Comparison of multimodal surgical and radiation treatment methods for pediatric craniopharyngioma: long-term analysis of progression-free survival and morbidity

Author(s):  
Vijay M. Ravindra ◽  
M. Fatih Okcu ◽  
Lucia Ruggieri ◽  
Thomas S. Frank ◽  
Arnold C. Paulino ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE The authors compared survival and multiple comorbidities in children diagnosed with craniopharyngioma who underwent gross-total resection (GTR) versus subtotal resection (STR) with radiation therapy (RT), either intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or proton beam therapy (PBT). The authors hypothesized that there are differences between multimodal treatment methods with respect to morbidity and progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS The medical records of children diagnosed with craniopharyngioma and treated surgically between February 1997 and December 2018 at Texas Children’s Hospital were reviewed. Surgical treatment was stratified as GTR or STR + RT. RT was further stratified as PBT or IMRT; PBT was stratified as STR + PBT versus cyst decompression (CD) + PBT. The authors used Kaplan-Meier analysis to compare PFS and overall survival, and chi-square analysis to compare rates for hypopituitarism, vision loss, and hypothalamic obesity (HyOb). RESULTS Sixty-three children were included in the analysis; 49% were female. The mean age was 8.16 years (95% CI 7.08–9.27). Twelve of 14 children in the IMRT cohort underwent CD. The 5-year PFS rates were as follows: 73% for GTR (n = 31), 54% for IMRT (n = 14), 100% for STR + PBT (n = 7), and 77% for CD + PBT (n = 11; p = 0.202). The overall survival rates were similar in all groups. Rates of hypopituitarism (96% GTR vs 75% IMRT vs 100% STR + PBT, 50% CD + PBT; p = 0.023) and diabetes insipidus (DI) (90% GTR vs 61% IMRT vs 85% STR + PBT, 20% CD + PBT; p = 0.004) were significantly higher in the GTR group. There was no significant difference in the HyOb or vision loss at the end of study follow-up among the different groups. Within the PBT group, 2 patients presented a progressive vasculopathy with subsequent strokes. One patient experienced a PBT-induced tumor. CONCLUSIONS GTR and CD + PBT presented similar rates of 5-year PFS. Hypopituitarism and DI rates were higher with GTR, but the rate of HyOb was similar among different treatment modalities. PBT may reduce the burden of hypopituitarism and DI, although radiation carries a risk of potential serious complications, including progressive vasculopathy and secondary malignancy. Further prospective study comparing neurocognitive outcomes is necessary.

Author(s):  
Yang Wang ◽  
Jun Nie ◽  
Ling Dai ◽  
Weiheng Hu ◽  
Jie Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and chemotherapy has been clinically confirmed to be beneficial as the first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. This study aimed to assess the effect of nivolumab + docetaxel versus nivolumab monotherapy in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy. Materials and methods The efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab + docetaxel combination therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy were compared in this retrospective study. Primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results Between November 2017 and December 2019, 77 patients were included in this study, with 58 patients in the nivolumab group and 19 in the nivolumab + docetaxel group. The median follow-up was 18 months, and the PFS was 8 months for patients receiving nivolumab + docetaxel and 2 months for those receiving nivolumab alone (p = 0.001), respectively. Nivolumab + docetaxel showed superior OS compared with nivolumab, with the median OS unreached versus 7 months (p = 0.011). Among patients without EGFR/ALK variation, compared to nivolumab monotherapy, nivolumab + docetaxel showed better PFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p  = 0.05). There was no significant difference in grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) between the two groups (p = 0.253). Conclusions The combination of nivolumab and docetaxel demonstrated a meaningful improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival compared to nivolumab monotherapy, in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy, irrespective of EGFR/ALK variation status.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serkan Yıldırım ◽  
Atike Pınar ERDOĞAN ◽  
Cengiz Yılmaz ◽  
Ferhat Ekinci ◽  
Gülcan Bulut ◽  
...  

