scholarly journals Analisis Perencanaan Pajak Penghasilan PPh 21 Sebagai Upaya untuk Meningkatkan Efesiensi Beban Pajak Studi Kasus Pada Persek MJH

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Mohammad Affan Mantu ◽  
Achmad Ibnu Sholeh

Tax planning is a process of organizing taxpayer's business in such a way that its payable tax, either income or other taxes, is in minimum amount. The company can save coporate income payment by means of applying Gross Up method in estimating income tax PPh 21 but the company applied gross method. This research aims to analyze the estimation of PPh 21 used by Persek Mjayahadi & Co through the estimation of PPh 21 using Gross and Gross Up methods as well as constraints an attempts taken to save the corporate tax. The author used Chairl Anwar Pohan’s (2017:21) theoy. The research method employed was descriptive quatitative one. Techniques of collecting data used were observation, interview, and documentation. The result of research shows that total tax assumed by the employees is IDR 2,431,591,608, but following the use of gross up method, it becomes IDR 2,429,661,781, with the difference of IDR 1,929,827. Therefore, the net profit after tax subtracted wtth non-deductible burden before the application of gross Up method Is IDR 7,987,666,865, and after the appIication of gross up is IDR 7,989,596,692. Therefore, there is a difference of IDR 1,929,827, meaning equal to the tax efficiency.

account ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabila Gita Hapsari ◽  
Lia Ekowati ◽  
Agus Buntoro

ANALISIS PERENCANAAN PAJAK UNTUK PAJAK PENGHASILAN PASAL 21PADA PT. XYZNabila Gita [email protected] Ekowati [email protected] [email protected] Program Studi Akuntasi Keuangan, Politeknik Negeri Jakarta  ABSTRACT Tax is the country's main income which according to the company (taxpayer) is an expensethat will reduce the company's net profit. So many companies tend to want to minimize their tax burdenby planning taxes that are adjusted to the applicable tax regulations. One of the taxes in Indonesia isIncome Tax Article 21 and PT. XYZ is one of the companies that carry out the obligation to collectIncome Tax Article 21. This research aims to describe the tax and tax planning Article 21 which isappropriate for PT. XYZ in accordance with applicable tax regulations. In this research the data wereanalyzed qualitatively (descriptively) which later gave many explanations related to tax planningArticle 21 of the permanent employees of PT. XYZ by doing alternative calculation of Income TaxArticle 21. From the results of the research showed that PT. XYZ has not done tax planning properly.Then it is recommended to use Income Tax Article 21 calculations using the gross up method. Wherethe company provides a tax allowance whose value is the same as Income Tax Article 21 which willbe deducted from each employee. These tax benefits can be charged to commercial and fiscal financialstatements. So when a company makes a fiscal correction, the tax allowance can reduce the company'sfiscal profit and the company's corporate income tax value will be smaller.   Keywords: Tax planning, Income tax Article 21 income tax, gross up method. ABSTRAKPajak merupakan penghasilan utama negara yang menurut perusahaan (wajib pajak)merupakan beban yang akan mengurangi laba bersih perusahaan. Sehingga banyak perusahaancenderung ingin meminimalkan beban pajaknya dengan melakukan perencananaan pajak yangdisesuaikan dengan peraturan perpajakan yang berlaku. Salah satu pajak yang ada di Indonesiaadalah Pajak Penghasilan (PPh) Pasal 21 dan PT. XYZ merupakan salah satu perusahaan yangmelaksanakan kewajiban pemungutan PPh Pasal 21. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk medeskripsikanperpajakan dan perencanaan PPh Pasal 21 yang tepat untuk PT. XYZ yang sesuai dengan peraturanperpajakan yang berlaku. Dalam penelitian ini data dianalisis secara kualitatif (deskriptif) yangnantinya banyak memberikan penjelasan terkait perencanaan pajak PPh Pasal 21 karyawan tetapPT. XYZ dengan melakukan alternatif perhitungan PPh Pasal 21. Dari hasil penelitian menunjukkanbahwa PT. XYZ belum melakukan perencanaan pajak dengan baik. Maka disarankan menggunakanperhitungan PPh Pasal 21 menggunakan metode gross up. Dimana perusahaan memberikantunjangan pajak yang nilainya sama dengan PPh Pasal 21 yang akan dipotong setiap karyawan.Tunjangan pajak tersebut dapat dibebankan kedalam laporan keuangan komersial dan fiskal.Sehingga ketika perusahaan melakukan koreksi fiskal, tunjangan pajak tersebut dapat mengurangilaba fiskal perusahaan serta nilai pajak PPh Badan perusahaan akan lebih kecil.  Kata kunci: Perencanaan pajak, Pajak penghasilan Pasal 21, Metode gross up.


