Main stages of establishment of farms in independent Ukraine

2021 ◽  
pp. 125-132
Author(s):  
M. Dolynska
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Functional System ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Family Farms ◽  
Peasant Farmer ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Natural Person ◽  
The Status ◽  
Logical Semantic

Purpose. The aim of the article is to outline the evolution of the formation of farms from peasant (farmer) farms to family farms during 1991-2021 in independent Ukraine; to distinguish separate stages of development of various agricultural formations, which were called "farms" in independent Ukraine. Methodology. The methodology covers a comprehensive analysis and generalization of available scientific and theoretical material and the formation of relevant conclusions and recommendations. The following methods of scientific cognition were used during the research: comparative-legal, logical-semantic, functional, system-structural, and logical-normative. Results. In the course of the research, the historical and legal analysis of the legal status of the most common types of agribusiness entities such as peasant farms, family farms of independent Ukraine is carried out. Scientific novelty. Having analyzed the development of farming in Ukraine during 1991-2021, five main stages of the development of farming in independent Ukraine are determined. The author states that the main types of farms in Ukraine since 2017 are: a farm-legal entity and a farm without the status of a legal entity, which is registered as a natural person-entrepreneur. Members of one family who have established a farm in the form of a family farm based on registration of a natural person-entrepreneur are co-entrepreneurs of the above-mentioned family farm.Practical significance. The results of the research can be used in lawmaking and law enforcement during the preparation of normative and legislative acts on the legal regulation of farming.

Peculiarities of Individual Judicial Regulation of Relations with Participation of Peasant (Farm) farms

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 27-33
Author(s):  
V.A. Chirkova
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Form ◽  
Peasant Farmer ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
Peasant Farm ◽  
Legal Document ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Law

The legal regulation of relations with the participation of peasant (farmer) farms is complicated by the absence of a single legal act that would consistently cover all the rules governing the creation and activities of known types of peasant farms, which include: a sole peasant farm represented by an individual entrepreneur, a contractual association of citizens without the formation of a legal entity and peasant farms as the legal form of a legal entity. Individual judicial regulation, possessing a sign of feedback for legal regulation, can help increase its effectiveness. The purpose is to study the characteristics of individual judicial regulation of relations with the participation of peasant (farmer) enterprises on the example of individual judicial acts, as well as suggesting ways to resolve the problems identified. To achieve the stated goal, the following tasks were set: – designation of peasant farms confirmed by court decisions on disputes involving them; – the identification and study of the features of individual judicial regulation of relations with the participation of these types of peasant farms; – consideration of the possibility of application by courts of an analogy of the law in relation to peasant farms; – suggesting ways to address the identified problems of individual judicial regulation of relations with the participation of peasant farms. The methodological basis of the study consists in the use of general scientific (dialectics, analysis and synthesis) and private scientific research methods (formal legal, document analysis method). Brief conclusions of the study. 1. The marked differentiation of types of peasant farming makes it possible to specify the features of legal and individual regulation of each of them, and also makes it possible to exclude the accidental application of improper legislation in relations with the participation of peasant (farm) farms. 2. To determine the characteristics of individual types of farms, it is necessary to accurately determine the basis for the occurrence of each of them. 3. The application of the analogy of the law to peasant farms as partnerships or societies should be excluded, and the full identification of farms with these legal entities should not be allowed. 4. A special law that would determine the particular legal status of the peasant economy as a legal entity in accordance with clause 5 of article 86.1 of the Civil Code has not yet been adopted.

scholarly journals Some issues of legal regulation (of the legal status) control and accounting bodies of municipalities

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-88
Author(s):  
Oleg Kozhevnikov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Regulatory Framework ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Government Organization ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Federation

Almost three decades have passed since the appearance of the Law of the Russian Federation from 06.07.1991 No. 1550-1 «On local self-government in the Russian Federation». Over the past historical stage, the regulatory framework of local self-government and its bodies has significantly transformed: this applies to the concept of local self-government, territorial and organizational foundations, and of course the legal status of individual local self-government bodies. This article provides a comparative legal analysis of certain provisions of Federal law No. 131-FZ of 06.102.2003 «On General principles of local self-government organization in the Russian Federation» and Federal law No. 6-FZ of 07.02.2011 «On General principles of organization and activity of control and accounting bodies of subjects of the Russian Federation and municipalities» in the part concerning control and accounting bodies of municipalities. Based on the results of this analysis, significant contradictions were identified in the basic Federal normative legal acts regulating the legal status of the control and accounting body of a municipality, which need to be corrected by the Federal legislator in order to increase the level of unity and consistency in the legal regulation of the status of one of the most important bodies in the system of local self-government-the control and accounting body of a municipality.

