scholarly journals Pluralisme Hukum sebagai Strategi Pembangunan Hukum Progresif di Bidang Agraria di Indonesia

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Widhiana H Puri
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
State Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The People ◽  
The Law ◽  
Agrarian Law

Abstrack: Pluralism of agrarian law is a consequence of the choice of society law that has a diversity of culture, ethnicity, customs and religion. This condition creates the selection to use legal norms beside national laws defined by the state. The philosophy is to find and to acquire the most appropriate legal order and provide justice for the people. This concept consistent with the progressive nature of the law that led to a dynamic legal system and was processed  following the dynamics of the community responsive to the needs and aspirations of justice in society. By using non state law as a complement of the state law, the chance of the state to quickly respons every dynamics of the community is possible, making the law progressive and responsive. This paper is a normative article with descriptive analytic  from the perspective of philosophy of jurisprudence.Intisari :Intisari Intisari Intisari IntisariPluralisme hukum agraria adalah sebuah kondisi yang menjadi konsekuensi atas pilihan hukum masyarakat yang memiliki keragaman budaya, suku, adat istiadat serta agama. Kondisi ini menciptakan adanya pilihan norma hukum yang digunakan selain hukum nasional yang ditetapkan negara. Filosofinya adalah menemukan dan memperoleh tatanan hukum yang paling sesuai dan memberikan keadilan bagi masyarakat. Konsep ini sejalan dengan hakikat hukum progresif yang mengarah pada sebuah sistem hukum yang dinamis dan berproses mengikuti dinamika masyarakat sehingga responsif terhadap kebutuhan dan cita keadilan dalam masyarakat. Dengan menempatkan hukum masyarakat sebagai pelengkap hukum negara, maka peluang negara untuk merespon setiap dinamika dalam masyarakat secara cepat dapat dilakukan sehingga terwujud hukum progresif dan responsif. Kajian ini bersifat normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif analitis dari perspektif filsafat ilmu hukum.

scholarly journals Pluralisme Hukum sebagai Strategi Pembangunan Hukum Progresif di Bidang Agraria di Indonesia

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Widhiana H Puri
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
State Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The People ◽  
The Law ◽  
Agrarian Law

Pluralism of agrarian law is a consequence of the choice of society law that has a diversity of culture, ethnicity, customs and religion. This condition creates the selection to use legal norms beside national laws defined by the state. The philosophy is to find and to acquire the most appropriate legal order and provide justice for the people. This concept consistent with the progressive nature of the law that led to a dynamic legal system and was processed  following the dynamics of the community responsive to the needs and aspirations of justice in society. By using non state law as a complement of the state law, the chance of the state to quickly respons every dynamics of the community is possible, making the law progressive and responsive. This paper is a normative article with descriptive analytic  from the perspective of philosophy of jurisprudence.Pluralisme hukum agraria adalah sebuah kondisi yang menjadi konsekuensi atas pilihan hukum masyarakat yang memiliki keragaman budaya, suku, adat istiadat serta agama. Kondisi ini menciptakan adanya pilihan norma hukum yang digunakan selain hukum nasional yang ditetapkan negara. Filosofinya adalah menemukan dan memperoleh tatanan hukum yang paling sesuai dan memberikan keadilan bagi masyarakat. Konsep ini sejalan dengan hakikat hukum progresif yang mengarah pada sebuah sistem hukum yang dinamis dan berproses mengikuti dinamika masyarakat sehingga responsif terhadap kebutuhan dan cita keadilan dalam masyarakat. Dengan menempatkan hukum masyarakat sebagai pelengkap hukum negara, maka peluang negara untuk merespon setiap dinamika dalam masyarakat secara cepat dapat dilakukan sehingga terwujud hukum progresif dan responsif. Kajian ini bersifat normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif analitis dari perspektif filsafat ilmu hukum.  

scholarly journals Islam-osmanli state law in Serbia

2006 ◽  
pp. 271-286
Author(s):  
Miroljub Jevtic
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
State Law ◽  
Normal Functioning ◽  
Basic Goal ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Moment ◽  
State Functions

Every state functions through its legal order and that legal order shows the nature of every state. From that point of view, the nature of the state and the authority which functioned in the regions of the Serbian lands from the moment of the Osmanli conquests till the end of that rule was best reflected through the law which regulated social relations. If one views the state which ruled in the regions of the Serbian lands in that way, one can clearly state that it, in its nature, had the basic goal to realize Islamic doctrine. All legal acts which the administration in Constantinople passed to ensure its normal functioning had the Islamic character. As most of these acts had been created long before the birth of the Osmanli state, they cannot be called Osmanli, because they were not such by their origin or their essence. It is specially important that their intention was not to maintain the Turkish national idea, as it could be concluded from a large number of historical syntheses which discuss that part of our history, but the triumph of Islam. Therefore, it is most correct to call that law Islamic-Osmanli law because its largest part had been created before the appearance of the Osmanli state and had as a goal the triumph of Islam; it is an Osmanli law because it was implemented in the territories ruled by the Osmanli dynasty.

