scholarly journals TINJAUAN YURIDIS AKTA NOTARIS YANG ISINYA DIINGKARI OLEH PARA PIHAK

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 193
Author(s):  
Diah Irmawati

Isi akta yang diingkari oleh para pihak setelah salinan akta diterima oleh para pihak belum ditemukan peraturan yang mengaturnya, padahal dalam Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf d Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014  mewajibkan notaris untuk mengeluarkan salinan dari akta yang telah dibuatnya. Jenis penelitian hukum yang digunakan dalam penulisan tesis ini adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil pada penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Akibat hukum bagi para pihak yang ingkar terhadap isi dari akta notaris yang telah dikeluarkan salinannya adalah para pihak dapat dikenakan pasal 264 dan 266 KUHP karena memberikan dan memasukkan keterangan palsu di dalam akta otentik dan kedudukan hukum salinan akta notaris yang isinya diingkari oleh para pihakadalah menjadi batal demi hukum karena akta tersebut cacat dalam isinya yaitu mengandung unsur penipuan. Hal ini diatur dalam Pasal 1869 KUH Perdata.Kata kunci: akta notaris, diingkari, para pihak The contents of the deed which is denied by the parties after the copy of the deed received by the parties has not found any rules governing it, even though in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter d of Law Number 2 Year 2014 requires the notary to issue a copy of the deed that has been made. The type of legal research used in writing this thesis is normative juridical. The results of the study show that the legal consequences for the parties who deny the contents of the notary deed that has been issued a copy are the parties may be subject to Article 264 and 266 of the Criminal Code because they provide and include false information on the authentic deed and legal position copy of the notary deed whose contents are denied by the parties it is null and void because the deed is defective in its contents, which contains elements of fraud. This is regulated in Article 1869 of the Civil Code.Keywords: notary deed, denied, the parties.

Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 511
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Anggelina

The legal status of a Notary employee in his capacity is a witness of the Instrumentair to support the validity of an authentic deed which is inseparable and has legal consequences for the deed of the Notary. Notary deed that raises the law causes the Notary employee to work as a witness instrument in the deed to be the party responsible and responsible for the law that appears. The legal issue in this journal is the Responsibility for the accountability of instruments in the deed of a Notary? And how to place the legal position in the instrumentation in terms of supporting the Notary deed related to the Notary's responsibility to keep the confidentiality of the deed which is made by him based on Article 16 Paragraph (1) Letter F and Article 40 of the UUJN Amendment?, This article is analyzed by normative legal research methods with a study of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter f UUJN Changes that still involve obscurity of legal norms. The purpose of this study is to examine the accountability of the instrumentair in the deed of the Notary and also provide understanding in terms of the legal position of the instrumentair selection related to the authenticity of the Notary deed. The results of the study through the journal can prove the lawsuits related to the substance of the deed whose signing involved him, remembering his capacity only employees who are functioned by a Notary to prepare the deed. The legal position of viewing related to the occupation of the Notary keeps the confidentiality of the deed whose production is made based on Article 16 paragraph (1) letter f and Article 40 of the UUJN. Therefore the instrumentair witness cannot apply Article 322 of the Criminal Code because his capacity as an election is not bound by professional ownership. Witness instructors who do not support the confidentiality of Notary documents. Status hukum pegawai Notaris dalam kapasitasnya menjadi saksi Instrumentair guna mendukung sahnya suatu akta autentik merupakan hal yang tak terpisahkan dan memiliki konsekwensi hukum terhadap akta Notaris. Akta Notaris yang menimbulkan persoalan hukum menyebabkan pegawai Notaris yang berfungsi sebagai saksi instrumentair dalam akta menjadi pihak yang dianggap tahu dan bertanggung jawab atas persoalan hukum yang muncul. Isu hukum dalam jurnal ini adalah Bagaimanakah tanggungjawab saksi instrumentair dalam akta Notaris? Dan bagaimanakah kedudukan hukum saksi instrumentair dalam hal mendukung keautentikan akta Notaris terkait adanya kewajiban Notaris menyimpan kerahasiaan akta yang pembuatannya dilakukan olehnya berdasarkan Pasal 16 Ayat (1) Huruf F dan Pasal 40 UUJN Perubahan ?, Artikel ini dianalisis dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan kajian terhadap Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf f UUJN Perubahan yang masih terdapat kekaburan norma hukum. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengkaji secara mendalam tanggungjawab saksi instrumentair dalam akta Notaris serta memberikan pemahaman dalam hal kedudukan hukum saksi instrumentair terkait dengan keautentikan akta Notaris. Hasil kajian melaui jurnal ini diketahui bahwa saksi instrumentair tidak bisa dituntut secara hukum terkait substansi akta yang penandatanganannya melibatkan dirinya, megingat kapasitasnya hanya pegawai yang difungsikan oleh Notaris untuk mempersiapkan akta. Kedudukan hukum saksi instrumentair terkait adanya kewajiban Notaris menyimpan kerahasiaan akta yang pembuatannya dilakukan olehnya berdasarkan Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf f dan Pasal 40 UUJN Perubahan tidak diwajibkan secara pasti harus menjaga kerahasiaan subtansi akta. Oleh sebab itu terhadap saksi instrumentair tidak bisa diterapkan Pasal 322 KUHP karena kapasitasnya sebagai saksi tidak melekat jabatan profesi. Saksi instrumentair yang tidak menjaga kerahasiaan dokumen Notaris perbuatannya diklasifikasikan perbuatan melawan hukum.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Elfan Winoto