scholarly journals Signs of a Legal Entity of Public Law under the Legislation of Ukraine

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (69) ◽  
pp. 386-394
Author(s):  
V. F. Poddubnaya ◽  
A. M. Yevkov ◽  
Yu. M. Filonova
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Legal Capacity ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
The Status ◽  
Separate Property ◽  
Cis Countries ◽  
Legal Entities

The article examines the legal status of legal entities of public law as participants in civil circulation. Both general and special research methods were used, which were determined by the purpose of the article, taking into account the object and subject of the research. To study the above-mentioned civil law relations in their interconnection and development, the dialectical method was used. The comparative legal method was used to analyze the world experience of legal regulation of the status of legal entities of public law in foreign legislation and the doctrine of law, in particular, in the legislation of the CIS countries. Results showed that legal entities of public law are organizations; as legal entities; have the characteristics of a legal entity: organizational unity, the presence of separate property, acting in circulation on their own behalf, independent civil liability. In addition to the general features of a legal entity, legal entities of public law also have special features that characterize them as participants in civil turnover. It was concluded that legal entities of public law are a type of legal entity, are created in the administrative order by the state and have targeted legal capacity.

scholarly journals LEGAL REGULATION OF CESSATION OF A NATURAL PERSON-ENTREPRENEUR: CONCEPTUAL AND TERMINOLOGICAL PROBLEMS

2021 ◽  
pp. 63-69
Author(s):  
P. Povar ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Entrepreneurial Activity ◽  
Economic Entity ◽  
Natural Person ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Status ◽  
State Registration ◽  
Structural Connection ◽  
Structural Methods

An important element of the legal status of a natural person-entrepreneur is the conditions for depriving him of the entrepreneur status. The purpose of the article is to determine the scope and content of the conceptual and terminological apparatus of legal regulation of a natural person-entrepreneur cessation, development of theoretical provisions and proposals for improving legislation and law enforcement practice. The research methodology is based on the application of historical, systemic, structural methods, methods of analysis, synthesis and other formal-logical procedures. As a result of the study of the historical formation of Ukrainian legislation, a logical series of development of the conceptual and terminological apparatus of legislative acts is defined and highlighted. The necessity of enshrining in the codified act in the field of entrepreneurship general provisions on deprivation of the status of an entrepreneur by an individual, including the use of appropriate terminology and concepts, is substantiated. Proposals have been formulated to supplement The Commercial Code of Ukraine with a norm on the loss of the entrepreneurial status by an individual. The distinction is made and the relations between the concepts of "termination of the natural person-entrepreneurial activity", "deprivation of a natural person of the entrepreneur status", "cessation of a natural person-entrepreneur", "cessation of the economic entity" are established. The provisions on the legal nature of the fact of termination of entrepreneurial activity and the fact of deprivation of a natural person of the status of an entrepreneur have been studied and formulated. The shortcomings of the norms of the current legislation, which do not differentiate the grounds for termination of activity of different legal nature, have been identified and substantiated. It is proposed to replace the term "state registration of cessation of natural person – entrepreneur activity" with the term "state registration of deprivation a natural person of the entrepreneurial status" and make appropriate changes in the legislation of Ukraine. In the conclusion the inexpediency of using the term "liquidation" in relation to a natural person-entrepreneur is substantiated. The definition of the concept of "cessation of a natural person-entrepreneur" is formulated. The possibility of using the concept of " deprivation of a natural person of the status of an entrepreneur" in the narrow and broad sense is outlined. Provisions are formulated for the structural connection between the basic concepts of cessation of economic entities.

scholarly journals Legal regulation of cooperation in Russia in 1917

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 202-208
Author(s):  
Yuliya O. Novikova
Keyword(s):  
Rapid Growth ◽  
Spiritual Development ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
The Status ◽  
Cooperative Partnership ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
First Time

