problem are shown.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document