scholarly journals Comparison of Learning Outcomes Inquiry Learning Model With Cooperative Learning Model Type Number Head Together (NHT) Learning In Natural Sciences Class V In Public Elementary School 66 Bengkulu City

Author(s):  
Rohimin Rohimin ◽  
Wiji Aziiz Hari Mukti ◽  
Septa Oktaviani ◽  
Muhammad Erfan ◽  
Tursina Ratu

Although many have raised the Inquiry learning model and the Number Head Together (NHT) learning model, there is no research on comparison of the two models in natural science subjects. This study aims to determine whether the learning outcomes of the 5th grade science students taught using the Inquiry Learning Model is better than using the Cooperative Learning Model Number Head Together (NHT) type in SDNegeri 66 Bengkulu City. This study used two groups, namely class 5A with 31 people as the experimental group and class 5B with 31 people as the control group. This research variable consists of independent variables namely Inquiry learning model and Number Head Together (NHT) learning model while the dependent variable is the science learning outcomes. This type of research is quantitative research with Nonequivalent Control Group Design approach. Data collection techniques using observation and multiple choice test questions. Data analysis techniques using the t test. Based on the results of the study found in the posttest results of class 5A students who use Inquiry Learning Model in the medium and high categories as many as 31 students (93%) get grades of 60 to 100 while the learning outcomes of class 5B that use Cooperative Learning Models Type Number Head Together ( NHT) as many as 31 students (81%) get a value of 50 to 90. It can also be proven by the results of the t test calculation that is tcount of 4.352 and the value of the table for df = 60 with a significance level of 5% is 2,000. From the analysis it was found that tcount is greater than ttable (4.352> 2,000). The results showed that the learning outcomes of Natural Sciences 5th grade students who were taught using the Inquiry Learning Model were better than using the Cooperative Learning Model Number Head Together (NHT) type at SDN 66 Kota Bengkulu.

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-86
Author(s):  
Wildana Wildana ◽  
Amran Rede ◽  
Afadil Afadil

The study of the effect of cooperative learning model two stay two stray types on motivation and learning outcomes of the fifth-grade students of SDN15 Palu was carried out from March to June 2018. This study used quasi-experimental methods. The research design used the Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. Data collection techniques used questionnaires and test results. The data analysis technique used the t-test inferential statistical method. The study population was fifth-grade students of SDN15 Palu. The sample of the research was Va class with as many as 29 people as the experimental group and Vb class with 28 people as the control group, which was determined by purposive sampling technique. The independent variable in this study was the TSTS model, while the dependent variable was a motivation and learning outcomes. Based on hypothesis testing with two-party t-test statistics obtained students learning motivation with t count was higher than t table (7.876 > 2.004). Student learning outcomes obtained tcount higher than t table  (3.654 > 2.004). These results indicated that the application of cooperative learning model two stay two stray type influences the motivation and learning outcomes of the science of the fifth-grade students of SDN 15 Palu.    


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Rajo Hasim Lubis

This study aims to determine: learning outcomes physics students with cooperative learning model GI and conventional learning, learning outcomes physics students who have Adversity Quotient (AQ) high and medium AQ and interaction cooperative learning model GI and AQ in affecting learning physics students.  This quasi-experimental study using pretest-posttest control group design. The sample in this research is class X IPA.4 as an experimental class and class X IPA.3 as the control class is selected by simple random sampling. The instrument used is the achievement test and which AQ questionnaire form. Data was analyzed using two ways  ANOVA. The results shows that: learning outcomes physics students with cooperative learning model GI better than conventional learning, learning outcomes physics students who have a high AQ better than students who have a medium AQ and there is interaction between cooperative learning model GI and AQ in influencing physics student learning outcomes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Fitria Silviana

This study aims: 1) to determine differences in science process skills of students with This study aims to determine: teamwork ability of students with cooperative learning model of type of group investigation and the ability to work with students with conventional learning, the effect  of cooperative learning model of group investigation on learning outcomes of students in learning physics., correlation  between the ability of teamwork and learning outcomes students. This research uses type of quasi-experimental with two group pretest-posttest  design. The study population was standard X SMA.Negeri 1 Langsa.The sample of this research were the students of X.10 as experiment group and X.9 as control group that established by purpossive sampling. The instruments used consist of observation sheets of teamwork and essay test of learning outcomes. The data were analyzed using parametric t-test analysis. The results showed that: The teamwork ability of  students who are taught by cooperative learning model type group investigation better than students taught by conventional teaching in physics learning, cooperative learning model of type of group investigation has effect on student learning outcomes. Learning outcomes of students taught by cooperative learning model of type of group investigation better than on learning outcomes for students who taught by conventional learning, and there is a correlation between the teamwork ability  with student learning outcomes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 161
Author(s):  
Maria Sisilia ◽  
Jamaluddin Sakung ◽  
Irwan Said

