scholarly journals Acute effects of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training on linear and nonlinear heart rate variability measures in arterial hypertension

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e47110712106
Author(s):  
Fabrício Olinda de Souza Mesquita ◽  
Pamela Beatriz Pereira da Silva ◽  
Herculano Ribeiro da Silva Neto ◽  
Sérgio Rodrigues Moreira ◽  
Dário Celestino Sobral Filho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Heart Rate Variability ◽  
Arterial Hypertension ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Acute Effects ◽  
Continuous Training ◽  
Linear And Nonlinear ◽  
High Intensity Interval

Introduction: Systemic arterial hypertension is a chronic disease worldwide. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been described as an effective alternative treatment. Objective: To evaluate the acute effects of one HIIT session versus one moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on linear and nonlinear heart rate variability (HRV) measures in hypertension patients. Methods: A preliminary cross-sectional study with 11 non-elderly (35 to 59 years) hypertensive patients using drug therapy from both sexes. They were assigned for cardiological evaluation, ergometric test, echocardiography, and cardiopulmonary exercise test. Patients performed cycling exercise in the conditions HIIT (10 bouts of 1-minute at 85% of the maximum power [Pmax] interspersed with 2 minutes at 50% of Pmax) and MICT (30 minutes at 50% of Pmax). R-R intervals (RRi) of HRV were recorded in the supine position for 10 minutes before and after the two exercise conditions. Results: HIIT and MICT presented a significant reduction (P<0.01) for the RRi between baseline (pre-session) and post-session. All other linear indices presented similar results (P>0.05) between moments. Significant differences (P<0.05) in the symbolic HRV analysis were identified only in the HIIT group for 0V, 2LV, and 2ULV indexes. 0V index increased 2.3-times from pre- to post-session while 2LV and 2ULV indexes reduced to near 50% and 35%, respectively. Conclusion: An increase in sympathetic modulation with a significant decrease in vagal modulation by nonlinear HRV measures was identified in patients with hypertension submitted to one HIIT session.

scholarly journals The Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Heart Rate Variability in Physically Inactive Adults

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah Alansare ◽  
Ken Alford ◽  
Sukho Lee ◽  
Tommie Church ◽  
Hyun Jung
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Heart Rate Variability ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Continuous Training ◽  
Significant Interaction Effect ◽  
High Intensity Interval ◽  
Physically Inactive

Physically inactive adults are prevalent worldwide. This study compared the effects of short-term high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on heart rate variability (HRV) in physically inactive adults as a preliminary study. Thirteen physically inactive male adults (27.5 ± 3.80 years) were randomly assigned to HIIT (N = 7) or MICT (N = 6). The HIIT program consisted of 20 min of interval training with cycling to rest ratio of 10/50 s at ≥90% HRpeak, while the MICT program consisted of 40 min of continuous cycling at 60–75% HRpeak. Both groups completed eight sessions of training within two weeks. Time and frequency domains of HRV were measured for 20 min with Actiwave-Cardio monitor (CamNtech, UK). The number of R-R interval and inter-beat interval (IBI) were significantly improved (p < 0.05) in both HIIT and MICT programs following eight sessions of training. A significant interaction effect for group by time was found in the lnLF/HF ratio (p < 0.05) where it was only improved in the HIIT group from pre- to post-test. The HIIT program is superior to MICT in improving HRV in physically inactive adults. The HIIT program can be applied as a time-efficient program for improving cardiac-autoregulation.

Effects of interval training on risk markers for arrhythmic death: a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 1320-1330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxime Boidin ◽  
Mathieu Gayda ◽  
Christine Henri ◽  
Doug Hayami ◽  
Lukas D Trachsel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Heart Rate Recovery ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Continuous Training ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
High Intensity Interval

Objective: To compare the effects of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on risk markers of arrhythmic death in patients who recently suffered from an acute coronary syndrome. Design: Double-blind (patient and evaluator) randomized controlled trial. Setting: Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Centre (EPIC Centre) of the Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Canada. Subjects: A total of 43 patients were randomized following an acute coronary syndrome. Interventions: Patients were assigned to either high-intensity interval training (n = 18) or isocaloric moderate-intensity continuous training (n = 19), three times a week for a total of 36 sessions. Main measures: Heart rate recovery for 5 minutes, heart rate variability for 24 hours, occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias, and QT dispersion were measured before and after the 36 sessions of training. Results: Among the 43 patients randomized, 6 participants in the high-intensity interval training group stopped training for reasons unrelated to exercise training and were excluded from the analyses. Heart rate recovery improved solely in the high-intensity interval training group, particularly at the end of recovery period ( p < 0.05). There were no differences in heart rate variability, occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias, or QT dispersion parameters between the groups at study end. Conclusion: Despite the lack of power to detect any large difference between the two interventions with respect to risk markers of arrhythmic death, high-intensity interval training appears safe and may be more effective at improving heart rate recovery relative to moderate-intensity continuous training in our patients following acute coronary syndrome.

