scholarly journals EFFECT OF CHICKEN FEATHER WASTE ON CONCRETE MIXING ON COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AND FLEXURAL STRENGTH

ASTONJADRO ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 162
Author(s):  
Sutarno Sutarno ◽  
Diah Rahmawati ◽  
Hendra Masvika
Keyword(s):  
Compressive Strength ◽  
Flexural Strength ◽  
Concrete Mixture ◽  
Optimum Level ◽  
Chicken Feather ◽  
Chicken Feathers ◽  
Feather Waste ◽  
Chicken Feather Waste ◽  
Feather Fiber ◽  
Chicken Feather Fiber

<p>The materials that are often used in the world of construction both in bridges, water structures, and buildings is concrete. The characteristic of concrete is that it is strong withstand compressive forces, but weak in resisting tensile forces. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the characteristics of the concrete. Improving the characteristics of the concrete can be done by applying a fiber mixture to the concrete. There are two types of fibers used as a concrete mixture, namely synthetic fibers and natural fibers. The research conducted was concrete using chicken feather waste fiber which was categorized as natural fiber with a fiber length of 3 cm, the grade of the concrete used was 20 MPa and the percentage of additional chicken feather waste was 0%, 1%, and 2% of the volume of concrete. The test is the compressive strength and flexural strength of the concrete using a specimen cylinder 15x30 cm and beam 15x15x60 cm. Each percentage of chicken feather waste that is used as a concrete mixture is 5 samples. From the test results, it was found that the concrete with the addition of 0% chicken feathers obtained an average compressive strength value of 200.78 kg/cm<sup>2</sup>, concrete with the addition of 1% chicken feather fiber, the compressive strength value increased to 215.09 kg/cm<sup>2</sup> and concrete with the addition of chicken feather fiber 2 % has a compressive strength value of 197.54 kg/cm<sup>2</sup>. Meanwhile, the flexural strength values obtained were 24.00 kg/cm<sup>2</sup>, 23.03 kg/cm<sup>2</sup>, 21.08 kg/cm<sup>2</sup> for the percentage of 0%, 1% and 2% fibers, respectively. This shows that the concrete with the addition of bristle fibers the chicken has decreased the compressive strength value when it has reached its optimum level. While the addition of the percentage of chicken feathers to the flexural strength value does not have much effect on the flexural strength of the concrete which tends to decrease. This is influenced by the characteristics of the chicken feathers which are difficult to bond with the concrete as well as being easy to absorb water, so that the concrete takes a longer time to dry after the maintenance of the concrete.</p>

scholarly journals Hubungan Antara Arah dan Susunan Bulu Ayam Potong terhadap Kekuatan Lentur Komposit

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (01) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Arga Tri Hantoro ◽  
Syamsul Hadi
Keyword(s):  
Compressive Strength ◽  
Yield Strength ◽  
Broiler Chicken ◽  
Bending Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Chicken Feather ◽  
Chicken Feathers ◽  
Feather Waste ◽  
Production And Consumption ◽  
Chicken Feather Waste

The amount of chicken production and consumption produces large amounts of waste as well. The amount of available chicken feather waste is not used properly so it needs an alternative to utilize chicken feather waste to be something more useful and innovative, one of which is to waste broiler chicken feathers. The main objective of this study was to obtain a variety of composite boards made from resin with broiler chicken feather filler instead of tile tiles. The making of composite specimens from polyester resin with yucalac 157 BQTN-EX type by adding different prepared chicken feather fillers in order to find out the best flexural and compressive strength from one variation of chicken feather filler arrangement. Composite specimens were made with the standard ASTM-D size 7264. Analysis of the test data using the TWO-WAY ANOVA approach ¬ to determine the effect of the transmission of chicken feather filler on flexural strength and press.The results of the flexural test obtained the lowest yield strength with a composition in the direction of 0 ° worth 11.3 MPa and the highest yield strength with a 45 ° alternating composition worth 54.5 MPa. For the compressive test results obtained the lowest compressive strength with a random composition of 23.9 MPa and the highest compressive strength of 34.5 Mpa. For the bending test and press on the tiles, the value of 1.1 MPa and 0.29 MPa means that the composite value is higher than the value of tile tiles.

ACOUSTIC PANEL CHICKEN FEATHER WASTE ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ansarullah ◽  
Ramli Rahim ◽  
Baharuddin Hamzah ◽  
Asniawaty Kusno ◽  
Muhammad Tayeb
Keyword(s):  
Animal Feed ◽  
Environmentally Friendly ◽  
Selling Price ◽  
Chicken Feather ◽  
Chicken Feathers ◽  
The Road ◽  
Feather Waste ◽  
Chicken Feather Waste ◽  
Almost All ◽  
The Impact

Chicken feathers are the result of waste from slaughterhouses and billions ofkilograms of waste produced by various kinds of poultry processing. This hal is a veryserious problem for the environment because it causes the impact of pollution. Hasmany utilization of chicken feather waste such as making komocen, accessories,upholstery materials, making brackets to the manufacture of animal feed but from theresults of this activity cannot reduce the production of chicken feathers that hiscontinuously increase every year. This is due to the fact that the selling price of chickenmeat has been reached by consumers with middle to upper economic levels. This caneasily be a chicken menu in almost all restaurants and restaurants to the food stalls onthe side of the road. An alternative way of utilizing chicken feathers is to makecomposite materials in the form of panels. Recent studies have shown that the pvacmaterial can be utilized as a mixing and adhesive material with mashed or groundfeathered composites to form a panel that can later be used as an acoustic material.The test results show that the absorption of chicken feathers and pvac glue into panelscan absorb sound well with an absorption coefficient of 0.59, light. This result is veryeconomical so it is worth to be recommended as an acoustic material. Apart from theresults of research methods carried out is one of the environmentally friendly activitiesin particular the handling of waste problems

scholarly journals Chicken Feather as a Fiber Source for Nonwoven Insulation

1999 ◽  
Vol os-8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1558925099OS-80
Author(s):  
Weiqin Ye ◽  
Roy M. Broughton ◽  
Joseph B. Hess
Keyword(s):  
Fibrous Material ◽  
Polyester Fiber ◽  
Processing Plant ◽  
Chicken Feather ◽  
Textile Processing ◽  
Chicken Feathers ◽  
Feather Fiber ◽  
Insulating Properties ◽  
Chicken Feather Fiber