Abstract İNTRODUCTİONIn this study, we aim to determine which treatment is more appropriate in castration-resistant chemotherapy-naive patients. Therefore, docetaxel and agents active in the androgen pathway (abiraterone and enzalutamide) were compared retrospectively in patients progressing on ADT.MATERİAL METHODThe study was designed as a retrospective and multi-center study. Patients from 5 centers in Turkey were included in the study. The primary endpoint of the study was ovreall survival and the secondary endpoint was progression-free survival.RESULTSMedian overall survival of the chemotherapy group was 18.66 months, it was 16.26 months in the hormonal treatment group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.311). Median progression-free survival of the chemotherapy group was 5.6 months, while it was 9 months in the hormonal therapy group. There was statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.024).CONCLUSİONThere was statistical difference in progression-free survival in favor of hormonal therapies in our study. The difference did not reflect on overall survival and there was no difference between hormonal therapies and docetaxel. Heterogeneity in the selection of patients is considered to lead to this result; however, larger randomized controlled studies are needed to determine the most appropriate treatment in these patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii36-ii36
Author(s):  
Dai Kamamoto ◽  
Hikaru Sasaki ◽  
Ryota Sasao ◽  
Takumi Fujiyama ◽  
Kazunari Yoshida

Abstract The optimal treatment for grade II/III meningioma is operation with or without radiation therapy. However, their natural course is sometimes aggressive with high recurrent rate. There is no effective treatment other than operation and radiation therapy, therefore, a new therapeutic strategy for grade II/III meningioma is urgently required.PD-1 and PD-L1 play important roles as immune-checkpoint mediators within tumor microenvironment and the antibodies to these molecules are now approved for the treatment of various kinds of cancers. In Japan, anti-PD-1 antibody and anti-CTLA-4 antibody are approved for unresectable melanoma or advanced / recurrent non-small cell lung cancer and their high effectiveness has been reported. We investigated the expression of PD-L1 (clone:28-8) in 51 cases of grade II/III meningioma by immunohistochemistry and analyzed the relationship between the expression with overall survival, progression free survival and initial WHO grade. For now, we have evaluated 25 cases of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry and PD-L1 showed positivity in 15 cases. There is no correlation observed between PD-L1 expression and patients’ prognosis. Although it does not reach a significant difference, the WHO grade at the time of initial operation tends to be high in those with high PD-L1 staining rate.Similar studies that were previously reported did not use antibodies targeting clone 28-8, which was used as a companion diagnosis for nivolumab administration, but “Correlation between PD-L1 expression and WHO grade”, or “PD-L1 expression is an independent prognostic factor” have been reported. In our investigation, which was using antibodies for companion diagnosis, PD-L1 was positive in more than half of Grade II / III meningiomas and it also related to WHO grade. These results suggest the possibility that tumor immune evasion mechanisms are also working in meningiomas. At the conference, we will report it with the specific data from all cases with a literature review.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi75-vi76
Author(s):  
Catherine Garcia ◽  
Zin Myint ◽  
Rani Jayswal ◽  
Allison Butts ◽  
Heidi Weiss ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Temozolomide (TMZ) is the cornerstone for glioblastoma (GBM) treatment. A significant proportion of patients develops hematologic toxicities with limited investigations on outcomes and risk factors for their development. METHODS Our study combines data from the two largest group trials, RTOG 0525 and RTOG 0825, to analyze serious hematologic adverse events (HAE) associated with TMZ therapy for GBM. We analyzed frequency and outcomes of HAE during chemoradiation. RESULTS 1154 patients were evaluated with a median age of 57 years. Over 79% of patients developed HAE during the entire course of GBM treatment. During chemoradiation the most common HAE during chemoradiation was lymphopenia (41.5%), followed by thrombocytopenia (39.0%), and anemia (35.3%). Of these, 34.1% were severe (Grade 3 or 4) and 65.9% were mild (grade 1 or 2). During maintenance the most common HAE was leukopenia (50.7%), followed by neutropenia (50.4%), and lymphopenia (45.3%). MGMT methylation was not associated with HAEs. A history of HAEs during chemoradiation was a protective factor for developing HAEs during maintenance. MGMT methylated and age younger than 50 were protective factors for mortality. Patients that presented HAEs anytime during treatment had a longer overall survival and progression free survival. There was no significant difference in survival between mild or severe HAEs. CONCLUSION HAE are common during chemoradiation with TMZ for GBM, but are more commonly grade 1 or 2 per CTCAE. HAE during GBM treatment is associated with decreased progression free survival and overall survival.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5517-5517 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Forastiere ◽  
M. Maor ◽  
R. S. Weber ◽  
T. Pajak ◽  
B. Glisson ◽  
...  

