scholarly journals Maslahah dalam Penetapan Harga Barang

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-151
Author(s):  
Abdul Manan Ismail
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Individual Ownership

This study discusses the issue of pricing of goods or the controlled goods price based on maslahah. Basically, the pricing of a product is the right of seller, but the government can intervene if there are particular interests. In other words, individual ownership is recognized by Islam as long as it is in line with the spirit of Shariah and does not put aside the public interest. Keywords: Maslahah, pricing, goods, rights of seller, individual ownership. Abstrak Kajian ini membincangkan isu penetapan harga sesuatu barangan atau harga barangan terkawal berdasarkan dalil maslahah. Secara asasnya, penetapan harga sesuatu barang adalah hak penjual, namun demikian pemerintah boleh campurtangan sekiranya ada kepentingan- kepentingan tertentu. Dengan kata lain, pemilikan individu diperakui oleh Islam selagi mana ia selari dengan roh Syariat dan tidak mengetepikan kepentingan masyarakat umum. Kata kunci: Maslahah, penetapan harga, barang-barang, hak penjual, pemilikan individu.

Tanggung Jawab Hukum Penilai Publik terhadap Laporan Penilaian Kegiatan Pengadaan Tanah bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum (Studi Atas Kantor Jasa Penilai Publik Toto Suharto)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gagah Yaumiyya Riyoprakoso ◽  
AM Hasan Ali ◽  
Fitriyani Zein
Keyword(s):  
Future Development ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Government ◽  
Conducting Research ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Systematic Explanation

This study is based on the legal responsibility of the assessment of public appraisal reports they make in land procurement activities for development in the public interest. Public assessment is obliged to always be accountable for their assessment. The type of research found in this thesis is a type of normative legal research with the right-hand of the statue approach and case approach. Normative legal research is a study that provides systematic explanation of rules governing a certain legal category, analyzing the relationship between regulations explaining areas of difficulty and possibly predicting future development. . After conducting research, researchers found that one of the causes that made the dispute was a lack of communication conducted between the Government and the landlord. In deliberation which should be the place where the parties find the meeting point between the parties on the magnitude of the damages that will be given, in the field is often used only for the delivery of the assessment of the compensation that has been done.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PEMEGANG HAK ATAS TANAH DALAM PENGADAAN TANAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Yusrizal
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Sense Of Justice

Land procurement is the act of the government to realize the availability of land to be used in various interests for development as the public interest. Limitations of land owned by the government takes the land derived from the community to facilitate the course of development for the public interest. The existence of the land needs to be used by the government in carrying out development activities, but in its implementation should not be detrimental to the rights of the landowners. Therefore, for the government which needs the land can not arbitrarily to take the land belonging to the community/the holder of the right to the land which area is affected by development for the public interest. Therefore, the state should provide guarantee and legal protection to the holder of the land in land procurement activity for public interest. So that the implementation of land procurement will be able to provide a sense of justice for the community affected by the development and provide security to the life of the community.

scholarly journals PENGADAAN TANAH BAGI PELAKSANAAN PEMBANGUNAN UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM

Solusi ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-252
Author(s):  
Abuyazid Bustomi
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
The Public ◽  
Deliberation Process ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

Land acquisition is any activity to obtain land by providing compensation to those who release or surrender land, buildings, plants, and objects related to land. Land acquisition can be carried out by the private sector and the government. In the case of land acquisition by the private sector, the methods carried out are through buying and selling, exchanging, or other means agreed upon by the parties concerned, which can be carried out directly between interested parties (for example: between developers with the right holder) with compensation for the amount or type determined in the deliberation. Whereas in the case of land acquisition by the government or regional government for the implementation of development in the public interest, it can be carried out by releasing or surrendering land rights, or also by revoking land rights through deliberation. Procurement of land for the implementation of development in the public interest is carried out through deliberation with the aim of obtaining an agreement on the implementation of development in the specified location, along with the form and amount of compensation. The deliberation process carried out by the land acquisition committee and the rights holder is intended to ensure that the rights holders receive adequate compensation for their land.

scholarly journals PROBLEMATIKA PEMENUHAN HAK MENYAMPAIKAN PENDAPAT DAN PELANGGARAN TERHADAP HAK ATAS KESEHATAN DI INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 114-124
Author(s):  
Tat Marlina ◽  
Duwi Handoko
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Right To Health ◽  
Public Order ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Road ◽  
Research Problems ◽  
Displaced People ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

