scholarly journals Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pegawai Pemerintah Non Pegawai Negeri (PPNPN) Terbaik Pada Kantor Imigrasi Kelas I Polonia Medan Menerapkan Metode Multifactor Evaluation Process (MFEP)

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 382
Author(s):  
Muhammad Wirza Pratama Agatmadja ◽  
Surya Darma Nasution
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Civil Servant ◽  
Class I ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Government Employees ◽  
Selection Of

The decision making process for the selection of the best non-civil servant government employees is still done manually, where in the election there are still often some non-civil servant government employees (ppnpn) that are not appropriate as desired by the agency, so that in the election there are still nonconformities with existing procedures, therefore the need for a decision support system that will later assist in the decision making process. Decision support system is a system that can be used to support decision makers with the best alternative in making decisions in the process of selecting non-civil servant government employees (PPNPN) at the Polonia Class I Immigration Office. The Multifactor Evaluation Process (MFEP) method is a fairly simple method that can be used in decision making to analyze multiple criteria. This method will make decisions with several criteria that conflict with each other and will produce the greatest value that will be selected as the best alternative. The results of the calculation of this method will be as expected if the chosen alternative meets the specified criteria. Thus a decision support system is needed so that it can help make the right decision in the selection of the best non civil servant government employees (PPNPN) at the Polonia Class I Immigration Office. In a decision support system there are several methods that can be used to solve a problem in making a decision

AN EXCEL-BASED DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR SCORING AND RANKING PROPOSED R&D PROJECTS

2008 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 529-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANNE DE PIANTE HENRIKSEN ◽  
SUSAN W. PALOCSAY
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
User Friendly ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Interactive User

One of the most challenging aspects of technology management is the selection of research and development (R&D) projects from among a group of proposals. This paper introduces an interactive, user-friendly decision support system for evaluating and ranking R&D projects and demonstrates its application on an example R&D program. It employs the scoring methodology developed by Henriksen and Traynor to provide a practical technique that considers both project merit and project cost in the evaluation process, while explicitly accounting for trade-offs among multiple decision criteria.1 The framework of the Excel-based system, PScore, is presented with an emphasis on the potential benefits of using this methodology with computer-automated extensions that facilitate and enhance managerial review and decision-making capabilities.

Sistem Pendukung Keputusan SNMPTN Jalur Undangan Dengan Metode Electre

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Lidia K Simanjuntak ◽  
Tessa Y M Sihite ◽  
Mesran Mesran ◽  
Nuning Kurniasih ◽  
Yuhandri Yuhandri
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Action Selection ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Prospective Students ◽  
College Entrance ◽  
Electre Method ◽  
Selection Of

All colleges each year organize the selection of new admissions. Acceptance of prospective students in universities as education providers is done by selecting prospective students based on achievement in school and college entrance selection. To select the best student candidates based on predetermined criteria, then use Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) or commonly called decision support system. One method in MCDM is the Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la Reality (ELECTRE). The ELECTRE method is the best method of action selection. The ELECTRE method to obtain the best alternative by eliminating alternative that do not fit the criteria and can be applied to the decision SNMPTN invitation path.

PEMILIHAN KEPLING TELADAN MENERAPKAN METODE RANK ORDER CENTROID (ROC) DAN METODE ADDITIVE RATIO ASSESSMENT (ARAS) DI KECAMATAN MEDAN AREA

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liza Handayani ◽  
Muhammad Syahrizal ◽  
Kennedi Tampubolon
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Priority Level ◽  
The Village ◽  
Field Area ◽  
Selection Of

The head of the environment is an extension of the head of the village head in assisting or providing services to the community both in the administration of administration in the village and to other problems. It is natural for a kepling to be appreciated for their performance during their special tenure in the kecamatan field area. Previously, the selection of a dipling in a sub-district was very inefficient and seemed unfair for this exemplary selection to use a system to produce an accurate value, and no intentional element. To overcome the process of selecting an exemplary kepling that experiences these obstacles by using an application called a Decision Support System. Decision Support System (SPK) is a system that can solve a problem, and this system is also assisted with several methods, namely the Rank Order Centroid (ROC) method that can assign weight values to each of the criteria based on their priority level. And to do the ranking or determine an exemplary set using the Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method, this method provides decision making that takes decisions based on ranking or the highest value.Keywords: Head of Medan Area Subdistrict, SPK, Centroid Rank Order, Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS).

SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN GURU BERPRESTASI KOTA MEDAN MENERAPKAN METODE PREFERENCES SELECTION INDEX (STUDI KASUS : DINAS PENDIDIKAN KOTA MEDAN)

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fajar Syahputra ◽  
Mesran Mesran ◽  
Ikhwan Lubis ◽  
Agus Perdana Windarto
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Formal Education ◽  
Basic Education ◽  
Selection Index ◽  
Main Task ◽  
Selection Of

The teacher is a major milestone in the world of education, the ability and achievement of students cannot be separated from the role of a teacher in teaching and guiding students. Based on the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 14 of 2005 concerning Teachers and Lecturers, in Article 1 explained that teachers are professional educators with the main task of educating, teaching, guiding, directing, training, evaluating, and evaluating students in early childhood education through formal education, basic education and education medium. Whereas in Article 4 of the Act, it is explained that the position of teachers as professionals serves to enhance the dignity and role of teachers as learning agents to function to improve the quality of national education.Decision making is an election process, among various alternatives that aim to meet one or several targets. The decision-making system has 4 phases, namely intelligence, design, choice and implementation. These phases are the basis for decision making, which ends with a recommendation.The Preferences Selection Index (PSI) method is a rarely used decision support system method. This method is a method developed by stevanie and Bhatt (2010) to solve the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). With the right consideration, this method can be one of the tools to determine policies in decision-making systems, especially the selection of outstanding teachers. Determination of policies taken as a basis for decision making, must use criteria that can be defined clearly and objectively.Keywords: Decision Support System, PSI, Selection of Achieving Teachers

Pengembangan Aplikasi Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Program Studi dengan Metode Fuzzy Logic (Studi Kasus: Universitas Multimedia Nusantara)

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-18
Author(s):  
Joko Haryanto ◽  
Seng Hansun
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Fuzzy Logic ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
System Application ◽  
Prospective Students ◽  
Fuzzy Logic Method ◽  
Index Terms ◽  
Selection Of

This paper describes the development of decision support system application to assist students who want to enter college so that no one choose the majors incorrectly. This application uses fuzzy logic method because fuzzy logic is very flexible in data which are vague and can be represented as a linguistic variable. The purpose of this application is to assist students to choose available majors at University Multimedia Nusantara which are appropriate with his/her capabilities. This application accepts five kinds of input values i.e. Mathematics, Indonesian, English, Physics, and TIK. Received input will be processed by the calculation of the system for decision-making and the application will generate output that shows how great a match for each majors. With this application, prospective students can find out where the majors that match his/her capabilities. This application has ninety nine percentage of match result accuracy. Index Terms—fuzzy logic, decision support system, UMN, selection of major

scholarly journals Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penyeleksian Colour Guard Pada Marching Band Ginada Dengan Menggunakan Metode Vikor Dan Borda

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-48
Author(s):  
Nurjannah ◽  
Dito Putro Utomo
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Body Language ◽  
Routine Activity ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Marching Band

Decision support system for selecting color guard with VIKOR and Borda methods. It has been made as a tool to select color guard at the Sei Rampah High School. The criteria used in the decision support system for color guard selection are: height, weight, agility, stamina, and body language. Color guard selection activities are a routine activity every year, so GINADA marching band coach Sei Rampah hereby selects to select permanent members in the marching band. Decision Support System in an organization can be seen as important in supporting the smooth running of activities and achieving an organizational goal. SPK can come in various forms, ranging from simple forms of data processing to complex application forms, and can also be used to accelerate and improve the quality of the decision-making process in the organization.

scholarly journals A Clinical Decision Support System based on Ontology and Causal Reasoning Models

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-197
Author(s):  
Nur Raidah Rahim ◽  
Sharifalillah Nordin ◽  
Rosma Mohd Dom
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision Support System ◽  
Causal Reasoning ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Graphical Modeling

