scholarly journals The Promotional Role of Patent Information Analysis in Improving the Quality of Research & Development in Chinese Universities

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingchun Chen ◽  
Chi Zhang ◽  
Xian Zhang ◽  
Dunkui Chen
Keyword(s):  
Research Development ◽  
Information Analysis ◽  
Chinese Universities ◽  
Patent Information ◽  
Quality Of Research

scholarly journals REFLEKSI EPISTIMOLOGI DALAM METODOLOGI PENELITIAN (Suatu Kontemplasi atas Pekerjaan Penelitian)

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saifullah Saifullah
Keyword(s):  
Research Methodology ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Central Position ◽  
Building Science ◽  
Scientific Disciplines ◽  
Science Community ◽  
Quality Of Research

<p>Research methodology is the application of epistemology in philosophical which is realized by logico hypotetico verificative-deducto hypothetico verificative. The results of the evaluation of the quality of the research methodology that gave rise buildings recently become a standard formula valid and tested public. In this context it is necessary scrutiny of the functioning and the importance of pre usability, and value the benefits of the research process so that the quality of research produced a positive impact on building science researchers. The role of the researcher holds a central position of being able to adjust the ground circumstances. Benefit value for the benefit of life as the goal of research in theory and practical should be explicitly and implicitly always accompanies every step of research. A consequence of the value of the benefits of scientific research which is undertaken is delivering research results to the user community. The use of research methodologies in the study strongly influenced the extent of the ability of researchers and scientists at the clump science community are able to map the identity of the building a distinctive methodology of scientific disciplines that is useful for subsequent research.</p> <p>Metodologi Penelitian merupakan penerapan epistimologi secara filsafati yang diwujudkan dengan logico  hypotetico  verificative-deducto  hypothetico  verificative.  Hasil  evaluasi terhadap  kualitas  bangunan  metodologi  penelitian  yang  memunculkan  formula  baru menjadi standar yang valid dan teruji publik. Dalam konteks ini maka perlu pencermatan tentang fungsi dan kegunaan akan pentingnya pra, proses dan nilai manfaat riset agar kualitas riset yang dihasilkan berdampak positif pada bangunan keilmuan peneliti. Peran peneliti  memegang  posisi  sentral  karena  mampu  menyesuaikan  situasi  dan  kondisi lapangan. Nilai kemanfaatan bagi kemaslahatan hidup sebagai tujuan riset secara teoritis dan praktis sebaiknya secara eksplisit dan implisit selalu menyertai setiap langkah riset. Konsekuensi ilmiah dalam nilai manfaat riset yang dilakukan adalah menyampaikan hasilhasil riset ke masyarakat pengguna. Penggunaan metodologi penelitian dalam riset sangat dipengaruhi sejauhmana kemampuan peneliti dan komunitas ilmuan pada rumpun ilmu mampu memetakan jati diri bangunan metodologi disiplin keilmuan yang khas sehingga bermanfaat bagi peneliti berikutnya.</p>

Liaison Psychiatry

1983 ◽  
Vol 143 (5) ◽  
pp. 519-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Mayou
Keyword(s):  
Liaison Psychiatry ◽  
Clinical Role ◽  
Psychological Reactions ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Consultation Liaison Psychiatry ◽  
Medical Wards ◽  
Practical Impact ◽  
Quality Of Research

A previous paper in this series with the same title (Lipowski, 1979) described the history and recent developments in the organisation of consultation liaison psychiatry. I therefore cover two other aspects, the nature of the psychological reactions to physical illness and the clinical role of the psychiatrist working on general surgical and medical wards. Lipowski remarked on the “generally mediocre quality of research” and on the lack of a “single fully adequate textbook”. These deficiencies remain all too apparent and the increasingly large literature is still mainly “clinical and anecdotal”. However straightforward clinical descriptions do provide an essential background to understanding the practical impact on patients' and families' lives of illnesses and of their treatment. A good knowledge of medicine is also essential and the liaison psychiatrist requires an up to date textbook and should try and read review papers and editorials in the general medical journals.

scholarly journals The Critical Role of Journal Reviewers

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Mu
Keyword(s):  
Critical Role ◽  
Research Articles ◽  
Editorial Team ◽  
Voluntary Contribution ◽  
Peer Reviewers ◽  
Quality Of Research

Any journal relies on voluntary peer reviewers to ensure the quality of research articles. Since reviewers are usually as busy as any of us, their voluntary contribution is greatly appreciated by our IJAHP editorial team. Still, reviewing a paper requires a set of skills...

scholarly journals The Role of Paraphrasing in Writing Research Papers

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-128
Author(s):  
Pungky Ramadhani
Keyword(s):  
Research Paper ◽  
Research Papers ◽  
Know How ◽  
Writing Research ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Quality Of Research

Almost all people in this world have experienced in writing a research paper. Nevertheless, there are only some people who understand how to write appropriately. Plagiarism still becomes a big problem among the writers. This happens because they often get difficulty in integrating sources into the text. As the writers, they should know how to overcome that problem. The existence of paraphrasing can be a way to avoid the plagiarism. The writers can paraphrase a direct quote of someone using their own words. This can be a great way to increase the quality of research papers.