The purpose of this paper is to find out the problem of fulfilling the right to express opinions and violations of the right to health in Indonesia. This type of research is normative legal research specifically discussing human rights in the field of expressing opinions and rights to health. Data analysis in this study was carried out systematically based on the research problems described qualitatively. In relation to expressing opinions in public, such as demonstrations or demonstrations with many participants, restrictions on freedom are usually associated with "public order" or public orders. The most difficult is how to provide a balance between freedom and public order. Demonstrations by a number of doctors certainly have an impact on patient care, which in principle has harmed the public interest. In addition, the demonstration by blocking the road body certainly hurts the public interest, namely the interests of all road users. Based on the results of Komnas HAM's investigation, at least 15 types of human rights violations were affected by Lapindo mudflow victims. The problem when it is associated with the right to health is in the form of: not a few refugees whose health is disrupted resulting in people falling ill and some dying due to the absence of a proper environment for displaced people; and gas contaminated air and clean water facilities that are damaged are not handled properly by the government. Keywords: human rights, freedom of opinion, right to health

scholarly journals Land Acquisition for Public Interests: A Review from the Human Rights Context

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Yesi Nurmantiyas Sari ◽  
Rizal Nugroho ◽  
Al Khanif
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
The Public ◽  
The People ◽  
Or Groups ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

Land acquisition for public purposes is an activity intended for the public interest that uses community land. To be able to carry out development in the public interest, the government uses state land. If state land is not sufficient or cannot maximize development, the government can use land from individuals or groups by carrying out the land acquisition. In implementing land acquisition, the land acquisition team must pay attention to the rights of the people affected by land acquisition. Irregularities that often occur in the implementation of land acquisition are related to discrimination, intimidation, and violence. These rights are included in human rights, which must be upheld and protected because this is closely related to property rights. Human rights give an understanding that the right to own something is the right of every citizen, including the right to own land is one of the human rights inherent in each person per person in groups. While property rights must not be taken arbitrarily and against the law, such matters are regulated in Article 28H of the 1945 Constitution. This paper concludes that the construction activities of the New Yogyakarta International Airport (NYIA) carried out violated human rights; this is because the land acquisition team has committed violence, discrimination, and violence against the people affected by land acquisition. The form of legal protection provided by the government is proper compensation. 

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Sengketa Pelepasan Hak Atas Tanah Oleh Pemerintah Dalam Proses Pendaftaran Tanah

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
T. Surya Reza
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Public ◽  
Registration Process ◽  
Planning Implementation ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
To Receive

Article 41 paragraph (2) of Law No. 2 of 2012 on Land Procurement for Development in the Public Interest states that, when granting Compensation of Parties Entitled to receive Mandatory Compensation, a. exercising the release of rights; and b. submit evidence of ownership or ownership of Land Procurement Objects to Agencies that require land through land institutions. In the court's ruling stated that the boundaries of the land should be mentioned and how much extent was waived and the rest how much, and the procedure of disengagement of the right there was preparation, planning, implementation and release, and the release of the land rights was always followed by compensation, because this is an unlawful act. The results of this study show that, the release of land rights by the government in the land registration process in the court's ruling states that if 6 (six) landowners relinquish the right, it must be 6 (six) people who relinquish their rights if only 2 (two) are invalid, then a new land is said to be state land after the release of his rights. Any release of land rights must have a reason there can't be no reason land is being released to the state. The procedure for the release of that right is there is preparation, planning, implementation and release, and the release of the land rights is always followed by compensation.

scholarly journals تسعیر کی فقہی حیثیت سےمتعلق آراء کا تحقیقی مطالعہ

Al-Duhaa ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (01) ◽  
pp. 95-107
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ubaid Ullah Khan ◽  
Muhammad Luqman Khan
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
The Public ◽  
The People ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

In jurisprudential terms, setting the price of goods by the government and ordering traders to sell goods at the same price is called pricing. According to iman Abu Hanifa, imam shafi, and imam Ahmad bin Hanbal, under normal circumstances. The government does not have the right to set the prices of goods. According to Iman Malik, it is permissible for the government to fix the prices of goods in the market to protect the people from harm. Hanfi jurists have allowed pricing with one condition. Such as  when there is artificial inflation in the market due to collusion of traders or hoarding and price is being doubled. Then it is permissible for the government to fix prices in order to protect the public from harm. According to our research this opinion is preferred. Nowadays while stockpiling and commericial monopolies are common in the market, it is important for the government to set prices in the public interest and to protect them  from harm.

