Do temporal information processing limitations share cognitive causes? A correlational study of different attentional forms and modalities
Selective attention can be directed according to behavioral goals or grabbed by salient stimuli. Whether controlled in a goal-directed or stimulus-driven fashion, attention has a dark side: Unattended items are frequently missed. Such failures have been explored through numerous experimental paradigms across sensory modalities, but their relationships have been incompletely characterized. In two experiments, we adopted an individual differences approach to better understand the common and dissociable cognitive components in temporal attention paradigms. In Experiment 1, participants (n=56) were tested twice on the attentional blink (goal-directed attention), surprise-induced blindness (stimulus-driven attention), and their auditory analogues. Despite strong effect reliability and significant within-modality correlations across effects, we found no significant correlations across modalities. In Experiment 2, participants (n=52) completed different versions of the visual tasks and a contingent capture task, whose deficit has been ascribed to both goal-directed and stimulus-driven components. Using exploratory factor analyses and partial correlations, we found that capture-related deficits accounted for the modest relationship between blink and surprise effects. Furthermore, surprise effects strongly habituated, blink effects remained, and capture-related deficits showed an intermediate pattern. We conclude that each attentional paradigm involves multiple cognitive components, some shared and others distinctly related to different attentional forms or sources of control.