The article deals with the features of the normative legal regulation of cooperation in 1917. New provisions regulating the activities of cooperative associations, that were fundamentally different from the norms of the cooperative legislation of the tsarist government, are defined. The author highlights the ideological foundations of the cooperative policy of the Provisional government, which influenced the formation of the main provisions of the cooperative legislation in 1917. Key features of the cooperative legislation of 1917 stand out: the determination of the legal status of cooperative companies for the first time a legislator was fixed definition of the concept of "cooperative partnership"; an accomplished fact of registration of a legal entity, this provision was introduced by the legislator for the first time since before the 1917 registration of a legal entity was permissive. This provision greatly facilitated the creation of cooperative associations, which contributed to their rapid growth. Another feature was that minors were allowed to become a member of a cooperative partnership from the age of seventeen, but they were not allowed to be included in the control and management bodies. Cooperative societies were now considered not only as an institution that increased the material well-being of the population, but also as an institution for its spiritual development. Since 1917, there had been a rapid growth of Union associations of cooperative associations both in the provincial and all-Russia ones. This was also a consequence of the new cooperative legislation. It is concluded that the rules of law that completely re-built the cooperative network, defined the status of cooperative partnerships, gave a new impetus to the development of cooperation as a powerful social movement that can mobilize huge masses of the population.

scholarly journals Ways to resolve conflicting issues of the status of legal entities in EU law and in the legislation of some of its member states

2020 ◽  
pp. 392-398
Author(s):  
Olga Ovechkina
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Member States ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Eu Member States ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Eu Directive ◽  
The Status ◽  
Personal Law ◽  
Legal Entities

entities in EU member states.Many EU Member States use two criteria for determining the personal law of a legal entity: the settlement criterion and the incorporationcriterion. However, the application of the theory of settlement in determining the personal law (statute) of a legal entity actuallyimpedes the implementation of the principle of freedom of establishment contained in the TFEU, as the relocation of control centers ofthe legal entity to the state where the theory of settlement is applied. loss of legal personality of a legal entity. This position is based onthe case law of the Court of Justice. In addition, the application of the theory of settlement and incorporation significantly complicates the process of regulating theactivities of legal entities and slows down the development of the single market in the EU.The experience of European countries in drafting an international treaty containing norms on unified legal regulation of the statusof legal entities has not proved effective. The EU has chosen other mechanisms for resolving conflicting issues of legal status of legalentities, namely: harmonization of national laws of EU member states on certain issues of legal status and activities of legal entities, aswell as the creation of new organizational and legal forms of legal entities. This partially overcomes certain issues of conflict-of-lawregulation of the status of legal entities, for example, the issue of cross-border movement of European companies, European cooperatives;in accordance with EU Directive 2019/2121, the rules of the laws of the Member States on cross-border transformation, mergersand divisions of limited liability companies should be harmonized.

scholarly journals Ways to resolve conflicting issues of the status of legal entities in EU law and in the legislation of some of its member states

2020 ◽  
pp. 392-398
Author(s):  
Olga Ovechkina
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Member States ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Eu Member States ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Eu Directive ◽  
The Status ◽  
Personal Law ◽  
Legal Entities

entities in EU member states.Many EU Member States use two criteria for determining the personal law of a legal entity: the settlement criterion and the incorporationcriterion. However, the application of the theory of settlement in determining the personal law (statute) of a legal entity actuallyimpedes the implementation of the principle of freedom of establishment contained in the TFEU, as the relocation of control centers ofthe legal entity to the state where the theory of settlement is applied. loss of legal personality of a legal entity. This position is based onthe case law of the Court of Justice. In addition, the application of the theory of settlement and incorporation significantly complicates the process of regulating theactivities of legal entities and slows down the development of the single market in the EU.The experience of European countries in drafting an international treaty containing norms on unified legal regulation of the statusof legal entities has not proved effective. The EU has chosen other mechanisms for resolving conflicting issues of legal status of legalentities, namely: harmonization of national laws of EU member states on certain issues of legal status and activities of legal entities, aswell as the creation of new organizational and legal forms of legal entities. This partially overcomes certain issues of conflict-of-lawregulation of the status of legal entities, for example, the issue of cross-border movement of European companies, European cooperatives;in accordance with EU Directive 2019/2121, the rules of the laws of the Member States on cross-border transformation, mergersand divisions of limited liability companies should be harmonized.

scholarly journals General And Limited Partnerships: Features Of Legal Regulation In Ukraine And European States

2021 ◽  
pp. 130-142
Author(s):  
V.V. Anatiichuk
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Entrepreneurial Activity ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Joint Activities ◽  
The Status ◽  
Legal Forms ◽  
Limited Partnerships ◽  
Legal Entities