PROBLEMATIKA PEMENUHAN HAK MENYAMPAIKAN PENDAPAT DAN PELANGGARAN TERHADAP HAK ATAS KESEHATAN DI INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 42-53
Author(s):  
Tat Marlina ◽  
Duwi Handoko
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Right To Health ◽  
Public Order ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Road ◽  
Research Problems ◽  
Displaced People ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

The purpose of this paper is to find out the problem of fulfilling the right to express opinions and violations of the right to health in Indonesia. This type of research is normative legal research specifically discussing human rights in the field of expressing opinions and rights to health. Data analysis in this study was carried out systematically based on the research problems described qualitatively. In relation to expressing opinions in public, such as demonstrations or demonstrations with many participants, restrictions on freedom are usually associated with "public order" or public orders. The most difficult is how to provide a balance between freedom and public order. Demonstrations by a number of doctors certainly have an impact on patient care, which in principle has harmed the public interest. In addition, the demonstration by blocking the road body certainly hurts the public interest, namely the interests of all road users. Based on the results of Komnas HAM's investigation, at least 15 types of human rights violations were affected by Lapindo mudflow victims. The problem when it is associated with the right to health is in the form of: not a few refugees whose health is disrupted resulting in people falling ill and some dying due to the absence of a proper environment for displaced people; and gas contaminated air and clean water facilities that are damaged are not handled properly by the government.

DIRECTIONS FOR PROVISION OF PUBLIC BODIES’ TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN CONDITIONS OF PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY DEVELOPMENT

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
pp. 144-154
Author(s):  
Olga Mykhailоvna Ivanitskaya
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Participatory Democracy ◽  
Main Task ◽  
The Public ◽  
State Governance ◽  
Legislative Initiative ◽  
The Government ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Right ◽  
Transparency And Accountability

The article is devoted to issues of ensuring transparency and ac- countability of authorities in the conditions of participatory democracy (democ- racy of participation). It is argued that the public should be guaranteed not only the right for access to information but also the prerequisites for expanding its par- ticipation in state governance. These prerequisites include: the adoption of clearly measurable macroeconomic and social goals and the provision of control of the processes of their compliance with the government by citizens of the country; ex- tension of the circle of subjects of legislative initiative due to realization of such rights by citizens and their groups; legislative definition of the forms of citizens’ participation in making publicly significant decisions, design of relevant orders and procedures, in particular participation in local referendum; outlining methods and procedures for taking into account social thought when making socially im- portant decisions. The need to disclose information about resources that are used by authorities to realize the goals is proved as well as key performance indicators that can be monitored by every citizen; the efforts made by governments of coun- tries to achieve these goals. It was noted that transparency in the conditions of representative democracy in its worst forms in a society where ignorance of the thought of society and its individual members is ignored does not in fact fulfill its main task — to establish an effective dialogue between the authorities and so- ciety. There is a distortion of the essence of transparency: instead of being heard, society is being asked to be informed — and passively accept the facts presented as due. In fact, transparency and accountability in this case are not instruments for the achievement of democracy in public administration, but by the form of a tacit agreement between the subjects of power and people, where the latter passes the participation of an “informed observer”.

RETHINKING MODEL BISNIS PEMERINTAH DESA: KASUS PADA BADAN USAHA MILIK DESA DI KABUPATEN BANYUMAS, INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-102
Author(s):  
Muhammad Husnul Maab ◽  
Shadu S. Wijaya ◽  
Zaula Rizqi Atika ◽  
Denok Kurniasih
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Rural Community ◽  
Fundamental Difference ◽  
Public Enterprise ◽  
Business Sector ◽  
Social Business ◽  
The Public ◽  
Sector Model ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

The emergence of rural community owned enterprises khown as BUMDes has been in line with evolution of public administration pradigm, from OPA to NPM who implemented in local government. Local potency development becomes a substantial aspect to improving local competitiveness. Hence, BUMDes formation is one of the models financial capacity to develop local potency in rural level. The aim is comparing traditional and public enterprise based management in local potency management. The results show that there is a fundamental difference in the management of local potency in rural level. Consequently, We argue that has been on the right track, the evolution of the government business model to the public enterprise for the management of local potency in rural level. Evolution of BUMDes is from a bureaucratic to the business sector model, but as a social business not profit maximizing businesses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document