Notary Legal Remedies as Inside Authorities Registration and Registration of Commanditaire Vennootschap through the Administration System of Business Agencies

This study aims to explain the limits and responsibilities of the position carried out by the notary in registration of Commanditaire Vennootschap (CV) online through the business entity administration system. The research method used in this research is normative juridical using a statutory and conceptual approach. The collection of research materials is carried out by examining library materials or secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that the notary was only authorized and responsible for the creation of the deed of CV. Notary cannot receive power of attorney because it contradicts the UUJN which has been stipulated authority and responsibility attached to the position of a Notary. With the enactment of the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 17 of 2018. Registration of CV which was previously in the District Court is delegated to the Ministry of Law and Human Rights through the online system. The entire Notary is acting as an Authorized Officer not as an authorized official, there is a prosecution of an error in the registration process, then the Notary can indirectly be presented in the trial at the Court but it must be with the permission of the Notary Honorary Council. Thus the Notary can refuse to accept power over online CV registration via SABU, because in carrying out such registration a Notary must position himself as a person not as a public official. This is because it is not regulated in Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public.

Download Full-text

Tanggung Jawab Ahli Waris Notaris dan Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Penghadap atas Protokol Notaris yang Hilang atau Rusak

JUPIIS JURNAL PENDIDIKAN ILMU-ILMU SOSIAL ◽

10.24114/jupiis.v13i1.25112 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (1) ◽

pp. 279

Author(s):

Bimo Lahkoro Anugroho

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Legal Protection ◽

The State ◽

Public Official ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Loss And Damage ◽

Notary Public ◽

The Republic

This paper focuses on the topic of what is the responsibility of heirs who not submit notary protocols when the protocol is lost or damaged ?, What is the form of legal protection for notary clients or clients when the deed is lost or damaged? The method used in this paper is a normative juridical approach, using a statutory approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results of this paper indicate that the notary as public official who is in charge of making authentic deeds in his duties is also attached to the obligations to maintain the Notary Protocol. The Protocol shall be maintained and guarded properly by the Notary concerned or by the Notary Holder of the Protocol, and will remain in effect as long as or as long as the Notary's office is still required by the State. The form of the responsibility of a notary public or notary's heir for the notary's protocol when the deed is damaged or lost by negligence or deliberately related to the legal protection obtained by the applicant (client) for his deed at a later date. Then the notary concerned will be held accountable by making a report to the police for loss and damage, sending a report to the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia regarding the condition of loss or damage then waiting for action to continue in the settlement process.

Download Full-text

Pengaturan Mengenai Pendaftaran Pendirian Firma Pada Sistem Administrasi Badan Usaha

Acta Comitas ◽

10.24843/ac.2019.v04.i03.p12 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 4 (3) ◽

pp. 475

Author(s):

I Made Hengki Permadi

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

District Court ◽

Commercial Law ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Government Regulations ◽

