scholarly journals Polygenic influences associated with adolescent cognitive skills

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittany L Mitchell ◽  
Narelle K Hansell ◽  
Kerrie McAloney ◽  
Nicholas G. Martin ◽  
Margaret J. Wright ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Genetic Predisposition ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Developmental Trajectory ◽  
Cognitive Outcomes ◽  
Cognitive Domain ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Negatively Associated

Genes play an important role in children’s cognitive ability through puberty and into adolescence. Recent advances in genomics has enabled us to test the effect of various genetic predispositions on measured cognitive outcomes. Here, we leveraged summary statistics from the most recent genome-wide association studies of eleven cognitive and mental health traits to build polygenic prediction models of measured intelligence and academic achievement in a cohort of Australian adolescent twins (N=2,335, 57% female). Additionally, we tested the association of these polygenic risk scores (PRS) with core academic skills such as the ability to comprehend, structure and sequence, evaluate and assess, communicate, and apply techniques and procedures. We show that PRSs for educational attainment, intelligence and cognitive factors explained up to 10% of the variance in educational achievement and 7% in intelligence test scores in our cohort. Additionally, we found that a genetic predisposition for ADHD was negatively associated with all cognitive outcomes and skills and a genetic predisposition for schizophrenia was negatively associated with performance IQ but no other cognitive domain. In this study, we show the potential value of genotypic data for predicting pupil achievement and cognitive developmental trajectory through puberty and into adolescence. We provide evidence that a genetic vulnerability to some mental health disorders is associated with poorer cognitive and educational outcomes, regardless of whether the individual has developed the disorder.

scholarly journals Polygenic transcriptome risk scores improve portability of polygenic risk scores across ancestries

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanyu Liang ◽  
Milton Pividori ◽  
Ani Manichaikul ◽  
Abraham A. Palmer ◽  
Nancy J. Cox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Transcript Abundance ◽  
Effect Sizes ◽  
European Ancestry ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Polygenic Risk ◽  
European Populations

AbstractPolygenic risk scores (PRS) are on course to translate the results of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) into clinical practice. To date, most GWAS have been based on individuals of European-ancestry, meaning that the utility of PRS for non-European populations is limited because SNP effects and LD patterns may not be conserved across populations. We hypothesized that cross population prediction at the level of genes rather than SNPs would be more effective, since the effect of genes on traits is likely to be more highly conserved. Therefore, we developed a framework to convert effect sizes at SNPs into effect sizes for genetically predicted transcript abundance, which we used for prediction in non-European populations. We compared this approach, which we call polygenic transcriptome risk scores (PTRS), to PRS, using data from 17 quantitative traits that were measured in multiple ancestries (European, African, East Asian, and South Asian) by UK Biobank. On average, PTRS using whole blood predicted transcriptome had lower absolute prediction accuracy than PRS, as we expected since not all regulatory processes were captured by a single tissue. However, as hypothesized, we found that in the African target set, the portability (prediction accuracy relative to the European reference set) was significantly higher for PTRS than PRS (p=0.03) with additional gain when transcriptomic prediction models ancestry matched the target population (p=0.021). Taken together, our results suggest that using PTRS can improve prediction in underrepresented populations and that increasing the diversity of transcriptomic data may be an effective way to improve portability of GWAS results between populations and help reduce health disparities.

scholarly journals ExPRSweb - An Online Repository with Polygenic Risk Scores for Common Health-related Exposures

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Ma ◽  
Snehal Patil ◽  
Xiang Zhou ◽  
Bhramar Mukherjee ◽  
Lars G. Fritsche
Keyword(s):  
Complex Traits ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Genetic Modifiers ◽  
Polygenic Risk ◽  
Health Related ◽  
The Uk

Complex traits are influenced by genetic risk factors, lifestyle, and environmental variables, so called exposures. Some exposures, e.g., smoking or lipid levels, have common genetic modifiers identified in genome-wide association studies. Since measurements are often unfeasible, Exposure Polygenic Risk Scores (ExPRSs) offer an alternative to study the influence of exposures on various phenotypes. Here, we collected publicly available summary statistics for 28 exposures and applied four common PRS methods to generate ExPRSs in two large biobanks, the Michigan Genomics Initiative and the UK Biobank. We established ExPRS for 27 exposures and demonstrated their applicability in phenome-wide association studies and as predictors for common chronic conditions. Especially, the addition of multiple ExPRSs showed, for several chronic conditions, an improvement compared prediction models that only included traditional, disease-focused PRSs. To facilitate follow-up studies, we share all ExPRS constructs and generated results via an online repository called ExPRSweb.

