scholarly journals Estudio de Validación de la Escala de Resiliencia de Connor-Davidson de 10- ítems entre Estudiantes de Medicina y Psicología Mexicanos

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 4-18
Author(s):  
Leopoldo Daniel-González ◽  
Cirilo Humberto García Cadena ◽  
Adrián Valle de la O ◽  
Tomás Caycho-Rodriguez ◽  
Enrique Martinez-Gómez
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Psychology Students ◽  
Structure Reliability ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Resilience Scale ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Good Internal Consistency ◽  
D 20 ◽  
De Medicina

The factorial structure, reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, as well as factorial invariance of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) were determined. The sample was composed of 330 students (174 medical students and 156 psychology students) with a mean age of 20.20 years (SD = 2.33). The results obtained con-firm the unidimensional structure of the scale (χ2/df = 3.06, GFI = .93, CFI = .92, NFI = .90, TLI = .92, RMSEA = .08, and SRMR = .04), the factorial in-variance with respect to career, and good internal consistency (ω = .85 and α = .85). A statistically significant difference in the level of resilience bet-ween medical students (M = 20.64, SD = 4.48) and psychology students (M = 20.27, SD = 4.51) was found [t(281) = 2.65, p = .009, d = .20]. Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity of CD-RISC-10 with happiness and perceived stress was obtai-ned. It is concluded that CD-RISC-10 shows adequate psychometric properties to measure resi-lience in Mexican university students

scholarly journals The Unified Narcissism Scale: Moving towards an integrated measure of narcissism

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danushika Sivanathan ◽  
Boris Bizumic ◽  
Conal Monaghan
Keyword(s):  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Classical Test Theory ◽  
Strong Support ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Test Theory ◽  
Pathological Narcissism ◽  
Structure Reliability ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Good Internal Consistency ◽  
Promising Avenue

Narcissism as a psychological construct has had a contentious past both in its conceptualization and measurement. There is an emerging consensus that narcissism consists of grandiose and vulnerable subtypes, which share a common core. In the present research (N = 1002), we constructed a new measure of unified narcissism that reflects these contemporary understandings using items from the most widely used measures of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI; Raskin & Terry, 1988, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890), and the Pathological Narcissism Inventory (PNI; Pincus et al., 2009, https://doi-org/10.1037/a0016530). We used classical test theory and item response theory approaches to devise a 29-item Unified Narcissism Scale. The scale showed good internal consistency, and convergent and discriminant validity, and showed evidence of measurement invariance between men and women. This research gave strong support for the structure, reliability, and validity of the unified measure, which offers a promising avenue for further enhancing our knowledge of narcissism.

scholarly journals Psychometric Performance of Resilience Scale for Chinese Adolescent (RSCA) for Undergraduates in Guangdong, China

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-93
Author(s):  
Hou Yongmei ◽  
Wang Yiyang
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Principal Components ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Floor Effect ◽  
Psychometric Performance ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Resilience Scale ◽  
Chinese Adolescent ◽  
Variance Contribution

To analyze the psychometric performance of Resilience Scale for Chinese Adolescent (RSCA) for undergraduates in Guangdong. Stratified random sampling method was used to select 1628 undergraduates from 7 colleges in Guangdong. RSCA and Academic Burnout Scale for Chinese Undergraduates (ABSCU) were used to investigate them. Cronbach's αcoefficient and split-half reliability were used to analyze the internal consistency of RSCA. Convergent validity, discriminant validity, factor analysis and criterion validity were used to evaluate its validity. Celling and floor effect were used to analyze its sensitivity. Cronbach's α coefficient of the total questionniar, 2 domains and 5 factors were0.72-0.86, which met the requirements of the group comparison. Spearman-Brown split-half coefficient of the total questionniar, 2 domains and 5 factors were 0.71-0.89. The calibration success rate of convergent and discriminant validity of 5 factors were all 100%. The calibration success rate of convergent and discriminant validity of 2 domains were all above 86.7%. Five principal components obtained from 27 items, witha cumulative variance contribution rate of48.79% and two principal components obtained from 5 factors, withacumulative variance contribution rateof 65.23%,which basically metthe theoretical conception of RSCA. The total score of RSCA significantly predicted the total score of ABSCU (Radj2=0.158, P<0.001). The total score, scores of 2 domains and 5 factors of RSCA were all normal distribution, without any celling or floor effect. The psychometric performance of RSCA for undergraduates in Guangdong were valid and reliable.