5517 Background: The 2-year results of Intergroup RTOG 91–11 were published in 2003 (NEJM 349:2091–8,2003). We now present the 5-year results (after median follow-up for surviving patients of 6.9 years) of 515 eligible pts with resectable stage III or IV (excluding T1 and high volume T4), cancer of the glottic or supraglottic larynx. Methods: Patients were randomized to induction cisplatin/5-FU (CF) with responders then receiving RT (I+RT) (n = 173); or concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m2 q 21 days × 3) and RT (CRT) (n = 171); or RT alone (R) (n = 171). Laryngectomy was performed for < partial response to induction CF, for persistent/recurrent disease or for laryngeal dysfunction. Results: At 5 years, laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) was significantly better with either I+RT (44.6%, p = 0.011) or CRT (46.6%, p = 0.011) compared to R (33.9%). There was no difference in LFS between I+RT and CRT (p = 0.98). Laryngeal preservation (LP) was significantly better with CRT (83.6%) compared to I+RT (70.5%, p = 0.0029) or R (65.7%, p = 0.00017). Local-regional control (LRC) was significantly better with CRT (68.8%) compared to I+RT (54.9%, p = 0.0018) or R (51%, p = 0.0005). I+RT compared to R for LP and LRC showed no significant difference (p = 0.37 and 0.62, respectively). The distant metastatic rate was low (I+RT 14.3%, CRT 13.2%, R 22.3%) with a trend (p ∼0.06) for benefit from chemotherapy. Disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly better with either I+RT (38.6%, p = 0.016) or CRT (39%, p = 0.0058) compared to R (27.3%). Overall survival rates were similar for the first 5 years (I+RT 59.2%, CRT 54.6%, R 53.5%); thereafter I+RT had a non-significant lower death rate. Compared to CRT, significantly more pts in the R group died of their cancer (34% vs 58.3%, p = 0.0007); the rate for I+RT was 43.8%. Conclusion: These 5-year results differ from the 2-year analysis by a significant improvement in LFS now seen for both I+RT and CRT treatments compared to R. For the endpoints of LP and LRC, CRT is still the superior treatment with no advantage seen to the addition of induction CF to R. There is no significant difference in overall survival. [Table: see text]


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1087-1087
Author(s):  
Zhongsheng Tong ◽  
Shufen Li ◽  
Yehui Shi ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
...  

1087 Background: Paclitaxel/carboplatin combinations are highly active in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We conducted a randomized, phase III, non-inferiority trial comparing paclitaxel/carboplatin (TP) with paclitaxel/epirubicin (TE) as first-line therapy for MBC. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary endpoints included response rate, overall survival, tolerability, and quality of life (QoL). Methods: From June 2009 to January 2015, 231 patients were randomly assigned, 115 of whom were randomized to TP and 116 to TE. Baseline characteristics were relatively well-balanced in the two treatments. Results: After a median follow-up of 29 months, no significant difference was observed between the two treatments in objective response rate (ORR) (38.3% vs. 39.7%, respectively). Both the progression-free survival (p=0.158) and overall survival (p=0.369) were very similar between the two treatments. Both regimens were well tolerated. The main toxicities were myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reactions, and alopecia. TP showed higher grades 3–4 alopecia and higher nausea (p<0.05). TE showed higher incidence of myelosuppression than TP (p<0.05) (Table). Those patients whose epirubicin cumulative dose was more than 1000 mg/m2 did not suffer worse cardiotoxicity. Conclusions: Our study suggests that TP arm is an effective therapeutic alternative for patients with MBC, especially in those previously exposed to epirubicin in the adjuvant setting. TP has some advantages, such as less cost and less side effects (myelosuppression and fatigue). Clinical trial information: NCT02207361. [Table: see text]


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 488-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukhvinder Johal ◽  
Irene Santi ◽  
Justin Doan ◽  
Saby George

