scholarly journals KEABSAHAN PERATURAN MENTERI HUKUM DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA NOMOR 17 TAHUN 2018 TENTANG PENDAFTARAN PERSEKUTUAN KOMANDITER, PERSEKUTUAN FIRMA, DAN PERSEKUTUAN PERDATA

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Musa Lasakar

Article 23 of the KUHDagang states that registration is submitted through the registration of a district court at the location of the company. In Permenkumham No. 17 of 2018 in Article 3 Paragraph (2) states that registration is submitted through the Business Entity Administration System (SABU). The problem of existence and strength binding legislation is regulated in Article 8 paragraph (1) of Law No. 12/2011, including Ministerial Regulation, does not only regulate the existence of laws and regulations based on delegation. This research using juridical method, and problem approach is Statute Approach and Conceptual Approach. The first conclusion was drawn, with the enactment of Permenkumham No. 17 of 2018 this makes CV registration easier and more regular and also this makes it easier for investors to get information about CVs that have been registered in the SABU and secondly, Problems of establishing a CV from Permenkumham No. 17 of 2018 this is the first, the establishment of a CV must order the name first before finally registering the CV in SABU. Secondly, the CV registration place is changed to the SABU. Third, the establishment of CV is required to use authentic deeds

Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 475
Author(s):  
I Made Hengki Permadi

The process or procedure for establishing a firm is regulated in Article 22 and Article 23 of the Commercial Law Code (hereinafter referred to as KUHD). In this provision, it is stipulated that the firm must be established with an authentic deed and registered with the Registrar of the District Court where the firm was established. The regulations in the KUHD are not in line with the Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 17 Year 2018 regarding the Registration of the Military Alliance, the Fima Alliance and the Civil Alliance which indicates that the registration of the firm is carried out in the Legal Entity Administration System (hereinafter referred to as SABU). it appears that there is a norm conflict between the two rules. This study aims to determine the arrangements in registering the Firm and the legal consequences of not registering the Firm in the Business Entity Administration System (SABU). This research is a normative legal research. In research using a statutory and conceptual approach. Using primary and secondary legal materials. The results showed that based on the principle of Lex Superiori derogate Legi Inferiori, based on the hierarchy of statutory regulations, the KUHD which is equivalent to the Law is stronger than the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 17 of 2018 concerning Registration of Komanditer Alliance, Firm Alliance and Civil Alliance whose position is under Government Regulations and Presidential Regulations, because the Acts are higher than Government Regulations and Presidential Regulations. The legal consequence of not registering a firm with SABU is that the name of the firm can be used first by other firms so it must change the name of the firm concerned with another name because in the SABU system there is a registration of the firm's alliance name. If there is a partnership with another firm that registers the name of the firm first, then the name of the same firm cannot be registered again and the firm is deemed invalid. Proses atau tata cara pendirian firma diatur dalam Pasal 22 dan Pasal 23 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Dagang (yang selanjutnya disebut KUHD). Dalam ketentuan tersebuti menentukan bahwa firma harus didirikan dengan akta otentik dan didaftarkan pada Kepaniteraan Pengadilan Negeri dimana firma tersebut didirikan. Peraturan dalam KUHD tersebut tidak sejalan dengan Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 17 Tahun 2018 tentang Pendaftaran Persekutuan Komanditer, Persekutuan Fima dan Persekutuan Perdata yang mengisyaratkan bahwa pendaftaran firma dilakukan pada Sistem Administrasi Badan Hukum (yang selanjutnya disebut SABU). terlihat bahwa adanya konflik norma diantara kedua aturan itu. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui   pengaturan dalam pendaftaran Firma  dan akibat hukum apabila tidak mendaftarkan Firma pada Sistem Administrasi Badan Usaha (SABU). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif. Dalam penelitian menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder.   Hasil penelitian  menunjukkan  bahwa  berdasarkan asas Lex Superiori derogate Legi Inferiori maka berdasarkan hirarki peraturan perundang-undangan, KUHD yang setara dengan Undang-Undang lebih kuat dibanding Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 17 Tahun 2018 tentang Pendaftaran Persekutuan Komanditer, Persekutuan Firma dan Persekutuan Perdata yang kedudukannya dibawah Peraturan Pemerintah dan Peraturan Presiden, karena Undang-Undang kedudukannya lebih tinggi dari Peraturan Pemerintah dan Peraturan Presiden. Akibat hukum dari tidak didaftarkannya firma pada SABU, yaitu nama firma dapat dipakai terlebih dahulu oleh firma lainnya sehingga harus mengganti nama firma yang bersangkutan dengan nama yang lain karena di dalam sistem SABU terdapat pendaftaran nama persekutuan firma. Jika ada persekutuan firma lain yang mendaftarkan nama firmanya terlebih dahulu maka nama firma yang sama tidak akan bisa didaftarkan kembali dan firma tersebut dianggap tidak sah pendiriannya.


Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Abdullah Dian Triwahyuni

The position of notary has been regulated in Act Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position (hereinafter referred to as UUJN-P). Even so, philosophical and technical notary obligations and responsibilities are not regulated in detail in these laws and regulations, leading to the absence of a barometer that becomes a standard for notary behavior, notary office administration system, and notary office governance that applies universally. This has caused in some instances negative views on the notary profession in the community. One of the negative views is because the morality of the notary is not in tune with ethical behavior in society. Negative views also arise due to the administration of notary office administration and the layout of the notary office that does not meet the aesthetic element. The situation made the notary public seem unprofessional in providing social services in his function as a public official. Then what should be the notary morality? How about a good notary office administration? How should the notary manage his office? The writing of this article uses normative research using a positive legal approach and a conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Legal materials were analyzed using descriptive techniques. The results of this study indicate that there are not yet detailed and universal rules regarding the obligations and responsibilities of notaries sociologically and technically in providing social services, but the values ??that live and develop in society can be used as benchmarks for notary behavior and administrative systems notary office and notary office governance.


Author(s):  
Masykur Masykur ◽  
Azhari Yahya ◽  
Dahlan Dahlan

This study aims to explain the limits and responsibilities of the position carried out by the notary in registration of Commanditaire Vennootschap (CV) online through the business entity administration system. The research method used in this research is normative juridical using a statutory and conceptual approach. The collection of research materials is carried out by examining library materials or secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that the notary was only authorized and responsible for the creation of the deed of CV. Notary cannot receive power of attorney because it contradicts the UUJN which has been stipulated authority and responsibility attached to the position of a Notary. With the enactment of the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 17 of 2018. Registration of CV which was previously in the District Court is delegated to the Ministry of Law and Human Rights through the online system. The entire Notary is acting as an Authorized Officer not as an authorized official, there is a prosecution of an error in the registration process, then the Notary can indirectly be presented in the trial at the Court but it must be with the permission of the Notary Honorary Council. Thus the Notary can refuse to accept power over online CV registration via SABU, because in carrying out such registration a Notary must position himself as a person not as a public official. This is because it is not regulated in Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 142
Author(s):  
Putu Ayu Anastasia Wierdarini

The amendment of the Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 positioned the Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat no longer as the highest state institution and the highest sovereign of the people. This has implications for the authority of the Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat to have a strategic position, namely to UUD 1945, to stipulate GBHN, to elect the president and vice president through amendment of its authority to be very limited and weak. This paper examines jurisdictionally how to restore the privileges possessed by the Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat through the amendment of the UUD 1945. A normative legal research method with statute approach and conceptual approach is used to analyze this problem.The results of the study indicate that the MPR's repatriation in the main and vital position in the Indonesian state administration system is very important, namely through amendments to the material content of the UUD 1945 which must be implemented on an ongoing basis.


Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 492
Author(s):  
I Gede Agus Yudi Suryawan ◽  
Dewa Nyoman Rai Asmara Putra

In accordance with the Decree of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights Number M-05 HT.01.01 of 2002 concerning the Enforcement of the Legal Entity Administration System at the Directorate General of General Legal Administration of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia, determines that all legal entity settlements include the ratification of the deed of establishment PT, application for approval and submission of deed reports, amendments to articles of association, fiduciary registration, will registration, are carried out with the online Legal Entity Administration System. So the notary has the authority to register all these legal acts online. The purpose of this research is to find out the role of the Notary in registering deeds and legalization of legal entities through the Directorate General of AHU Online services and to find out the responsibilities of the Notary if there are problems in registering deeds and legal entity approval through the services of the Directorate General of AHU Online. This study uses a normative juridical research method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the research, namely, the role of the notary in registering deeds and ratifying legal entities is entering deed data, checking all deed data to avoid data entry errors and the notary has the responsibility if there is an error from the notary's office, the notary will make corrections at a cost of Notary, however in this regard there is still cooperation from the applicant regarding the required data.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 369
Author(s):  
Inca Nadya Damopolii ◽  
R. Imam Rahmat Sjafi’i

This study aimed to analyze the force of private testament proofing and the judge's consideration in the Bitung District Court Decision Number 43 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Bit. about sale without any written evidence. The study used a normative research method with a statutory approach and a case approach. The results showed the power of private testament regarding the Bitung District Court Decision Number 43 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Bit. is strong, judging from the power of physical evidence, the power of formal evidence, and the power of material evidence. However, the sale carried out between the plaintiff and the defendant which was not in the presence of the Land Deed Official had weak legal force because it was not in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations. In their legal considerations, judges used the principle of sale customary law only, namely light and cash, and witness testimony de auditu as evidence. This legal consideration was deemed inappropriate because it was against the Basic Agrarian Law and in general the witness testimony de auditu was rejected as evidence.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 222
Author(s):  
Abd. Shomad ◽  
Rahadi Wasi Bintoro

Religious court as forefront in economic sharia dispute resolution in litigation has not ideal place to perform their duty since there are still regulation conflicts such as implementation of encumbrance right execution which still becomes a domain in district court. As explained, this article discusses phi-losophical foundation of Religious Court competence to resolve economic sharia issues. In regard to this, conceptual approach, law approach and historical approach are respectively used. Based on the analysis, basic competence of religious court is Islamic personality principle which carries the use of Islamic law elements (sharia principle) in its legal relationship. From the analysis the implication is drawn that as long as a dispute belongs to economic sharia, then it is Religious Court which is com-petent to handle including court decision.Keywords: law enforcement, economic sharia dispute, absolute competence, court decision implementation


Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 458
Author(s):  
Ida Bagus Putu Pramarta Wibawa

The purpose of this research is to reviewe and analyze the extent to which the applicable laws and regulations in Indonesia regulate the use of signatures change by the partys in making notary deeds and to review and analyze the legal consequences of the use of signatures change by the partys in making a notary deed. This research is a normative legal research, using two types of approaches, namely the statute approach and the conceptual approach. The results of this study show that there are various causes of changing signatures of party, but the laws and regulations that apply in Indonesia do not have articles that govern this. The validity of a signature is seen based on the acknowledgment to justify the person affixing the signature. A different or change signature is justified by law insofar as the signer affixing his signature confirms that it is his signature, so that the legal consequences of such notary deeds are still valid to be used as evidence of authentic writing that has the power of perfect proof law. Tujuan dari dilakukannya penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis mengenai sejauh mana peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia mengatur mengenai penggunaan tanda tangan berubah-ubah oleh penghadap di dalam pembuatan akta notaris dan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis mengenai akibat hukum dari digunakannya tanda tangan berubah-ubah oleh penghadap di dalam pembuatan akta notaris. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif, dengan menggunakan dua jenis pendekatan yaitu pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa ada berbagai penyebab terjadinya tanda tangan yang berubah-ubah dari penghadap, namun peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia tidak terdapat pasal yang mengatur mengenai hal tersebut. Keabsahan dari suatu tanda tangan adalah dilihat berdasarkan adanya pengakuan untuk membenarkan dari orang yang membubuhkan tanda tangan. Tanda tangan yang berbeda atau berubah-ubah dibenarkan oleh hukum sepanjang penghadap yang membubuhkan tanda tangannya tersebut membenarkan bahwa itu adalah tanda tangannya, sehingga akibat hukum terhadap akta notaris yang demikian adalah tetap sah untuk digunakan sebagai alat bukti tulisan otentik yang memiliki kekuatan hukum pembuktian sempurna.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 232-240
Author(s):  
Nanang Ibrahim Soleh ◽  
Heriamariaty ◽  
Thea Farina ◽  
Nor Asriadi

