scholarly journals Current applications of robotics in spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. E2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob R. Joseph ◽  
Brandon W. Smith ◽  
Xilin Liu ◽  
Paul Park
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Spinal Instrumentation ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Robotic Applications

OBJECTIVESurgical robotics has demonstrated utility across the spectrum of surgery. Robotics in spine surgery, however, remains in its infancy. Here, the authors systematically review the evidence behind robotic applications in spinal instrumentation.METHODSThis systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant studies (through October 2016) that reported the use of robotics in spinal instrumentation were identified from a search of the PubMed database. Data regarding the accuracy of screw placement, surgeon learning curve, radiation exposure, and reasons for robotic failure were extracted.RESULTSTwenty-five studies describing 2 unique robots met inclusion criteria. Of these, 22 studies evaluated accuracy of spinal instrumentation. Although grading of pedicle screw accuracy was variable, the most commonly used method was the Gertzbein and Robbins system of classification. In the studies using the Gertzbein and Robbins system, accuracy (Grades A and B) ranged from 85% to 100%. Ten studies evaluated radiation exposure during the procedure. In studies that detailed fluoroscopy usage, overall fluoroscopy times ranged from 1.3 to 34 seconds per screw. Nine studies examined the learning curve for the surgeon, and 12 studies described causes of robotic failure, which included registration failure, soft-tissue hindrance, and lateral skiving of the drill guide.CONCLUSIONSRobotics in spine surgery is an emerging technology that holds promise for future applications. Surgical accuracy in instrumentation implanted using robotics appears to be high. However, the impact of robotics on radiation exposure is not clear and seems to be dependent on technique and robot type.

P–004 Effect of varicocelectomy on sperm DNA fragmentation rates in infertile men with clinical varicocele: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Tenori. Lir. Neto ◽  
M Roque ◽  
S Esteves
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Dna Fragmentation ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Sperm Dna Fragmentation ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Infertile Men ◽  
Sperm Dna ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Study question Does varicocelectomy improve sperm DNA quality in men with infertility and clinically detected varicoceles? Summary answer Varicocelectomy reduces sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) rates in infertile men with clinical varicocele. What is known already Varicocele has been linked to male infertility through various non-mutually exclusive mechanisms, including an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) production that may lead to sperm DNA damage. Damage to sperm DNA may result in longer time-to-pregnancy, unexplained infertility, recurrent pregnancy loss, and failed intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Therefore, interventions aimed at decreasing SDF rates, including varicocele repair, have been explored to improve fertility and pregnancy outcomes potentially, either by natural conception or using medically assisted reproduction. Study design, size, duration Systematic review and meta-analysis Participants/materials, setting, methods We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Our systematic search included PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Scielo, and Google Scholar to identify all relevant studies written in English and published from inception until October 2020. Inclusion criteria were studies comparing SDF rates before and after varicocelectomy in infertile men with clinical varicocele. Articles were included if the following SDF assays were utilized: SCSA, TUNEL, SCD test, or alkaline Comet. Main results and the role of chance Thirteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were selected for the analysis. The estimated weighted mean difference of SDF rates after varicocelectomy was –6.58% (13 studies, 95% CI –8.33%, –4.84%; I2=90% p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant decrease in SDF rates using SCSA (eight studies, WMD –6.80%, 95% CI –9.31%, –4.28%; I2=89%, p < 0.0001), and TUNEL (three studies, WMD –4.86%, 95% CI –7.38%, –2.34%; I2=89%, p < 0.0001). The test for subgroup difference revealed that pooled results were conservative using the above SDF assays. Comet and SCD tests were used in only one study each; thus, a meta-analysis was not applicable. The studies were further categorized by the surgical technique (microsurgical versus non-microsurgical). This subgroup analysis showed a significant decrease in SDF rates using microsurgical technique (10 studies, WMD –6.70%, 95% CI –9.04%, –4.37%; I2=91%, p < 0.0001). After varicocelectomy, SDF rates were also decreased when non-microsurgical approaches were used, albeit the effect was not statistically significant (2 studies, WMD –6.84%, 95% CI –10.05%, 1.38%; I2=86%) (Figure 3). The heterogeneity was not materially affected by performing analyses by the above subgroups, suggesting that the SDF assay and surgical technique do not explain the inconsistency in the treatment effect across primary studies. Limitations, reasons for caution There were no randomized controlled trials comparing varicocelectomy to placebo for alleviating SDF levels. Heterogeneity was high, which may be explained by the low number of included studies. Pregnancy data are not available in most studies, thus the impact of reduced SDF after varicocelectomy on pregnancy rates unclear. Wider implications of the findings: Our study indicates a positive association between varicocelectomy and reduced postoperative SDF rates in men with clinical varicocele and infertility, independentetly of the assays used to measure SDF. These findings may help counsel and manage infertile men with varicocele and high SDF levels. Trial registration number Not applicable