<p>Abortion is the fifth highest cause of maternal mortality. Legal abortions are called <em>abortus provocatus medicinalis</em> and those that are illegal are called <em>abortus provocatus criminalis</em>. Indonesian law prohibits abortion except indications of medical emergencies and the consequences of rape. This study aims to determine the legal consequences of someone who failed an abortion and the legal protection of the doctor who treated her.</p><p>This legal research uses a juridical normative with a conceptual and legislative approach.</p><p>The results of the perpetrators and those who helped the abortion that caused medical emergencies to be threatened with Criminal Code Article 53. They cannot be convicted if in accordance with professional standards and standard operating procedures.</p><p>The conclusion and suggestion are the doctor cannot be convicted as a criminal offender or as an assistant to an abortion crime if it can be proven that an abortion is carried out in emergency condition to save mother or fetus and prevent disability. The government needs to make laws that regulate who will carry out safe, qualitative and responsible abortions.</p><p> </p><p>Abortion is the fifth highest cause of maternal mortality. Legal abortions are called <em>abortus provocatus medicinalis</em> and those that are illegal are called <em>abortus provocatus criminalis</em>. Indonesian law prohibits abortion except indications of medical emergencies and the consequences of rape. This study aims to determine the legal consequences of someone who failed an abortion and the legal protection of the doctor who treated her.</p><p>This legal research uses a juridical normative with a conceptual and legislative approach.</p><p>The results of the perpetrators and those who helped the abortion that caused medical emergencies to be threatened with Criminal Code Article 53. They cannot be convicted if in accordance with professional standards and standard operating procedures.</p><p>The conclusion and suggestion are the doctor cannot be convicted as a criminal offender or as an assistant to an abortion crime if it can be proven that an abortion is carried out in emergency condition to save mother or fetus and prevent disability. The government needs to make laws that regulate who will carry out safe, qualitative and responsible abortions.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 421-425
Author(s):  
I Made Ari Nurjaya ◽  
I Nyoman Sumardhika ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati

One of the legal products made by notary as a part of their authorities is a deed, both authentic deeds and underhand-made deeds. In addition to these deeds, a notary also has the authority to issue a certificate which is commonly referred to as a covernote. A certificate or covernote is a statement or note in the form of information confirming that a land ownership deed is in the process of a certificate making that is due to a process of roya, transfer of name of land ownership and splitting of one certificate into two. This study examines two issues related to notary authority, namely the basis for the notary’s authority in issuing a covernote and the legal consequences of making the covernote. This study uses a normative legal research method and a conceptual approach as well as a statutory approach. The results showed that the covernote issued by a notary was actually an ordinary certificate, not a legal product of a notary. Covernote only contains an explanation of the deed that is in the process of certification which has not been completed and will be completed within a period determined by the notary itself, so the covernote is not legally binding. The notary is authorized to make a covernote, but it is not regulated in the laws and regulations so that, if it is concluded, the covernote is not a legal product of a notary. The legal consequences for the notary if they fail to carry out the covernote, they can be held liable to solve them immediately. The legal consequence of not fulfilling the contents of the covernote is a violation of Article 1366 of the Criminal Code because notaries are considered negligent in carrying out their duties and authorities.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Devi Dharmawan ◽  
Ivonne Jonathan

Background: The public's lack of understanding of the different professions of dental artisans, dental technicians, and dentists has an impact on the practice that exceeds the authority carried out for years without any legal consequences borne by dental artisans. Although the regulations concerning work that can be done by dental artisans have been clearly explained in Permenkes No. 39 of 2014 this is still violated by dental artisans. In this case, the people are victims because of ignorance and high local wisdom in certain areas. Method: This study uses a type of normative juridical legal research. Normative legal research is research that focuses its study by viewing the law as a whole system rule which includes a set of principles, norms, and rules of law, both written and unwritten. Results: Giving the right to claim compensation to the patient is an effort to provide protection for each patient for a result that arises both physically and non-physically due to a mistake or negligence by health personnel. Conclusion: Dental workers can be charged with the Criminal Code article 359, 360, 361, namely whoever is due to his mistake (negligence) causes other people to be injured, severely disabled, or even die. In addition, the Consumer Protection Act No.8 of 1999 Article 4 of the Consumer Protection Law has the right to comfort, security and safety in consuming goods and/or services that can be used.


Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 508
Author(s):  
Putu Ratih Mahalia Septiana

The level of discipline and understanding of the rules and the low courtesy of traffic from road users is something that needs special attention in their efforts to solve problems in the field of traffic. The purpose of this study is as follows: to determine the legal consequences for perpetrators in traffic accidents whose victims have died and to find out legal considerations for perpetrators in criminal liability for traffic accidents. The type of research used is empirical juridical legal research. Results of the discussion in this study: The legal consequences for perpetrators in traffic accidents where the victim died was sentenced to a minimum prison sentence of 5 years. In accordance with Article 359 of the Criminal Code. Legal considerations for perpetrators in criminal liability for traffic accidents include unintentional elements (negligence), have never been convicted, there is peace between the parties, giving information is not convoluted, there are witnesses who are mitigating, then the threat of punishment can be lighter. Tingkat disiplin dan pemahaman terhadap peraturan dan sopan santun berlalu lintas yang rendah dari para pemakai jalan merupakan hal yang perlu mendapatkan perhatian khusus dalam upaya pemecahannya untuk mengatasi permasalahan di bidang lalu lintas. Tujuan dari penelitian ini sebagai berikut: untuk mengetahui akibat hukum bagi pelaku dalam kecelakaan lalu lintas yang korbannya meninggal dunia dan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan hukum bagi pelaku dalam pertanggung jawaban pidana terhadap kecelakaan lalu lintas. Jenis penelitian yang dipergunakan adalah penelitian hukum yuridis empiris. Hasil pembahasan dalam penelitian ini: Akibat hukum bagi pelaku dalam kecelakaan lalu lintas yang korbannya meninggal dunia dipidana dengan hukuman penjara minimal 5 tahun. Sesuai Pasal 359 KUHP. Pertimbangan hukum bagi pelaku dalam pertanggung jawaban pidana terhadap kecelakaan lalu lintas antara lain ada unsur ketidaksengajaan (alpa), belum pernah dihukum, ada perdamaian diantara para pihak, memberikan keterangan tidak berbelit-belit, adanya saksi yang meringankan, maka ancaman hukuman bisa lebih ringan.