The Femininity Ideology Scale: Factor Structure, Reliability, Convergent and Discriminant Validity, and Social Contextual Variation

Sex Roles ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 57 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 373-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Levant ◽  
Katherine Richmond ◽  
Stephen Cook ◽  
A. Tanner House ◽  
Maryse Aupont
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Scale Factor ◽  
Structure Reliability ◽  
Contextual Variation ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity

scholarly journals Validating Appearance-Based Rejection Sensitivity and Fear of Negative Appearance Evaluation Scales in the Russian Sample

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 118-143
Author(s):  
A.Yu. Razvaliaeva ◽  
N.A. Polskaya
Keyword(s):  
Body Image ◽  
Body Dissatisfaction ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Rejection Sensitivity ◽  
Drive For Thinness ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Body Image Disturbances ◽  
Good Internal Consistency ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

We present the results of validating Fear of Negative Appearance Evaluation Scale (Lundgren et al., 2004) and Appearance-based Rejection Sensitivity Scale (Park, 2007) on the Russian sample. These scales operationalize factors of interpersonal vulnerability to body dissatisfaction as a result of internalizing the notions of the ideal body transmitted by parents, peers and mass media. The sample included 760 respondents aged 16—48, 687 female (Mage=24, Med=22, SD=6.75) and 73 male (Mage=23.2, Med=22, SD=5.58). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that either scale had a single latent factor, both showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α for FNAE — α=0.91; ARS — α=0.93) and test-retest reliability (for FNAE — rs=0.89; for ARS —0.93; p&lt;0,001). FNAE showed age differences, reaching the highest scores in the youngest group (aged 16—20). Convergent and discriminant validity of the scales was confirmed; they were positively related to attachment-related anxiety and disturbances in body image and eating behavior, and correlated negatively with self-esteem. Both scales had a positive impact on body image disturbances and drive for thinness. Fear of Negative Appearance Evaluation Scale and Appearance-based Rejection Sensitivity Scale can be used in studies broadly related to body dissatisfaction.

scholarly journals Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Resilience Scale for Children with Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce Oi Kwan Chung ◽  
William Ho Cheung Li ◽  
Xia Wei ◽  
Ankie Tan Cheung ◽  
Laurie Long Kwan Ho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Chinese Version ◽  
Hong Kong Chinese ◽  
Children With Cancer ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Resilience Scale ◽  
Hong Kong Chinese Children

Abstract Background: To test the psychometric properties of a traditional Chinese version of the Resilience Scale for Children (RS-10) and examine its factorial structure via a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).Methods: One hundred and eighty-six Hong Kong Chinese children with cancer were recruited in the paediatric oncology units of two public acute-care hospitals in Hong Kong to participate in this cross-sectional study. The psychometric properties of the traditional Chinese version of the RS-10 were assessed, namely its content validity, convergent and discriminant validity, construct validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability.Results: The newly translated traditional Chinese version of the RS-10 demonstrated adequate internal consistency, excellent test–retest reliability, good content validity and appropriate convergent and discriminant validity. The CFA results demonstrated that there was a good fit between the factor structure of the Chinese version of the RS-10 and the observed data, thereby confirming the construct validity of this instrument.Conclusions: The traditional Chinese version of the RS-10 was found to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing the resilience of Hong Kong Chinese children with cancer. The newly developed traditional Chinese version of the RS-10 is an appropriate clinical research tool for evaluating the effectiveness of nursing interventions in enhancing the resilience of and promoting mental well-being in children with cancer. Trial registration: NCT03544190

Comparing Rape Myth Acceptance Among Police Trainees and Medical Students: A Preliminary Danish Validation of the Updated Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale

2021 ◽  
pp. 107780122110389
Author(s):  
Marie Skov ◽  
Sarah van Mastrigt ◽  
Andreas V. Jensen
Keyword(s):  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Rape Myth Acceptance ◽  
Rape Myth ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Professional Groups ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Acceptable Model ◽  
Acceptance Scale ◽  
Good Internal Consistency ◽  
Myth Acceptance

Identifying rape myths among criminal justice and medical professionals is central to preventing secondary victimization. We present the first preliminary Danish validation of McMahon and Farmer’s updated Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance scale using samples of police and medical trainees. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses result in a 14-item, four-factor measure that demonstrates acceptable model fit, satisfactory convergent and discriminant validity, and good internal consistency. Although reported rape myth acceptance is generally low in both samples, some subscale scores vary across professional groups, thereby identifying specific targets for intervention in different occupational contexts. Further tests of the scale are recommended.