IQTISHODUNA ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanik Wahyuni

To the effect of observational it is subject to be to insofar know which income tax planning effectiveness that can be done by firm and to reach efficiency in paying taxes charges that shall pay firm. Base observational result and taxation problem study in particular about tax planning on, therefore writer can glean from that firm has applied effective so corporate tax planning can't economize taxes charges payment it. To economize taxes, expedition company ought to applies tax planning, which is with shift cost that don't be admitted fiskus as accrued expenses fiskus as deducted as productions. In shifts cost, firm shall regard impact of that cost shift. Meanwhile to avoid of corporate maximum tax rate gets to broadcast production as production of some taxpayer, which is with make proprietary branch office as new firm that includes in group firm, then broadcasts proprietary production corporate to that new firm. With that implement, firm can economize taxes who shall be paid to state, and that thrift gets to be utilized to do marketing region extension and for things what do get to increase quality and firm amount.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Budi Tri Rahardjo, Ak., M.Ak., CA

The purpose of this study is to know the tax planning undertaken by the company is appropriate and in accordance with the applicable tax laws in an effort to minimize the taxation terutangnya. The research method used is descriptive analysis method. The object of research used is evaluation of planning on Income Tax (PPh) Article 21. This research evaluate planning of Income Tax (PPh) Article 21 as an effort to minimize tax cost. The results achieved are having a considerable impact on the company's activities. The owner of the company would want to enjoy the results of his business to the fullest. Therefore it is necessary to prepare a tax planning coordinated with long-term plans and short-term plans of the company. The conclusion is that the difference that occurs after applying the tax planning is a tax savings that can be obtained by the company. Where before the implementation of tax planning, income tax to be paid company is Rp. 425,671,743.25 and seteah doing tax planning to Rp. 341,456,597.75. So obtained tax savings of Rp. 84,215,145.50 the difference can be used by the company for something more useful and useful


KEBERLANJUTAN ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 740
Author(s):  
Mahwiyah Mahwiyah

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a comparison between the calculation of the net method and the tax gross-up method (income tax) body transform and minimize the tax owed. The method of analysis used descriptive qualitative method, in which the author takes the data relating to Income Tax Article 21, including the recap salary then analyze the components in question are salary and benefits.  After doing the analysis, it can be concluded that the presence of Tax Planning is the company can do a comparison of income tax (VAT) of Article 21 by using Method Net or Gross-up method is the most efficient method is to gross-up or giving an allowance of tax payable, from the comparison of the two calculations are done, the gross-up method or allowances payable for the tax efficiency of the Income Tax (VAT) amounting Rp3.141.683 Agency for 2010, Rp1.513.929 for 2011, and Rp1.846.733 for 2012. Keywords: Article 21 Income Tax,   Corporate Income Tax, Net Methods and Gross Up Method


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Amar Syukroni ◽  
Hwihanus Hwihanus

ABSTRACTThis research discusses the implementation of revaluation of fixed assets by taking a case study at PT. XYZ in 2015. PT. XYZ is a company engaged in industrial services for a variety of special works of metals and metal goods. PT. XYZ conducts revaluation of fixed assets for taxation purposes. Tax regulations which are the basis for the revaluation of fixed assets at PT. XYZ is PMK 191 / PMK.010 / 2015, PMK 233 / PMK.03 / 2015, and PMK 29 / PMK.03 / 2016. The research method used is descriptive qualitative with the aim to determine the application of PMK 191 / PMK.010 / 2015 to the implementation of revaluation of fixed assets at PT. XYZ and the impact on the financial statements. The results of this study are the revaluation of fixed assets by PT. XYZ is in accordance with applicable tax regulations. Impact arising on the financial statements of PT. XYZ is an increase in the balance of fixed assets, equity, tax debt, and a decrease in the ratio of debt to equity. Tax implications that arise are PT. XYZ must pay taxes on revaluation of Rp 251,006,279. Depreciation expenses which increase due to increasing value of fixed assets are a deduction from operating income in the calculation of corporate tax expenses. However, it should also be considered that revaluation creates new costs, including appraisal services fees and Final Income Tax debt. Keywords: revaluation of fixed assets, taxes, PMK 191 / PMK.010 / 2015, financial statements


2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 259-285
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Kubick ◽  
Thomas C. Omer ◽  
Zac Wiebe

ABSTRACT Companies are adopting executive compensation recoupment (“clawback”) policies to discourage aggressive financial reporting choices. Recent research suggests clawback policies encourage other means of meeting earnings expectations. We suggest that reducing income tax expense is a means of meeting earnings expectations. We find that effective tax rates are lower after clawback adoption due to increased investments in tax planning. We identify three tax planning activities that clawback companies invest in to lower effective tax rates: purchases of auditor-provided tax services, increased connections to other low-tax companies, and use of tax havens. We provide evidence that effective tax rate decreases do not result from use of opportunistic income tax accruals, and that decreases are stronger among companies that adopt robust clawback policies. Additional tests indicate lower tax outcome volatility and longer, more readable tax footnotes following clawback adoption. Our results suggest a positive spillover effect of clawback adoption on corporate tax policy.