scholarly journals Genetic architecture of schizophrenia: a review of major advancements

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Sophie E. Legge ◽  
Marcos L. Santoro ◽  
Sathish Periyasamy ◽  
Adeniran Okewole ◽  
Arsalan Arsalan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Architecture ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Copy Number Variants ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Genetic Loci ◽  
Significant Enrichment ◽  
High Heritability ◽  
Coding Variants

Abstract Schizophrenia is a severe psychiatric disorder with high heritability. Consortia efforts and technological advancements have led to a substantial increase in knowledge of the genetic architecture of schizophrenia over the past decade. In this article, we provide an overview of the current understanding of the genetics of schizophrenia, outline remaining challenges, and summarise future directions of research. World-wide collaborations have resulted in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in over 56 000 schizophrenia cases and 78 000 controls, which identified 176 distinct genetic loci. The latest GWAS from the Psychiatric Genetics Consortium, available as a pre-print, indicates that 270 distinct common genetic loci have now been associated with schizophrenia. Polygenic risk scores can currently explain around 7.7% of the variance in schizophrenia case-control status. Rare variant studies have implicated eight rare copy-number variants, and an increased burden of loss-of-function variants in SETD1A, as increasing the risk of schizophrenia. The latest exome sequencing study, available as a pre-print, implicates a burden of rare coding variants in a further nine genes. Gene-set analyses have demonstrated significant enrichment of both common and rare genetic variants associated with schizophrenia in synaptic pathways. To address current challenges, future genetic studies of schizophrenia need increased sample sizes from more diverse populations. Continued expansion of international collaboration will likely identify new genetic regions, improve fine-mapping to identify causal variants, and increase our understanding of the biology and mechanisms of schizophrenia.

scholarly journals Polygenic Risk Score of Longevity Predicts Longer Survival Across an Age Continuum

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niccolo’ Tesi ◽  
Sven J van der Lee ◽  
Marc Hulsman ◽  
Iris E Jansen ◽  
Najada Stringa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Human Longevity ◽  
Polygenic Risk Score ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Polygenic Risk ◽  
Age Related

Abstract Studying the genome of centenarians may give insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying extreme human longevity and the escape of age-related diseases. Here, we set out to construct polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for longevity and to investigate the functions of longevity-associated variants. Using a cohort of centenarians with maintained cognitive health (N = 343), a population-matched cohort of older adults from 5 cohorts (N = 2905), and summary statistics data from genome-wide association studies on parental longevity, we constructed a PRS including 330 variants that significantly discriminated between centenarians and older adults. This PRS was also associated with longer survival in an independent sample of younger individuals (p = .02), leading up to a 4-year difference in survival based on common genetic factors only. We show that this PRS was, in part, able to compensate for the deleterious effect of the APOE-ε4 allele. Using an integrative framework, we annotated the 330 variants included in this PRS by the genes they associate with. We find that they are enriched with genes associated with cellular differentiation, developmental processes, and cellular response to stress. Together, our results indicate that an extended human life span is, in part, the result of a constellation of variants each exerting small advantageous effects on aging-related biological mechanisms that maintain overall health and decrease the risk of age-related diseases.

scholarly journals Evaluation of glycemic traits in susceptibility to COVID-19 risk: a Mendelian randomization study

BMC Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiu Lun Au Yeung ◽  
Jie V Zhao ◽  
C Mary Schooling
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Genetic Predisposition ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Fasting Glucose ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Inverse Association ◽  
Wide Confidence Interval