scholarly journals The Impact of Accidental Hypothermia on Mortality in Trauma Patients Overall and Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Specifically: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 4106-4117
Author(s):  
David Rösli ◽  
Beat Schnüriger ◽  
Daniel Candinas ◽  
Tobias Haltmeier
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Accidental Hypothermia ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Qualitative Synthesis ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Accidental hypothermia is a known predictor for worse outcomes in trauma patients, but has not been comprehensively assessed in a meta-analysis so far. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the impact of accidental hypothermia on mortality in trauma patients overall and patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) specifically. Methods This is a systematic review and meta-analysis using the Ovid Medline/PubMed database. Scientific articles reporting accidental hypothermia and its impact on outcomes in trauma patients were included in qualitative synthesis. Studies that compared the effect of hypothermia vs. normothermia at hospital admission on in-hospital mortality were included in two meta-analyses on (1) trauma patients overall and (2) patients with TBI specifically. Meta-analysis was performed using a Mantel–Haenszel random-effects model. Results Literature search revealed 264 articles. Of these, 14 studies published 1987–2018 were included in the qualitative synthesis. Seven studies qualified for meta-analysis on trauma patients overall and three studies for meta-analysis on patients with TBI specifically. Accidental hypothermia at admission was associated with significantly higher mortality both in trauma patients overall (OR 5.18 [95% CI 2.61–10.28]) and patients with TBI specifically (OR 2.38 [95% CI 1.53–3.69]). Conclusions In the current meta-analysis, accidental hypothermia was strongly associated with higher in-hospital mortality both in trauma patients overall and patients with TBI specifically. These findings underscore the importance of measures to avoid accidental hypothermia in the prehospital care of trauma patients.

scholarly journals The Impact of Corticosteroid Injection Timing on Infection Rates Following Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110266
Author(s):  
Gregory S. Kazarian ◽  
Michael E. Steinhaus ◽  
Han Jo Kim
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Infection ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Lumbar Spine Surgery ◽  
Injection Timing ◽  
The Impact

Study Design/Setting: Systematic review/meta-analysis. Objectives: The objective of this review was to assess how the risk of infection following lumbar spine surgery varies as a function of the timing of preoperative corticosteroid spinal injections (CSIs). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched and data was pooled for meta-analysis. Results: Six studies were identified for inclusion. Two (33.3%) demonstrated a significant relationship between the timing of preoperative CSIs and the risk of postoperative infection, while 4 (66.7%) demonstrated no impact. A total of 2.5% (110/4,448) of patients who underwent CSI <1 month before surgery experienced a postoperative infection, as compared to 1.2% (1,466/120, 943) of controls, which was statistically significant (RR = 1.986 95% CI 1.202-3.282 P = 0.007). A total of 1.6% (25/1,600) of patients who underwent CSI 0-3 months before surgery experienced a postoperative infection, as compared to 1.6% (201/12, 845) of controls (RR = 0.887 95% CI 0.586-1.341, P = 0.569). A total of 1.1% (199/17 870) of patients who underwent CSI 3-6 months before surgery experienced a postoperative infection, as compared to 1.3% (1,382/102, 572) of controls (RR = 1.053 95% CI 0.704-1.575, P = 0.802). Differences in infection risk for 0-3 months and 3-6 months were not statistically significant. Conclusions: CSIs <1 month prior to lumbar spine surgery are a significant risk factor for infection, while CSIs beyond that point showed no such association. Surgeons should consider avoiding CSIs <1 month of the use of CSIs of the spine.

