Does hospital delay in appendectomy affect immediate surgical outcome in adults with acute appendicitis?

Background: Emergency appendectomy is the commonest emergency surgical procedure being performed for many years. Till now, the dictum is that it should be done as soon as possible from the onset of attack.Objectives: To evaluate immediate surgical outcome in cases undergone appendectomy after hospital delay of more than 12 hours duration compared with appendectomy done immediately within 12 hours of presentation.Methods: This is a retrospective study of 118 patients on whom appendectomies were done between 1st June 2008 to 31st August 2010. These patients were divided into two groups on the basis whether the appendectomy was done ≤ 12hours or >12 hours from the time of presentation in the hospital and intergroup comparison was made regarding length of hospital stay, rate of perforation and post operative complications.Results: A total of 118 patients were included in the study. Out of which 71(60.2%) were male and 47(39.8%) were female. Mean age of patients was 30.97 ± 12 years. Mean duration of hospital stay was 4.35 ± 1.75 days. In comparison of two groups of ≤ 12 hours or >12 hours from the time of presentation in the hospital, there were no statistically significant difference in length of hospital stay (4.29 vs 4.4 days, p=0.7), rate of perforation of appendix (9.25% vs 10.93%, p=0.3) and post-operative wound infection (16.66% vs 17.18%, p = 0.9).Conclusion: Delaying an appendectomy for a valid reason can be considered. Prospective trials are required to establish findings of this study.Journal of Kathmandu Medical College, Vol. 5, No. 4, Issue 18, Oct.-Dec., 2016, Page: 112-115

Download Full-text

Is Obesity a Risk Factor for Spinal Surgeries? A Retrospective Study in a Specialized Orthopedic Spine Center

Journal of Research in Orthopedic Science ◽

10.32598/jrosj.8.1.759.1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

pp. 37-42

Author(s):

Hasan Ghandhari ◽

◽

Ebrahim Ameri ◽

Mohsen Motalebi ◽

Mohamad-Mahdi Azizi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Retrospective Study ◽

Postoperative Complications ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Obese Group ◽

Obese Patients ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Duration Of Surgery

Background: Various studies have shown the effects of morbid obesity on the adverse consequences of various surgeries, especially postoperative infections. However, some studies have shown that the complications of spinal surgery in obese and non-obese patients are not significantly different. Objectives: This study investigated and compared the duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and complications after common spinal surgeries by orthopedic spine fellowship in obese and non-obese patients in a specialized spine center in Iran. Methods: All patients who underwent decompression with or without lumbar fusion were included in this retrospective study. These patients were classified into two groups: non-obese (BMI <30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). The data related to type and levels of surgery, 30-day hospital complications, length of hospital stay, rate of postoperative wound infection, blood loss, and need for transfusion were all extracted and compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 148 patients (74%) were in the non-obese group and 52 patients (26%) in the obese group. The number of patients that need packed cells was significantly higher in the obese group (51.8% vs 32.6%) (P=0.01). Otherwise, there were not a significant difference between type of treatment (fusion or only decompression) (P=0.78), interbody fusion (P=0.26), osteotomy (P=0.56), duration of surgery (P=0.25), length of hospital stay (P=0.72), mean amount of blood loss (P=0.09), and postoperative complications (P=0.68) between the two groups. Conclusion: Our results suggest that duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications are not associated with the BMI of the patients.

Download Full-text

Effects of Intermittent Kangaroo Mother Care on Low-Birth-Weight Neonates: A Retrospective Before-and-After Study

Acta Medica Philippina ◽

10.47895/amp.v55i9.3769 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 55 (9) ◽

Author(s):

Jannie Lyne C. Notarte-Palisbo ◽

Cindy D. Canceko-Llego

Keyword(s):

Birth Weight ◽

Mortality Rate ◽

Low Birth Weight ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Kangaroo Mother Care ◽

Equal Distribution ◽

Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Before And After

Objective. To compare outcomes of low-birth-weight neonates delivered before and after implementation of intermittent kangaroo mother care (KMC) in terms of duration of hospital stay, mortality rate, and clinical outcome. Methods. This is a retrospective analytical study that included all neonates delivered in a tertiary government hospital with birth weight of less than 2000 grams before and after intermittent KMC implementation from January 2015 to December 2016. Chart review was done for demographics, mortality profile, and length of hospital stay. Chi-square test and Student’s t-test were used to compare mortality rate and length of hospital stay, and odds ratio was used for mortality outcome. Results. A total of 677 low birth weight newborns were reviewed and of these, 276 (79.8%) neonates in group 1 (Pre-intermittent KMC implementation), and 263 (79.4%) neonates in group 2 (Post-intermittent KMC implementation) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The duration of hospital stay of neonates enrolled in KMC was significantly shorter (p ≤ 0.05). In Groups 1 and 2, 93–94% of neonates were discharged improved with a 5–6% mortality of almost equal distribution. There was no significant difference in mortality between groups 1 and 2 (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.59, 2.42). Conclusion. There was no significant difference in mortality rate and cause of death pre- and post-intermittent KMC implementation. However, the length of hospital stay among the LBW neonates discharged improved was significantly shortened.

