New Concepts Of Antigenic Shift And Antigenic Drift In Influenza And Corona - A Review Of Literature

1987 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Hope-Simpson ◽  
D. B. Golubev

SUMMARYInfluenza A virus was discovered in 1933, and since then four major variants have caused all the epidemies of human influenza A. Each had an era of solo world prevalence until 1977 as follows: H0N1 (old style) strains until 1946. H1N1 (old style) strains until 1957, H2N2 strains until 1968. then H3N2 strains, which were joined in 1977 by a renewed prevalence of H1N1 (old style) strains.Serological studies show that H2N2 strains probably had had a previous era of world prevalence during the last quarter of the nineteenth century, and had then been replaced by H3N2 strains from about 1900 to 1918. From about 1907 the H3N2 strains had been joined, as now. by H1N1 (old style) strains until both had been replaced in 1918 by a fifth major variant closely related to swine influenza virus A/Hswine1N1 (old style), which had then had an era of solo world prevalence in mankind until about 1929. when it had been replaced by the H0N1 strains that were first isolated in 1933.Eras of prevalence of a major variant have usually been initiated by a severe pandemic followed at intervals of a year or two by successive epidemics in each of which the nature of the virus is usually a little changed (antigenic drift), but not enough to permit frequent recurrent infections during the same era. Changes of major variant (antigenic shift) are large enough to permit reinfection. At both major and minor changes the strains of the previous variant tend to disappear and to be replaced within a single season, worldwide in the case of a major variant, or in the area of prevalence of a previous minor variant.Pandemics, epidemics and antigenic variations all occur seasonally, and influenza and its viruses virtually disappear from the population of any locality between epidemics, an interval of many consecutive months. A global view, however, shows influenza continually present in the world population, progressing each year south and then north, thus crossing the equator twice yearly around the equinoxes, the tropical monsoon periods. Influenza arrives in the temperate latitudes in the colder months, about 6 months separating its arrival in the two hemispheres.None of this behaviour is explained by the current concept that the virus is surviving like measles virus by direct spread from the sick providing endless chains of human influenza A. A number of other aspects of the human host influenza A virus relationship encountered in household outbreaks are among the list of 20 difficulties that are inexplicable by the current concept of direct spread.Alternative concepts have usually been designed to counter particular difficulties and are incompatible with other features of influenzal behaviour in mankind. The new concept detailed in the appendix provides simple explanations for most if not all of the difficulties. It proposes that influenza A virus cannot normally be transmitted during the illness because it too rapidly becomes non-infectious in a mode of persistence or latency in the human host. Many months or a year or two later it is reactivated by a seasonally mediated stimulus which, like all seasonal phenomena, is ultimately dependent on variations in solar radiation caused by the tilt of the plane of earth's rotation in relation to that of its circumsolar orbit. The carriers, who are always widely seeded throughout the world population, become briefly infectious and their non-immune companions, if infected, comprise the whole of the next epidemic. The reactivated virus particles must encounter the immunity they have engendered in the carrier, thus allowing minor mutants an advantage over virions identical with the parent virus, and so favouring antigenic drift and automatic disappearance of predecessor and prompt seasonal replacement. Antigenic shift and recycling of major variants may also be explained by virus latency in the human host.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangam Banerjee

In this article we have put down certain facts reported so far and raised some pertinent questions to understand the progress of Covid-19 disease. We have discussed the important role of innate immunity to tame Covid-19. Basics of innate and adaptive immunity has been discussed for general audience. Subsequently, we have discussed why immunity fails leading to ‘immunity escape’. We have asked and tried to address few concerns such as: Can vaccines drive the pathogen to mutate to a higher virulent strain?; Evolution of more virulent pathogens; Evidence of new variants; Evidence of variants evading immunity; Antibody cocktail demand for new design of vaccine; Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 evades T cell responses; Imperfect leaky vaccine; Complete Mapping of Mutations to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-Binding Domain; Where is the originally identified SARS-CoV-2 (labeled as D614) found first in Wuhan, China; Deletion of spike glycoprotein itself: How to fix missing?; What is the present status?; To be or not to be vaccinated?; The challenge of antigenic drift and antigenic shift; What causes variant and can it be controlled?; A new dawn in the fight against the disease, to be or not to be worried?; Judging the risk “risk management”; Prophylactic measures for covid 19: Changing Diet and life style; Maneuvering the pandemic and finally the “Take away message”.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Christopher Chew ◽  
Supriya Mannepalli

