scholarly journals “Daddy, can’t you see we are burning?” Traumatic Time and Parental Responsibility in Kenneth Lonergan’s Manchester by the Sea

Author(s):  
Lona Moutafidou

In Kenneth Lonergan’s film Manchester by the Sea, screened in 2016, Lee commits a life-changing mistake: on his way to the mini-market, he forgets to put the screen on the fireplace. Upon his return, he becomes a numbed witness to the spectacle of his own family tragedy as the authorities remove his children’s bodies from the burning house scene. This significant event is represented through a sequence of flashbacks, which designates said cinematic device as one of the film’s most important features. Indeed, in The Trauma Question, Roger Luckhurst approaches the flashback as “the cinema’s rendition of the frozen moment of the traumatic impact . . . flash[ing] back insistently in the present because the image cannot yet or perhaps ever be narrativized as past.” Years after the incident, and still unable to address the wound of his parental negligence and child-death trauma, Lee dreams of his dead daughter suggestively asking, “Daddy, can’t you see we are burning?” The question echoes the one from Freud’s The Interpretation of Dreams, where another father dreams of his dead child being burnt. In Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History, Cathy Caruth examines Freud and Lacan’s analysis of this question as to the significance of grief articulation, trauma coping and trauma persistence in sleep and awaken reality. The purpose of this article is to examine anachrony as a feature which exalts the dysfunctional inertia of a present life and of a traumatized mind afflicted by events which have been impossible to either register, integrate or narrate. Secondly, the article will try to unearth the mechanics of Lee’s grief and guilt via his daughter’s question. Emphasis will be placed on Lee’s inability to assume what Caruth calls the “ethical burden of survival” when asked to be his orphaned nephew’s guardian. This will be viewed as a reminder of Lee’s failure as a parent and as a challenge and invitation for the character to recover from the vacuum of his current death-in-life.

1991 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Cockburn

There are significant numbers of well-documented cases of the following general kind. At the age of 3 or 4 a child starts to make claims about his past which clearly do not correspond to anything that has happened in his present life. He claims to remember living in a certain place, doing certain things, being with certain people, and so on. It is then found that these memory claims fit the life of a person who died shortly before the child was born. The accuracy of the memory claims is striking and there seems to be no possible normal explanation of this. The child also has certain character traits, interests and skills which correspond closely to those of the one who died; and, perhaps, a physical characteristic, such as a birthmark or wound, which closely resembles a characteristic of the earlier individual.


Author(s):  
Ahmed Ajil ◽  
Manon Jendly ◽  
Claudia Campistol Mas

Abstract Scholarship on security has recently seen a shift from traditionally state-centric, elitist and objectivist conceptions of ‘security’ towards human-centred perspectives, which put emphasis on forms of ‘vernacular’ and ‘everyday’ security, and promote bottom-up empirical inquiries to further our understand of what security looks like ‘from below’. There remains, however, a dearth of empirical material exploring ‘everyday security’. In this paper, we are studying the ‘everyday security’ of a particularly securitized group, namely refugees. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted between 2016 and 2017 with 23 Syrian and Iraqi urban refugees living in the Jordanian cities of Amman and Mafraq. We analyse how they understand and perceive their own (in)security: we do so by focusing, retrospectively, on the factors and events that led up to their flight from their home country (‘pre-flight period’) on the one hand and those shaping their present life in exile in Jordanian urban areas (‘post-flight period’) on the other. Our findings indicate that, while pre-flight insecurity is mostly defined around existential threats to physical integrity, post-flight insecurity is shaped by a more diffuse form of insecurity, resulting from the legal, economic, social and political limbo they are stuck in.


Numen ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-370
Author(s):  
Mikel Burley

Despite the Buddha’s renowned aversion to metaphysical-cum-cosmological speculation, ostensibly cosmological systems have proliferated in Buddhist traditions. Debates persist over how to interpret these systems, a central puzzle being the relation between apparently cosmological and psychological aspects. This article critically analyzes three main interpretive orientations, namely psychologization, literalism, and the one-reality view. After examining a tendency in the third of these to equivocate between talk of two co-referentialvocabulariesand talk of two correspondingorders, I discuss at length the debate between literalist and psychologizing approaches. The latter emphasize how accounts of “realms of existence” are most cogently read as figurative descriptions of mental states, whereas literalists argue that at least some of the accounts should be understood cosmologically, as descriptions of spatiotemporal regions. Notwithstanding weaknesses in some literalist arguments, the importance to Buddhist soteriology of a conception of rebirth beyond one’s present life counts against psychologizing approaches that either ignore or downplay this importance. Returning to the one-reality view, I develop the idea that it is the existential state being described that constitutes the common factor between “cosmological” and “psychological” passages. Treating the texts in an overly literal-minded manner, I suggest, risks missing these descriptions’ affective and conative significance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 48-65
Author(s):  
Cíntia da Silva Telles Nichele ◽  
Marco Aurelio Pereira Horta ◽  
Aldo Pacheco Ferreira

The Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a Communications Procedure (OPCP) make commitments and guarantees in relation to child health. The aim of the study is to verify the effects of these commitments on the causes of child death. To analyze these effects, we apply the one-way analysis of variance. For each group, we calculated the averages of child deaths in their respective countries for the years 2002, 2007, 2012, and 2017. The p-value resulting indicated whether there was a difference between the means of child deaths in those years that were compared. We also observed the time series for each cause of death over the years 2000 to 2017. The CRC has an expressive adhesion. OPCP has a smaller number of acceptors in all regions compared to CRC. The acceptance of OPCP did not significantly alter the results of the number of deaths in the accepting countries in any of the 13 causes of child death observed. In the non- accepting group, significant differences were found concerning five causes of child death: HIV/AIDS, diarrhoeal diseases, measles, meningitis/encephalitis, and acute lower respiratory infections (p-values 0.01, 0.01, 0.003, 0.002, and 0.003, respectively). Our results suggest that the group of countries that have accepted the OPCP are more committed to issues of child deaths causes studied. In all of them the annual death numbers were considerably lower in this group.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-277
Author(s):  
Firman Panjaitan

In the Bible it is often found a difficult part to understand, especially in this paper about the plan of the Lord who wanted to kill Moses. Even if you look deeper, Moses is a person sent by the LORD to free the nation of Israel from occupation in Egypt. This section needs to be examined more deeply, so that it can be searched for what is the basis of this action of the Lord, and at the same time what theological meanings are contained in this section, which are also relevant to present life. Through word study research efforts, it can be found that the plan of the Lord to kill Moses was not a playful plan, but it was a truly serious plan. But all these plans could be failed because Zipporah, the wife of Moses, succeeded in making atonement with the LORD through the foreskin of Moses 'son who was affixed to Moses' pubic. This indicates that the Lord's plan occurred because Moses was negligent in keeping his holiness, which is to circumcise his child. Holiness is the most important thing in carrying out all forms of service and call of God. If this holiness was ignored, then it could be that the Lord's plan to send someone turned into the anger of the LORD against the one sent.Abstrak: Dalam Alkitab seringkali dijumpai bagian yang sulit untuk dipahami. Terkait dengan tulisan ini, bagian yang sangat sulit itu adalah tentang rencana TUHAN yang hendak membunuh Musa. Padahal kalau dilihat lebih dalam lagi, Musa adalah orang yang diutus oleh TUHAN untuk membebaskan bangsa Israel dari kerja paksa di Mesir. Bagian ini perlu untuk diteliti lebih dalam lagi, agar dapat dicari apa yang menjadi dasar dari tindakan TUHAN ini, dan sekaligus ditarik makna teologi apa yang terkandung dalam bagian ini, yang juga relevan bagi kehidupan sekarang. Melalui studi kata, maka dapat dijumpai bahwa rencana TUHAN membunuh Musa bukanlah rencana yang main-main, tetapi merupakan rencana yang memang sungguh-sungguh. Namun semua rencana itu dapat digagal-kan karena ada Zipora, istri Musa, yang berhasil mengadakan upaya ‘pendamaian’ dengan TUHAN melalui kulit khatan anak Musa yang ditempelkan ke ‘kemaluan’ Musa. Ini menandakan bahwa rencana TUHAN itu terjadi karena Musa telah lalai dalam menjaga kekudusan dirinya, yaitu menyunatkan anaknya. Kekudusan meru-pakan hal terpenting dalam menjalankan segala bentuk pelayanan dan panggilan TUHAN. Apabila kekudusan ini diabaikan, maka bisa saja rencana TUHAN mengutus seseorang berubah menjadi kemarahan TUHAN terhadap yang diutus. 