C-reactive Protein, Infection, and Outcome After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Registry and Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 405-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Wang ◽  
Yuxiao Li ◽  
Changyi Wang ◽  
Wen Guo ◽  
Ming Liu
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Poor Outcome ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
The Impact

Background: A number of studies have explored the prognostic role of CRP in patients with acute ischemic stroke, however, the results have been inconclusive. The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of infection on the association between CRP and 3-month functional outcome by performing a registry study and systematic review. Methods: Patients admitted within 24 hours of acute ischemic stroke onset and had CRP measured within 24 hours after admission were included. Patients admitted between June 2016 and December 2018 in Chengdu Stoke Registry were enrolled. The PubMed database was searched up to July 2019 to identify eligible studies. Poor outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale scores at 3-month more than 3. Results: Totally, 368 patients in the registry and 18 studies involving 15238 patients in the systematic review were included. A statistically significant association between CRP values on admission and 3-month poor outcome in patients without infection was found, both in our registry (CRP per 1-mg/L increment, OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07, p=0.008) and meta-analysis (CRP per 1-mg/dL increment, OR 1.66 [95% CI 1.37 to 2.01, p<0.001]). In patients with infection, CRP was not associated with a 3-month poor outcome according to registry data (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.01, p=0.663) and meta-analysis (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.01, p=0.128). Conclusion: High CRP value was independently associated with a 3-month poor outcome after stroke in patients without infection. Further studies are required to examine the value of infection on CRP measures and long-term functional outcomes.

scholarly journals The Role of Mitochondrial DNA Variation in Drug Response: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha W. Jones ◽  
Amy L. Ball ◽  
Amy E. Chadwick ◽  
Ana Alfirevic
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mitochondrial Dna ◽  
Drug Response ◽  
Drug Efficacy ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Mtdna Variation ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Mtdna Variants ◽  
The Impact

Background: The triad of drug efficacy, toxicity and resistance underpins the risk-benefit balance of all therapeutics. The application of pharmacogenomics has the potential to improve the risk-benefit balance of a given therapeutic via the stratification of patient populations based on DNA variants. A growth in the understanding of the particulars of the mitochondrial genome, alongside the availability of techniques for its interrogation has resulted in a growing body of literature examining the impact of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variation upon drug response.Objective: To critically evaluate and summarize the available literature, across a defined period, in a systematic fashion in order to map out the current landscape of the subject area and identify how the field may continue to advance.Methods: A systematic review of the literature published between January 2009 and December 2020 was conducted using the PubMed database with the following key inclusion criteria: reference to specific mtDNA polymorphisms or haplogroups, a core objective to examine associations between mtDNA variants and drug response, and research performed using human subjects or human in vitro models.Results: Review of the literature identified 24 articles reporting an investigation of the association between mtDNA variant(s) and drug efficacy, toxicity or resistance that met the key inclusion criteria. This included 10 articles examining mtDNA variations associated with antiretroviral therapy response, 4 articles examining mtDNA variants associated with anticancer agent response and 4 articles examining mtDNA variants associated with antimicrobial agent response. The remaining articles covered a wide breadth of medications and were therefore grouped together and referred to as “other.”Conclusions: Investigation of the impact of mtDNA variation upon drug response has been sporadic to-date. Collective assessment of the associations identified in the articles was inconclusive due to heterogeneous methods and outcomes, limited racial/ethnic groups, lack of replication and inadequate statistical power. There remains a high degree of idiosyncrasy in drug response and this area has the potential to explain variation in drug response in a clinical setting, therefore further research is likely to be of clinical benefit.

scholarly journals O-195 The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on psychological distress due to the cancellation of ART. A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Z Donarelli ◽  
G Lo Coco ◽  
S Gullo ◽  
V Oieni ◽  
A Volpes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Infertile Couples ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Infertile Patients