scholarly journals LAW POLITIC OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURT JUDICATURE IN INDONEESIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
Wahyu Mukti Beny Setiyawan ◽  
Fitriya Desi Wulandari
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
The State ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The People ◽  
The Law ◽  
Administrative Courts ◽  
Administrative Justice

Law politic present at the point of encounter between living realism and the demands ofidealism. Political law concerns on an ideal or hope, then there is a legal vision that is setin advance, then the form and content of the law are built to realize that vision. Theurgency existence of administrative justice in realizing the rule of law encourages thegovernment to establish a legal system in the field of administrative justice through theestablishment of Law Number 51986 about State Administrative Courts, which is thefoundation for the establishment of a State Administrative Court in Indonesia. In theexplanation of Law Number 5 of 1986 stated that the State Administrative Court was heldin order to provide protection to the people seeking justice, which felt themselves to beharmed by a State Administrative Decision. Principly, a country is expected to giveprotection for the human rights of its citizens

The Failure of Legal Pluralism

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell Sandberg
Keyword(s):  
Social Control ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Pluralism ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Niklas Luhmann ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Subjective Approach ◽  
Sharia Law ◽  
Legal Literature

Concerns about legal pluralism, the co-existence of more than one legal system within a state, have become pronounced in recent years, owing to fears about the operation of sharia law in Western societies. At the same time, the concept of legal pluralism has become ubiquitous within legal literature. Paradoxically, the concept is both politically controversial and academically banal. This article contends that a major failing of the concept of legal pluralism has been the inability to distinguish legal norms from other forms of social control. It is suggested that this failure can be overcome by developing the concept of a ‘legal order’ as found in the work of Maleiha Malik and the understanding of law as discourse in the work of the German theorists Niklas Luhmann and Robert Alexy. It is argued that developing these approaches provides a means by which legal norms can be distinguished without adopting either a wholly objective or a completely subjective approach and without focusing exclusively upon the legal norms generated by the state.

The Transformation of the Trengganu Legal Order

1980 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Sutherland
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Social Order ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Institutional Framework ◽  
Law And Politics ◽  
The Will ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Relationship

The relationship between law and politics is both close and ambiguous. Ideally, the law provides impartial justice, but at the same time it expresses—both actually and symbolically—the will of the state. Consequently, a legal system usually embodies the establishment idea of proper social order, and should provide a legitimate means of enforcing compliance to that idea. It follows then that different societies have different kinds of law: underlying principles, procedure, and the institutional framework vary considerably from place to place.

The Legal Framework for Foundations in the Habsburg Monarchy from 1750 to 1918

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-172
Author(s):  
Gabriele Schneider
Keyword(s):  
Public Good ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
The State ◽  
Habsburg Monarchy ◽  
The Public ◽  
Regulation And Supervision ◽  
Role Of The State ◽  
The Law

Foundations, as permanent funds established by a certain legal act, can serve manifold purposes, but often pursue charitable goals. As such, they play an important role for the public good. Therefore, states always had an interest in fostering foundations by providing a pertinent legal framework. In Austria, this topic has not yet been the focus of scholarship. Through this study some light is shed on the implementation of the law on foundations in the Habsburg Monarchy. It focuses on the role of the state and its legal system regarding the regulation and supervision of foundations from 1750 to 1918. This period is characterized by the sovereigns’ endeavor to regulate the position of foundations via extensive legislation. In particular, a system of oversight for foundations was created in order to guarantee the attainment of their charitable goals. In fact, this system prevailed until the end of the 20thcentury.

scholarly journals Problems of defining legal concepts in laws and other normative legal acts

Legal Ukraine ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 30-41
Author(s):  
Volodymyr Klochkov
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Legal Concept ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
State And Society ◽  
Word Representation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Legal Concepts ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Each legal concept has not only content (content), but also a form. The form requires compliance with the rules for the definition and construction of concepts. Improving legal terminology is impossible without deep development and observance of the rules of analysis and the precise construction of the conceptual apparatus. Gaps in legislation and regulations are derived from inaccuracy, lack of clarity and simplicity of conceptual constructions. The inconsistency of certain legal norms found in various laws and regulatory legal acts, the inconsistency of norms with the prevailing realities of legal life in the state and society impede the fulfillment by state authorities, including law enforcement, of their functional responsibilities. Mistakes made in the preparation of draft laws and regulations, methodological recommendations mainly boil down to the violation of the requirements of the unified laws of logic: the law of identity, the law of contradiction, the law of the excluded third and the law of sufficient reason. The use of inappropriate terminology causes complications in the application of legal norms. The Constitution of Ukraine assigns to the prosecutor the function of representing the interests of a citizen or state in court in cases specified by law. The term representation is not exactly chosen. The word "representation" means: the performance of the duties of a representative; an institution representing the interests of someone; elections, as well as the law, the procedure for the election of representatives to any bodies; representation is a legal relationship in which one party (representative) is obligated or entitled to make a transaction on behalf of the other party that it represents; representation means activity on behalf of someone, on behalf of a person. By its legal nature, a representative can only be authorized for transactions that the person he represents is entitled to carry out. The representation of the prosecutor's office in court is specific, since this body does not need instructions, contracts or other documents. The prosecutor or his deputy should act not on behalf of someone, but on behalf of the state in favor of the person and citizen, state or society, within the limits established by law. In the legislation there is a conflict (conflict) in the law regarding the term «representation». To eliminate such a conflict, it is necessary to amend the Law of Ukraine «On the Prosecutor's Office». Key words: definition of concepts, laws and regulations, accuracy, clarity, brevity of terms.