The world of microbiology is vast in nature, and viruses continue to be a subset containing a lot of unknowns. Initial infection with certain viruses, such as varicella zoster virus and measles, allows for development of lifelong immunity; on the other hand, the influenza virus requires yearly vaccination, which may not provide adequate immunity. This can be attributed to antigenic shift and drift, rendering previously made antibodies ineffective against new strains of influenza. This article describes six cases of patients who presented with mild acute respiratory symptoms and tested positive for COVID-19 virus. After recovering from initial illness and being asymptomatic for several months, they developed recurrence of acute respiratory symptoms and, again, tested positive for COVID-19 virus, in more severe form than initial presentation. In the current state of the world, COVID-19 has created a lot of unknowns in the medical community, including patient presentation and treatment. COVID-19 research is evolving daily, but many questions remained unanswered. “Will a sufficient antibody response be created by the human body in those infected with COVID-19 and how long will that immunity last?” “Will antigenic drift occur quickly allowing the virus to evade previously made antibodies?” During initial surveillance of the COVID-19 virus, we were expecting development of an immune response comparable to SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV, given the viral similarities. Unfortunately, based on our observations, this may not necessarily be true and will be further discussed in the presented article.


JMS SKIMS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed Mudasir Qadri

Acute respiratory tract infection accompanying systemic symptoms are fever, malaise, coryza and myalgia. It is caused by influenza virus belonging to the orthomyxoviridae group. Three types of Influenza viruses occur in humans i.e. Influenza A, B and C All the known pandemics were caused by influenza A strains as it is known to change its genetic makeup by antigenic “shift” and “drift”. Influenza B is comparatively a genetically stable virus without any animal reservoir and Influenza C causes a milder disease. There is one more type, influenza D which occurs exclusively in cattle. The type A viruses are further divided into various subtypes based on the hemagglutinin “H” and neuraminidase “N” antigen expressed on their surface. There are 18 subtypes of hemagglutinin and 11 subtypes of neuraminidase. Influenza epidemics affect 10-20% of the global population on an average each year and are typically the result of minor antigenic variations of the virus or antigenic drift, which occur often in influenza A virus. On the other hand, pandemics which are associated with higher mortality appear at longer and varying intervals (often many decades) as a consequence of major genetic reassortment of the virus (antigenic shift) or adaptation of an avian or swine virus to humans (as with the pandemic H1N1 virus of 1918).


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. E. Navia

The occurrence of viral pandemics depends on several factors, including their stochasticity, and the prediction may not be possible. However, we show that the historical register of pandemics coincides with the epoch of the last seven grand solar minima of the Holocene era. We also included those more recent, and some pandemics incidence forecasts for the coming years, with the probable advent of a new Dalton-like solar minimum with onset in 2006. Taking into account that cosmic-rays and consequently the neutrons produced by them in the atmosphere are in an inverse relationship with the solar activity. We show the possibility of obtention the pandemics occurrence rates considering that they are due to mutations induced by the neutron capture upon the presence of hydrogen in the viral proteins, producing radical changes, an “antigenic-shift”, forming a new type of viral strains. Since the cross-section of neutron capture is small, the occurrence of an antigenic-shift requires a substantial increase in the flow of thermal neutrons, and this is more feasible during the epochs of the grand solar minima when the cosmic-rays fluence is highest. On the other hand, the rate of occurrence of most common viral outbreaks (epidemics) suggests a link with the scattering of neutrons and other secondary cosmic rays, causing small changes, an “antigenic-drift”. In addition to being influenced by seasonal conditions, we also show the solar modulation antigenic-drifts by the 11-year solar cycle. We present details of these observations.


Author(s):  
M. R. Edwards ◽  
J. D. Mainwaring

Although the general ultrastructure of Cyanidium caldarium, an acidophilic, thermophilic alga of questionable taxonomic rank, has been extensively studied (see review of literature in reference 1), some peculiar ultrastructural features of the chloroplast of this alga have not been noted by other investigators.Cells were collected and prepared for thin sections at the Yellowstone National Park and were also grown in laboratory cultures (45-52°C; pH 2-5). Fixation (glutaraldehyde-osmium), dehydration (ethanol), and embedding (Epon 812) were accomplished by standard methods. Replicas of frozenfracture d- etched cells were obtained in a Balzers apparatus. In addition, cells were examined after disruption in a French Press.


Author(s):  
Arthur V. Jones

In comparison with the developers of other forms of instrumentation, scanning electron microscope manufacturers are among the most conservative of people. New concepts usually must wait many years before being exploited commercially. The field emission gun, developed by Albert Crewe and his coworkers in 1968 is only now becoming widely available in commercial instruments, while the innovative lens designs of Mulvey are still waiting to be commercially exploited. The associated electronics is still in general based on operating procedures which have changed little since the original microscopes of Oatley and his co-workers.The current interest in low-voltage scanning electron microscopy will, if sub-nanometer resolution is to be obtained in a useable instrument, lead to fundamental changes in the design of the electron optics. Perhaps this is an opportune time to consider other fundamental changes in scanning electron microscopy instrumentation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document