A clinical PREMISE for personalized models: Towards a formal integration of case formulations and statistical networks

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Burger ◽  
Sacha Epskamp ◽  
Date C. van der Veen ◽  
Fabian Dablander ◽  
Robert A. Schoevers ◽  
...  

Statistical innovations allow clinicians to estimate personalized networks from longitudinal data, for example data collected via the Experience Sampling Method (ESM). Such networks can generate insights that may be relevant for constructing case formulations, and therefore guide the selection of personalized treatment targets. While the notion of personalized networks aligns well with the way clinicians think and reason, there are currently several barriers to clinical implementation that limit the utility of such models. First, the most popular network estimation routines are data-driven and do not allow clinicians to incorporate their expertise and theory. Second, network models have many parameters, which can make accurate estimation challenging. Finally, network estimation requires technical skills that are not regularly taught in clinical programs. In this article, we introduce PREMISE, an approach that formally integrates case formulations with personalized network estimation. Using prior elicitation techniques, clinical working hypotheses are translated into formal models, which can subsequently inform network estimation from ESM data using Bayesian inference. PREMISE tackles the three challenges described above: Incorporating clinical information into network estimation systematically allows theoretical and data-driven integration, which in turn increases the accuracy of network estimation techniques. In addition, we implemented the principles of PREMISE into a practical web-based toolkit that generates intuitive feedback, thereby facilitating clinical implementation. To illustrate its clinical potential, we use PREMISE to estimate clinically informed networks for a client suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder. We discuss open challenges in selecting statistical models for PREMISE, as well as specific future directions for clinical implementation.

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Daniel ◽  
Margaret Haberman

Abstract Psilocybin, a classic hallucinogen, is a chemical produced by more than 100 species of mushrooms worldwide. It has high affinity for several serotonin receptors, including 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, and 5-HT2C, located in numerous areas of the brain, including the cerebral cortex and thalamus. With legislation introduced in 1992, more work is being done to further understand the implications of psilocybin use in a number of disease states. Certain mental health disease states and symptoms have been studied, including depressed mood, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, alcohol use disorder, and tobacco use disorder. This article provides an in-depth review of the study design and results of psilocybin in each of these conditions and discusses the clinical potential for use.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose A. Piqueras ◽  
Mariola Garcia-Olcina ◽  
Maria Rivera-Riquelme ◽  
Agustin E. Martinez-Gonzalez ◽  
Pim Cuijpers

Emotional disorder symptoms are highly prevalent and a common cause of disability among children and adolescents. Screening and early detection are needed to identify those who need help and to improve treatment outcomes. Nowadays, especially with the arrival of the COVID-19 outbreak, assessment is increasingly conducted online, resulting in the need for brief online screening measures. The aim of the current study was to examine the reliability and different sources of validity evidence of a new web-based screening questionnaire for emotional disorder symptoms, the DetectaWeb-Distress Scale, which assesses mood (major depression and dysthymic disorder), anxiety (separation anxiety, generalized anxiety, social phobia, panic disorder/agoraphobia, and specific phobia), obsessive–compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, suicidality (suicidal ideation, plans, and attempts), and global distress. A total of 1,499 participants (aged 8–18) completed the DetectaWeb-Distress Scale and specific questionnaires for emotional disorder symptoms, suicidal behaviors, and well-being through a web-based survey. Results indicated that a structural model of 10 correlated factors fits reasonably better in comparison to the remaining models; measurement invariance for age and gender; good internal consistency (McDonald's ω ranging from 0.65 to 0.94); and significant positive correlation with other measures of anxiety, depression, PTSD, or distress, and negative correlation with well-being measures, displaying support for convergent-discriminant validity. We also found that girls scored higher than boys on most of the subscales, and children had higher scores for social anxiety, specific phobia, panic disorder, and obsessive–compulsive symptoms, whereas adolescents scored higher on depressive symptoms, suicidality, and generalized anxiety, but the effect sizes were small to medium for all comparisons. The DetectaWeb-Distress Scale is a valid, innovative, and useful online tool for the screening and evaluation of preventive programs for mental health in children and adolescents.