Abstract Study question Is there evidence that infertile patients have been more likely to experience distress during the COVID-19 outbreak with the consequent interruption of treatment plans? Summary answer High levels of psychological distress among infertile patients have been found during the COVID-19 pandemic, greater than that reported in the general population. What is known already Preliminary research on the negative consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak on mental health evidenced heightened levels of anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress in some clinical populations as well as in community samples. However, little is known about the impact of COVID-19 on psychological distress of infertile patients who have been forced to suspend infertility treatment and postpone parenthood goals during the pandemic. The aim of this meta-analytic review is to summarize extant literature on the prevalence of psychological distress symptoms in infertile patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Study design, size, duration A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the PRISMA guidelines on PsycInfo, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, MedRxiv from March 2020 to mid-December 2020. Study inclusion criteria were specified according to the PICOS guideline. All naturalistic or RCT studies published in 2020 that examined infertility as the primary diagnosis and had a quantitative measurement of distress, were eligible. The primary outcomes were symptoms of psychological distress and secondary outcomes were indicators of psychological health. Participants/materials, setting, methods The database search identified 144 papers. Two reviewers independently screened potential studies by title and abstracts based on the inclusion criteria. The full texts were then screened for eligibility. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to judge the methodological quality of the studies. In order to estimate the pooled prevalence of distress, Odds Ratios with 95% Confidence Interval were calculated as the effect size by using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was tested using I2 statistics. Main results and the role of chance Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were summarized for the systematic review (N = 6473). Only six studies did not include males although, in the surveys, females made up 92% of the total sample. Ten studies adopted a cross-sectional study design. 100% gathered data through an online survey. Nine studies showed a high risk of bias, and five had a moderate risk. Review results showed that 56,4% of patients wished to resume treatment; participants were mostly worried about the delay in treatment because of their age (&gt;35 years) or diminished ovarian reserve, or money constraints and low education level. Only five studies examined the role of protective factors such as social support, coping, optimism trait and intolerance of uncertainty. Nine studies were included for meta-analysis. The prevalence of psychological distress was 0.58 (95% CI 0.32÷0.84). The pooled point estimates of prevalence for anxiety (N = 6) were 0.56 (95% CI 0.24÷0.88), whereas the prevalence for depression (N = 5) was 0.46 (95% CI 0.15÷0.77). There was significant heterogeneity among studies to estimate the prevalence (I² ranging from 99% to 100%). Limitations, reasons for caution Results are preliminary, given the small number of studies and their cross-sectional data. The risk of bias was high or moderate across studies. Wider implications of the findings Infertile couples reported high levels of distress due to cancellation of their diagnostic procedures or treatment; they would benefit from information, appropriate support and advice from healthcare professionals, with an important role in maintaining the wishes of infertile couples to continue their parenthood goals. Trial registration number not applicable

Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1012-1019
Author(s):  
Khosrow S Houschyar ◽  
Christian Tapking ◽  
Mimi R Borrelli ◽  
Behrus Puladi ◽  
Mark Ooms ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
English Language ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Stevens Johnson Syndrome ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Johnson Syndrome ◽  
Pubmed Database

Objective: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare and severe skin and mucosal reactions that are associated with high mortality. Despite the severity, an evidence-based treatment protocol for SJS/TEN is still lacking. Method: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the PubMed database was searched using the following terms: [Stevens–Johnson syndrome] OR [toxic epidermal necrolysis] AND [therapy] OR [treatment] over a 20-year period (1999–2019) in the German and English language. All clinical studies reporting on the treatment of SJS/TEN were included, and epidemiological and diagnostic aspects of treatment were analysed. A meta-analysis was conducted on all comparative clinical studies that met the inclusion criteria. Results: A total of 88 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes in 2647 patients. Treatment was either supportive or used systemic corticosteroid, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, cyclosporine, thalidomide or cyclophosphamide therapy. The meta-analysis included 16 (18%) studies, reporting outcomes in 976 (37%) patients. Systemic glucocorticoids showed a survival benefit for SJS/TEN patients in all analyses compared with other forms of treatment. Cyclosporine treatment also showed promising results, despite being used in a small cohort of patients. No beneficial effects on mortality could be demonstrated for intravenous immunoglobulins. Conclusion: Glucocorticoids and cyclosporine may be tentatively recommended as the most promising immunomodulatory therapies for SJS/TEN, but these results should be investigated in future prospective controlled trials.

