Desain dan struktur organisasi

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurfadilah

Pengorganisasian merupakan pengelompokan kegiatan ke dalam departemen. Pengorganisasian juga meliputi penugasan setiap aktifitas, membagi pekerjaan ke dalam setiap tugas yang spesifik, dan menentukan siapa yang memiliki hak untuk mengerjakan beberapa tugas.Dalam suatu organisasi, diperlukan Kerangka kerja yang akan diproses sesuai dengan rencana yang telah ditentukan. Kerangka kerja organisasi tersebut disebut sebagai desain organisasi (organizational design) sedangkan bentuk fisik dari kerangka kerja tersebut dinamakan struktur organisasi (organizational structure).Struktur organiasi pada dasarnya merupakan desain organisasi dimana manajer melakukan alokasi sumber daya organisasi yang dikoordinasikan dengan tujuan dan rencana yang ditetapkan, mencakup tentang pembagian kerja serta penjelasan bagaimana rencana organisasi akan dilaksanakan.

Author(s):  
Peter G. Klein ◽  
Mark D. Packard ◽  
Karen Schnatterly

This chapter looks inside the firm at how organizational design affects collaboration in pursuit of corporate entrepreneurship or “intrapreneurship.” It shows how the intrafirm “marketplace” of ideas, employees, and resources can be strategically configured to encourage or inhibit collaborative innovation. The chapter focuses on the key structural dimensions of autonomy, sponsorship, and incentives. Complementarities between these dimensions create spillover effects that produce unique innovation outcomes by mitigating barriers to collaboration such as knowledge problems, resource constraints, and employee motivation. Illustrating configurations of these dimensions with company examples, the chapter shows how organizational design affects intrapreneurship and offers suggestions on how firms might strategically align their organizational structure with their intrapreneurial strategy.


AKTUELNOSTI ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (32) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dragana Došenović

Organizational structure is a system of internal relations and links in the organization. Since adequately designed organizational structure is the key to the success of enterprises, efficient operations and achievement of the objectives of each organization, the basic issue of this paper is the process of organizational design, with particular focus on the differentfactors that affect this process.For this reason, the purpose of this paper is to describe the impact of certain internal and external factors on the organizational structure, as well as to point out their importance in the design process.Based on the conducted analysis and research, author has come to many conclusions on the basis of which has been proven that there are many internal and external factors that directly affect the organizational structure. In order to successfully operate in today's turbulent conditions, it is necessary for companies to constantly adjust to a number of factors. A successful response to new changes often requires a process of restructuring through which organizational structure adapts to new needs.


Author(s):  
A. L. Minkes ◽  
G. R. Foxall

This paper is concerned with entrepreneurship in the large and complex corporation: it argues that this should be seen as a management process in the formulation of strategic decisions and in the creation of organizational structure through which decisions are made effective. The entrepreneurial function is seen as being diffused throughout the large organization, so that there is an entrepreneurial aspect to the task of managers: this has significant implications for the practical development of managers and organizational design. In this position paper, the authors bring together ideas from several years' work in which they have explored, theoretically and empirically, the nature of entrepreneurship in large businesses.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 233
Author(s):  
Ludmilla Shkurti

This research paper will try to understand and explain how much and how is understood the nature, the importance and factors that affect the business organizational structure and design in Albanian Organizations, compared with theoretical factors researched from the literature. How a business does structure in our country, knowing how important are the theoretical factors in business organization performance and therefore how much and how the principles of organizational design are applied in Albanian Organizations. Why structure, strategy and organizational design? Organizational design and organizational restructuring remains one of the most important issues that management of organizations, in the global era and information technology, must deal with, for the fact that businesses today face some unprecedented challenges: increased competition, globalization, growing of social responsibility, technological changes, changes in taste and consumer’s exigency, new strategic thinking, etc. Referring the literature and contemporary researchers, a constant topic during these recent years has been the one of how globalization and economic crisis have obliged the organizations to review their strategies and to change the way they operate, trying often therefore to structure for surviving and achieving success. These challenges should be carefully managed in order to build and hold a high performance organization, to deal with tough competition and endless problem that this era we live does bear. It is also important to understand correctly that organizational structure and design, by dictating roles connection in an organization and consequently how people function, may often be the main cause of the problems, but also one more reason of success. The way that organizations structure or the specific model of business, may constitute their competitive advantage, or special strategic skills, so it can make a business organization unique and competitive in the market. For many researchers the prevailing conclusion is that the organizations either neglect the importance of organizational design, or they just do not know what to do about it and therefore they evolve in an indirectly, spontaneous or intuitive way. From what the paper identifies, most of organizational structuring in Albania are made in a hasty way, without seeing or paying attention to full frame or circumstances. This may result in some partial and fragmentary initiatives instead of aiming in organizational designing and general structuring. This is not surprising as the subject is complex, often poorly explained and not rightly understood even though the academics and the consulters have made a great work to address the organizational design topic. However the paper shows that entrepreneurs and managers still lack a practical and systematic framework in order to guide their choices of organizational structure. To find a practical approach for the organizational design, can be difficult, even though some business schools have tried to simplify the things. The study will try to achieve this task, through careful research, in order to diagnose the organizational design process and restructuring situation in Albania, highlighting the effect of the current challenges which have an impact on this difficult process, mainly based on a survey of 200 organizational businesses in Albania.