Abstract Background Observational studies suggest poorer glycemic traits and type 2 diabetes associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) risk although these findings could be confounded by socioeconomic position. We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization to clarify their role in COVID-19 risk and specific COVID-19 phenotypes (hospitalized and severe cases). Method We identified genetic instruments for fasting glucose (n = 133,010), 2 h glucose (n = 42,854), glycated hemoglobin (n = 123,665), and type 2 diabetes (74,124 cases and 824,006 controls) from genome wide association studies and applied them to COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative summary statistics (17,965 COVID-19 cases and 1,370,547 population controls). We used inverse variance weighting to obtain the causal estimates of glycemic traits and genetic predisposition to type 2 diabetes in COVID-19 risk. Sensitivity analyses included MR-Egger and weighted median method. Results We found genetic predisposition to type 2 diabetes was not associated with any COVID-19 phenotype (OR: 1.00 per unit increase in log odds of having diabetes, 95%CI 0.97 to 1.04 for overall COVID-19; OR: 1.02, 95%CI 0.95 to 1.09 for hospitalized COVID-19; and OR: 1.00, 95%CI 0.93 to 1.08 for severe COVID-19). There were no strong evidence for an association of glycemic traits in COVID-19 phenotypes, apart from a potential inverse association for fasting glucose albeit with wide confidence interval. Conclusion We provide some genetic evidence that poorer glycemic traits and predisposition to type 2 diabetes unlikely increase the risk of COVID-19. Although our study did not indicate glycemic traits increase severity of COVID-19, additional studies are needed to verify our findings.

scholarly journals Challenges of Adjusting Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Effect Sizes for Linkage Disequilibrium

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Valentina Escott-Price ◽  
Karl Michael Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Linkage Disequilibrium ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Ordinary Least Squares ◽  
Effect Sizes ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Single Nucleotide ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Tikhonov Regularisation

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were successful in identifying SNPs showing association with disease, but their individual effect sizes are small and require large sample sizes to achieve statistical significance. Methods of post-GWAS analysis, including gene-based, gene-set and polygenic risk scores, combine the SNP effect sizes in an attempt to boost the power of the analyses. To avoid giving undue weight to SNPs in linkage disequilibrium (LD), the LD needs to be taken into account in these analyses. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> We review methods that attempt to adjust the effect sizes (β<i>-</i>coefficients) of summary statistics, instead of simple LD pruning. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We subject LD adjustment approaches to a mathematical analysis, recognising Tikhonov regularisation as a framework for comparison. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Observing the similarity of the processes involved with the more straightforward Tikhonov-regularised ordinary least squares estimate for multivariate regression coefficients, we note that current methods based on a Bayesian model for the effect sizes effectively provide an implicit choice of the regularisation parameter, which is convenient, but at the price of reduced transparency and, especially in smaller LD blocks, a risk of incomplete LD correction. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> There is no simple answer to the question which method is best, but where interpretability of the LD adjustment is essential, as in research aiming at identifying the genomic aetiology of disorders, our study suggests that a more direct choice of mild regularisation in the correction of effect sizes may be preferable.

Stroke Genetics: Turning Discoveries into Clinical Applications

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Dichgans ◽  
Nathalie Beaufort ◽  
Stephanie Debette ◽  
Christopher D. Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Clinical Applications ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Neuroprotective Agents ◽  
Experimental Systems ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Rapid Pace

The field of medical and population genetics in stroke is moving at a rapid pace and has led to unanticipated opportunities for discovery and clinical applications. Genome-wide association studies have highlighted the role of specific pathways relevant to etiologically defined subtypes of stroke and to stroke as a whole. They have further offered starting points for the exploration of novel pathways and pharmacological strategies in experimental systems. Mendelian randomization studies continue to provide insights in the causal relationships between exposures and outcomes and have become a useful tool for predicting the efficacy and side effects of drugs. Additional applications that have emerged from recent discoveries include risk prediction based on polygenic risk scores and pharmacogenomics. Among the topics currently moving into focus is the genetics of stroke outcome. While still at its infancy, this field is expected to boost the development of neuroprotective agents. We provide a brief overview on recent progress in these areas.

scholarly journals 297 GWAS for complex models accounting for populations structure with GBLUP and ssGBLUP

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. 32-32
Author(s):  
Juan P Steibel ◽  
Ignacio Aguilar
Keyword(s):  
Hypothesis Testing ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Type I ◽  
Phenotypic Variance ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Formal Hypothesis Testing