The aim of this study is to determine the learning outcomes of students in the class which is treatedwith the cooperative learning model Jigsaw whether it is better than the untreated class on chemicalequilibrium topic. This study is a quasi-experimental research design with Non Randomized Pretest-posttest control group design. The population in this study is 245 students of class XI MIA withacademic year 2014/2015, from 8 classes. The sample in this study class XI MIA 5 (n = 32) as anexperimental class while class XI MIA 6 (n = 32) as a control class. The analysis of data obtained inthe experimental class, X1 1 valueis 79.66 with a standard deviation = 9.41. In the control class, X2valueis 70.03 with a standard deviation = 11.13. The result of hypothesisis found that tcalculated>ttable(5.53 > 1.67) with a significance level (α = 0.05) and degrees of freedom = 62. This shows that H0 isrejected and H1 is accepted. Therefore, it can be concluded that student learning outcomes in class which is treated using the cooperative learning model Jigsaw is better than the untreated class on chemicalequilibrium topic.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Lika Yulinda ◽  
Kasmudin Mustapa ◽  
Ratman Ratman

This study aim was to determine the influence of application of cooperative learning model type numbered head together combination with contextual teaching and learning toward learning outcomes of students in SMA Imanuel Palu. This study used quasi experimental design with non randomized pretest-posttest control group. Sample used were two classes, Xb (n=30) as experimental and Xa (n = 30) as control one. The test of student learning outcomes data used the t-test statistical analysis of the two parties. The results of data analysis obtained, the average score of experimental class () was 50.50 with a standard deviation of 9.79 and for control class () was 41.03 with a standard deviation of 11.01. The result of testing hypothesis with the statistical t-test of two parties obtained that –ttable < tcalculation > +ttable (tcalculation = 2.35 and ttable = 2.00) with a significance level α= 0.05 and 58 degrees of freedom, then H0 was rejected and Ha was accepted. The result of the data analysis showed that there was any in learning outcomes between students in experimental class and the control class, until concluded there is any influences of application of cooperative learning model type numbered head together combination with contextual teaching and learning toward learning outcomes of students in SMA Imanuel Palu.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Putu Hermayanti ◽  
Made Sumantri ◽  
I Komang Sudarma

This study aims to determine the differences of science learning outcomes between groups of students who were taught by cooperative learning model of Team Games Tournament (TGT) type assisted concept maps and groups of students who were taught by conventional model in V grade II students in Gugus VI Kecamatan Sukasada, Kabupaten Buleleng academic year 2016/2017. The research design used is non equivalent posttest-only control group design. The population in this study is all students of grade V SD GugusV I Sukasada District, Buleleng District. Determination of sample is done by random sampling technique, so that got two classes that is class V SD Negeri 2 Panji Anom amounted to 33 students as experiment class and class V student of SD Negeri 4 Panji Anom amounted 30 student as control class. The instrument of data collection in this research is multiple choice test (objective) with two stages of analysis that is descriptive static analysis and inferential statistical analysis (t-test). The result of this research is t-test, tct = 14,4> ttable = 1,98 (with db 61 and significance level 5%), so H0 is rejected and H1 accepted. Thus, it can be stated that cooperative learning model of Team Games Tournament type (TGT) with concept map has significant effect on science learning outcomes of class V students in Gugus VI Sukasada Sub-district of Buleleng Regency in the Lesson Year 2016/2017.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akbarul Kautsar ◽  
Marzuki Marzuki ◽  
Sadrina Sadrina

This research is motivated by the low learning outcomes of students in subjects Simple home electric lighting installation techniques, this is because the learning process is still teacher-centered. This study aims to reveal differences in student learning outcomes between jigsaw cooperative learning models with conventional models in subjects of simple home electric lighting installation techniques at SMK 1 Darul Kamal and to improve student learning outcomes. The research method used was Pre-Experiment with the research subjects of the 11th grade students of TITL SMKN 1 Darul Kamal consisting of 1 class, students were divided into 2 groups, namely the experimental group and the control group. From the results of data analysis based on the results of the t-test shows that Ho is rejected based on the significance value <α = 5% or 0.05, in the column t-test for equality of means we see in the column "sig. 2 tailed "with Equal variances assumed, the variance similarity test was obtained that both control and experimental groups had the same variant. Value "sig. 2 tailed "that is: 0.00 then it can be decided that Ho is rejected because the sig value is 0.00 <α = 0.05, so it can be concluded at the significance level (α) = 5% the control group and the experimental group do not have the same average value. So that the truth is that there are significant differences in student learning outcomes of the experimental group using the Jigsaw cooperative learning model compared to the control group students who did not use the jigsaw cooperative learning model.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 335
Author(s):  
Sumarni Sahrudin ◽  
Wahyudi Wahyudi ◽  
Hikmawati Hikmawati

