Radikale Demokratiebildung

2021 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 430-445
Author(s):  
Werner Friedrichs

Abstract Radical Democracy Education In the article, the question of the form of democratic education is central. Especially the Anthropocene gives rise to future tasks that must be theorized on the basis of a more radical understanding of democratic coexistence and that require a new form of democratic education. Fundamental to this is a change in the basic epistemological assumptions of democratic education. In the process, interfaces with artistic practices emerge. Ideas of methodical implementations arise in the context of aesthetic practices.

AL-TA LIM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Warnis Warnis

Social life of a village in Minangkabau is built on a tradition of democracy and mutual agreement. This study aims to explain and elaborate on the values contained in the legend and tradition as the basis of democratic education in Minangkabau. Furthermore, it also describes the potential and contribution of the custom that support the understanding of democracy and democratization process that includes: Representativeness, Sakato consensus (Sakato, an institution that accommodates the aspirations of the people), decision-making, basic freedoms and individual engagement in decision-making, and the equality of voting rights in the deliberations. This study used a qualitative approach, comprehensive interviews and documentation as data collection. The data source is the prince, traditional leaders, Nagari custom, traditional Alam Minangkabau, Bundo Kanduang, religious leaders and society. Data analyzed refers to the analysis of qualitative data presented by Alwasilah (2002). The results showed that the global concept of democracy can be united with the democracy education system brought by traditional communities. That is, people's understanding of democracy education not only refers to the idea of West democracy. However, the custom values of society can be used as the basis democratic education for Minangkabau society of the present and future. The result also shows that the Minangkabau community has first implemented democracy based on traditional values long before Western democracy applied in Indonesia, especially in Minangkabau.


This paper aims to evaluate: Evaluation of the implementation of democratic education in the learning of Pancasila and Citizenship Education in Surakarta City Senior High School. Research method with a qualitative approach with observation, documentation and interviews. Data analysis techniques by collecting data, reducing data and drawing conclusions. Test the validity with the triangulation method. Students are trained to be open and dare to express their opinions, respect the opinions of students, can improve the quality of communication interactions between fellow students, teachers, schools and students with their communities. 2) The results of the study evaluated the implementation of democratic education in the subjects of Pancasila Education and Citizenship Education in Surakarta City Senior High School. Students are not seen as objects, but students have been viewed as subjects in the learning process. The results of the study, can be applied in the learning process of democratic education on Pancasila and Citizenship Education subjects compiled in the RPP compiled by the Surakarta City Pancasila and Citizenship Education subject teacher. The implementation is in the learning process, adapted to the conditions of each high school in Surakarta City. The involvement of the school environment and the community environment to support learning also depends on the school environment and the community environment of the students. The novelty in this research is that the school began to involve the school environment and the community environment in learning democracy education. However, not all schools are able to involve the school environment and the community environment to organize democratic education.


2003 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 404-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Baum

This paper returns to J. S. Mill to draw out democratic conceptions of education and equality that challenge still-current conceptions of intractable human inequalities. Mill acknowledges that individuals differ in abilities. Nonetheless, he develops a broad conception of ‘education for freedom’ and insists that only ‘wretched social arrangements’ prevent virtually all people from exercising capacities for self-government in citizenship, marriage, and industry. In the same breath, he qualifies his democratic egalitarianism with reference to a sub-class of working people whose ‘low moral qualities’ leave them unfit for such self-government. Modern liberal states largely dismiss Mill's more radical democratic impulse. Meanwhile, they reiterate and refine his exclusionary one through new practices for constructing and managing inequalities – for example, IQ tests, educational ‘tracking’, and social science categories like the ‘underclass’. I reconsider this divided legacy of Mill's egalitarianism as a basis for rethinking the limits of today's ‘meritocratic’ egalitarianism.


Author(s):  
Zoran Avramovic

The paper comprises three sections: (a) the concepts and institutions of democracy, (b) the concept of education for democracy, and (c) the role of school in democratic education. The concept of 'open society' is critical to the strategy of education for democracy. In addition to general conditions for establishing and functioning of democracy, the author points to some of its basic institutions: structured social groups, political parties, leader elections. The concept of 'education' is considered from the standpoint of goals - social, national and individual. It is pointed to tolerance as a key concept of the theory of education for democracy. School, being the most prominent institution in the process of education for democracy, places student and development of his/he; democratic characteristics and capacities in the focus of its strategy. All elements of teaching: curriculum, methods teacher, student, textbook are in the function of the basic idea of democratic education - tolerance and crisscrossed influences (practicing of getting used to differences). Apart from the development and acquisition of thinking in concepts about democracy, education for democracy should encompass knowledge for life at state and social institutions, for private and public life, acquisition of national values, rational decision-making discussion. The framework of strategy in question is certainly exercising of tolerance and getting used to crisscrossed influences.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-229
Author(s):  
Serlina Agustin ◽  
Dinie Anggraeni Dewi

This research aims to determine the form of implementation of the values of democracy education in grade VIII students of SMP Negeri 1 Situraja. The research method used is a case study method with a qualitative approach. The research informants were class VIII students of SMP Negeri 1 Situraja in the 2020/2021 school year with data collection techniques, namely asynchronously using google form media. The results showed that the values of democracy which became the benchmark in developing democracy had been lived by students, especially in grade VIII students of SMP Negeri 1 Situraja. They have implemented democratic values in the school environment. The values of democratic education are tolerance, honesty, social spirit, environmental care, creativity and responsibility. These democratic values are implemented through activities organized by the OSIS at SMP Negeri 1 Situraja.