Administration System ◽

Military Alliance ◽

Legal Consequence ◽

The Military ◽

Legal Consequences

The process or procedure for establishing a firm is regulated in Article 22 and Article 23 of the Commercial Law Code (hereinafter referred to as KUHD). In this provision, it is stipulated that the firm must be established with an authentic deed and registered with the Registrar of the District Court where the firm was established. The regulations in the KUHD are not in line with the Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 17 Year 2018 regarding the Registration of the Military Alliance, the Fima Alliance and the Civil Alliance which indicates that the registration of the firm is carried out in the Legal Entity Administration System (hereinafter referred to as SABU). it appears that there is a norm conflict between the two rules. This study aims to determine the arrangements in registering the Firm and the legal consequences of not registering the Firm in the Business Entity Administration System (SABU). This research is a normative legal research. In research using a statutory and conceptual approach. Using primary and secondary legal materials. The results showed that based on the principle of Lex Superiori derogate Legi Inferiori, based on the hierarchy of statutory regulations, the KUHD which is equivalent to the Law is stronger than the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 17 of 2018 concerning Registration of Komanditer Alliance, Firm Alliance and Civil Alliance whose position is under Government Regulations and Presidential Regulations, because the Acts are higher than Government Regulations and Presidential Regulations. The legal consequence of not registering a firm with SABU is that the name of the firm can be used first by other firms so it must change the name of the firm concerned with another name because in the SABU system there is a registration of the firm's alliance name. If there is a partnership with another firm that registers the name of the firm first, then the name of the same firm cannot be registered again and the firm is deemed invalid. Proses atau tata cara pendirian firma diatur dalam Pasal 22 dan Pasal 23 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Dagang (yang selanjutnya disebut KUHD). Dalam ketentuan tersebuti menentukan bahwa firma harus didirikan dengan akta otentik dan didaftarkan pada Kepaniteraan Pengadilan Negeri dimana firma tersebut didirikan. Peraturan dalam KUHD tersebut tidak sejalan dengan Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 17 Tahun 2018 tentang Pendaftaran Persekutuan Komanditer, Persekutuan Fima dan Persekutuan Perdata yang mengisyaratkan bahwa pendaftaran firma dilakukan pada Sistem Administrasi Badan Hukum (yang selanjutnya disebut SABU). terlihat bahwa adanya konflik norma diantara kedua aturan itu. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaturan dalam pendaftaran Firma dan akibat hukum apabila tidak mendaftarkan Firma pada Sistem Administrasi Badan Usaha (SABU). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif. Dalam penelitian menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan asas Lex Superiori derogate Legi Inferiori maka berdasarkan hirarki peraturan perundang-undangan, KUHD yang setara dengan Undang-Undang lebih kuat dibanding Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 17 Tahun 2018 tentang Pendaftaran Persekutuan Komanditer, Persekutuan Firma dan Persekutuan Perdata yang kedudukannya dibawah Peraturan Pemerintah dan Peraturan Presiden, karena Undang-Undang kedudukannya lebih tinggi dari Peraturan Pemerintah dan Peraturan Presiden. Akibat hukum dari tidak didaftarkannya firma pada SABU, yaitu nama firma dapat dipakai terlebih dahulu oleh firma lainnya sehingga harus mengganti nama firma yang bersangkutan dengan nama yang lain karena di dalam sistem SABU terdapat pendaftaran nama persekutuan firma. Jika ada persekutuan firma lain yang mendaftarkan nama firmanya terlebih dahulu maka nama firma yang sama tidak akan bisa didaftarkan kembali dan firma tersebut dianggap tidak sah pendiriannya.

Download Full-text

Tanggung Jawab Notaris Menggunakan Layanan Ditjen Ahu Online Dalam Hal Pendaftaran Akta Dan Pengesahan Badan Hukum

Acta Comitas ◽

10.24843/ac.2020.v05.i03.p05 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 5 (3) ◽

pp. 492

Author(s):

I Gede Agus Yudi Suryawan ◽

Dewa Nyoman Rai Asmara Putra

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Data Entry ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Legal Entity ◽

Administration System ◽

Directorate General ◽

The Republic ◽

Legal Administration ◽

Legal Entities

In accordance with the Decree of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights Number M-05 HT.01.01 of 2002 concerning the Enforcement of the Legal Entity Administration System at the Directorate General of General Legal Administration of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia, determines that all legal entity settlements include the ratification of the deed of establishment PT, application for approval and submission of deed reports, amendments to articles of association, fiduciary registration, will registration, are carried out with the online Legal Entity Administration System. So the notary has the authority to register all these legal acts online. The purpose of this research is to find out the role of the Notary in registering deeds and legalization of legal entities through the Directorate General of AHU Online services and to find out the responsibilities of the Notary if there are problems in registering deeds and legal entity approval through the services of the Directorate General of AHU Online. This study uses a normative juridical research method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the research, namely, the role of the notary in registering deeds and ratifying legal entities is entering deed data, checking all deed data to avoid data entry errors and the notary has the responsibility if there is an error from the notary's office, the notary will make corrections at a cost of Notary, however in this regard there is still cooperation from the applicant regarding the required data.

Download Full-text

KEWENANGAN NOTARIS DALAM HAL MEMBUAT AKTA PARTIJ (CONTOH KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR: 1003 K/PID/2015)

Jurnal Hukum Adigama ◽

10.24912/adigama.v2i2.6562 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 2 (2) ◽

pp. 482

Author(s):

Rio Utomo Hably ◽

Gunawan Djajaputra

Keyword(s):

Research Methods ◽

Secondary Data ◽

Supreme Court Decision ◽

Primary Data ◽

Public Official ◽

Descriptive Research ◽

Notary Public ◽

The Republic ◽

Case Number

Partij deed is a type of deed that can be made by a notary public official who is authorized by the state to perform services in society. Notary public as a public official who contains an authentic description of all events or events that are seen, experienced, and witnessed by the Notary himself. Notary Deed must contain what is desired by both parties in the agreement. The notary public only has the role of providing perfect proof of strength through the deed he made if later the parties to the deed disputed in court. In practice problems often arise including the issue of notary responsibility and notary authority as happened in the deed of party, how the authority of the Notary in Making Partij Deed (Example of Supreme Court Decision Case Number: 1003 K / PID / 2015) is a problem that is discussed. Descriptive research methods, using secondary data and primary data as supporting data, are analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study illustrate that the Notary does not follow under Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary.

