SISTEMATIK REVIU TENTANG KECENDERUNGAN PERILAKU CYBERBULLYING DI KALANGAN REMAJA (SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE TRENDS OF CYBERBULLYING BEHAVIOR IN ADOLESCENTS)

PSIMPHONI ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Dias Pandu Fisabilillah Fasya ◽  
Tri Na'imah
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Database Research ◽  
Behavioral Tendencies ◽  
Review Question

ABSTRACTCyberbullying is a behavior that can disturb others, this behavior almost occurs in adolescents aged 14-17 years The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize trends in cyberbullying behavior among adolescent systematic reviews. This review was conducted by reviewing 26 articles from the Research Gate database source, SINTA, Sematic Scholar, DOAJ, Academia, CiterSeerX Google Scholar, Dergi Park, Springer. The author uses PICOSS (Population, Intervention, Comparators, Outcome Variables, Study Design and Setting) tables that are used to determine the inclusion, exclusion, detailed, clear and relevant criteria related to key components of the systematic review question. The findings of this study are that most of the trends in cyberbullying behavior from each journal can be synthesized into several cyberbullying behavioral tendencies such as spreading lies, sending messages or threats, imitating or acting on behalf of someone.Keywords :  Behavior, Cyberbullying Tendencies, Teenagers ABSTRAKCyberbullying merupakan perilaku yang dapat menganggu orang lain, perilaku tersebut hampir terjadi pada remaja umur 14-17 tahun. Tujuan dari sistematik review ini adalah mensintesakan kecenderungan perilaku cyberbullying di kalangan remaja sistematik review ini dilakukan dengan cara mereview 26 artikel yang berasal dari sumber database Research Gate, SINTA, Sematic Scholar, DOAJ, Academia, CiterSeerX Google Scholar, Dergi Park, Springer. Penulis menggunakan tabel PICOSS (Population, Intervention, Comparators, Outcome Variables, Study Design and Setting) yang digunakan untuk menentukan kriteria inklusi, eksklusi yang terperinci, jelas dan relevan berhubungan dengan komponen kunci dari pertanyaan peninjauan sistematis. Temuan dari penelitian ini adalah sebagian besar kecenderungan perilaku cyberbullying dari masing-masing jurnal dapat di sintesakan menjadi beberapa kecenderungan perilaku cyberbullying seperti menyebar kebohongan, mengirim pesan atau ancaman, meniru atau mengatasnamakan seseorang.Kata Kunci : Perilaku, Kecenderungan Cyberbullying, Remaja

Systematic Reviews are Rarely Used to Inform Study Design - a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgitte Nørgaard ◽  
Eva Draborg ◽  
Jane Andreasen ◽  
Carsten Bogh Juhl ◽  
Jennifer Yost ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a protocol for a systematic review and narrative synthesis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Archer ◽  
Charles Baird ◽  
Adrian Gardner ◽  
Alison B. Rushton ◽  
Nicola R. Heneghan
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Adult Scoliosis ◽  
Measurement Properties ◽  
Narrative Synthesis

Abstract Background Adult scoliosis represents a distinct subgroup of scoliosis patients for whom the diagnosis can have a large impact on their health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Therefore, HR-QOL patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential to assess disease progression and the impact of interventions. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the measurement properties of HR-QOL PROMs in adult scoliosis patients. Methods We will conduct a literature search, from their inception onwards, of multiple electronic databases including AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, PsychINFO and PubMed. The searches will be performed in two stages. For both stages of the search, participants will be aged 18 and over with a diagnosis of scoliosis. The primary outcome of interest in the stage one searches will be studies which use PROMs to investigate HR-QOL as defined by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) taxonomy, the secondary outcome will be to assess the frequency of use of the various PROMs. In stage two, the primary outcome of interest will be studies which assess the measurement properties of the HR-QOL PROMs identified in stage one. No specific measurement property will be given priority. No planned secondary outcomes have been identified but will be reported if discovered. In stage one, the only restriction on study design will be the exclusion of systematic reviews. In Stage two the only restriction on study design will be the exclusion of full-text articles not available in the English language. Two reviewers will independently screen all citations and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. The study methodological quality (or risk of bias) will be appraised using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. The overall strength of the body of evidence will then be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. A narrative synthesis will be provided with information presented in the main text and tables to summarise and explain the characteristics and findings of the included studies. The narrative synthesis will explore the evidence for currently used PROMs in adult scoliosis patients and any areas that require further study. Discussion The review will help clinicians and researchers identify a HR-QOL PROM for use in patients with adult scoliosis. Findings from the review will be published and disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentations. Systematic review registration This systematic review has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), reference number: CRD42020219437

scholarly journals Dietary Sodium Intake and Health Indicators: A Systematic Review of Published Literature between January 2015 and December 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 1174-1200
Author(s):  
Katherine J Overwyk ◽  
Zerleen S Quader ◽  
Joyce Maalouf ◽  
Marlana Bates ◽  
Jacqui Webster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Sodium Intake ◽  
Health Indicators ◽  
Dietary Sodium ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Online Databases ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Disease Risks

