scholarly journals PENERAPAN STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN INTERAKTIF DENGAN TEKNIK PEMBELAJARAN KOLABORATIF SEND-A-PROBLEM TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS IX SMP

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-144
Author(s):  
Beni Junedi ◽  
Juliana Juliana

Abstract. Mathematical problem solving is a process that includes understanding problems, planning problem solving, solving problems and checking again. Writing this article aims to determine the mathematical problem solving abilities of students by applying interactive learning strategies with collaborative learning techniques a-problem and conventional learning. This study was a quasi-experimental study with a randomized subject design posttest only control group design. Data collection techniques in the form of essay tests by testing hypotheses using the t-test. The results of the hypothesis test concluded that mathematical problem solving ability with the application of interactive learning strategies with collaborative learning technique is a problem better than conventional learning.Keywords: Interactive Learning, Collaborative Techniques Send-a-Problem, Mathematical Problem Solving Ability

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-200
Author(s):  
Sri Yunita Ningsih ◽  
Nurseha Nurseha

Abstract. The research is motivated by the low ability of problem solving in student math SMP Negeri 6 Rengat, the activity of students in following the lesson is still relatively low. The us of fishbowl collaborative learning strategy is throught to be able overcome the problem solving ability of student math which is still low. The purpose of this research is to know the ability of problem solving of student mathematics by using fishbowl collaborative learning strategy. This type of research is experimental research. The research design used was randomized subjects posttest only control group design. The population in these villages is class VII. The class selected to be the experimental class is the class VIIA and the control class is the class VIIB. The data collection technique used in this research is the ability problem solving test in the form of essay. Data analysis techniques in this test use t test based on hypothesis test results obtained t count = -4,321 and t table = -2,010. Based on hypothesis test results t arithmetic < t table with the real level used is 0,05. Ho rejected. So, it can be concluded that the ability to solve mathematical problem with the application of fishbowl collaborative learning strategy is better than the ability to solve mathematical problems with the application of conventional learning strategies in the class VII SMP Negeri 6 Rengat. Keywords: Collaborative Learning Strategy Fishbowl, Problem Solving 


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-152
Author(s):  
Indhira Asih Vivi Yandhari ◽  
Trian Pamungkas Alamsyah ◽  
Dede Halimatusadiah

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi dengan rendahnya kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa serta strategi pembelajaran yang masih bertumpu pada guru. Salah satu alternatifnya yakni diterapkalah strategi pembelajaran Problem Based Learning, karena strategi ini diharapakan dapat meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa. Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk mengetahui pencapaian akhir dan peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan strategi pembelajaran Problem Based Learning lebih baik dari pada siswa yang menggunakan strategi pembelajaran Inkuiri. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah quasi ekperiment dengan desain non-equivalent control group. Teknik sampel menggunakan teknik purposive sampling, dimana kelas IV-A sebagai kelas ekperimen dan kelas IV-B sebagai kelas kontrol. Hasil analisis data menunjukan rata-rata skor posttest kelas ekperimen 75,03 dan kelas kontrol 68,7. Rata-rata data Gain kelas ekperimen 0,59 dan kelas kontrol 0,51. Hasil analisis tersebut memberikan kesimpulan bahwa pencapaian akhir dan peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa kelas ekperimen lebih baik daripada kelas kontrol.The research is motivated by the low mathematical problem solving abilities of students and learning strategies that are still based on the teacher. One of the alternative is to apply the learning strategies of Problem Based Learning, because this strategy is expected to improve students' mathematical problem solving abilities. This study has a goal whether the final achievement and improvement of students' mathematical problem solving abilities using Problem Based Learning learning strategies is better than students who use Inquiry learning strategies. The research method used was a quasi experiment with a non-equivalent control group design. The sample technique used purposive sampling technique, where class IV-A as the experimental class and class IV-B as the control class. The results of data analysis showed an average posttest score of experimental class 75.03 and control class 68.7. The average Gain data of the experimental class is 0.59 and the control class is 0.51. The results of the analysis provide the conclusion that the final achievement and improvement of experimental class mathematical problem solving abilities are better than the control class. 