Download Full-text

Kewajiban Dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Umum

Acta Comitas ◽

10.24843/ac.2020.v05.i01.p01 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. 1

Author(s):

Abdullah Dian Triwahyuni

Keyword(s):

Social Services ◽

Ethical Behavior ◽

Public Official ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Administration System ◽

Administrative Systems ◽

Notary Public ◽

Materials Used ◽

The Aesthetic ◽

Laws And Regulations

The position of notary has been regulated in Act Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position (hereinafter referred to as UUJN-P). Even so, philosophical and technical notary obligations and responsibilities are not regulated in detail in these laws and regulations, leading to the absence of a barometer that becomes a standard for notary behavior, notary office administration system, and notary office governance that applies universally. This has caused in some instances negative views on the notary profession in the community. One of the negative views is because the morality of the notary is not in tune with ethical behavior in society. Negative views also arise due to the administration of notary office administration and the layout of the notary office that does not meet the aesthetic element. The situation made the notary public seem unprofessional in providing social services in his function as a public official. Then what should be the notary morality? How about a good notary office administration? How should the notary manage his office? The writing of this article uses normative research using a positive legal approach and a conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Legal materials were analyzed using descriptive techniques. The results of this study indicate that there are not yet detailed and universal rules regarding the obligations and responsibilities of notaries sociologically and technically in providing social services, but the values ??that live and develop in society can be used as benchmarks for notary behavior and administrative systems notary office and notary office governance.

Download Full-text

Pluralisme Pengaturan Umur Kecakapan Dalam Pembebanan Hak Tanggungan

Acta Comitas ◽

10.24843/ac.2016.v01.i01.p10 ◽

2016 ◽

Author(s):

I Made Widana Putra

Keyword(s):

Main Subject ◽

Power Of Attorney ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Legal Study ◽

Existing Problems ◽

Minimum Age ◽

The Subject ◽

Notary Public ◽

The Republic ◽

Article 50

SKMHT (Power of Attorney to Grant a Mortgage) shall be concluded through a notarial deed or Land Conveyancer’s deed as regulated in Article 15 paragraph (1) of Law No. 4 of 1996. Article 39 paragraph (1) of Law No. 30 of 2004 in conjunction with Law No. 2 of 2014 stipulate that an appearer before a Notary Public shall be minimum eighteen (18) years old. However, to conclude an SKMHT, PPAT (Land Conveyancer) applies the age requirement of minimum twenty-one (21) years old as regulated in the provision of article 330 of BW (Civil Code of the Republic of Indonesia). As such, there are two (2) contradictive age requirements to conclude an SKMHT, namely horizontal norm conflict (geschijld van normen) between Article 330 of BW and Article 39 paragraph (1) of Law No. 30 of 2004 in conjunction with Law No. 2 of 2004. Apart from the two (2) provisions referred to above, Law No. 1 of 1974 also regulates the age requirement, namely article 47 and article 50. The validity of SKMHT will affect the execution of APHT (Deed of Mortgage Granting) and the registration of mortgage granting. Based on the said backgrounds, the main subject of this study is what the age requirement should be in order to able to conclude an SKMHT, APHT and to register a Mortgage Granting. This study constitutes a normative legal study derived from the existing norm conflict between article 330 of BW and article 39 paragraph (1) of Law No. 30 of 2004 in conjunction with Law No. 2 of 2014, and among article 330 of BW and article 47, article 50 and article 66 of Law No. 1 of 1974. Meanwhile, this study adopts the Statue Approach and Analytical & Conceptual Approach. The legal stuff resources come from primary legal stuff resources and secondary legal stuff resources. The methodology to collect legal stuff resources is the snow ball principle, where the resources were inventoried and identified in order to able to analyze the existing problems in this study. The results of this legal study indicate that normatively, an SKMHT shall be concluded by using the age requirement of eighteen (18) years old. However, Notary Public and PPAT in practice remain to adopt the age requirement of twenty-one (21) years old to conclude an SKMHT. PPAT should also apply the age requirement of eighteen (18) years old to conclude APHT. However, PPAT in practice remain to adopt the age requirement of twenty-one (21) years old. Therefore, the process to conclude an APHT will not be able to be carried out if the subject of notarized SKMHT is eighteen (18) years old. The same also applies to the registration of mortgage granting at the Land Office because the Land Office requires the age requirement of twenty-one (21) years old as regulated in the provision of Article 330 of BW. As a consequence, if the subject has not yet reached the minimum age requirement, the mortgage granting cannot be registered.