Author(s):  
Ashley Simpson

The word democracy is frequently uttered by academics, politicians, and, generally within society. Phrases such as ‘democratic education', ‘democracy education' and ‘(student) participation' are often referred to within national curricula, policy briefings, and, teacher education/training and resources. Little critical attention has been given to the word within the context of Finnish education. In recent years the educational system of Finland has been described as a ‘miracle' and commentators have noted its ‘successes.' This article offers a deeper gaze within Finnish education by looking at the ways democracy discourses are uttered by practitioners. For the purposes of this article the author analyses two in-depth conversation extracts, one was from a youth participation conference in Helsinki in 2015, the other is a conversation from a conference held in February 2016. This article focuses on the uses and functions of discourse to uncover cultural stereotyping and othering in terms of how democracy is discussed and expressed within the context of Finland.


Author(s):  
Alex Demirović

The article sketches out three arguments: a) The financial crisis that dominates the economic and political processes since 2008 transforms the transnationalized network state into a new form of the exceptional state. Arguing against those who describe the actual conjuncture as authoritarian statism, Demirovi? argues that the new is a governmentalized austerity state. b) Since long critical state theory argues that democracy is in a crisis. But the process is not one of a constant decline but rather a cycle; and the cycle is determined by the compromises between social classes. c) In the recent crisis of democracy not only new actors appeared fighting for real democracy but also the theories of radical democracy became radicalized. This is demonstrated in the discussion of the approaches of Jürgen Habermas and Chantal Mouffe. The theory of democracy overcomes the liberal distinction of economy and politics and tends to democratize social complexity in itself.


This paper aims to evaluate: Evaluation of the implementation of democratic education in the learning of Pancasila and Citizenship Education in Surakarta City Senior High School. Research method with a qualitative approach with observation, documentation and interviews. Data analysis techniques by collecting data, reducing data and drawing conclusions. Test the validity with the triangulation method. Students are trained to be open and dare to express their opinions, respect the opinions of students, can improve the quality of communication interactions between fellow students, teachers, schools and students with their communities. 2) The results of the study evaluated the implementation of democratic education in the subjects of Pancasila Education and Citizenship Education in Surakarta City Senior High School. Students are not seen as objects, but students have been viewed as subjects in the learning process. The results of the study, can be applied in the learning process of democratic education on Pancasila and Citizenship Education subjects compiled in the RPP compiled by the Surakarta City Pancasila and Citizenship Education subject teacher. The implementation is in the learning process, adapted to the conditions of each high school in Surakarta City. The involvement of the school environment and the community environment to support learning also depends on the school environment and the community environment of the students. The novelty in this research is that the school began to involve the school environment and the community environment in learning democracy education. However, not all schools are able to involve the school environment and the community environment to organize democratic education.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sabri ◽  
Muh. Ikhsan ◽  
Ismail Suardi Wekke

Democratic transition phenomenon from New Order era to Reform era is always as important subject of study. From the standpoint of democracy, Indonesia is currently at the "crossroads" with three possible options of different consequences. First, it brings us consolidating democracy and peace. Second, it brings us turn around and go back to the old system. Third, it brings us circling aimlessly and occasionally enlivened by social conflicts to SARA (ethnicity, religion, race, and intergroup). The question is: which direction of democracy are we going to? This article focuses on Sekolah Demokrasi Jeneponto (SDJ/Jeneponto School Democracy) program in Jeneponto South Sulawesi, which took place in 2006-2008. The program held in cooperation of Komunitas Indonesia untuk Demokrasi (KID/Indonesian Community for Democracy) and Melania Foundation, by Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy (NIMD) sponsorship. SDJ program is a citizen of political and democratic education that aims to transform the value, knowledge, and skills the concept of democracy in Indonesia by considering religion and culture. By discussing about democracy, religion, and culture following by training and mastering democracy instrument, its participants were able to actualize themselves by means of theoretical understanding, excavation experience, reflection, and the implementation of democracy within the framework of civil society.


Author(s):  
W. H. Zucker ◽  
R. G. Mason

Platelet adhesion initiates platelet aggregation and is an important component of the hemostatic process. Since the development of a new form of collagen as a topical hemostatic agent is of both basic and clinical interest, an ultrastructural and hematologic study of the interaction of platelets with the microcrystalline collagen preparation was undertaken.In this study, whole blood anticoagulated with EDTA was used in order to inhibit aggregation and permit study of platelet adhesion to collagen as an isolated event. The microcrystalline collagen was prepared from bovine dermal corium; milling was with sharp blades. The preparation consists of partial hydrochloric acid amine collagen salts and retains much of the fibrillar morphology of native collagen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document