Download Full-text

Duration of Hospital Stay and Treatment Pattern among Patients Undergoing Common Operative Procedures at tertiary care hospital in Nepal

Janaki Medical College Journal of Medical Science ◽

10.3126/jmcjms.v7i2.30691 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 7 (2) ◽

pp. 27-35

Author(s):

Sanjay Chaudhary ◽

Lokeshwar Chaurasia ◽

Jitendra Kumar Singh

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Operative Procedure ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Treatment Pattern ◽

Operative Procedures ◽

Care Hospital ◽

Third Generation ◽

Medical College ◽

Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽

Significant Difference

Background and Objectives: Appendectomy, cholecystectomy, fistulectomy, and herniotomy or herniorrhaphy are the most common surgical operations in Nepal. Despite the high prevalence and complexity of the patient population served by general and universal surgery services, little has been reported about the services, treatment procedures and outcomes. Therefore, the study is designed to investigate the duration of hospital stay, and treatment pattern among patients undergoing common surgical operative procedures at Janaki Medical College, Janakpur, Nepal. Material and methods: A prospective observational study was conducted among patients undergoing common surgical operative procedures at surgery department of Janaki Medical College (JMC) over a period of one year from January 2018 to December 2018. Patients of all age groups and gender undergoing surgical operative procedures; appendectomy, herniotomy cholecystectomy and fistulectomy were included in the study. The patients were assessed preoperatively, intra-operatively and postoperatively. Results: In a total of 325 patients, 11.1% of patients underwent fistulectomy, 14.5% underwent appendectomy, 35.4% underwent herniorrhaphy and 39.1% underwent cholecystectomy. Mean duration of stay at hospital for cholecystectomy was slightly higher (8.13±2.40 days) than other operating procedures: fistulectomy (5.44 ±1.48 days), appendectomy (7.40±2.00 days), and operative procedure of hernia (6.17±1.59 days). Most commonly used antibiotic for control of preoperative and post operative infection was third generation cephalosporin’s, ceftriaxone and cefixime. Conclusion: The study demonstrates longer duration of hospital stay for cholecystectomy as compared to other operating procedures like fistulectomy, appendectomy, herniorrhaphy, hernioplasty and herniotomy with significant difference by types of surgery. Most commonly used antibiotic for control of infection was third generation cephalosporin, ceftriaxone and cefixime.

Download Full-text

Post neoadjuvant chemo-radiation positive anterior circumferential resection margin in carcinoma rectum: Extended resection of rectum versus total pelvic exenteration—Results from a single centre retrospective study.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e15156 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e15156-e15156

Author(s):

Kamlesh Verma ◽

Reena Engineer ◽

Vikas S. Ostwal ◽

Suman Kumar ◽

Supreeta Arya ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Retrospective Study ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Circumferential Resection Margin ◽

Resection Margin ◽

Pelvic Exenteration ◽

Total Pelvic Exenteration ◽

Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Carcinoma Rectum

e15156 Background: Positive circumferential resection margin has been shown to be powerful predictor of poor prognosis in rectal CA. Radiologically positive anterior CRM (PACRM) after NACT+RT leads to either resection of involved organ alone ie.Extended resection of rectum (ERR) or Total pelvic exenteration (TPE). Purpose of this study is to compare recurrence rate and survival of patients undergoing ERR or TPE for PACRM after NACT+RT. Methods: Retrospective study of patients operated for rectal CA from January 2013 to December 2014. Results: Out of 237 patients with non-metastatic CA rectum, 51 patients (21.5%) had PACRM. After NACT+RT, 22 patients (43.1%) developed systemic metastases, 7 patients (13.8%) were downsized and underwent extra-mesorectal resection (AR/APR), remaining 22 patients (43.1%) had persistent PACRM. 13 patients with PACRM underwent ERR whereas 9 patients underwent TPE. Median duration of hospital stay in TPE group was 13 days (10 - 26) whereas it was 7 days (5 – 21) in ERR group. Negative pathological CRM was achieved in all TPE and 92.3% of ERR patients. After median follow-up of 31.6 months, 5 patients with TPE (55.6%) and 4 patients with ERR (30.7%) developed systemic recurrence. None of the TPE patient, whereas 3 patients with ERR (23.1%) developed local recurrence. Median D.F.S. was 12.3 months in TPE and 18.9 months in ERR whereas mean O.S. was 36.2 and 32.8 respectively. Conclusions: Due to lack of significant difference in O.S./ D.F.S. and low post-operative complication and duration of hospital stay, ERR can be considered acceptable alternative to TPE.

