scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pemuda Dari Kejahatan Terorisme Di Wilayah Hukum Provinsi Jambi

Wajah Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 388
Author(s):  
Ferdricka Nggeboe ◽  
Reza Iswanto ◽  
Sriayu Indah Puspita
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Provincial Government ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Government ◽  
Data Collection Technique

Research on legal protection against youth from terrorism crimes in the jurisdiction of Jambi Province aims to determine the form of protection from the government and law enforcement in Jambi Province. The object of his research is legal protection for youth. The problem in this case is how the legal protection of youth from terrorism crimes in the jurisdiction of Jambi Province. The research method is normative so that this research is more descriptive qualitative in nature and sourced from literature. The approach is a case approach and the data collection technique is document study and data analysis is done qualitatively. The result of his research is that legal protection for youth from terrorism crimes in the jurisdiction of Jambi Province is carried out by means of preventive means, namely the government issues legal rules related to terrorism crimes, namely Law Number 5 of 2018 to protect youth who are victims of terrorism crimes, then law enforcement officers and The Counter-Terrorism Communication Forum conducts outreach / counseling related to terrorism crimes, while the repressive form is the Jambi Provincial government and law enforcement officials to ensnare perpetrators of terrorism crimes by imposing criminal sanctions as regulated in Law Number 5 of 2018 concerning Amendments to Law Number 15 2003 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2002 Concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism into Law.

scholarly journals Enforcement of Law of Copyright Infringement and Forgery with the Rise of the Digital Music Industry

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 223
Author(s):  
Nevey Varida Ariani
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Music Industry ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Infringement ◽  
Digital Music ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

The current pandemic situation encourages musicians to be productive in creating digital works such as songs and music so that their creative works can produce moral and economic values. However, infringement and forgery of digital music works are rampant. The issue of royalties is still a problem in the digital music industry in Indonesia, including new challenges to the role of aggregators and Collective Management Organization. The problem of this research is how the enforcement of the law of copyright infringement and forgery is with the emergence of the digital industry. This research used a qualitative method with a normative juridical approach. The results of the research showed that the increasing and complicated law enforcement related to digital music copyright is influenced by regulations such as complaint offense that hindered the law enforcement. The process of coordination and supervision between the Civil Servant Investigator (PPNS) of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property and other law enforcement officers needs to be improved. Law enforcement includes payment of compensation, termination of certain activities that cause harm to creators and owners of related rights, obligation to withdraw from circulation, revocation of business licenses, termination of business activities, and the last resort of ultimum remedium in the form of criminal sanctions. Dissemination of information and knowledge regarding IPR law and its derivative regulations including Government Regulation No. 50 Year 2021 carried out by the government is part of the legal protection of the society to increase public legal awareness in the digital era. 

ANALISIS ABORSI DALAM PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NO. 61 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG KESEHATAN REPRODUKSI

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ferry Fadzlul Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Reproductive Health ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Rape Victims ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Community Factors ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Government

Abortion is a social phenomenon that is increasingly alarming. The concern is not without reason, because so far the behavior of abortion many negative effects both for themselves the perpetrators and the wider community. With the passing of the Government Regulation No. 61 Year 2014 on Reproductive Health still raises the pros and cons in the middle of the community. The approach used to address the problem that the above problems are normative juridical approach. Based on the results of the study need to decriminalize abortion in Government Regulation No. 61 Year 2014 on Reproductive Health which has the goal of creating the legal basis for abortion and the experts who helped him as an indication of a medical emergency or pregnancy due to rape, and factors inhibiting the decriminalization of abortion is legal factors themselves, law enforcement officials factors, factors facilities or infrastructure, community factors, and cultural factors. Suggestion that the author should the government needs to review the Government Regulation No. 61 Year 2014 on Reproductive Health in particular Article 31 and Article 34 within the limited evidence of rape victims in just 40 days because of the time limit is not relative to the law enforcement agencies to prove it, as well as regarding the evidentiary aspects of pregnancy due to rape victims in order to avoid an impression of legitimizing the act of abortion in any form. Keywords: Abortion, , Reproductive Health

ANALISIS DEKRIMINALISASI ABORSI DALAM PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NO. 61 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG KESEHATAN REPRODUKSI