ABSTRACT As the science surrounding population sodium reduction evolves, monitoring and evaluating new studies on intake and health can help increase our understanding of the associated benefits and risks. Here we describe a systematic review of recent studies on sodium intake and health, examine the risk of bias (ROB) of selected studies, and provide direction for future research. Seven online databases were searched monthly from January 2015 to December 2019. We selected human studies that met specified population, intervention, comparison, outcome, time, setting/study design (PICOTS) criteria and abstracted attributes related to the study population, design, intervention, exposure, and outcomes, and evaluated ROB for the subset of studies on sodium intake and cardiovascular disease risks or indicators. Of 41,601 abstracts reviewed, 231 studies were identified that met the PICOTS criteria and ROB was assessed for 54 studies. One hundred and fifty-seven (68%) studies were observational and 161 (70%) focused on the general population. Five types of sodium interventions and a variety of urinary and dietary measurement methods were used to establish and quantify sodium intake. Five observational studies used multiple 24-h urine collections to assess sodium intake. Evidence mainly focused on cardiovascular-related indicators (48%) but encompassed an assortment of outcomes. Studies varied in ROB domains and 87% of studies evaluated were missing information on ≥1 domains. Two or more studies on each of 12 outcomes (e.g., cognition) not previously included in systematic reviews and 9 new studies at low ROB suggest the need for ongoing or updated systematic reviews of evidence on sodium intake and health. Summarizing evidence from assessments on sodium and health outcomes was limited by the various methods used to measure sodium intake and outcomes, as well as lack of details related to study design and conduct. In line with research recommendations identified by the National Academies of Science, future research is needed to identify and standardize methods for measuring sodium intake.

scholarly journals Application of immersive technology interventions in sexual victims: A systematic review protocol

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashkan Ilami ◽  
◽  
Mohammadali Amini-Tehrani ◽  
Hadi Zamanian
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Systematic Review Protocol ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
Review Question ◽  
Intervention Content ◽  
Immersive Technology ◽  
Sexually Victimized

Review question / Objective: The aim of this systematic review is to critically evaluate the current evidence regarding the immersive technology interventions in sexual victims in terms of applied methodology and patient-related outcomes. Accordingly, this systematic review will address the following questions: 1) what are the general methodological features (study design, sample and related variables, intervention content and related variables, so forth) of immersive technology interventions targeting sexually victimized individuals, 2) to what extent immersive technology interventions targeting sexually victimized individuals are promising in terms of methodological outcomes (such as feasibility, safety, so forth), and 3) to what extent the immersive technology interventions have been effective in addressing biopsychosocial outcomes in sexually victimized individuals.

scholarly journals Protocol for Systematic Review in Privacy and Security in Telehealth: Best Practices for Healthcare Professionals

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie J.M. Watzlaf ◽  
Dilhari R. DeAlmeida ◽  
Leming Zhou ◽  
Linda M. Hartman
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Federal Regulations ◽  
Systematic Review Protocol ◽  
Privacy And Security ◽  
Review Protocol

Healthcare professionals engaged in telehealth are faced with complex US federal regulations (e.g., HIPAA/HITECH) and could benefit from the guidance provided by best practices in Privacy and Security (P&S). This article describes a systematic review protocol to address this need. The protocol described herein uses the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). The PRISMA-P contains 17 items that are considered essential, as well as minimum components to include in systematic reviews. PICOS (participants, interventions, comparisons, outcome(s) and study design of the systematic review) are also relevant to the development of best practices in P&S in telehealth systems. A systematic process can best determine what information should be included and how this information should be retrieved, condensed, analyzed, organized, and disseminated.

scholarly journals A comparison between two recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews on drug’s safety

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Penedones ◽  
Carlos Alves ◽  
Francisco Batel Marques
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Post Marketing ◽  
Review Question ◽  
Marketing Data

Abstract Background Several recommendations are available to conduct and report a systematic review of adverse drug reactions. This study is aimed at identifying and comparing the methodologies of the two most commonly used recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews on drug’s safety. Methods Two systematic reviews were conducted following the recommendations “Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions” and “Systematic Reviews’ Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidance for undertaking reviews in healthcare.” The methods of each recommendation were characterized, and the results and the discussion of each systematic review were also evaluated. Results The methodologies of both recommendations are similar. The review question was structured. Both recommendations suggest to include pre- and post-marketing data. The recommended data sources differed and, consequently, the results of the systematic reviews (37 vs. 35 studies). Other aspects of search literature were identical. Different tools are suggested to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. For case reports, both recommendations only report some questions that may be helpful to assess risk of bias. The reporting of the results and discussion is also identical for both recommendations. Conclusions Few methodological differences were observed between the analyzed recommendations to conduct a systematic review on drug’s safety. Combining their methods into a single and recognized recommendation could be of great value.