Download Full-text

Remdesivir versus Standard of Care in Moderate to Severe COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Study

JOURNAL FOR CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH ◽

10.7860/jcdr/2021/48386.14767 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

JM Jeetendra Kumar ◽

SB Vaibhav ◽

HR Avinash ◽

P Pratheek

Keyword(s):

Retrospective Study ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Inflammatory Markers ◽

Treatment Protocol ◽

General Medicine ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Respiratory Illness ◽

Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽

Significant Difference ◽

D Dimer

Introduction: In December 2019, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), a novel coronavirus, was first identified as the cause of a respiratory illness designated Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Since then, several anti-viral drugs have been evaluated for the treatment of COVID-19, but none have shown any efficacy. The only drug which showed some efficacy was Remdesivir (RDV). Aim: To assess the effect and efficacy of RDV and to compare the outcome of patients who are receiving RDV and those receiving standard treatment protocol without RDV. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted. The data was collected from the case sheets of the case files of patients presenting to the Department of General Medicine Triage who were admitted from the month of July 2020 to December 2020 and analysis was done in January 2021. The method of sampling employed was a non-probability sequential sampling method. Results: Age and sex distributions were comparable in both the groups. The percentage of the patients who expired was 10% and 9% (n=10 and 9, respectively) in Non-RDV and RDV groups respectively, this was statistically insignificant (0.809).However, the duration of hospital stay in those who received RDV was 10 (9-12) days while those receiving standard of care without RDV was 12 (10-15) days (0.0018) which was statistically significant. Also, after a comparison between the two groups it was evident that there was a significant difference in inflammatory markers D-dimer and Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) with p=0.001 and 0.029, respectively. Conclusion: Study concludes that there was no significant difference in outcome of patients who received RDV. However, the duration of hospital stay was found to be decreased in patients receiving RDV and also there was a significant improvement in inflammatory markers like LDH and D-dimer.

Download Full-text

Effect of Chewing Gum on Bowel Motility in Women Undergoing Post-Operative Cesarean Section

International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science ◽

10.23958/ijirms/vol03-i06/04 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 3 (06) ◽

Author(s):

Dr.Randa Mohammed AboBaker

Keyword(s):

Cesarean Section ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Demographic Data ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Chewing Gum ◽

Control Group ◽

Controlled Clinical Trial ◽

Bowel Motility ◽

Gum Chewing ◽

Significant Difference

Postoperative Ileus (POI) is one of the most common problems after obstetrics, gynecologic and abdominal surgeries. Sham feeding, such as gum chewing, accelerates the return of bowel function and the length of hospital stay. The present study aims to evaluate the effect of chewing gum on bowel motility in women undergoing post-operative cesarean section. Intervention study was used at the Postpartum Department of Maternity and Children Hospital, KSA. A randomized controlled clinical trial research design. Through a convenience technique, 80 post Caesarian Section (CS) women were included in the study. Data were collected through three tools: Tool (I): Socio-demographic data and reproductive history interview schedule. Tool (II): Postoperative Assessment Sheet. Tool (III): Outcomes of gum chewing and the length of hospital stay. Method: subjects were assigned randomly into two groups of (40) the experimental and (40) the control. Subjects in the study group were asked to chew two pieces of sugarless gum for 30 min/three times daily in the morning, noon, and evening immediately after recovery from anesthesia and in Postpartum Department; while subjects in the control group followed the hospital routine care. Each woman in both groups was tested abdominally using a stethoscope to auscultate the bowel sounds and asked to report immediately the time of either passing flatus or stool. Results: illustrated that a highly statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups concerning their gum chewing outcomes. Where, P = 0.000. The study concluded that gum chewing is safe, well tolerated and appears to be effective in reducing the incidence and consequences of POI following CS.

Download Full-text

Stereotactic Electroencephalography Is Associated With Reduced Pain and Opioid Use When Compared with Subdural Grids: A Case Series

Operative Neurosurgery ◽

10.1093/ons/opab040 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Jonathan P Scoville ◽

Evan Joyce ◽

Joshua Hunsaker ◽

Jared Reese ◽

Herschel Wilde ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Chart Review ◽

Statistical Tests ◽

Case Series ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Retrospective Chart Review ◽