Children are gifts and entrusted from God who are given talents and dignity as a whole creature. During their lifetime, children sometimes face legal problems such as narcotics abuse. This becomes complicated while the child has been married and being a subject against the law. The determination the age limit for children is still a debate because sev-eral laws and regulations provide different figures. This is, indeed, a crucial matter because it will affect legal conse-quence to the children, especially for those who deal with narcotics crime. Based on this point of departure, the authors examine Sampit District Court Decision Number: 03/Pid.SusAnak/2015/PN.Spt regarding narcotics abuse by a married child.


Author(s):  
Anna Triningsih

<p>Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 tentang Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, Dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (UU MD3) pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) dinilai memiliki problem substantif/materil akibat materi muatannya bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (UUD NRI 1945), yang mengakibatkan kerugian konstitusional terhadap Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD), meliputi dikuranginya kewenangan DPD untuk dapat mengajukan (Rancangan Undang-Undang) RUU, dikuranginya kewenangan DPD untuk membahas RUU dan dikuranginya kewenangan DPD dalam kedudukannya sebagai lembaga perwakilan daerah. Hal ini menunjukan bahwa pembentukan UU MD3 nyata-nyata tidak menghormati putusan MK yang diberi mandat UUD NRI 1945 sebagai lembaga penafsir dan penjaga konstitusi, dengan tidak menghormati, mematuhi, dan melaksanakan putusan MK ini menunjukkan ketidakpatuhan terhadap putusan lembaga negara yang telah ditunjuk konstitusi untuk mengawal kemurnian pelaksanaan konstitusi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan ( statute approach ), pendekatan konsep ( conceptual approach ), dan pendekatan historis ( historical approach ). Ketidaktaatan penyusunan UU MD3 pada putusan MK merupakan pengingkaran UUD NRI 1945 dan perkembangan ini merupakan langkah mundur reformasi. Pembentuk Undang-Undang, dalam hal ini, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) dan Presiden harus segera melakukan perubahan UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan dengan berpijak pada rambu-rambu konstitusional Putusan MK Nomor 92/PUU-X/2012.</p><p>Law Number 17 Year 2014 on the People’s Consultative Assembly, House of Representatives, Regional Representatives Council, and the Regional House of Representatives (MD3 Law) after the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) is considered to have a substantive problem due to the substance that is contrary to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (the 1945 Constitution), which resulted in the constitutional loss of Regional Representatives Council (DPD), including the reduction of DPD authority to propose draft bills, to discuss draft bills and the reduction in its authority as the regional representative institution. This shows that the drafting of MD3 Law is obviously not respecting the decision of the Court that is mandated by the 1945 Constitution as the interpreter and guardian institution of the constitutional, by not respecting, obeying and implementing MK’s decision which indicates non-compliance with the decision of the state institution that has been designated to guard the purity of the constitution implementation of the constitution. This study uses normative method with statute approach, conceptual approach and a historical approach. The noncompliance of the drafting of MD3 Law towards the MK’s decision is a denial of MK and this development is a step back of Reformation. The legislators, in this case, the House of Representatives (DPR) and the President should immediately amend the Law Number 12 Year 2011 on the Establishment of Laws and Regulations based on the MK’s Decision No. 92/PUU-X/2012. </p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document