“Raw” chicken feathers directly from a processing plant were washed with detergent and dried. Cleaned feathers were mechanically worked to separate fibrous material from the quills and ultimately classified into two components: a fibrous material suitable for further textile processing, and a residue containing large feathers and pieces of quill. The chicken feather fiber was blended with binder fiber (sheath/core construction) and made into nonwoven batting. The battings show effective insulating properties when compared with other battings made from goose down and polyester fiber.

Chicken feather fiber-based bio-piezoelectric energy harvester: an efficient green energy source for flexible electronics

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 1857-1866
Author(s):  
Epsita Kar ◽  
Moumita Barman ◽  
Soumen Das ◽  
Ankita Das ◽  
Pallab Datta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Source ◽  
Flexible Electronics ◽  
Energy Harvester ◽  
Green Energy ◽  
Chicken Feather ◽  
Chicken Feathers ◽  
Piezoelectric Energy ◽  
Feather Fiber ◽  
Chicken Feather Fiber

We report the prototype fabrication of a flexible, biocompatible bio-piezoelectric energy harvester using keratin-enriched chicken feathers.

scholarly journals The Use of Chicken Feather Waste as an Adsorbent for Crude Oil Clean Up from Polluted Water

2020 ◽  
pp. 43-53
Author(s):  
A. A. Okoya ◽  
N. O. Ochor ◽  
A. B. Akinyele ◽  
O. O. Olaiya
Keyword(s):  
Activated Carbon ◽  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Crude Oil ◽  
Polluted Water ◽  
Chicken Feather ◽  
Initial Concentration ◽  
Chicken Feathers ◽  
Feather Waste ◽  
Chicken Feather Waste ◽  
Scanning Electron

The present study aims to evaluate the use of chicken feather waste (CFW) as an absorbent for the removal of crude oil from crude oil polluted water (CPW) in comparison with commercial activated carbon (CAC) ) in Nigeria. Oil pollution, can be as a result of natural disaster like earthquake, volcanic eruption, hurricane etc., or as a result of man’s interference for example terrorism, oil bunkering, tanker and oil rig accidents. CAC have been use as adsorbent for crude oil removal from the water environment but very expensive, hence the need to develop cheaper and environment friendly adsorbents from some agricultural waste which could constitute nuisance in the environment. The pulverized chicken feathers were characterized using Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometer (RBS) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) for elemental composition and the determination of surface morphology, respectively. The agricultural wastes used for this study was chicken feathers. The CFW was sourced from a local market at Ile-Ife, Osun State Nigeria, while commercial activated carbon was purchased from Uche-El Water Limited Company. The pulverized CFW was characterized using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Particle-induced X-ray Emission (PIXE). Elemental composition of the CFW showed the presence of Na, Mg, Al, P, K, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Cu, Zn, Sr, Zr, Cd, Sn, Pb and Si within the range 12.8 - 22566.3 ppm with agglomeration of particle. The results of the scanning electron microscope clearly showed the surface texture and morphological characteristics of CFW. The efficiencies of adsorption increased with increasing initial concentration for the two adsorbents except initial concentration of 20/30 which decreased in the case of CAC. The adsorption efficiencies for all the initial concentrations for the adsorbents is significantly different (F=16.114; P=0.000) at confidence interval of 0.05. CFW showed greater adsorption efficiency of 99.95%, followed by CAC which showed an adsorption potential of 95.08% (P=0.577 > C.I=0.05). The adsorption efficiencies obtained for the chicken feather compare very well with the activated carbon and even better as the dosages of the chicken feather increased. The result of the study shows that chicken feathers is an efficient sorbent for the mopping of crude oil spill in water.

Effects of Loading Percentage of Polyurethane in Lightweight Concrete

2013 ◽  
Vol 357-360 ◽  
pp. 1082-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamarul Aini Mohd Sari ◽  
Sohif Mat ◽  
Khairiah Haji Badri ◽  
Muhammad Fauzi Mohd Zain
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Conductivity ◽  
Compressive Strength ◽  
Lightweight Concrete ◽  
Palm Kernel ◽  
Physical And Mechanical Properties ◽  
Concrete Mixture ◽  
Experimental Program ◽  
Polymer Concrete ◽  
Optimum Level ◽  
Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate

An experimental program was performed to obtain the density, compressive strength, and thermal conductivity of palm-based lightweight concrete. Palm-based polyurethane (PU) particles were used as lightweight aggregates in creating concrete systems. Concrete systems contain palm kernel oil-based polyol (PKO-p) reacted with 2,4-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI). In this study, polymer concrete was improved to achieve the optimum level of PU with the lowest possible density. The PU particles in the concrete mixture comprised of 1% to 5% w/w with density of less than 1800 kg/m3. The PU particles were 5 mm in size. The ratio of PKO-p to MDI was set at 1:1 and the loading of the concrete mixture was set at 3% w/w to produce lightweight concrete. The resulting concrete has excellent compressive strength (17.5 MPa) and thermal conductivity (0.24 W/mK). Results show that the PU particle dosage has the most significant effect on the physical and mechanical properties of concrete.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document