Author(s):  
E.V. Medvedev

The paper reveals the functional purpose of the norms regulating the procedure for establishing, extending and canceling the probation period on the grounds provided for in Article 74 of the Criminal Code, and determines their place in the mechanism for implementing the protective and restorative functions of criminal law. In the course of the study, the author comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to make a number of changes to this procedure, in particular, concerning the assessment of the grounds and determination of the legal consequences of the cancellation of probation as a result of the commission of an administrative offense by a conditionally convicted person, careless and intentional crimes, as well as violations of the requirements established for the behavior of a convicted person for the period of probation by a court verdict. At the same time, when designing the norms on probation, the legislator should proceed from the fact that the maximum effect of using this tool depends on the degree of integration of the convict's personality into a socially oriented environment, including in terms of correcting his value-semantic attitudes. It can be achieved if the probationer takes part in the life of society on an equal basis with its other representatives, being in the same social status and legal position with them, that is, in conditions of equal opportunities. Therefore, the longer a person is in the status of a convicted (albeit conditionally convicted) and a judged person, the further the prospect of full-fledged re-socialization will move away from him.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 883
Author(s):  
Intan Permata Putri ◽  
Mohammad Mahrus Ali

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam pengujian undang-undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (UUD NRI 1945) dengan amar tidak dapat diterima atau niet ontvankelijke verklaard (NO) pada umumnya tidak memiliki pertimbangan hukum. Akan tetapi dalam perkembangannya MK memberikan pertimbangan hukum baik mengenai pokok perkara dan kedudukan hukum Pemohon. Penelitian ini hendak menjawab dua permasalahan yaitu; apa urgensi adanya pertimbangan hukum yang mengandung judicial order dalam putusan dengan amar tidak dapat diterima? Kemudian bagaimana karakteristik judicial order dalam putusan dengan amar tidak dapat diterima? Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan metode pengumpulan data melalui studi pustaka. Penelitian ini mengelompokkan putusan yang memiliki amar NO dari tahun 2003 sampai dengan 2018 yang berjumlah 375 putusan. Dari jumlah tersebut, putusan NO yang memiliki pertimbangan hukum sebanyak 71 putusan. Penelitian ini menemukan 3 putusan yang didalam pertimbangan hukumnya terdapat judicial order yakni Putusan 105/PUU-XIV/2016, Putusan 57/PUU-XV/2017, dan Putusan 98/PUU-XVI/2018. Simpulan dari penelitian ini adalah putusan dengan amar Tidak Dapat Diterima yang memuat judicial order selalu berkaitan dengan implementasi putusan yang tidak berjalan sebagaimana mestinya. MK menegaskan kembali sifat final dan binding Putusan MK serta sifat putusan MK yang declatoir konstitutif melalui putusan a quo. Karakteristik judicial order dalam ketiga a quo adalah ketika MK memberikan peringatan konstitusional secara bertahap (gradual). Pada Putusan 105/PUU-XIV/2016 MK menegaskan bahwa pengabaian putusan MK merupakan perbuatan melawan hukum, selanjutnya pada putusan 57/PUU-XV/2017 MK tegaskan sifat putusan yang self executing dan yang paling mendasar adalah pada putusan 98/PUU-XVI/2018 yang menyatakan bahwa lembaga atau masyarakat yang tidak menjalankan putusan MK merupakan pembangkangan terhadap konstitusi. Lahirnya pertimbangan tersebut sebagai ikhtiar menegakkan supremasi konstitusi dan marwah Mahkamah Konstitusi.Decisions of the Constitutional Court in judicial review of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (1945 Constitution) with an unacceptable verdict or niet ontvankelijke verklaard (NO) generally do not have legal considerations. However, in its development the Court gave legal considerations both on the subject matter and legal position of the Petitioner. This research wants to answer why is the Constitutional Court gives judgment (judicial order) to the case with the unacceptable verdict? What are the legal consequences of legal considerations in the unacceptable verdict on compliance with the Constitutional Court's decision? This research is a normative legal research with data collection method through literature study. This study grouped the decisions that had NO verdicts from 2003 to 2018 totaling 375 decisions. From all of those, NO verdicts that have legal considerations are 71. This study found 3 decisions that have judicial orders in their legal considerations namely Decision 105/PUU-XIV/2016, Decision 57/PUU-XV/2017, and Decision 98/PUU-XVI/2018. The conclusion of this research is that an unacceptable verdict that contains a judicial order is always related to the implementation of a decision that does not work as it should. The Court reaffirmed the final and binding character of the Constitutional Court's decision as well as the character of the Constitutional Court's decision which declared constitutive through a quo decision. The characteristic of judicial order in the three a quo is when the Constitutional Court gives a gradual constitutional warning. In Decision 105/PUU-XIV/2016 the Constitutional Court confirmed that the disregard for the Constitutional Court's decision was an act against the law, then in the decision 57/PUU-XV/2017 the Constitutional Court affirmed the character of the decision that was self-executing and the most basic was the decision 98/PUU-XVI/2018 which states that an institution or community that does not carry out the Constitutional Court's decision is a defiance of the constitution. The birth of these considerations is as an effort to uphold the supremacy of the constitution and the spirit of the Constitutional Court. 