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-210
Author(s):  
Rivdya Eliza ◽  
Fitri Aulia

The purpose of this research are: 1) to know the learning activity of learners mathematics which is taught by Search, Solve, Create, and Share (SSCS), and 2) model to know the ability of problem solving of mathematics learners who taught by SSCS learning model in the class XI MIA MAN 1 Muara Labuh academic year 2016/2017. This research belongs to a kind of quasi-experimental research with randomized control group only design. In this study design, a group of subjects taken from a particular population were randomly assigned into two groups, the experimental group and the control group. After analyzing the data, it is known that the learning activity of the students after applying the SSCS learning model has improved towards the better from the first meeting to the fifth meeting, ie 35%, 45%, 55%, 68%, 77%. Based on the hypothesis test obtained ttable = 1.645 and tcount = 2.598 so obtained (2.598> 1.645) at 95% confidence interval. Because tcount > ttable then hypothesis in this research accepted. Thus, students 'math-problem-solving skills taught by SSCS learning models are higher than the students' uneducated mathematical problem-solving skills with SSCS learning modelsKeywords: Problem solving abilities, search, solve, sreate and share (SSCS) learning models


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-96
Author(s):  
Winmery Lasma Habeahan

The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in the improvement of students' mathematical problem-solving abilities with the Contextual Teaching and Learning approach in the material of the two-variable linear equation system in class X SMA Negeri 2 Pematangsiantar. This study used an experimental method with the aim of being in accordance with the previous statement to determine the difference in students' mathematical problem-solving abilities with a contextual approach and an expository approach, with a randomized pretest-posttest control group design. The average increase in problem-solving abilities in the control class was 0.1688 while the increase in problem-solving abilities in the experimental class was 0.0085. By using the t-test (SPSS), with a value of Fcount = 10.907 and a significant level of 0.05, a significant probability is obtained 0.002 <0.05, it can be concluded that there is a difference in normalized gain or an increase in problem-solving ability with conventional and contextual approaches. Based on the average gain of the control and experimental classes, the increase in the control class using the conventional approach is higher than the experimental class with the contextual approach. The difference in increasing problem-solving abilities in conventional classrooms is possible due to differences in students' entry-level abilities, which can be seen in the average pretest of each class.


2003 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 306-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn S. Fuchs ◽  
Douglas Fuchs ◽  
Karin Prentice ◽  
Mindy Burch ◽  
Carole L. Hamlett ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-446
Author(s):  
Nur Asih ◽  
Sendi Ramdhani

AbstrakTujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui apakah peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA) lebih baik dari pada konvensional, untuk mengetahui sikap kemandirian belajar siswa terhadap pembelajaran matematika menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA), dan untuk mengetahui hambatan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. Metode penelitiannya adalah eksperimen kuasi dan desain penelitiannya Nonequivalent control group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI SMA PASUNDAN CIKALONGKULON dengan sampel sebanyak dua kelas. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Kelas XI MIPA-3 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas XI MIPA-1 sebagai kelas kontrol. Instrumen berupa tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis, angket dan wawancara. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA) lebih baik dari konvensional. Hasil angket siswa kelas XI MIPA-3 memperoleh hasil hampir seluruhnya positif respon siswa terhadap model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA).Kata Kunci: Kemandirian, MEA, Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Increased Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Student Learning Independence Using the Means-End Analysis Learning Model AbstractThe purpose of this research is to find out whether the improvement of students 'mathematical problem-solving abilities using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model is better than conventional learning, to determine the attitudes of students' learning independence towards mathematics learning using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model, and to find out the obstacles of students in solving problems mathematical problem solving abilities. The research method is a quasi-experiment and the research design is Nonequivalent control group design. The population in this study were all students of class XI SMA PASUNDAN CIKALONGKULON with a sample of two classes. The sampling technique uses a purposive sampling technique. Class XI MIPA-3 as an experimental class and class XI MIPA-1 as a control class. The instruments were in the form of tests of mathematical problem-solving abilities, questionnaires, and interviews. Based on the results of data analysis, the improvement of students' mathematical problem-solving abilities using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model is better than conventional. The results of the XI MIPA-3 class questionnaire obtained almost entirely positive student responses to the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model.Keywords: Independence, MEA, Mathematical Problem Solving.


