JUAL BELI TANAH YANG DILAKUKAN TANPA AKTA PPAT

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-107
Author(s):  
Cheri Bayuni Budjang
Keyword(s):  
Everyday Life ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Right ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Buying and selling is a way to transfer land rights according to the provisions in Article 37 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration which must include the deed of the Land Deed Making Official to register the right of land rights (behind the name) to the Land Office to create legal certainty and minimize the risks that occur in the future. However, in everyday life there is still a lot of buying and selling land that is not based on the laws and regulations that apply, namely only by using receipts and trust in each other. This is certainly very detrimental to both parties in the transfer of rights (behind the name), especially if the other party is not known to exist like the Case in Decision Number 42 / Pdt.G / 2010 / PN.Mtp

scholarly journals The Contradiction of Between Judge’s Decision and Legal Provisions Regarding The Position of Heirs in Proof of Land Rights

2019 ◽  
pp. 133-148
Author(s):  
Sulistiani Adont ◽  
La Syarifuddin ◽  
Rahmawati Al Hidayah
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

As the economic development of Indonesian society increases, so will the need for legal certainty in the field of land for the right holder of a plot of land. the fundamental issue in verifying the right to the land is any person claiming to have a right, or appointing an event to affirm his right or to deny any right of another person, shall prove the existence of that right or prove the event, the heirs' a case study of the Samarinda District Court Judgment Number 138 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN.Smr.This research uses normative research method. The primary legal material of this research is the legislation that is compiled into a conceptual form based on existing legislation. Which then conducted legal analysis of the problems in this study.The result of the research is the position of the heirs in verification of the right to land must have at least two evidences, that can prove that the heirs are valid first through the certificate of inheritance. To strengthen the verification of the heirs to the land rights, the heirs must prove by means of evidence as set forth in Article 24 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Registration. The second result of the research is the letter of appointment by the Government/Local Government is a valid evidence based on existing legislation, and it becomes the base of the right which is the basis of the land ownership, the analysis of the judge's decision namely the judge decision of Samarinda District Court No. 138 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN.Smr is incorrect and does not provide legal certainty, it is caused by no reference what is contained in Article 24 paragraph (1) and Article 32 paragraph (2) Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 on Land Registration.

scholarly journals PENGARUH SERTIFIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM MENCAPAI KEPASTIAN HUKUM

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-43
Author(s):  
Abdul Muthallib
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Role Of The Government

This article discusses legal certainty as one of the objectives of Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian (Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Pokok-Pokok Agraria) Principles and the influence of land rights certificates as a strong means of proof of land registration. The provision of guarantees of legal certainty to holders of land rights is accommodated in Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian Principles and further regulated in Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration (Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah). Using a normative legal view, this article refers to regulations on agrarian. The discussion of the article looks at the role of the government in providing opportunities for all citizens to register land with the aim of obtaining legal certainty and minimizing disputes. This article looks at the purpose of issuing certificates in land registration activities so that right-holders can easily prove that they are the right-holders. This is done so that rights holders can obtain legal certainty and legal protection. However, the land rights certificate issued is considered to be still lacking in minimizing disputes and it is assumed that it has not affected the land rights owners to protect their rights.

scholarly journals JAMINAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM YANG TERKANDUNG DALAM SERTIPIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahmat Ramadhani
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Registration Process ◽  
Physical Data ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Subjects

The product of the land registration process is a certificate of title granted to the right holder. The certificate according to Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 is in the form of one sheet of documents containing information about the juridical data and physical data required on a parcel of registered land. Although the certificate of land rights is referred to as the strongest evidence but in reality the certificate of land rights has not fully guaranteed legal certainty. This is because the law still opens loopholes for other legal subjects to question it both personally and in groups within the judiciary. In order to ensure legal certainty of a right to land for the right holder, the certificate of land rights must be tested in three aspects: relating to; Legal Certainty of Object, Legal Certainty of Status of Rights and Legal Certainty on Subject.

scholarly journals KEPASTIAN HUKUM DALAM PERBUATAN HUKUM ATAS HARTA BERSAMA PADA PEMBELIAN DAN PENJAMINAN HAK ATAS TANAH

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 308
Author(s):  
Jane Elizabeth Priscillia Chendra ◽  
Nurfaidah Said ◽  
Kahar Lahae
Keyword(s):  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Marital Property ◽  
The Right ◽  
Husband And Wife ◽  
Laws And Regulations