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Ferry Fadzul Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Reproductive Health ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Rape Victims ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Community Factors ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Government

Abortion is a social phenomenon that is increasingly alarming. The concern is not without reason, because so far the behavior of abortion many negative effects both for themselves the perpetrators and the wider community. With the passing of the Government Regulation No. 61 Year 2014 on Reproductive Health still raises the pros and cons in the middle of the community. The approach used to address the problem that the above problems are normative juridical approach. Based on the results of the study need to decriminalize abortion in Government Regulation No. 61 Year 2014 on Reproductive Health which has the goal of creating the legal basis for abortion and the experts who helped him as an indication of a medical emergency or pregnancy due to rape, and factors inhibiting the decriminalization of abortion is legal factors themselves, law enforcement officials factors, factors facilities or infrastructure, community factors, and cultural factors. Suggestion that the author should the government needs to review the Government Regulation No. 61 Year 2014 on Reproductive Health in particular Article 31 and Article 34 within the limited evidence of rape victims in just 40 days because of the time limit is not relative to the law enforcement agencies to prove it, as well as regarding the evidentiary aspects of pregnancy due to rape victims in order to avoid an impression of legitimizing the act of abortion in any form.

scholarly journals LEGAL PROTECTION FOR CONSUMERS IN TRANSACTIONS FOR E-COMMERCE

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Bing Yusuf
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Community Members ◽  
Daily Consumption ◽  
Business World ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Technological Developments ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Subjects

The development of information and electronic technology every time becomes faster, supported by the great curiosity of humans to make information technology and electronics as daily consumption. Technology penetrated into the business world pampering the community with ease of accessibility through ecommerce systems. People enjoy buying and selling facilities through e-commerce, but most people forget that every thing has a positive and negative side. The majority of people enjoy the convenience and convenience of e-commerce to access and obtain the desired items, but not a few community members have become victims of e-commerce transactions. The government acting as a regulator has issued a lot of laws and regulations, but until now all forms of injustice, fraud, and even crime through ecommerce buying and selling have not been completely blocked. Institutions established specifically to defend disadvantaged consumers also do not yet have adequate specifications to protect disadvantaged consumers through e-commerce buying and selling. The capabilities and facilities possessed by law enforcement officers are still limited, there are still many perpetrators of injustice, fraud and crime in buying and selling e-commerce that are still moving and operating freely. Based on the reality of e-commerce buying and selling formulated a problem regarding how legal protection is actually for consumers in buying and selling e-commerce? What obstacles are faced by consumers to get legal protection in buying and selling e-commerce? How is the legal effort made by consumers who are disadvantaged in buying and selling ecommerce? Using positive law analyzed with reality that occurs in the community it can be concluded that e-commerce buying and selling is arguably a new thing so that it demands for the whole legal system and legal subjects to adapt to technological developments and the progress of civilization

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Perantara Narkotika (Study Putusan No.14/Pid.Sus Anak.2015/PN.Dps)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-199
Author(s):  
Rezky Ayu Saraswati ◽  
I Nyoman Sujana ◽  
Diah Gayatri Sudibya
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
District Court ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Moment

The rise of drug trafficking involving children as narcotics couriers is a problem that needs serious attention from both the government, law enforcement and the community. Children who commit crimes must continue to obtain legal protection in the best interests of the child. Child protection is contained in Law number 11 of 2012 concerning the juvenile justice system, where at the moment children can become narcotics abuse even as narcotics brokers with the rampant abuse of narcotics for all circles both in Indonesia and in the international world. The formulation of the problem raised is how is the basis for judges' consideration in imposing criminal sanctions on children as intermediaries for narcotics? And what is the legal protection of children as an intermediary for narcotics? The problems to be discussed will be examined based on normative perspectives and the legislative approach to the decisions of the Denpasar District Court No. 14 / Pid.Sus Anak / 2015 / PN. Dps, that the judge considers that the accused child has committed narcotics crimes by being charged Law number 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics, which can be sentenced to a minimum of 5 years and a maximum of 20 years and can be subject to fines. Legal protection for children is carried out by judges by imposing criminal training on employment in a generation of Indonesian foundations, solely so that children can carry out their activities as usual when they return to the community and do not disturb their psychic rights and can increase their skills in children. The child does not return to committing a crime.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak yang Menjadi Korban Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan di Bawah Umur