The role of libraries in improving the quality of research and dissertation work

Infolib ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-71
Author(s):  
Nargiza Pazilova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Information ◽  
Information Resources ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
User Needs ◽  
Actual Problem ◽  
Online Access ◽  
Quality Of Research ◽  
Role Of Information

The article examines the importance of using information resources in scientific and educational activities and their impact on improving the quality of scientific research and dissertations. The role of information and library institutions in organizing online access to scientific information, completing the collection based on the analysis of user needs is shown. The author also touches upon the actual problem of plagiarism in science and provides information on the Russian system for detecting text borrowings Antiplagiat, which most closely meets the needs of scientific and educational institutions of Uzbekistan

Evaluating Research: the Case of Legal Scholarly Outputs

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ginevra Peruginelli
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Impact Factor ◽  
Scholarly Communication ◽  
International Level ◽  
European Level ◽  
Measurement And Evaluation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Quality Of Research

AbstractScientific scholarly communication is subject to selection rules. In recent years, the issues around the assessment of research results has assumed a central role in academia. Despite recent efforts, by several initiatives both at national and international level, and the adoption of guidelines that emerged from the evaluation of research programs at European level, the measurement and evaluation of the quality of research still faces strong opposition from all bibliometric areas, in which the instruments available (amount of citations identified, the impact factor, and so on) are not appropriate to the humanities and social sciences. In particular, specific attention is paid today to the role of the book, which is a fundamental resource in the processes of scientific scholarly communication. In this regard this paper, written by Ginevra Peruginelli, analyses the missing link between the indicators and legal scholars' notions of quality, with reference to the role of the monograph in legal science.

Institutional repositories as complementary tools to evaluate the quantity and quality of research outputs

2014 ◽  
Vol 63 (1/2) ◽  
pp. 46-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anabel Bonilla-Calero
Keyword(s):  
Research Evaluation ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Free Access ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Institutional Repositories ◽  
Evaluation Practice ◽  
Quality Of Research ◽  
Original Approach

Purpose – The aim of this study is to analyse the advantages of using an institutional repository (IR) as a complementary source to evaluate the research output produced by a university. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on previous studies where IRs have been used as source to analyse the research output. Findings – Some advantages of using repositories as a tool to evaluate research output are: they help to evaluate the research output from different perspectives, using multidimensional approaches that combine various factors and types of documents with free access to all researchers, evaluators and society in general. Practical implications – The paper is aimed at researchers and experts that use Web of Knowledge and Scopus services to evaluate the research output. It recommends that they consider using IRs as an additional, practical and complementary tool to traditional databases. Originality/value – To underline the advantages of using an IR as a complementary source in the evaluation of research outputs; this evaluative approach is not sufficiently appreciated in comparison with the role of traditional (non-open access) databases. Adopting this original approach would be a significant enhancement to current research evaluation practice.

scholarly journals Integrity in Education and Research

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-59
Author(s):  
Manorama Tripathi
Keyword(s):  
Academic Research ◽  
Higher Learning ◽  
Living Standards ◽  
Limited Resources ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
The People ◽  
Institutions Of Higher Learning ◽  
Quality Of Research

Universities and higher educational institutions, in the country or across the globe create new knowledge through their study of the existing ecosystems along with the constraints and challenges that lie therein. The most crucial tool in the box towards solving these gaping issues happens to be academic research. The knowledge generated at these epicentres address the problems, related to health, climate change, sustainability among many others. The findings of the research offer substantial breakthroughs to enhance the living standards of the people, better utilization of the limited resources and preservation of the planet. With the changing and ever-growing role of the institutions of higher learning and universities in particular research has become all the more crucial. There is hardly any domain where universities and the scholars don’t have a role to play. With spectacularly arrayed disciplines coming under the ambit of education, the researchers have a ringside view of the world problems. If we pick up any instance of authorities dealing with contemporary issues, we are sure to find a few academics in the core team. Academics and particularly the hard research has emerged as the new go-to guy. With so much riding on the research, any dilution of its sanctity would bring down the entire edifice of progress and development. Any laxity on the rigorous methodologies or standards procedures may prove very catastrophic for all the stakeholders and the community as a whole. Sadly it has been observed worldwide that researchers often indulge in misconduct while pursuing their education and research enterprises. Misconduct refers to a gamut of wrong practices like plagiarizing, fabricating or falsifying data, manipulating images or pictures to substantiate their finding; reporting selectively to support their research objectives. The menace of gift and ghost authorship is also prevalent across academic and research intelligence. Any of this dilutes the quality of research and questions the authenticity of the resulting knowledge.

scholarly journals Insights from a cross-sector review on how to conceptualise the quality of use of research evidence

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Rickinson ◽  
Connie Cirkony ◽  
Lucas Walsh ◽  
Jo Gleeson ◽  
Mandy Salisbury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Evidence ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Empirical Work ◽  
Research Use ◽  
Evidence Use ◽  
Quality Of Research ◽  
Support Evidence ◽  
Use Of Research

AbstractRecent decades have seen widespread efforts to improve the generation and use of evidence across a number of sectors. Such efforts can be seen to raise important questions about how we understand not only the quality of evidence, but also the quality of its use. To date, though, there has been wide-ranging debate about the former, but very little dialogue about the latter. This paper focuses in on this question of how to conceptualise the quality of research evidence use. Drawing on a systematic review and narrative synthesis of 112 papers from health, social care, education and policy, it presents six initial principles for conceptualising quality use of research evidence. These concern taking account of: the role of practice-based expertise and evidence in context; the sector-specific conditions that support evidence use; how quality use develops and can be evaluated over time; the salient stages of the research use process; whether to focus on processes and/or outcomes of evidence use; and the scale or level of the use within a system. It is hoped that this paper will act as a stimulus for future conceptual and empirical work on this important, but under-researched, topic of quality of use.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document