scholarly journals The impact of selection criteria and study design on reported survival outcomes in extracorporeal oxygenation cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR): a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameer Karve ◽  
Dominique Lahood ◽  
Arne Diehl ◽  
Aidan Burrell ◽  
David H. Tian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Prospective Studies ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale ◽  
Study Designs ◽  
Based Medicine ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during cardiac arrest (ECPR) has increased exponentially. However, reported outcomes vary considerably due to differing study designs and selection criteria. This review assessed the impact of pre-defined selection criteria on ECPR survival. Methods Systematic review applying PRISMA guidelines. We searched Medline, Embase, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews for RCTs and observational studies published from January 2000 to June 2021. Adult patients (> 12 years) receiving ECPR were included. Two investigators reviewed and extracted data on study design, number and type of inclusion criteria. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). Outcomes included overall and neurologically favourable survival. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed. Results 67 studies were included: 14 prospective and 53 retrospective. No RCTs were identified at time of search. The number of inclusion criteria to select ECPR patients (p = 0.292) and study design (p = 0.962) was not associated with higher favourable neurological survival. However, amongst prospective studies, increased number of inclusion criteria was associated with improved outcomes in both OHCA and IHCA cohorts. (β = 0.12, p = 0.026) and arrest to ECMO flow time was predictive of survival. (β = -0.023, p < 0.001). Conclusions Prospective studies showed number of selection criteria and, in particular, arrest to ECMO time were associated with significant improved survival. Well-designed prospective studies assessing the relative importance of criteria as well as larger efficacy studies are required to ensure appropriate application of what is a costly intervention.

scholarly journals Strategies for Reducing the Impact of Cycling on the Perineum in Healthy Males: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamil Litwinowicz ◽  
Marcin Choroszy ◽  
Anna Wróbel
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Indirect Evidence ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Alcock’S Syndrome ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Healthy Males

Abstract Introduction Perineal pressure associated with bicycle riding is the cause of several genitourinary pathologies, most notably Alcock’s syndrome and subsequent perineal numbness. The possible link between cycling-induced perineal numbness and erectile dysfunction makes the development of strategies for perineal protection in bicycle users critical. Objective To assess the effectiveness of strategies for reducing the impact of cycling on the perineum in healthy males. Methods We have conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis of studies examining various means of reducing the impact of cycling on the perineum under the PRISMA guidelines. Results Out of 2217 screened studies, 22 met our inclusion criteria, and 6 qualified for meta-analysis. The strategies included various designs of saddles, changes in the cycling position, seat shock absorber, shorts with different padding, using the recumbent bike. Using the no-nose saddle and recumbent bike resulted in a significant reduction of perineal pressure and higher penile oxygen pressure compared with a standard saddle. Indirect evidence supports the protective effect of standing on the pedals every few minutes during cycling. More evidence is needed to support—or dismiss—other strategies. Conclusions Current evidence supports the use of no-nose saddles as a mean to reduce the negative impact of cycling on the perineum in healthy males at the cost of worse stability and increase of posterior seat pressure. Standing on the pedals every ten minutes might be an effective and potentially widely applicable strategy. The use of a recumbent bike appears to protect the perineum, but several concerns prevent its widespread use.

scholarly journals Clinical Behavior of Short Dental Implants: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 3271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Torres-Alemany ◽  
Lucía Fernández-Estevan ◽  
Rubén Agustín-Panadero ◽  
José María Montiel-Company ◽  
Carlos Labaig-Rueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Short Implants ◽  
Edentulous Patients ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
The Impact

Short implants are an increasingly common alternative to other surgical techniques in areas where bone availability is reduced. Despite the advantages they offer, a variety of biological repercussions have been described in the literature that can even lead to the loss of these. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the impact of the use of short implants on their survival and on peri-implant bone loss, evaluating the influence that length, diameter, and crown-to-implant ratio (C/I) have on these parameters. This systematic review was based on guidelines proposed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). An electronic search was conducted using terms related to the use of short implants in partially or totally edentulous patients. A total of five databases were consulted in the literature search: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science. After eliminating the duplicate articles and assessing which ones met the inclusion criteria, 15 articles were included for the qualitative analysis and 14 for the quantitative study. Through meta-analysis, the percentage of implant loss and peri-implant bone loss was estimated. Relating these parameters to length, diameter, and C/I ratio, no significant differences have been found for implant loss (values of p = 0.06, 0.10, and 0.9, respectively for length, diameter, and C/I ratio), nor for peri-implant bone loss (values of p = 0.71, 0.72, and 0.36, respectively for length, diameter, and C/I ratio). In conclusion, the use of short implants does not seem to have a significant influence on marginal bone loss or the survival rate of implants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document