JURTAMA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Adam Pramana Putra

Authentic Deed is a deed in which the truth of the Formal and Material and Subjective elements and the Objective Elements must be in accordance with the applicable Laws and Regulations. This study analyzed the form of notary's responsibility as an official making deeds on deeds that formally defects and legal consequences for authentic deeds if the witnesses in the deed are not present at the time the deed is read. The research method used normative legal research, namely legal research conducted by examining library materials or secondary legal material while the problem approach is carried out using a legal approach and conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that the Notary Deed that does not meet the Formal and Maternal requirements and does not meet the Subjective Elements and Objective Elements, then the deed can be null and void, and / or can be canceled. The absence of witnesses at the time of reading and signing the Minuta deed can make the notary be declared to give false information in an authentic deed


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 397-402
Author(s):  
I Made Agus Angga Kusuma Putra ◽  
Anak Agung Istri Agung ◽  
Desak Gde Dwi Arini

Trademarks are one of the most disputed intellectual property rights. The number of brand counterfeiting events conducted to gain profit by shortcuts, namely by violating business ethics, norms, and laws certainly do not make trade good and worsen the image as a violation of IPR. The purposes of this research are to examine the form of legal protection against registered clothing brand holders and to analyze the legal consequences for businesses that market clothing brands without a license? This research uses normative legal research methods by using statutory approach. Law No. 20 of 2016 and Law No. 5 of 1999 source to know criminal sanctions and also civil sanctions against businesses that use the brand without a permit. The results of this study show a form of legal protection against registered brand holders in the form of exclusive rights granted by the state to registered brand owners. Legal consequences for businesses that market brands without a license can be penalized as follows, in article 382bis criminal code can also be penalized i.e. material acts are threatened with a maximum prison sentence of one year and a fine as high as nine hundred million rupiah.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 490-495
Author(s):  
I Gede Agus Dedy Andika ◽  
I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti

Marriage according to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage is an inner and outer bond between a man and a woman to form a happy household. The authority of polygamy is not absolute in the hands of the husband, but there are other conditions that must be met, namely obtaining permission from the judge (court). The purposes of this study are to analyze the regulation of criminal sanctions in a second marriage without the permission of the first wife and the legal consequences of a second marriage that does not meet the applicable legal provisions. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary and secondary sources of legal materials. Data collection techniques were carried out by examining existing library materials which were then analyzed systematically. The results of the study reveal that criminal sanctions are given in the second marriage without providing incorrect information based on the criminal provisions in PP No. 9 of 1975 which is a lex specialis of the Criminal Code. The legal consequence of the second marriage is that if the husband has remarried or is polygamous without the knowledge of the first wife, the first wife can sue by submitting a request for annulment of the marriage contained in Articles 22-29 of the Marriage Law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document