Definition and content of the right to freedom of conscience

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (05) ◽  
pp. 145-148
Author(s):  
Ниджат Рафаэль оглу Джафаров ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Human Behavior ◽  
The State ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Freedom Of Conscience ◽  
Key Words Human ◽  
The People ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

It can be accepted that the classification of human rights, its division, types, and groups, is of particular importance. The syllogism for human rights can be taken as follows: law belongs to man; human beings are the highest beings on earth like living beings. Therefore, the regulation prevails. The right to freedom is conditional. Man is free. Consequently, human rights are dependent. Morality is the limit of the law. Morality is the limit and content of human actions. Therefore, the law is the limit of human activities. Morality is related to law. Law is the norm of human behavior. Thereby, human behavior and direction are related to morality. The people create the state. The state has the right. Therefore, the right of the state is the right of the people. The state is an institution made up of citizens. Citizens have the privilege. Such blessings as Dignity, honor, conscience, zeal, honor, etc., and values are a part of morality and spiritual life. Morality is united with law. Therefore, moral values are part of the law. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought and conscience. Space is about the law. Therefore, everyone has the right to opinion and conscience. Key words: human rights, freedom of conscience, conceptuality, citizenship

Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change

2021 ◽  
pp. 297-302
Author(s):  
Marc Galanter
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Change ◽  
System P ◽  
The Law ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Do So ◽  
The Way

This article proposes some conjectures about the way in which the basic architecture of the legal system creates and limits the possibilities of using the system as a means of redistributive change. Specifically, the question is under what conditions litigation can be redistributive, taking litigation in the broadest sense of the presentation of claims to be decided by courts. Because of differences in their size, differences in the state of the law, and differences in their resources, some of the actors in society have many occasions to utilize the courts; others do so only rarely. One can divide these actors into those claimants who have only occasional recourse to the courts (one-shotters) and repeat players who are engaged in many similar litigations over time. The article then looks at alternatives to the official litigation system.

Enemy Combatants Versus Enemy Criminal Law: An Introduction to the European Debate Regarding Enemy Criminal Law and Its Relevance to the Anglo-American Discussion on the Legal Status of Unlawful Enemy Combatants

2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 529-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Góómez-Jara Dííez
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Common Ground ◽  
Civil Liberties ◽  
The United States ◽  
The State ◽  
External Threats ◽  
General Terms ◽  
The Law ◽  
Enemy Combatants

At the beginning of the twenty-first century two legal concepts linking citizen/enemy status with criminal law have provoked heated discussion both in Europe and in the United States. The American concept, i.e., Enemy Combatants, has been basically developed by the U.S. Supreme Court and more recently by the Bush administration. The European term, Feindstrafrecht/Enemy Criminal Law, has been fundamentally coined and explained by leading German academic Professor Güünther Jakobs. Though born and raised by different parents, the two concepts have numerous aspects in common, or at least this will be argued throughout the paper. The most important common ground is that both concepts, with similar terminology, try to address the problem of what to do with individuals who are viewed as sources of extreme dangerousness. Put differently, they both tackle the question of whether citizenship-in a broad sense-concedes certain rights but imposes a fundamental duty: to have a minimum of law-abiding behavior. If the duty is not fulfilled, then the rights are not acknowledged and the individual is treated as an enemy, not as a citizen. The underlying reasoning oozes social contract theory. This is not by chance, as great philosophers (Rousseau, Fichte, Hobbes, Kant) have employed similar arguments that are briefly sketched in the essay. There are also references to the legal theory behind the scenes predicating that in order for legal constructions to exist (rights, the State), they need to be followed by most people. Hence such a duty to comply, in general terms, with the law is imposed upon all persons. If not, law would be just daydreaming. Strong and consistent as all these arguments sound, the basic problem with this type of reasoning is that it is hard for the legal system to follow without entering into self-contradiction. In this light, criticism will be brought by one of the most prominent social theories of the time, i.e., systems theory, arguing that law-abiding behavior is a precondition for legal institutions to exist, yes, but it cannot be secured by law itself. It is a precondition that has to be presupposed by the legal system. Moreover, using this kind of necessity rule, i.e., the State and the Law need to secure the preconditions of their own existence (self-preservation), entails a diabolic logic as it may lead to the destruction of the system itself. To this extent, self-preservation against external threats (terrorist attacks) and internal threats (curtailment of civil liberties) seems equally important. The essay finishes with some proposals for resolving this delicate matter, trying to reflect a keen sense of balance and forward-looking thinking.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document