488 Background: Progression-free survival (PFS) is often used as a primary endpoint in oncology clinical trials as a surrogate for overall survival. Traditionally, the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) have defined disease progression as a significant increase in the size of tumor lesions and the development of new lesions. However, some patients starting immunotherapy have shown initial increased size of tumor lesions followed by tumor regression, due to the unique mechanism of action of immunotherapies. This initial “pseudo-progression” could be classified inaccurately as disease progression, as evidenced by benefit from the treatment beyond progression approach ( JAMA Oncol 2016). The phase III CheckMate 025 trial of nivolumab versus everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma allowed treatment beyond progression if there was investigator-assessed clinical benefit and tolerability. The purpose of our study was to test if treatment duration for an immunotherapy was different from RECIST-defined PFS, and as such, could potentially explain the apparent lack of correlation between RECIST progression and overall survival shown in CheckMate 025. Methods: Using 1-year data from CheckMate 025, Kaplan–Meier methodology was used to estimate the median duration of PFS and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD). Stratified log-rank test was used to assess the difference in treatments. Results: For all patients, the median PFS with nivolumab was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.7–5.4 months) and median TTD was 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.6–7.7 months). For everolimus, the median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7–5.5 months) and median TTD was 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.7–4.6 months). Conclusions: Patients in CheckMate 025 had significantly longer survival with nivolumab than with everolimus, but with similar PFS. Our analysis demonstrated that while PFS was similar to TTD with everolimus, there was a significant difference between the 2 measures for nivolumab, suggesting that RECIST-defined PFS may not be the proper endpoint to define progression for immunotherapies. Further evaluation of the association of TTD and other immune-related progression endpoints with overall survival is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01668784.


2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 1429-1433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiyo Taneichi ◽  
Hiroyuki Fujiwara ◽  
Yoshifumi Takahashi ◽  
Yuji Takei ◽  
Shizuo Machida ◽  
...  

ObjectiveEndometrial cancer often coexists with uterine adenomyosis. However, little is known about the clinical characteristics of these cases. Thus, cases of endometrial cancer occurring with and without uterine adenomyosis were compared, and the influences of uterine adenomyosis on the clinical progress of endometrial cancer were examined.Materials and MethodsOf endometrial cancer patients who underwent hysterectomies in our facility from 2002 to 2011, we included only endometrioid adenocarcinoma patients in our study. The patients were divided into 2 groups, adenomyosis group and nonadenomyosis group, according to the presence/absence of uterine adenomyosis. Patient characteristics, stage, histopathological grade, muscle invasion, recurrence, and mortality were retrospectively compared and examined.ResultsThere were 362 cases of endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterine body, of which 121 (33.4%) and 241 cases (66.6%) were in the adenomyosis and nonadenomyosis group, respectively. There were no significant differences with respect to the disease stages or ratios of the histopathological grade between the 2 groups. In the adenomyosis group/nonadenomyosis group, 5-year progression-free survival for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I and II was 89.9%/93.7% and that for stages III and IV was 70.6%/62.0%; the 5-year overall survival was 100%/95.9% for FIGO stages I and II, and 88.0%/73.5% for stages III and IV. There were no significant between-group differences for either progression-free survival or overall survival. When limiting the results to only FIGO stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma, despite no grade variance between the 2 groups, a significant difference was observed in the ratios of outer-half muscle invasion between the adenomyosis and nonadenomyosis groups (19.5% [17/87] vs 10.1% [16/158], P < 0.05); however, the prognosis was similar in the 2 groups.ConclusionsUterine adenomyosis is associated with deep myometrial invasion in stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma; however, it did not affect the recurrence or mortality rates.


2012 ◽  
Vol 117 (5) ◽  
pp. 825-830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia J. Compton ◽  
Nadia N. Issa Laack ◽  
Laurence J. Eckel ◽  
David A. Schomas ◽  
Caterina Giannini ◽  
...  

Object Gangliogliomas comprise less than 1% of all brain tumors and occur most often in children. Therefore, there are a limited number of patients and data involving the use or role of adjuvant therapy after subtotal resections (STRs) of gangliogliomas. The objective of this study was to examine and review the Mayo Clinic experience of 88 patients with gangliogliomas, their follow-up, risk of recurrence, and the role of radiation therapy after STR or only biopsy. Methods Eighty-eight patients with gangliogliomas diagnosed between 1970 and 2007 were reviewed. Data on clinical outcomes and therapy received were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Results The median age at diagnosis was 19 years. The median potential follow-up as of June 2008 was 142 months (range 9–416 months). Fifteen-year overall survival was 94%, median PFS was 5.6 years, with a 10-year PFS rate of 37%. Progression-free survival was dramatically affected by extent of initial resection (p < 0.0001). Conclusions This single-institution retrospective series of patients with gangliogliomas is unique given its large cohort size with a long follow-up duration, and confirms the excellent long-term survival rate in this group. The study also shows the importance of resection extent on likelihood of recurrence. Patients with gangliogliomas who undergo STR or biopsy alone have poor PFS. Radiation therapy may delay time to progression in patients with unresectable disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document