Establishing and evaluating a Balint group for fourth-year medical students at an Irish University

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sorcha McManus ◽  
David Killeen ◽  
Yvonne Hartnett ◽  
Gearoid Fitzgerald ◽  
Kieran C. Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Qualitative Assessment ◽  
Self Reflection ◽  
Balint Groups ◽  
Resilience Scale ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Fourth Year Medical Students ◽  
Balint Group ◽  
The Impact

ObjectiveThe study was designed to establish and evaluate the impact of a 6-week Balint group on empathy and resilience in fourth-year medical students during their psychiatry rotation.MethodologyThis prospective study used the Jefferson Scale of Empathy – Student Version and the Brief Resilience Scale before and after 6-week Balint groups. Participating students also completed a qualitative assessment of their experience.ResultsStudents who participated were enthusiastic regarding the value of Balint groups in promoting self-reflection and gaining insight into self- and patient-care dynamics. There was a significant difference in empathy scores pre- and post-Balint intervention. There was no significant difference in resilience scores.ConclusionThe establishment of a 6-week Balint group for fourth-year medical students was successful in increasing empathy. Students reported a positive view of Balint and its beneficial role in this study group.

scholarly journals Emotional Intelligence Scale: Assessing its Psychometric Characteristics in Bangladeshi Culture

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Akram Uzzaman ◽  
Dr. A. K. M. Rezaul Karim
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Emotional Intelligence ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Emotional Understanding ◽  
Intelligence Scale ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Grand Total ◽  
Good Internal Consistency ◽  
And Control

After the publication of Goleman’s (1995) best-selling book ‘Emotional Intelligence’ the term drew attention scholars (Algera, 2011) in terms of ensuring social and universal unity and for study. Due to development of technology, increasing social unrest and  competition  social relationships have been declining and individualism has been arising in parallel with the rapid emotional understanding and control has arisen in order to each individual accepts and works in cooperation with an individual from another culture. But there is no valid scientific tool for measuring this important emotional intelligence behavior in Bangladesh culture. So, considering the significance of the tool, the purpose of the present study was to translate the instrument into Bangla and validate in Bangladeshi culture. A grand total of 1000 participants (491 males and 509 females) participated in the study. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) which was administered on sample 1 (n = 500) identified a seven-factor of the Emotional Intelligence Scale (EIS) with 33 items. The seven factors explained 56.60% of the total variance. When analyzed the data for sample 2 (n = 500) in Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), it revealed that the seven-factor model with 33 items is an acceptable fit [χ 2 (469) = 1325.99, RMSEA = .06, RMR = .08, CFI = .87, GFI = .86] model to the data. Moreover, the EIS showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .93 for the 1st sample, .92 for the 2nd , and combined sample), strong convergent, and discriminant validity. Thus, the Bangla version EIS appears to be valid and reliable and may be used in further research on emotional intelligence behavior in the country.

scholarly journals Validation of a German and English Version of the Revised Art-of-Living Inventory

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Bernhard Schmitz ◽  
Bettina Schumacher ◽  
Mira Schwarz ◽  
Franziska Feldmann
Keyword(s):  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Art Of Living ◽  
Multiple Strategies ◽  
Multiple Components ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
German Speaking ◽  
Good Internal Consistency ◽  
English Speaking

Abstract. It is an important goal for many people to achieve happiness or well-being. Research has shown the effects of various stand-alone strategies to increase well-being. However, it is unclear whether multiple strategies can enhance happiness. Art-of-living is defined as a combination of the most important strategies that lead to well-being. Based on philosophical theory and empirical studies, 11 strategy components have been identified. A basic questionnaire, the Art-of-Living Inventory (AOLI), which aims to measure these strategies, was validated in a German-speaking sample ( n = 1,302) and an English-speaking sample ( n = 2,166). Results confirmed the hypothesized factor structure which comprised 11 dimensions and at least weak measurement invariance. Further analyses demonstrated good internal consistency, retest reliability and convergent, and discriminant validity with respect to different indicators of well-being and the validation measures. Multiple regressions indicated that a combination of multiple components was significantly better at predicting well-being than even the best single component. Moreover, when compared to personality, art-of-living was demonstrated to have additional and distinct effects on well-being. In sum, the AOLI has promising measurement characteristics and may be applied in research studies to better understand well-being and in intervention studies aimed at enhancing well-being.

Psychometric Properties of the Expanded Version of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in a Turkish Population

2018 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. 517-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Metehan Irak ◽  
Ece Oral Albayrak
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Turkish Population ◽  
Anxiety Symptoms ◽  
Depression And Anxiety ◽  
Post Traumatic Stress ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Mood Disorder Questionnaire ◽  
Good Internal Consistency

The study examined psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms-II (IDAS-II) in a Turkish sample. The sample consisted of nonclinical ( N = 931) and clinical ( N = 208) individuals. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that Turkish IDAS-II was similar to the original IDAS-II and supported the construct validity of the test. The Turkish IDAS-II showed good internal consistency, significant acceptable retest correlations, and was sensitive to changes over time. The Turkish IDAS-II also showed good convergent and discriminant validity in relation to the Beck Depression Inventory, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, the Mood Disorder Questionnaire, the Maudsley Obsessive Compulsive Inventory, the Panic Agoraphobia Scale, and the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian Version. Discriminant analyses revealed that the subscales of the Turkish IDAS-II significantly differentiated healthy controls from outpatients. The Turkish IDAS-II is a reliable and valid measure for assessing symptoms of depression and anxiety in Turkish-speaking participants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document