Download Full-text

Hukum Internasional sebagai Alat Interpretasi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang

Jurnal Konstitusi ◽

10.31078/jk1514 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

pp. 73

Author(s):

Umbu Rauta ◽

Ninon Melatyugra

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Judicial Review ◽

Review Process ◽

Constitutional Court ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

The Republic ◽

Constitutional Tradition ◽

The Relationship

Tulisan ini ingin menjawab dua isu utama mengenai hubungan hukum internasional dan pengujian undang-undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi RI (MKRI). Isu pertama adalah legitimasi penggunaan hukum internasional sebagai alat interpretasi dalam pengujian undang-undang, sedangkan isu kedua adalah urgensi penguasaan hukum internasional oleh hakim MKRI. Tulisan ini merupakan penelitian hukum yang menggunakan pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan historis dalam menjelaskan perkembangan pengujian undang-undang di Indonesia sekaligus menemukan legitimasi penggunaan hukum internasional oleh MK RI. Kesimpulan dari tulisan ini menegaskan bahwa hukum internasional memiliki sumbangsih yang penting dalam perannya sebagai alat interpretasi dalam proses pengujian undang-undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi, khususnya terkait hak asasi manusia. Justifikasi keabsahan praktik penggunaan hukum internasional tersebut ditarik dari tradisi ketatanegaraan yang secara implisit dikehendaki UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Manfaat positif yang diberikan hukum internasional nyatanya harus disertai juga dengan penguasaan hukum internasional oleh hakim MK RI supaya hukum internasional dapat digunakan secara tepat. Pembahasan dalam tulisan ini dibagi ke dalam empat sub bahasan inti yakni, pengujian undang-undang, penggunaan hukum internasional sebagai the interpretative tool dalam pengujian undang-undang oleh MK, legitimasi penggunaan hukum internasional sebagai the interpretative tool dalam pengujian undang-undang, pentingnya penguasaan hukum internasional oleh hakim MK.This article intentionally answers two principal issues regarding the relationship between international law and judicial review by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The first issue is the legitimacy of international use as an interpretative tool in judicial review. The second issue talks about the necessity of urgent international law mastery by the Constitutional Court’s judges. This legal research utilizes both a conceptual approach and a historical approach to explain the development of judicial review in Indonesia, and to find legitimacy of international law by the Constitutional Court. The analysis in this article affirms that international law positively contributes as an interpretative tool in judicial review by the Constitutional Court, particularly pertaining to human rights. A justification of a legitimate international law use is withdrawn from constitutional tradition which is implicitly desired by the Indonesian Constitution (UUD NRI 1945). Since international law has provided better insights into norms, a mastery of international law should be encouraged. There are four main discussions in this article: judicial review, application of international law in judicial review process, legitimacy of international law application in judicial review, and the importance of international law mastering by Constitutional Court judges.

Download Full-text

Exercising the right to a trial in a reasonable time in the Republic of Serbia

Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine ◽

10.5937/gakv0710311o ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 79 (9) ◽

pp. 311-333

Author(s):

Maja Omeragić-Pantić ◽

Biljana Vujičić ◽

Bojan Tubić ◽

Rodoljub Etinski

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Legal System ◽

Current Status ◽

National Strategy ◽

Reasonable Time ◽

Legal Remedies ◽

European Court ◽

The Republic ◽

Judicial Procedure ◽

The Right

Constitution and procedural laws explicitly guarantee right to a trial in a reasonable time. The procedural laws have been changed and some new solutions, which have to enable a trial in a reasonable time, were adopted. The Decision on establishing of national strategy of judicature reform was adopted, in order to make the judicature more efficient. However, the inquiries show that there are still some significant disadvantages which affect the right to a trial in a reasonable time. Despite the new legislative solutions, adopted in order to accelerate the trials, some of these solutions are not completely sufficient or their implementation in practice is not entirely adequate. The Decision on establishing of national strategy of judicature reform sets up the right analysis of the current status, as well as "therapy for the healing" of judicature. However, it seems that current measures are not in accordance with this therapy. Technical modernization of the courts is very slow and personal capacities, on the level of the associates, is declining instead of getting stronger. The biggest disadvantage of the present legal system, regarding the right to a trial in a reasonable time is the absence of the efficient legal remedies with which the party could accelerate the judicial procedure, respectively with which it could give damages caused by the breach of this right. This paper shows how strict are the criteria of the European court of human rights in Strasbourg related to it and that the existing legal remedies in our legal system are not sufficient to meet these demands. The confirmation of this conclusion came from Strasbourg, when this paper was already written, in the judgment V.A.M. v. Serbia of March 13, 2007.