Short-Term High-Intensity Interval Training Is Superior to Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Improving Cardiac Autonomic Function in Children

Cardiology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 141 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anneke van Biljon ◽  
Andrew J. McKune ◽  
Katrina D. DuBose ◽  
Unathi Kolanisi ◽  
Stuart J. Semple
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Continuous Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval ◽  
The Impact

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the impact of 3 isocaloric exercise programs on cardiac autonomic nervous system (ANS) functioning in children. Methods: One hundred nine children (39% boys and 61% girls) aged 10–13 years (mean 11.07 ± 0.81) were conveniently assigned to 1 of 4 groups as follows: Moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT; n = 29) at 65–70% of the predicted maximum heart rate (MHR), High-intensity interval training (HIIT; n = 29) at > 80% of the predicted MHR, HIIT and MICT combined on alternate weeks (ALT; n = 27), and a control group (n = 24). Morning ANS activity was assessed via analysis of heart rate variability (HRV), with the patient in supine position for 10 min, before and after the exercise intervention. Data Analysis: A 2-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate the effects of training on all HRV parameters (p < 0.05/4 = 0.0125). Results: After 5 weeks of training, significant improvements were observed for ln of the standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (p < 0.0001), ln of the root mean square of successive difference (p < 0.0001), and ln of standard deviation 1 (p < 0.0001), with superior results reported in the HIIT group (effect size [ES] = 2.22, 2.69, and 2.69) compared with the MICT (ES = 1.67, 1.75, and 1.75) and ALT (ES = 0.87, 1.06, and 1.06) groups, respectively. Conclusion: Short-term HIIT seems to induce superior alterations in cardiac ANS activity compared to MICT and ALT in children through enhanced vagal activity.

Moderate-intensity continuous training and high-intensity interval training improve cognition, and BDNF levels of middle-aged overweight men

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neumir Sales de Lima ◽  
Ricardo Augusto Leoni De Sousa ◽  
Fabiano Trigueiro Amorim ◽  
Fernando Gripp ◽  
Caíque Olegário Diniz e Magalhães ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Continuous Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval

scholarly journals High-Intensity Interval Training Improves Cognitive Flexibility in Older Adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 796
Author(s):  
Said Mekari ◽  
Heather F. Neyedli ◽  
Sarah Fraser ◽  
Myles W. O’Brien ◽  
Ricardo Martins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Executive Function ◽  
Cardiorespiratory Fitness ◽  
Cognitive Flexibility ◽  
Stroop Task ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Continuous Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval

Introduction: Regular aerobic exercise is associated with better executive function in older adults. It is unclear if high-intensity-interval-training (HIIT) elicits moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) or resistance training (RT). We hypothesized that HIIT would augment executive function more than MICT and RT. Methods: Sixty-nine older adults (age: 68 ± 7 years) performed six weeks (three days/week) of HIIT (2 × 20 min bouts alternating between 15 s intervals at 100% of peak power output (PPO) and passive recovery (0% PPO); n = 24), MICT (34 min at 60% PPO; n = 19), or whole-body RT (eight exercise superior improvements in executive function of older adults than moderate-intensity-continuous-training, 2 × 10 repetitions; n = 26). Cardiorespiratory fitness (i.e., V˙O2max) and executive function were assessed before and after each intervention via a progressive maximal cycle ergometer protocol and the Stroop Task, respectively. Results: The V˙O2max findings revealed a significant group by time interaction (p = 0.001) in which all groups improved following training, but HIIT and MICT improved more than RT. From pre- to post-training, no interaction in the naming condition of the Stroop Task was observed (p > 0.10). However, interaction from pre- to post-training by group was observed, and only the HIIT group exhibited a faster reaction time (from 1250 ± 50 to 1100 ± 50 ms; p < 0.001) in switching (cognitive flexibility). Conclusion: Despite similar improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness, HIIT, but not MICT nor RT, enhanced cognitive flexibility in older adults. Exercise programs should consider using HIIT protocols in an effort to combat cognitive decline in older adults.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document