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Agustinus Yitsak Mannuel Kapitan ◽  
I Made Sepud ◽  
I Nyoman Sujana
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Sexual Intercourse ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Medical Assistance ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Sense Of Security ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Body And Soul ◽  
The Right

Legal protection is a legal effort that must be provided by law enforcement officials to provide a sense of security to the community both body and soul from interference and threats from any party. The protection of children who are victims of moral crimes is regulated in Law Number 23 of 2002 jo and Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection. This research was conducted with the aim of describing the legal protection of a child who is the victim of criminal acts of sexual intercourse and the criminal sanctions against the perpetrators of the sexual intercourse crime on a child. This research was conducted using the normative legal research method. Based on the results of the research and discussion, the legal protection for children who are victims of criminal acts of intercourse is regulated in Law No. 35/2014. Children who are victims are given protection in the form of medical assistance, psycho-rehabilitation, the right to restitution, the right to compensation. Criminal sanctions against the perpetrator of the criminal act of child sexual intercourse in decision number 58 / Pid.Sus / 2015 / PN.Tab, the perpetrator was sentenced to 7 (seven) years in prison and a fine of 150,000,000.00. Seeing the perpetrator's actions were very cruel, robbing other people's honor, namely his own daughter, the punishment that should be given to the perpetrator is the maximum punishment. If the fine cannot be paid, the defendant's sentence will be increased to 6 (six) months.

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI RESTITUSI ANAK SEBAGAI BENTUK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI ANAK KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA DI PROVINSI RIAU

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-42
Author(s):  
Dewi Lisnawati
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Sexual Assault ◽  
Sexual Violence ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Child Victims ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Victims Of Crime

ABSTRAKSetiap anak yang menjadi korban tindak pidana berhak mendapatkan restitusi seperti yang tertuang di dalam peraturan pelaksana dari Pasal 71 D Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak No. 35 Tahun 2014 yakni Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 43 Tahun 2017 tentang Pelaksanaan Restitusi Bagi Anak Yang Menjadi Korban Tindak Pidana. Pelaksanaan restitusi kepada korban hanya ditujukan kepada beberapa tindak pidana tertentu saja termasuk tindak pidana kekerasan seksual. Diterbitkannya Peraturan Pemerintah tersebut bertujuan untuk memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap korban khususnya anak-anak atas penerapan hak restitusi. Penelitian ini termasuk tipologi penelitian hukum empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan restitusi bagi anak yang menjadi korban tindak pidana kekerasan seksual di Provinsi Riau berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 43 tahun 2017 belum berjalan dengan baik. Hal ini disebabkan oleh beberapa kendala yakni kurangnya kesadaran dari aparat penegak hukum untuk mendorong terlaksananya restitusi bagi anak yang menjadi korban tindak pidana, administirasi pengajuan permohonan restitusi yang rumit, dan kendala restitusi yang tidak dibayarkan dan ketentuan dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 43 Tahun 2017 yang kurang jelas. Fokus penelitian ini adalah penerapan restitusi pada anak korban tindak pidana berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 43 Tahun 2017.Kata kunci: restitusi; anak korban tindak pidana; kekerasan seksualABSTRAKEvery child who is a victim of a crime is entitled to get restitution as stipulated in the implementing regulations of Article 71 D of the Child Protection Act No. 35 of 2014 namely Government Regulation Number 43 of 2017 concerning Implementation of Restitution for Children Who Become Victims of Criminal Acts. The implementation of restitution to victims is only aimed at a number of specific criminal acts including sexual violence. The issuance of this Government Regulation aims to provide legal protection for victims, especially children, on the application of restitution rights so that they can run well. This research is a typology of empirical legal research. The results showed that the implementation of restitution for children who were victims of sexual violence in Riau Province based on Government Regulation No. 43 of 2017 has not gone well. This is caused by several constraints namely lack of awareness from law enforcement officials to encourage the implementation of restitution for children who are victims of criminal acts, administration of submission of complex restitution applications, and restitution constraints that are not paid and the unclear provisions in Government Regulation Number 43 of 2017. The focus of this research is on the provisions stipulated in Government Regulation Number 43 of 2017 concerning the implementation of restitution for children who are victims of criminal acts.Keywords: restitution; child victims of crime; sexual assault

scholarly journals Urgensi Saksi Pelaku yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator) dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 179-185
Author(s):  
Ni Luh Made Dwi Pusparini ◽  
A. A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Life ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
Major Influence ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Article 5