Author(s):  
Leonard Leonard ◽  
Kurnia Khaerul Nisa

Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika merupakan salah satu tujuan pendidikan nasional di Indonesia, tetapi pencapaiannya masih tergolong rendah. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kuasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian posstest-only. Pengambilan sampel pada penelitian ini menggunakan teknik purpose sampling. Sampel penelitian sebanyak 60 peserta didik yang terbagi dalam dua kelas (30 kelas eksperimen dan 30 kelas kontrol). Penelitian ini dilakukan di sekolah SMP N 10 Bekasi dan SMP N 26 Bekasi. Kelas eksperimen menggunakan model pembelajaran teamdengan strategi pembelajaran tugas dan paksa, sedangkan kelas kontrol menggunakan pembelajaran . Data yang terkumpul kemudian dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji beda rata-rata sampel bebas. Hasil analisis data menunjukan bahwa rata-rata nilai peserta didik yang pembelajarannya menggunakan model pembelajaran team assisted individualization dengan strategi tugas dan paksa lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan rata-rata nilai peserta didik yang pembelajarannya menggunakan model pembelajaran langsung. Kata kunci: Model pembelajaran team assisted individualization, Strategi pembelajaran tugas dan paksa, kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika   ABSTRACT This research was conducted to determine the effect of team assisted individualization learning models with task learning strategies and forced to the ability to solve mathematical problems. Mathematical problem solving ability is an ability that belongs to the national education goals, but its achievement is still relatively low. The method used in this study is a quasi-experimental method with a poststest-only research design. Sampling in this study uses purpose sampling technique. The study sample consisted of 60 students divided into two classes (30 experimental classes and 30 control classes). This research was conducted in the school of SMP N 10 Bekasi and SMP N 26 Bekasi. The experimental class uses team individualization learning models with task and forced learning strategies, while the control class uses direct learning. The collected data is then analyzed using independent sample t-test. The results of data analysis showed that the average value of students who learned using the team assisted individualization learning model with higher task and forced strategies compared to the average value of students who learned using direct learning models. Keywords: Team assisted individualization learning model, task and forced learning strategies, mathematical problem solving skills                


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-92
Author(s):  
Eliza Ayu Pratiwi ◽  
Amir Rusdi ◽  
Agustiany Dumeva Putri

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penggunaan model pembelajaran mastery learning (belajar tuntas) terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa dikelas X SMA ‘Aisyiyah 1 Palembang. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah true exprimental design dengan desain pretest – posttest control group design, populasi yang digunakan adalah seluruh siswa kelas X yang ada di SMA ‘Aisyiyah 1 Palembang tahun ajaran 2015/2016. Penelitian ini mengambil dua kelas sebagai sampel yang diambil dengan menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling yaitu kelas X4 dengan jumlah 37 siswa sebagai kontrol dan kelas X1 berjumlah 37 siswa sebagai kelas ekprimen. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan instrumen berupa tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika dan observasi kepada siswa. Data yang diperoleh dari hasil tes digunakan untuk menguji hipotesis penelitian dengan menggunakan uji-t. Dari hasil analisis diperoleh bahwa terdapat pengaruh positif penggunaan model pembelajaran mastery learning (belajar tuntas) terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa dan hasil rata-rata observasi aktivitas kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa sebesar 74.This research aims to determine the effect of using the mastery learning models to the mathematical problem solving ability of first grader of 'Aisyiyah 1’s Senior High School Palembang. The type of this research is the true experimental design with the design pretest - posttest control group design, the populations are all first grader of 'Aisyiyah 1’s Senior High School Palembang 2015/2016. This research took two classes as a samples by using the cluster random sampling technique. The classes are X4 with 37 students as a control and X1 with 37 students as a experiment class. The research was conducted of eight meetings. The collection of datas are done by using an instrument which are mathematical problem solving ability test and observation to students. The datas obtained from the test are used to test the research hypothesis by using t-test. From the analysis, this shows that there is positive effect of using the mastery learning to the mathematical problem solving abilities of students and the average result of observation the ability mathematical problem solving is 74.


Jurnal Elemen ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-365
Author(s):  
Ayu Faradillah ◽  
◽  
Yasmin Husna Restu Fadhilah ◽  

This study aims to describe mathematical resilience on slow learner students in solving problems. According to the previous research, there is no research focused on the subject of slow learners. The research method is a qualitative descriptive approach. The total population of this study was 71 students with special needs, which consisted of 51 male students and 20 female students. The selection of subjects in this study was reviewed based on three levels of mathematical resilience, namely high, medium, and low. The process of selecting this subject uses the Wright Maps table on Winsteps application version 3.73. Selected subjects were given instruments and interviews to analyze their mathematical problem-solving. The results showed that mathematical resilience on slow learner students was directly proportional to solving mathematical problems for subjects with high mathematical resilience. Meanwhile, subjects with medium and low mathematical resilience were inversely proportional to solving mathematical problems. The stages of solving the problem of the slow learners were incomplete because they have not passed one of the stages formulated by Polya. Therefore, based on the results of this research analysis, teachers can pay more attention to the slow-learners learning strategies in solving problems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document