Author(s):  
D. V. Kotov ◽  
◽  
I. V. Burenina ◽  
S. F. Sayfullina ◽  
◽  
...  

The article discusses a number of topical issues of modern organizational design. Through the analysis of the approaches of Russian and foreign scientists, the factors that need to be taken into account in organizational design are identified. Out of a multitude of factors, we have selected those that have the greatest impact in various options for the market and technological environment for an oil and gas company. Organizational schemes which can be recommended for organizing management in different market conditions are shown. A method to reconcile the influence of the basic and other factors in the organizational design process is proposed. A mechanism for constructing an organizational structure in modern conditions in oil and gas companies is proposed. In the conclusion, recommendations on the directions for further research on the problems of building organizational structures are given. Keywords: organizational structure; building organizational structures; competitiveness factors; organizational design.


2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Pruysers

AbstractThis paper reconsiders whether federal and provincial parties are as independent and separate as the literature would suggest. Examining five different types of party personnel (party members, activists, riding presidents, candidates and legislators) this paper explores how federal parties and their counterparts in Ontario have responded to multi-level governance. Rather than embracing “two political worlds,” party personnel have responded to the federal nature of Canadian politics by engaging with parties at multiple levels. Additionally, the paper examines two competing explanations of party integration and seeks to uncover whether differences organizational design or ideological consistency best explain divergent levels of party integration. The experience of the Conservatives demonstrates that vertical integration is not a result of a party's organizational design alone and that a coherent ideology can help to offset a truncated organizational structure.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 105-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Guadalupe ◽  
Julie Wulf

This paper establishes a causal effect of product market competition on various characteristics of organizational design. Using a unique panel dataset on firm hierarchies of large US firms (1986–1999) and a quasi-natural experiment (trade liberalization), we find that competition leads firms to flatten their hierarchies: firms reduce the number of positions between the CEO and division managers, and firms increase the number of positions reporting directly to the CEO. The results illustrate how firms redesign their organizational structure through a set of complementary choices in response to changes in their environment. We discuss several possible interpretations of these changes. (JEL D23, F13, G34, M12, M51)


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-21
Author(s):  
Bijan Bidabad ◽  
Roohollah Mohammadi ◽  
Mahshid Sherafati

Purpose: This paper aims to explain the organizational structure of Rastin Profit and Loss Sharing (PLS) Banking. Rastin Banking is a full Islamic Banking System with all necessary parts for banking operations that can be installed in conventional and Islamic banks both. Design: Rastin Banking complies with the nature of the financial intermediary activity (the partnership of depositor in the yields of the fund receiver via the bank). To fulfill this goal, particular organizational structure, accompanying with instruments and workflow are defined. Findings: To handle Rastin Banking, particular theoretical and operational regulatory frameworks should be defined to fulfill the participation operations. In this paper, we will have a look at the necessary organizational structure to setup Rastin Banking. Research limitations: This plan was formed and tested in Bank Melli Iran in order to propose a model for other banks as well. Practical implications: In this system, the investment return of the participation is distributed to the parties of the financial partnership (depositor, entrepreneur, and bank), and it is done by eliminating fixed interest rate, and it is based on the real economy profit (return) of the activity. Social implications: Rastin Banking can lead to important positive effects on growth and economic welfare through money and capital markets. Interest rate as an essential factor in conventional banking is not usable in Islamic banking and other similar institutions that work based on partnership, such as mutual funds and saving and loan associations. Originality/value: Approach of this system is entirely different from conventional banking. In addition to removing usury in banking activities, Rastin Banking uses the best practical ethic finance to creating safe and public confidence environment for banking operations. Article Type: Technical paper


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirko Tripunoski ◽  
Fisnik Ferati ◽  
Borche Sibinovski

The world is full of favorable opportunities, they could be big, small, recurrent, unrepeatable, and in the end they are always either used or missed forever. The product design is a convenient opportunity used to implement something new in the business in the service of international marketing. One of the biggest opportunities in this dynamic economic development is to invent something that will have a significantly lower price than the competitors’ while remaining profitable. The priority task is to achieve maximum level of engagement by the management in the process of designing an organizational structure where the organizational design represents a solid and complex architecture composed of several parts while the main strategy focuses on the new competitive advantages. This complex reality should be accepted as both a challenge and an opportunity provided that the designing of the product basically becomes a proper state of mind within the management. This means that managers need more creativity and more profound logic if they want their product to be successful and effective. Certainly in this case the management can create a model of organizational structure that will allow the company to create value for the shareholders, employees and customers. An integral part of this paper is the way we achieve this new state of prudent consciousness needed for the success of the future market.


2011 ◽  
pp. 90-107
Author(s):  
Enid Mumford

The last two case studies showed the importance of understanding a problem before embarking on its solution and the need to develop an appropriate strategy before making any change. Here it was suggested that it was good policy to take account of two things. These were relevant strategic thinking, such as that developed by the Tavistock Institute, and how to use this for particular problems and appropriate industries. The next step in problem solving for change is structure. Choosing an appropriate organizational structure to accompany and accommodate change is always difficult. There will be many constraints, including the skills and availability of labour, the requirements of technology and the knowledge of management. Despite these problems, there will usually be a number of different options available. The excellent manager will have the ability to distinguish good organizational design from bad. Sometimes this has to be a result of trial and error, but as the last chapter suggested, a useful first strategy is to investigate what other companies have done and evaluate the different organizational options they have used.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document