Opioid Use ◽

Pain Scores ◽

Surgical Methods ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been shown to decrease length of hospital stay and opioid use. OBJECTIVE To identify whether surgery for epilepsy mapping via MIS stereotactically placed electroencephalography (SEEG) electrodes decreased overall opioid use when compared with craniotomy for EEG grid placement (ECoG). METHODS Patients who underwent surgery for epilepsy mapping, either SEEG or ECoG, were identified through retrospective chart review from 2015 through 2018. The hospital stay was separated into specific time periods to distinguish opioid use immediately postoperatively, throughout the rest of the stay and at discharge. The total amount of opioids consumed during each period was calculated by transforming all types of opioids into their morphine equivalents (ME). Pain scores were also collected using a modification of the Clinically Aligned Pain Assessment (CAPA) scale. The 2 surgical groups were compared using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS The study identified 43 patients who met the inclusion criteria: 36 underwent SEEG placement and 17 underwent craniotomy grid placement. There was a statistically significant difference in median opioid consumption per hospital stay between the ECoG and the SEEG placement groups, 307.8 vs 71.5 ME, respectively (P = .0011). There was also a significant difference in CAPA scales between the 2 groups (P = .0117). CONCLUSION Opioid use is significantly lower in patients who undergo MIS epilepsy mapping via SEEG compared with those who undergo the more invasive ECoG procedure. As part of efforts to decrease the overall opioid burden, these results should be considered by patients and surgeons when deciding on surgical methods.

Download Full-text

Effects of early corticosteroid use in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019

BMC Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1186/s12879-021-06221-5 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Jong Hoon Hyun ◽

Moo Hyun Kim ◽

Yujin Sohn ◽

Yunsuk Cho ◽

Yae Jee Baek ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Case Fatality ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Corticosteroid Treatment ◽

Threshold Value ◽

Steroid Use ◽

Corticosteroid Administration ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Early Use

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome, and corticosteroids have been considered as possible therapeutic agents for this disease. However, there is limited literature on the appropriate timing of corticosteroid administration to obtain the best possible patient outcomes. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study including patients with severe COVID-19 who received corticosteroid treatment from March 2 to June 30, 2020 in seven tertiary hospitals in South Korea. We analyzed the patient demographics, characteristics, and clinical outcomes according to the timing of steroid use. Twenty-two patients with severe COVID-19 were enrolled, and they were all treated with corticosteroids. Results Of the 22 patients who received corticosteroids, 12 patients (55%) were treated within 10 days from diagnosis. There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics. The initial PaO2/FiO2 ratio was 168.75. The overall case fatality rate was 25%. The mean time from diagnosis to steroid use was 4.08 days and the treatment duration was 14 days in the early use group, while those in the late use group were 12.80 days and 18.50 days, respectively. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio, C-reactive protein level, and cycle threshold value improved over time in both groups. In the early use group, the time from onset of symptoms to discharge (32.4 days vs. 60.0 days, P = 0.030), time from diagnosis to discharge (27.8 days vs. 57.4 days, P = 0.024), and hospital stay (26.0 days vs. 53.9 days, P = 0.033) were shortened. Conclusions Among patients with severe COVID-19, early use of corticosteroids showed favorable clinical outcomes which were related to a reduction in the length of hospital stay.

Download Full-text

Clinical evaluation of two adult oxygenator systems in terms of mortality and major adverse events

Perfusion ◽

10.1177/02676591211063830 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 026765912110638

Author(s):

Hüsnü Kamil Limandal ◽

Mehmet Ali Kayğın ◽

Servet Ergün ◽

Taha Özkara ◽

Mevriye Serpil Diler ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Artery Bypass ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Fresh Frozen Plasma ◽

Wound Complications ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Delayed Sternal Closure ◽

Fresh Frozen ◽

Major Adverse Events

Purpose The primary aim of this study was to examine the effects of two oxygenator systems on major adverse events and mortality. Methods A total of 181 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in our clinic were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the oxygenator used: Group M, in which a Medtronic Affinity (Medtronic Operational Headquarters, Minneapolis, MN, USA) oxygenator was used, and Group S, in which a Sorin Inspire (Sorin Group Italia, Mirandola, Italy) oxygenator was used. Results Group S consisted of 89 patients, whereas Group M included 92 patients. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of age ( p = .112), weight ( p = .465), body surface area ( p = .956), or gender ( p = .484). There was no statistically significant difference in hemorrhage on the first or second postoperative day ( p = .318 and p = .455, respectively). No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of red blood cell ( p = .468), fresh frozen plasma ( p = .116), or platelet concentrate transfusion ( p = .212). Infections, wound complications, and delayed sternal closure were significantly more common in Group M ( p = .006, p = .023, and p = .019, respectively). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenators and intra-aortic balloon pumps were required significantly more frequently in Group S ( p = .025 and p = .013, respectively). Major adverse events occurred in 16 (18%) patients in Group S and 14 (15.2%) patients in Group M ( p = .382). Mortality was observed in six (6.7%) patients in Group S and three (3.3%) patients in Group M ( p = .232). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of length of hospital stay ( p = .451). Conclusion The clinical outcomes of the two oxygenator systems, including mortality, major adverse events, hemorrhage, erythrocyte and platelet transfusions, and length of hospital stay, were similar.

Download Full-text