Author(s):  
Ahfi Nova Ashriana

The Gross Up method is a way of calculating income tax by batching net income after tax to get DPP, then after DPP is obtained newly multiplied by tax rate. This method can be used for alternative calculation of Income Tax Article 21 in relation to income tax saving efforts. The purpose of this study is to find out how the treatment of income tax article 21 on the salary of company employees and to know sebesapa big differences in the amount of corporate tax between Gross Up method with non Gross Up.  This type of research is a case study that is a detailed study of a certain obek over a period of time with sufficient depth and thorough including ngkungan and past conditions. The variables in this study is the method of calculating income tax article 21 which includes paid company, paid employer, paid company by using Gross Up.  The result of research shows that (1) Gross Up method can help the implementation of tax planning, because by using this method the company's operational expenses increase that is the burden of allowance PPh 21 which is charged to the company. So that corporate profits can be minimized. (2) Tax planning using Gross Up method is a concept to improve the efficiency of calculation of PPh 21 which is deducted by the employer and can determine the amount of tax allowance paid by the employer. (3) In this way the company will benefit on a fiscal basis because the income tax benefit of PPh 21 may be a deduction from the taxable income of the employer (the company). The logical consequence of this method is the amount of tax payable 21 which will be paid by the company will be big due to the added element of tax allowance in the procedure of calculation of income tax 21 employees


Akuntabilitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-64
Author(s):  
Vania Wimayo

The purpose of this study was to determine differences in compliance cost incurred before and after the use of E-Filing applications for corporate tax payers E-Filing users.E-Filing Tax Return is a reporting system created by the DGT which makes it easy for taxpayers in the manufacture and delivery of Tax Return report to the Director General of Taxation. The hypothesis in this study was tested using the Wilcoxon test match pairs. The type of data used in this study is quantitative data. The research method used is a survey and the instrument used to collect data is a questionnaire. The results show that compliance cost after the use of e-filing in contrast to earlier, where the compliance cost will be lower.


2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44
Author(s):  
Dessy Herlisnawati ◽  
Yola Fahmi Ahmad

ABSTRACTCompetition increases, the company is expected to make savings in all areas. One ofthe savings that can be done by the company is in the field of taxation, namely to streamlinethe burden of corporate income tax with tax planning. The purpose of this study was toinvestigate the implementation and effect of how the Tax Planning (Tax Planning) in Effortsto Increase the Efficiency of Corporate Income Tax Expense PT Akasha Wira InternationalTbk.The result showed that Tax Planning conducted by PT Akasha Wira International Tbkhas not been implemented properly, this can be seen from the persistence of the cost of taxexpendituresthat can still be maximized. Tax planning can still be maximized is consideringproviding tax benefits are included in the payroll, this planning can save the tax burden of4.5%. So that the tax burden can be saved then the company should consider providing taxbenefits to employees who entered into the payroll, thus increasing the operational costs ofsalaries, by itself will reduce tax payable.Keyword : Tax Planning, Equity, Income Tax, Efficiency.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 125
Author(s):  
Puji Rahayu

Implementation of tax planning through tax lawdengan exploiting loopholes in tax regulations one of which is exempted from the tax object is the payment of zakat on the amil zakat or amil zakat institutions established or endorsed by the government. Zakat is part of the pillar of Islam is the third pillar. For the Islamic ummah zakat law it must be done.Manajemen company has done tax planning in minimizing the tax burden.How that has been used by companies through depreciation of assets and financing the procurement of goods using leasing or leasing services.Namun companies have never applied zakat payments As a tax savings. The purpose of this study to know the tax planning through the implementation of zakat as an effort to minimize the agency tax burden.Types of data used in this study are qualitative and quantitative data.Data in this study are taken directly in the form of data about corporate organizational structure, employee data, company history and tax planning system that has been applied company. The data analysis technique used in this research is qualitative descriptive by analyzing fiscal reconciliation in order to calculate the Corporate Income Tax by applying the company before applying the tax planning through the payment of zakat, calculating the amount of zakat, calculating the Income Tax after applying the tax planning through zakat payment, Comparing the Income Taxes owed before After applying the tax planning through the payment of zakat.From the research result, it is concluded that the income tax burden payable by the company in 2016 before doing the implementation of tax planning through the payment of zakat amounting to Rp 282.355.625, - while after implementing the zakat of Rp 275.449.750, - the difference of Rp 6.905.875, - And tax payable prior to the fiscal reconciliation of Rp 275,096,375,-. There is a difference of Rp 353,375, - so the researcher recommends to apply zakat payment to amil zalcat or amil zalcat institution which has been legalized by the government because it has been legalized by taxation and paying zakat besides being able to clean the property is also a mandatory command of Allah SWT We carry out according to His word in the Al-Qur'an.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document