This research aims to determine the effect of inquiry learning model with experimental methods towards the result of physics learning of students SMAN 1 Gunungsari academic year 2016/2017. This type of research is a quasi experimental research with pretest-postest control group design. Sampling was done using purposive sampling technique. The results of this research are learning outcomes in the cognitive domain while for the affective domain, and psychomotor as supporting data. The instrument used to measure the learning outcomes in the cognitive domain is an objective test that firstly tested the validity, reliability, differentiation, and degree of difficulty. The average grade of the experimental class's learning result is 68.06 and the control class is 56.25. The result of prerequisite analysis test shows that post test data are normal and homogeneous distributed so that statistic test used is parametric statistic t-test polled varians with t test criterion, and obtained t count equal to 3,95 and t table equal to 2.00 at 5% significant level. Therefore t count is bigger than t table then Ho is rejected and Ha accepted, so there is influence of inquiry learning model with experiment method towards the result of physics learning of students SMAN 1 Gunungsari academic year 2016/2017.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 214
Author(s):  
Ilham Suliadi ◽  
Irwan Said ◽  
Minarni Rama Jura

This study aimed to obtain description in application the cooperative learning model type scramble on student’s learning outcomes in hydrocarbon material in class X SMAN 8 Palu. This type of research was quasi-experimental research. This study was conducted at two group, 27 students in class XB as an experimental group and 28 students in class XA as a control group. The testing of student’s learning outcomes data used the statistical analysis t-test of the two parties with the prerequisite test: normality test and homogeneity test. The results of the data analysis, it was obtained the average values of students in experiment class () was 72.40 with a standard deviation of 11.86 and students in control class () was 67 with a standard deviation of 12.03. Based on the results of testing hypotheses by statistical t-test two parties, it was obtained –ttable­<tcalculation> +ttable (tcalculation=2.37 and ttable=1.67)  with a significance level α = 0.05 and degrees of freedom 53, then H0 was rejected and ha was accepted. It can be concluded that there is the effect of applying the cooperative learning model type scramble toward student’s learning outcomes in the hydrocarbon material in class X SMA 8 Palu.


Author(s):  
Sri Maiyena ◽  
Kuntum Khaira ◽  
Widia Oktavia

The science learning outcomes of grade VIII students at MTsN Lawang Mandahiling are still low. Students physics's low learning outcomes are because teachers still dominate physics learning, and the intensity of student involvement when learning is a little. This study aims to determine how to apply a scientific approach to the Inside-Outside Circle cooperative learning model for students' physics learning outcomes. This type of research is quasi-experimental research, with the research design used is posttest only control group design. Sampling used random sampling, resulting in two sample classes, namely class VIII.2 as the experimental and VIII.3 as the control class. The data collection used a test of student learning outcomes on knowledge competencies in a multiple-choice test of 20 items. The competency data of students' attitudes and skills used observation sheets which were analyzed qualitatively descriptive. The results of the final tests conducted in the study showed that the physics learning outcomes of students in the experimental class were better than the control class. The average final score of students for knowledge competence in the experimental class and control class, respectively, was 78.00 and 66.00. For attitudinal competence, the average scores obtained by the experimental class and control class were 68.98 and 65.34, respectively. For the competency skills, the average scores obtained by the experimental class and control class are 74.22 and 68.25, respectively. Hypothesis testing is done by using a t-test. From the calculation on knowledge competency, the result of tcount = 3.07 while ttable = 1.684; on attitude competence, the price of tcount = 2.29; on skills competency, the tcount = 4.26; while ttable = 1.684 while t table = 1.684 at the real level α = 0.05. It means that tcount> ttable so that H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. It can be concluded that the students' physics learning outcomes in applying the synthetic approach to the Inside-Outside Circle cooperative learning model are better than the physics learning outcomes of students who do not use the Inside-Outside Circle cooperative learning model in solar system subject matter in grade VIII  MTsN Lawang Mandahiling.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document