Download Full-text

Islamic Justice Perspective On Notary The Perpetrators Criminal Action

Jurnal Akta ◽

10.30659/akta.v7i1.9759 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

pp. 93

Author(s):

Ira Alia Maerani

Keyword(s):

Islamic Law ◽

Code Of Ethics ◽

Public Official ◽

Legal Principles ◽

Islamic Perspective ◽

Criminal Sanctions ◽

The Law ◽

Notary Public ◽

The Republic ◽

The Government

This study aims to find out to know the form of violations and witnesses to the notary position based on Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary and the perspective of Islamic justice in viewing a notary who is indicated to have committed a crime in connection with an authentic deed he made. This research uses normative law research or dogmatic law research using the doctrinal method. Normative legal research includes research on legal principles, research on legal systematics, research on vertical and horizontal synchronization stages, comparison of law and legal history. This research concludes that the notary public is a public official who makes an authentic deed and has the authority as regulated in Article 15,16, 17 of Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary Public. The notary is obliged to act on trust; honest; independent; objective and safeguard the interests of parties involved in legal actions. Notaries in carrying out their duties and positions if convicted of violations, may be subject to sanctions or sanctions in the form of civil, administrative, and notary code of ethics in accordance with Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary Positions. Even so, the Notary Position Law does not regulate criminal sanctions against Notaries. Whereas in practice there is an opportunity for a legal action or violation by a notary related to an authentic deed he made that can be qualified as a criminal offense. A notary who is indicated to have committed a crime in carrying out his authority as a Public Official, of course, must be a concern of the government and law enforcement because the law must be upheld against anyone who commits indiscriminate violations. This rule is a manifestation of the principle of "equality before the law" (equality before the law) which is a fundamental element in the concept of the rule of law. Honesty values; keep the mandate; fair; and this objective is synergistic with the values of justice in an Islamic perspective that promotes justice and problems. Described in the Qur'an An-Nisa verses 58 and 135 and QS. Al Ma'idah verse 8. Islamic law also regulates justice in recording a deed, for example just in recording accounts receivable debts (Q.S. Al Baqoroh: 282)Keywords: Islamic Perspective; Justice; Notary Public; Perpetrators; Criminal Act

Download Full-text

Improving The Object Of Fiduciary Guarantee According To Law Number 42 Of 1999 On Fiduciary Guarantee

Journal of Sustainable Development Science ◽

10.46650/jsds.2.1.901.30-39 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

pp. 30-39

Author(s):

Ahmad Yani Kosali

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Secondary Data ◽

Public Official ◽

Legal Research ◽

Object Based ◽

Legal Consequence ◽

The Subject ◽

Ownership Rights ◽

Legal Consequences

Fiduciary is the transfer of ownership rights of an object based on trust, where ownership right of the object is transferred remains under the control of the owner of the object. The subject of the research was how to bind the object of fiduciary guarantee according to Law Number 42 of 1999 on fiduciary? What are the consequences if the binding of fiduciary guarantee object is unfulfilled? This research was normative legal research which means that the objects are secondary data on library. The type of the research was descriptive. It can be concluded that the binding of fiduciary guarantee object according to Law Number 42 of 1999 on fiduciary guarantee is certificate of fiduciary guarantee as an evidence which is an authentic deed. It can be seen from the characteristics of certificate fiduciary guarantee, issued by an authorized official or public official who has authority for issuing certificate fiduciary guarantee in Fiduciary Registration Office under the supervision of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. The consequences (the binding of fiduciary guarantee object is unfulfilled) are the default causes several legal consequences for debtors and creditors, especially for creditors who must loss. While for debtors, the legal consequence is the existence of a new status for which the debtor must responsible of. Fiduciary guarantee, mostly in form of movable objects, allows for a transfer of fiduciary guarantee; one example of the reason for the transfer is the debtor wants to transfer his credit to another creditor to seek for lower interest. Then, if a debtor has paid off the debt, it can cause the fiduciary guarantee to be canceled.

Download Full-text