The State of Indonesia appears as a State of Law meaning that State power is exercised according to applicable laws so the law applies to all aspects of social life that lead to the creation of an objective of the law. As a consequence of the weakness of the law in the State of Indonesia there are still a large number of crimes that are developing, including the criminal acts of corruption as one of organized crimes. Not only have corruption crimes developed in Indonesia but also in other countries. As a result, in tackling the emergence of the criminal acts of corruption, it is necessary to have perpetrators cooperating as witnesses with law enforcement authorities in terms of revealing the main perpetrators and others so it has a major influence on the corruption case. Using the normative legal research method, this research examines the urgency of regulating witnesses of collaborating perpetrators in a the criminal act of corruption and the criminal sanctions against witnesses of collaborating perpetrators in criminal acts of corruption. The results show that in positive Indonesian law there are regulations regarding Justice Collaborator in Government Regulation No 71 Article 5 Paragraph (2) of 2000 regulating the rights and legal protection of every witness, criminal reporter / witness who reports. Whereas judges’ considerations in imposing criminal sanctions on justice collaborators in the criminal acts of corruption which are based on Law No. 20 of 2001 related to Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradicating Corruption Crimes and is contained in the Supreme Court Circular No. 4 of 2011 in specific actions regarding Criminal Sanctions namely providing relief in other forms of protection.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Karya Cipta Lagu “Hilang” Atas Tindakan Perbanyakan Atas Karya Cipta Tanpa Perjanjian Lisensi (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 192 PK/Pdt.Sus/2010)

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-113
Author(s):  
Khairil Fahmi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Financial Gain ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Human Creativity ◽  
The Government ◽  
Role Of The Government ◽  
Copyright Piracy

The development of human creativity in creating a work that can have economic value requires legal protection. This protection is very important to encourage the creative enthusiasm of people. There are some basic principles of the copyright law protection of the sound recordings results in its protection that need to be considered, such as what is protected by copyright is an idea that has been tangible and original. As a result of law enforcement efforts against piracy song or music copyright is regulated in the Article 72 where the law enforcement efforts by the government by providing criminal sanctions and civil sanctions with claims for compensation, the Supreme Court considers the reasons of the Petitioner for Review that these reasons cannot be justified, because the judex juris did not commit an error or a real mistake in deciding the a quo case . In general, the forms of Song or Music copyright piracy are divided into several categories, namely Pirate, Couterfeit and Bootleging. The motive for the piracy is for commercial interests in the form of financial gain. The role of the government in law enforcement dealing with piracy is to provide strict sanctions in the form of confiscation and destruction of goods resulting from Copyright piracy carried out by the government. Keywords: Legal Protection, Copyright, Songs, Propagation Actions, License.

scholarly journals Legal Protection for Victims of Corporate Crimes In The Employment Field at Palembang City

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Burhanuddin Burhanuddin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Corporate Executives ◽  
Alternative System ◽  
Criminal Penalties ◽  
The City ◽  
Economic Considerations

Criminal sanctions which are imposed on corporations committing employment crimes as provided inArticle 185 paragraph (1) of the Manpower Act are sufficiently burdensome, both for corporations andcorporate administrators, as the cumulative and alternative system of criminal imposition of criminalpenalties. It means that the corporate executives who commit crimes may be subject to imprisonmentor criminal penalties and both imprisonment and fine. But in practice law enforcement officers do notdirectly impose criminal sanctions in the form of imprisonment to corporate executives who commitcrimes in the field of employment in the city of Palembang. This is due to the tendency of lawenforcement officers to use the principle of subsidiarity, namely the criminal law placed in the ultimumremendium position, on the grounds of economic considerations, so that sanctions are imposed onlyadministrative sanctions and criminal penalties and close the normative rights of labor only. DOI: 10.15408/jch.v5i2.7087

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document