scholarly journals Summaries of harms in systematic reviews are unreliable (Part 1 of 2): Methods used to assess harms are neglected in systematic reviews of gabapentin

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riaz Qureshi ◽  
Evan Mayo-Wilson ◽  
Thanitsara Rittiphairoj ◽  
Mara McAdams-DeMarco ◽  
Eliseo Guallar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Paradigm Shift ◽  
General Guideline ◽  
Meta Analyses

ObjectiveIn this methodologic study (Part 1 of 2), we examined methods used to assess harms in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) of gabapentin. We compared methods used with current recommendations for synthesizing harms. Study Design & SettingWe followed recommended systematic review practices. We selected reliable SRMAs of gabapentin (i.e., met a pre-defined list of methodological criteria) that assessed at least one harm. We extracted and compared methods in four areas: pre-specification, searching, analysis, and reporting. Whereas our focus in this paper is on the methods used, Part 2 examines the results for harms across reviews. ResultsWe screened 4320 records and identified 157 SRMAs of gabapentin, 70 of which were reliable. Most reliable reviews (51/70; 73%) reported following a general guideline for SRMA conduct or reporting, but none reported following recommendations specifically for synthesizing harms. Across all domains assessed, review methods were designed to address questions of benefit and rarely included the additional methods that are recommended for evaluating harms. ConclusionApproaches to assessing harms in SRMAs we examined are tokenistic and unlikely to produce valid summaries of harms to guide decisions. A paradigm shift is needed. At a minimal, reviewers should describe any limitations to their assessment of harms and provide clearer descriptions of methods for synthesizing harms.

scholarly journals Factors Related To Citing From Preceptorship Competence: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-107
Author(s):  
Fitri Chandra Kuspita ◽  
Nursalam Nursalam ◽  
Slamet Riyadi Yuwono
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Work Environment ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Full Text ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Monitoring And Evaluation ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Learning Method ◽  
Level Of Education ◽  
Education Experience

Introduction: Preceptorship is a learning method that involves more experience in conveying their knowledge to someone who is less experienced. In this article, the authors conducted a relevant systematic review in various data used the keywords “preceptorship,”transition and article thinking”. Data based on SCOPUS, Science Direct, Proquest, Pubmed, and Google Scholar. The criteria consisted of the full text published in five years limit journal (2013-2018) and used the article in English. The results as much as 1517 articles found, and selected 15 article that suitable with criteria. Aim: The purpose of this study is to analyze factors that affect the implementation of preceptorship in the hospital and to give the recommendation of monitoring and evaluation preceptorship as well. Method: Papers were critically reviewed and relevant data were extracted and synthesized using an approach based on preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Result: These factors include the level of education, experience, support, guiding model, and work environment

scholarly journals EFFECT OF STRETCHING TO RELIEVE SPASTICITY IN NEUROLOGICAL CONDITIONS- A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-12
Author(s):  
Aditi Hari Bhilwade ◽  
Suvarna Ganvir
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Cochrane Database ◽  
Literature Evidence ◽  
Neurological Conditions

Background- Stretching is most commonly used technique to reduce spasticity. There are various techniques in reducing spasticity in neurological conditions. Objective- To investigate the literature evidence for the effect of stretching on spasticity in neurological conditions. Data sources- A systematic review of all literature found in last 20 years are related to the different techniques of stretching to reduce spasticity (keywords: stretching, spasticity) from PubMed, Google scholar, Science direct and Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Electronic searching was used to find the source literature using definitive keywords. Conclusion- There are the wide variety of the studies investigating the effect of stretching to relieve spasticity in neurological conditions. The further studies can be done to investigate the long-term effects of stretching to reduce spasticity.  

scholarly journals Injury prevention protocols in male soccer players: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Barrera ◽  
◽  
Antonio J. Figueiredo ◽  
Filipe Manuel Clemente ◽  
José Afonso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Injury Prevention ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Prevention Programs ◽  
Soccer Players ◽  
Umbrella Review ◽  
Review Question ◽  
Meta Analyses

Review question / Objective: This article synthesizes the findings of systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyzes (SRMA) available on injury prevention programs in male soccer players and their effectiveness. Condition being studied: The objective of this study was to carry out a systematic review of the systematic reviews and meta-analyzes published up to now, on injury prevention programs and their effectiveness in male soccer players, trying to find a broader vision on the strategies most used for this. problem that affects so many clubs and athletes. Additionally, this research will allow a better understanding of the spread of summary effects, heterogeneity, evidence of bias, and the quality of the findings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document