AbstractThis research aims to analyze whether a husband/wife has the right to act by themselves in the case of land right purchase or mortgage, also the means that can be done to induce legal certainty in this matter. The purchase of land rights using money from the marital property should be done together by the husband and wife, or with a statement of approval from the husband/wife. The mortgage of a land right which is a part of a marital property or inheritance property must be done together by all the joint-owners; if an authority is required, it must be given in the form of Power of Attorney to Impose Mortgage. The means that can be done to induce legal certainty in this matter is by making some changes in the laws and regulations concerning marriage, land, and mortgage. IntisariPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis apakah seorang suami/istri berwenang untuk bertindak sendiri dalam membeli dan/atau menjaminkan harta bersama berupa hak atas tanah serta upaya untuk mewujudkan kepastian hukum dalam hal tersebut. Pembelian hak atas tanah menggunakan uang dari harta bersama seharusnya dilakukan bersama-sama oleh suami-istri atau diberikan pernyataan persetujuan dari istri/suaminya. Penjaminan hak atas tanah yang merupakan harta bersama maupun harta warisan seharusnya dilakukan bersama-sama oleh para mede-eigenaar; jika menggunakan kuasa, harus dalam bentuk Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan. Upaya untuk mewujudkan kepastian hukum dalam hal ini adalah mengubah beberapa ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan mengenai perkawinan, pertanahan dan Hak Tanggungan.

scholarly journals Kedudukan Notaris dan PPAT dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah dan Jaminan Perlindungan bagi Para Pihak

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-383
Author(s):  
I Komang Edy Susanto ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati ◽  
Ni Gusti Ketut Sri Astiti
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Equal Treatment ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

Basically, notaries also serve as Land Deed Making Official (hereafter called PPAT) after they carry out a test. Thus, in carrying out their role as PPAT, they are entitled to make deeds of transferring land rights. Based on this background, this research was conducted with the aim of describing how the position of the notary and PPAT in transferring land rights and how legal protection for parties who transfer land through sale and purchase. The research method used in this research was a normative legal method. The results of this study indicated that the position of a notary in the transfer of land rights as an official deed maker is mentioned in article 2 paragraph (1) of Law No. 2/2014 concerning the Position of Notary, which states that a notary is a public official who is authorized to make authentic deeds and has other powers as referred to in this Law or based on other Prevailing Laws. The position of the PPAT in essence has the task of carrying out land registration by making deeds as evidence and having carried out certain legal actions regarding land rights. Legal protection for parties transferring land through sale and purchase is stated in the 1945 Constitution, namely Article 27 paragraph (1) which states that each person has the right to recognition, guarantee, protection, and legal certainty that is just and equal treatment before the law.

scholarly journals The Strength of Evidence (Certificate) in Land Rights Disputes According to Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 Concerning Land Registration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriella Talenta Sekotibo
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
Legal Standing ◽  
Legal Consequences

The purpose of this study is to provide legal certainty and to resolve disputes over land rights ownership for buyers who are acting in good faith when purchasing and selling inheritance. The research method is normative juridical, employing both a statutory and case-based approach. According to the study's findings, buyers with good intentions receive legal protection in the form of compensation. However, when parties with bad intentions violate Article 1267 of the Civil Code, the legal consequences of buying and selling inherited land are null and void, as they contain elements of fraud, oversight, and ignorance. additional heirs. Keeping in mind that the property being traded is inheritance land that already possesses permanent legal standing and cannot be traded without the approval of other heirs.Keywords: Legal Protection; Good Faith Buyers; and Inheritance Land.

scholarly journals ESENSI TRANSPARANSI DAN AKUNTABILITASI DALAM PENDAFTARAN TANAH DALAM SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Deselfia D N M Sahari
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Positive Tendency ◽  
The Government