Author(s):  
Tia Byer

Criticism of Michael Herr’s Dispatches (2015) and Don DeLillo’s Falling Man (2007) can be divided into two mainstream interpretations. On the one hand, they are both marked as psychic trauma texts. Herr’s writing of Dispatches can be read as a therapeutic process that allows him to deal with his trauma experienced as a war correspondent during the Vietnam War. The intimate and domestic trauma in DeLillo’s Falling Man focuses on the disconnected lives of a couple and their child in the wake of the attacks on the World Trade Center. On the other hand, critics have aligned each text with the national trauma narrative. This article aligns itself with the latter interpretation. I propose, through a postmodern reading, that the national trauma narrated in both Dispatches and Falling Man is an example of Lyotard’s “incredulity toward metanarratives” (xxix). I argue that both texts represent the failure of the metanarrative of American Exceptionalism; the ideology that defines the essence of America as the embodiment of “supremacy” and “power”. Narrative fails in each text when the nature of each conflict deconstructs this metanarrative of national identity. This deconstruction arises from the way conflict appears to alienate Herr as author, and DeLillo’s characters from preconceived notions of knowledge. As a result of this, both authors explore the fictive nature of the human condition to present the national trauma caused by each conflict. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 870
Author(s):  
Idoia Otaegui Aizpurua

Resumen: La determinación de la correcta competencia judicial internacional en procedimientos relativos a la responsabilidad parental, reviste una relevancia especial por las consecuencias finales que dicha determinación tiene sobre los menores, principales destinatarios de las medidas que los tribunales competentes adoptarán sobre ellos. Si a ello le añadimos una situación de residencia habitual en Estados miembros diferentes y de litispendencia internacional, la complejidad del caso aumenta. Afortunadamente, las disposiciones comunes del Reglamento Bruselas II bis establecen unos criterios claros para la solución de los conflictos de competencia como el planteado en el caso objeto de análisis.Palabras clave: Reglamento “Bruselas II bis”. Litispendencia. Competencia judicial internacional. Responsabilidad parental. Residencia habitual del menor.Abstract: The determination of the proper international jurisdiction in proceedings related to parental responsibility is particularly relevant due to the final consequences that this determination has on minors, main addressees of the measures that the competent courts will adopt on them. If we add to this a situation of habitual residence in different Member States and an international lis pendens foreclosure, the complexity of the case increases. Fortunately, the common rules of the Brussels II bis Regulation set clear criteria for the resolution of conflicts of competence such as the one raised in the case under analysis.Keywords: “Brussels II bis” Regulation. Lis pendens. International jurisdiction. Parental responsibility. Habitual residence of the child.


2018 ◽  
pp. 143
Author(s):  
María José Fuenzalida San Martín ◽  
Karina Cerda Gallardo

ResumenEl trabajo examina la regulación del cuidado personal de los menores en caso de separación de los padres bajo la normativa previa a la Ley de Corresponsabilidad (20.680), desde la óptica de la igualdad entre los padres, concluyendo que su afectación de este derecho hacía necesaria sumodicación. La segunda parte del trabajo analiza la nueva regulación, poniendo énfasis en los efectos de ella sobre el bienestar del menor en casos de separación. Se concluye con algunas observaciones críticas, basadas en los conceptos y criterios vagos de la ley, respecto de la posibilidad de que efectivamente la ley sirva, por un lado, como guía parael ejercicio de la corresponsabilidad entre los padres, y, por otro, para evitar la judicialización de los desacuerdos entre estos.Palabras clave: Cuidado personal; Igualdad ante ley; Corresponsabilidad; Interés superior del niño.AbstractThe article examines the legal regulation of child custody in cases of separation of parents under rules prior to the Act on Joint Parental Responsibility (20.680), from the point of view of equality among the parents, concluding that the infringment of that right made necessary theirreform. The second part examines the new rules, emphasizing their eects on the child's welfare in cases of separation. It concludes, based on the law's vague concepts and criteria, with some critical remarks on the chances of the Act to eectively serve as guide for the parents in the excercise of joint parental responsibility, on the one hand, and to prevent litigation in cases of disagremeent among them, on the other.Keywords: Child custody; Equality before the law; Joint parental responsibility; Best interests of the child.


2015 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-64
Author(s):  
Nils Neumann

Abstract: The image of „God’s Armor“ in Eph 6,11–17 is modeled, on the one hand, after biblical traditions, taking formulations from the book of Isaiah (Isa 11,5; 52,7; 59,17). But on the other hand the author of Ephesians also adds some elements to the image that do not have any equivalents in Isaiah or other biblical texts. These extra elements in Ephesians are the sword, the shield, the mention of the military term πανοπλία („armor“), and the sandals. The naming of these additional items is based on first century knowledge about the equipment of a Roman legionnaire. As can be shown by comparison to descriptions of ancient Roman warfare in Josephus and Polybius, the wearer of God’s armor in Ephesians is figuratively positioned in a concrete battle situation, namely the siege of a town wall. The author of Eph 6,11–17 imagines the present life of the Christian community as a dramatic situation that can be compared to a battle. With the sword of God’s word in their hands the members of the Christian community are supposed to defend the wall of their fortress against the attacks of the forces of evil.


2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura R. Umphrey ◽  
John C. Sherblom ◽  
Victoria Pocknell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document