  Clinical decision support system (CDSS) is promising in assisting physicians for improving decision-making process and facilitates healthcare services. In medicine, causality has become the main concern throughout healthcare and decision-making. Causality is necessary for understanding all structures ofscientific reasoning and for providing a coherent and sufficient explanation for any event. However, thereare lack of existing CDSS that provide causal reasoning for the presented outcomes or decisions. Theseare necessary for showing reliability of the outcomes, and helping the physicians in making properdecisions. In this study, an ontology-based CDSS model is developed based on several key concepts andfeatures of causality and graphical modeling techniques. For the evaluation process, the Pellet reasoneris used to evaluate the consistency of the developed ontology model. In addition, an evaluation toolknown as Ontology Pitfall Scanner is used for validating the ontology model through pitfalls detection.The developed ontology-based CDSS model has potentials to be applied in clinical practice and helpingthe physicians in decision-making process. Keywords: clinical decision support system, ontology, causality, causal reasoning, graphical modeling

scholarly journals Penerapan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Dalam Pemilihan Rumah Kost

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 243
Author(s):  
Rita Novita Sari ◽  
Ratna Sri Hayati
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Information Technology ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Utility Theory ◽  
Weighted Sums ◽  
Multi Attribute Utility Theory ◽  
Boarding House ◽  
Selection Of

The development of information technology is currently developing rapidly. The use of information technology is very broad in various fields of life. The choice of boarding house is one of the things that is not easy to do. The problem often faced when choosing a boarding house is that boarders find it difficult to get information about boarding houses. Decision support system is a method that helps in making decisions on a particular problem, where no one can make a definite decision. Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) is a method of decision making. MAUT is a method where looking for weighted sums of the same values in each utility in each attribute. By applying the MAUT method in the selection of boarding houses, it can give good suggestions or recommendations on boarding houses.

scholarly journals UML-МОДЕЛЮВАННЯ СИСТЕМИ ПРИЙНЯТТЯ РІШЕНЬ В МЕДИЧНИХ НАУКОВИХ ДОСЛІДЖЕННЯХ

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. P. Martsenyuk ◽  
I. Ye. Andrushchak ◽  
О. M. Kuchvara
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Medical Research ◽  
Support System ◽  
Systems Analysis ◽  
Software Implementation ◽  
Decision Making Process

There was fulfilled systems analysis of decision making process for systemic medical research. The structure of the system was analysed. There were executed project research with help of UML-tools, allowing to fulfill project and software implementation of decision support system.

scholarly journals DESAIN DSS (DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM) MENGGUNAKAN METODE PROFILE MATCHING UNTUK PENENTUAN PENERIMA BEASISWA DI POLITEKNIK NEGERI SAMARINDA

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Muchamad Zainul Rohman
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Profile Matching ◽  
To Receive

The scholarship selection process of Politeknik Negeri Samarinda are constraints on the decision-making process. This is because there is no objective method to determine quickly and precisely. To assist in the determination of the set someone worthy scholarship in this study will be design DSS (Decision Support System) with model of Multi-Criteria Decision Making. The method used is the method Profile Matching. Profile Matching methods have been able to select the best alternative from a number of alternatives, in this case meant that alternatives are eligible to receive scholarships based on the criteria specified. Research carried out by finding the weights for each sub-aspect, then carried ranking process that will determine the optimal alternative, the best students will be considered by decisionmakersto get a scholarship. Proses seleksi beasiswa di Politeknik Negeri Samarinda banyak terdapat kendala pada proses pengambilan keputusan. Hal ini dikarenakan belum ada metode objektif yang dapat memutuskan dengan cepat dan tepat. Untuk membantu penentuan dalam menetapkan seseorang yang layak menerima beasiswa maka dalam penelitian ini akan didesainkan DSS (Decision Support System) dengan model Multi Criteria Decision Making. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode Profile Matching. Metode Profile Matching dipilih karena mampu menyeleksi alternatif terbaik dari sejumlah alternatif, dalam hal ini alternatif yang dimaksudkan yaitu yang berhak menerima beasiswa berdasarkan kriteria-kriteria yang ditentukan. Penelitian dilakukan dengan mencari nilai bobot untuk setiap sub aspek, kemudian dilakukan proses perankingan yang akan menentukan alternatif yang optimal, yaitu mahasiswa terbaik yang akan dipertimbangkan oleh pengambil keputusan untuk mendapatkan beasiswa.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document