The essence of transparency and accountability in land registration within the legal system in Indonesia has not been realized properly. Due to the weakness of the guarantee of legal certainty and legal protection from the government.  In addition, the publication system of land registration adopted is negative with a positive tendency, not applied in Article 32 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997 regarding expiration to file a five-year lawsuit there is a synchronization / non-harmonization concerning land authority between local government Article 14 paragraph (2 ) Letter k of Law Number 23 Year 2014 regarding Regional Government and Authority of National Land Agency (Regulation of Head of National Land Agency No.2 Year 2013 regarding Abundance of Land Rights and Land Registration Authority) and regulation of grace period of entitlement right. AbstrakEsensi transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam pendaftaran tanah dalam sistem hukum di Indonesia belum terealisasi dengan baik. Karena lemahnya jaminan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum dari pemerintah. Selain itu, sistem publikasi pendaftaran tanah yang diadopsi negatif dengan kecenderungan positif, tidak diterapkan dalam Pasal 32 ayat (2) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang berakhirnya pengajuan gugatan lima tahun ada sinkronisasi / non-harmonisasi tentang kewenangan pertanahan antar pemerintah daerah Pasal 14 ayat (2) Huruf k Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dan Kewenangan Badan Pertanahan Nasional (Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional No.2 Tahun 2013 tentang Kelimpahan Hak atas Tanah dan Pendaftaran Tanah Otoritas) dan peraturan masa tenggang hak cipta. Kata kunci: Transparansi; Akuntabilitas; Pendaftaran Tanah; Sistem Hukum;

scholarly journals Akibat Hukum Ketentuan Pasal 33 Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 220
Author(s):  
Bambang Tri Wahyudi ◽  
Rachmad Safa’at
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Legal Force

This study aimed to analyze the legal force, legal conflicts, and legal consequences of the provisions of Article 33 of the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency Number 6 of 2018 and the formulation that was appropriate with the regulations of the payment procedures for income tax (PPh) and acquisition duty of right on land and building (BPHTB). This study used a normative juridical method with a conceptual and statute approach. Based on academic juridical perspective, article 33 Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency Number 6 of 2018 had weak legal force, while from a formal juridical perspective the regulation remained valid before a decision to cancel its application from the Supreme Court. The provisions of Article 33 of the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency Number 6 of 2018 contradicted the provisions of Articles 3 and 7 of Government Regulation Number 34 of 2018 and Articles 90 and 91 of Law Number 28 of 2009. It caused legal consequences i.e. legal uncertainty, legal injustice, and did not fulfill the legal force of land rights certificates as a strong means of proof. The formulation of the right regulation regarding the procedure for paying income tax and fees for acquiring land and building rights was carried out by establishing and stipulating a ministerial regulation as a normative guideline for a complete systematic land registration program.

scholarly journals Cancellation of Land Ownership Certificate by the State Administrative Court Reviewed from the State Administrative Justice Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 703
Author(s):  
Nurul Muzakkir ◽  
Yanis Rinaldi ◽  
Adwani Adwani
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
The State ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Land Area ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Right

Based on Article 32 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration states, in the event that a land area has been issued a certificate legally and on behalf of a person or legal entity who acquires the land in good faith and expressly controls it, then the other party who feels that it has the right to the land, can no longer demand the exercise of the right if within a period of 5 years from the issuance of the certificate does not object in writing to the holder of the certificate or the Head of the Land Office concerned or does not file a lawsuit to the Court regarding the mastery or issuance of the certificate. Legal problems arise that a certificate that has been issued a certificate for 5 years can not be sued in court on an validity basis. The results showed that the cancellation of land rights certificate by tun court based on The State Administrative Court Law, cancellation of land certificates by deliberation and other efforts and unilateral settlement by the National Land Agency (BPN) has been carried out, where the plaintiffs held a review of the State Administrative Decision that has been issued can not be received by the plaintiff or the disputing party. Prior to the ruling that has legal force it remains prohibited for the relevant State Administration officials to carry out mutations on the land in question, it is to avoid the occurrence of problems in the future that cause harm to the litigants and third parties.

SURAT KUASA MEMBEBANKAN HAK TANGGUNGAN ATAS TANAH NEGARA (STUDI KASUS PT X DI KOTA Y)

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 192
Author(s):  
Ayang Fristia Maulana
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Right

State land is land directly controlled by the state as stated in Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 on Land Registration. State land is not an object of Mortgage Rights, the object of mortgage is the right to land with the status of “Right of Ownership”,” Right to Exploit”, Right to Build” and “Rights to Use” as described in Article 51 of BAL in Article 4 UUHT. Because state land is not the object of mortgage rights, it is not justified if the state land is guaranteed as the repayment of debtor's debt which is tied up with Power of Attorney Charging the Deposit Rights. In this case, the debtor is a legal entity of a Limited Liability Company engaged in real estate which has located permission for land acquisition. The land to be acquired has the right of ownership status which is then released by the owner with the provision of compensation. After the release of the land rights, the released land will become state land as set forth in Article 19 of the BAL. This is the land which is released as collateral by the debtor to the creditors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document