2013 ◽  
pp. 1717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasser Khazaal ◽  
Anne Marie Chatton ◽  
Ariane Zermatten ◽  
Hedi Klila ◽  
Riaz Khan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Nidia Enjelita Saragih ◽  
Robiatul Adawiyah

Obsessive Compulsive disorder or OCD is a type of anxiety disorder that makes someone wasting so much time in doing the same things reccurently. it cause distress and significant impairment. This anxiety disorder will becoming worse if someone didn't realize and get psychologist help. An expert system that diagnose OCD would be the initial step of detection, so this disorder can be handled sooner. By implementing Dempster Shafer method, this expert system produce percentage value of someone having this disorder, based on the inputted symptons. If the result more than 60%, the user need a psychologist's treatment before it coming worse. The system is web based, so it is handy to access.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Azadeh Kushki ◽  
Evdokia Anagnostou ◽  
Christopher Hammill ◽  
Pierre Duez ◽  
Jessica Brian ◽  
...  

AbstractThe validity of diagnostic labels of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is an open question given the mounting evidence that these categories may not correspond to conditions with distinct etiologies, biologies, or phenotypes. The objective of this study was to determine the agreement between existing diagnostic labels and groups discovered based on a data-driven, diagnosis-agnostic approach integrating cortical neuroanatomy and core-domain phenotype features. A machine learning pipeline, called bagged-multiview clustering, was designed to discover homogeneous subgroups by integrating cortical thickness data and measures of core-domain phenotypic features of ASD, ADHD, and OCD. This study was conducted using data from the Province of Ontario Neurodevelopmental Disorders (POND) Network, a multi-center study in Ontario, Canada. Participants (n = 226) included children between the ages of 6 and 18 with a diagnosis of ASD (n = 112, median [IQR] age = 11.7[4.8], 21% female), ADHD (n = 58, median [IQR] age = 10.2[3.3], 14% female), or OCD (n = 34, median [IQR] age = 12.1[4.2], 38% female), as well as typically developing controls (n = 22, median [IQR] age = 11.0[3.8], 55% female). The diagnosis-agnostic groups were significantly different than each other in phenotypic characteristics (SCQ: χ2(9) = 111.21, p < 0.0001; SWAN: χ2(9) = 142.44, p < 0.0001) as well as cortical thickness in 75 regions of the brain. The analyses revealed disagreement between existing diagnostic labels and the diagnosis-agnostic homogeneous groups (normalized mutual information < 0.20). Our results did not support the validity of existing diagnostic labels of ASD, ADHD, and OCD as distinct entities with respect to phenotype and cortical morphology.


2015 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monique C. Pfaltz ◽  
Beatrice Mörstedt ◽  
Andrea H. Meyer ◽  
Frank H. Wilhelm ◽  
Joe Kossowsky ◽  
...  

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a severe anxiety disorder characterized by frequent obsessive thoughts and repetitive behaviors. Neuroticism is a vulnerability factor for OCD, yet the mechanisms by which this general vulnerability factor affects the development of OCD-related symptoms are unknown. The present study assessed a hierarchical model of the development of obsessive thoughts that includes neuroticism as a general, higher-order factor, and specific, potentially maladaptive thought processes (thought suppression, worry, and brooding) as second-order factors manifesting in the tendency toward obsessing. A total of 238 participants completed questionnaires assessing the examined constructs. The results of mediator analyses demonstrated the hypothesized relationships: A positive association between neuroticism and obsessing was mediated by thought suppression, worry, and brooding. Independent of the participant’s sex, all three mediators contributed equally and substantially to the association between neuroticism and obsessing. These findings extend earlier research on hierarchical models of anxiety and provide a basis for further refinement of models of the development of obsessive thoughts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document