Abstract Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP) is the method of choice for incorporating genomic information into the genetic evaluation of livestock species. Furthermore, single step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) is adopted by many breeders’ associations and private entities managing large scale breeding programs. While prediction of breeding values remains the primary use of genomic markers in animal breeding, a secondary interest focuses on performing genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The goal of GWAS is to uncover genomic regions that harbor variants that explain a large proportion of the phenotypic variance, and thus become candidates for discovering and studying causative variants. Several methods have been proposed and successfully applied for embedding GWAS into genomic prediction models. Most methods commonly avoid formal hypothesis testing and resort to estimation of SNP effects, relying on visual inspection of graphical outputs to determine candidate regions. However, with the advent of high throughput phenomics and transcriptomics, a more formal testing approach with automatic discovery thresholds is more appealing. In this work we present the methodological details of a method for performing formal hypothesis testing for GWAS in GBLUP models. First, we present the method and its equivalencies and differences with other GWAS methods. Moreover, we demonstrate through simulation analyses that the proposed method controls type I error rate at the nominal level. Second, we demonstrate two possible computational implementations based on mixed model equations for ssGBLUP and based on the generalized least square equations (GLS). We show that ssGBLUP can deal with datasets with extremely large number of animals and markers and with multiple traits. GLS implementations are well suited for dealing with smaller number of animals with tens of thousands of phenotypes. Third, we show several useful extensions, such as: testing multiple markers at once, testing pleiotropic effects and testing association of social genetic effects.

scholarly journals An atlas of polygenic risk score associations to highlight putative causal relationships across the human phenome

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom G. Richardson ◽  
Sean Harrison ◽  
Gibran Hemani ◽  
George Davey Smith
Keyword(s):  
Web Application ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Complex Disease ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Polygenic Risk Score ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Genetic Liability ◽  
Polygenic Risk ◽  
The Uk

AbstractThe age of large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) has provided us with an unprecedented opportunity to evaluate the genetic liability of complex disease using polygenic risk scores (PRS). In this study, we have analysed 162 PRS (P<5×l0 05) derived from GWAS and 551 heritable traits from the UK Biobank study (N=334,398). Findings can be investigated using a web application (http://mrcieu.mrsoftware.org/PRS_atlas/), which we envisage will help uncover both known and novel mechanisms which contribute towards disease susceptibility.To demonstrate this, we have investigated the results from a phenome-wide evaluation of schizophrenia genetic liability. Amongst findings were inverse associations with measures of cognitive function which extensive follow-up analyses using Mendelian randomization (MR) provided evidence of a causal relationship. We have also investigated the effect of multiple risk factors on disease using mediation and multivariable MR frameworks. Our atlas provides a resource for future endeavours seeking to unravel the causal determinants of complex disease.

scholarly journals Fine-tuning Polygenic Risk Scores with GWAS Summary Statistics

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zijie Zhao ◽  
Yanyao Yi ◽  
Yuchang Wu ◽  
Xiaoyuan Zhong ◽  
Yupei Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Association Studies ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Training Dataset ◽  
Validation Dataset ◽  
P Value ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Summary Statistics ◽  
Polygenic Risk ◽  
Model Tuning

AbstractPolygenic risk scores (PRSs) have wide applications in human genetics research. Notably, most PRS models include tuning parameters which improve predictive performance when properly selected. However, existing model-tuning methods require individual-level genetic data as the training dataset or as a validation dataset independent from both training and testing samples. These data rarely exist in practice, creating a significant gap between PRS methodology and applications. Here, we introduce PUMAS (Parameter-tuning Using Marginal Association Statistics), a novel method to fine-tune PRS models using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWASs). Through extensive simulations, external validations, and analysis of 65 traits, we demonstrate that PUMAS can perform a variety of model-tuning procedures (e.g. cross-validation) using GWAS summary statistics and can effectively benchmark and optimize PRS models under diverse genetic architecture. On average, PUMAS improves the predictive R2 by 205.6% and 62.5% compared to PRSs with arbitrary p-value cutoffs of 0.01 and 1, respectively. Applied to 211 neuroimaging traits and Alzheimer’s disease, we show that fine-tuned PRSs will significantly improve statistical power in downstream association analysis. We believe our method resolves a fundamental problem without a current solution and will greatly benefit genetic prediction applications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document