The article focuses on one of the corporate forms of entrepreneurial activity - general and limited partnerships. Limited liability companies and joint stock companies are among the most popular legal forms of companies. However, the development of Ukrainian legislation moves in the direction of creating a system of different forms of entrepreneurship, which are aimed at different needs and interests of their founders. Such forms of entrepreneurship exist and operate successfully in Europe. Carrying out a comparative analysis in the article allows the author to confirm the existing thesis that there is no single vector in European countries concerning the legal status of these partnerships. Some states define these partnerships as legal entities, others - as a form of joint business activity. It is emphasized in the article that the European legal space is characterized by the use of the concept of defective legal entity. The author perceives any of these European approaches, but points to the need for its consistent reflection in all legal acts that determine the status of general and limited partnerships. The article supports the assertion formed in the scientific literature about the criticism of domestic legislation on general and limited partnerships. Such criticism concerns to those norms of Ukrainian legislation, which use untypical provisions for legal entities. All existing researches are directed to one aim - to develop a single vector in the regulation of general and limited partnerships. They should be regulated either as legal entities or as forms of joint activity on the basis of an agreement. The author states that the main attention in granting general and limited partnerships the status of a legal entity should be focused on clear boundaries between the liability of a legal entity and the subsidiary liability of its members. The article supports leading scholars’ critical assessment of the legislative definition of general partnerships as an association of persons for joint business activities. Based on the analysis of the definitions of a general partnership in EU law (for example, France), it is proposed to define a general partnership as an association of persons engaged in business activities through joint contributions of all participants (full partners) and their subsidiary liability for the company’s obligations. This wording indicates that the partnership itself carries out business activities, and not its members. The author also does not deny the possibility of introducing general and limited partnerships as associations of persons on the basis of an agreement on joint activities. At the same time, it is noted that all norms of national legislation should consistently adhere to such concept.

Organizer of Scientific Activity as a Subject of Intellectual Rights

2020 ◽  
pp. 42-53
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Scientific Activity ◽  
Research Teams ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
The Status ◽  
Scientific Results ◽  
Exclusive Right ◽  
Academic Search ◽  
Scientific Team

The author analyzes the legal status of the organizers of artistic creation, enshrined in the Russian legislation de lege lata, and develops the legal status of the organizer of scientific activities de lege ferenda. It is proposed to consider the organizer of scientific activity as only the head of the temporary scientific team, the purpose of which is to solve a specific scientific problem. A set of elements of the legal structure is formulated, which may be fixed in a normative manner in order to ensure uniformity of legal regulation of the activities of temporary research teams. The status of the organizer of scientific activity is determined on the base of his organizational efforts to guide the creative activities of the team (a distinction is made between the creative and organizational contribution of the head of the scientific team to the overall result). Various options for modeling the legal status of the organizer of scientific activities are discussed: inclusion of the organizer among the co-authors the scientific results obtained by the team; inclusion of the organizer among the co-authors in case if he / she has a creative idea (topic) of academic search; granting the organizer related intellectual rights to the entire result obtained by the team. It is presumed that the organizer of scientific activity is the author of the idea of scientific search for solving the task set for the temporary team. It is concluded that the organizer of scientific activity (the head of the temporary scientific team) must be endowed with related intellectual rights: 1) the exclusive right to use the scientific result obtained by the team as a whole, and 2) the personal non-property right to indicate his name in any use of this result. The author substantiates the content, non-turnover and special validity period of the exclusive right of the organizer of scientific activity.

INHERITANCE OF THE PROPERTY OF A MEMBER OF A PEASANT (FARMER) FARM

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Татьяна Алексеевна Безгодкова ◽  
Людмила Дмитриевна Туршук
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Peasant Farmer ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
The Russian Federation

В статье рассматриваются проблемы правового регулирования наследования имущества члена крестьянского (фермерского) хозяйства. КФХ может существовать в двух формах: как юридическое лицо и без образования юридического лица. ГК РФ определяет порядок перехода по наследству имущества лишь КФХ без образования юридического лица. The article deals with the problems of legal regulation of inheritance of property of a member of a peasant (farmer) farm. PFF can exist in two forms: as a legal entity and without the formation of a legal entity. The Civil Code of the Russian Federation defines the procedure for the inheritance of property only in a farm without the formation of a legal entity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document