scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS DINAMIKA TINDAK PIDANA DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN KORPORASI

to-ra ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Jeane N. Saly

AbstractThe impact of globalization has not only resulted in growth of increasingly thin state border, butalso growth of legal events that are not only private, but also be public, as a criminal offense, whichrequires accountability as a result of the activities of large companies (corporate) in their activities,to the detriment public (public). The problem is how the development of corporate criminal offensesettings and is responsible under the law in Indonesia, and other countries. The conclusion is thatthe offense and the responsibility of corporations in Indonesia are not regulated in the CriminalJustice Act (Criminal Code), but scattered in various legislation. The next development, both incriminal law and administrative law that have criminal sanctions have largely been set up ofcorporate as subjects of criminal law. In fact, in the General Explanation of the first bookmanuscript draft Law Code of Criminal Law (Draft-Criminal Code) 1999-2000 recognized. Inother countries, criminal offense of corporate and its accountability is set up, especially thecountries adherents of the common law system, are like the UK, the USA, and Canada, whichstarted in the industrial revolution 1842. The district court in its decision to apply through penaltiesfor the corporate fails to perform obligations under the legislation.Kata Kunci: Dinamika Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban korporasi

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-85
Author(s):  
Slavica Dinić ◽  
Emil Turković

As a part of the presentation in this paper, we will deal with one of a number of specific characteristics arisen while determining the criminal responsibility of perpetrators of international crimes, the one related to the institute of command responsibility, which are familiar with the statutes of both ad hoc tribunals (the Statute of the Tribunal in the Hague of 1993 and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda of 1994), as well as the so - called the Rome Statute from 1998. In these statutes, it is set in such a way that, in one of its parts, it contradicts the basic criminal law institutes (the principle of individual subjective responsibility, the principle of justice). However, in accordance with the assumed international obligations, this institute was introduced to the criminal law system of Republic of Serbia on January 1st 2006, by prescribing, within Article 384 of the Criminal Code of Republic of Serbia, a real criminal offense of omission, which is also the subject of this paper.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 253
Author(s):  
Zico Junius Fernando

Abstract: The State of Indonesia is a state of law, the affirmation of this can be seen in Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The settlement of cases through the judicial system which results in a court verdict is law enforcement towards the slow path. This is because law enforcement through a long-distance, through various levels starting from the Police, Attorney General's Office, District Court, High Court and even to the Supreme Court which ultimately has an impact on the accumulation of cases which are not small in number in the Court and not to mention other effects. For this reason, it is necessary to proceed with the steps to compile invitations concerning the rights and obligations of citizens in the context of implementing the Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. Renewal of the Criminal Code by its authors is positioned as the foundation for building a national criminal law system. Related to the Political Law of Criminal Law Renewal in the upcoming National Criminal Law there is a concept known as the Restorative Justice concept. Restorative Justice involves restoring relations between the victim and the perpetrator. The restoration of this relationship can be based on mutual agreement between the victim and the perpetrator. The victim can convey about the loss he suffered and the perpetrator was given the opportunity to make it up, through compensation mechanisms, peace, social work, and other agreements. Keywords: Restorative Justice; Legal Reform; RKUHP


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-94
Author(s):  
Zulfanur Fitri

Forests are an invaluable asset of the nation and state. The state based on its authority has made several legal products to protect forests from human actions. As happened in the jurisdiction of the Muaro Bungo District Court who has imposed a criminal offense against the perpetrators of forest fires in the ruling No.159 / Pid.B / LH / 2018 / PN.Mrb. and Decision No.201 / Pid.B / LH / 2017 / PN.Mrb. The problems to be studied are how the application of criminal sanctions, and Judges considerations in issuing criminal decisions against perpetrators of forest fires. The approach used is a normative approach. The data used are secondary data. The data used is only secondary data. The technique of data collection is through library research and document study in the form of Judge's Decree No.159 / Pid.B / LH / 2018 /PN.Mrb and Judge's Decree No. 201 / Pid.B / LH / 2017 / PN.Mrb. The data is then analyzed normatively and presented in a descriptive qualitative form. The results of the study showed that: First, the application of punishment by the judge in the decision No.159 / Pid.B / LH / 2018 / PN.Mrb. and Decision No.201 / Pid.B / LH / 2017 / PN.Mrb. that Article 56 Paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 108 of Law Number 39 Year 2014 concerning Plantation in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) 1st of the Criminal Code. Second, the judge's consideration in making a decision No.159 / Pid.B / LH / 2018 / PN.Mrb. and Decision No.201 / Pid.B / LH / 2017 / PN.Mrb. are: considerations of a juridical nature indictment, witness testimony, defendant's letter, evidence, non-juridical considerations: the defendant's physical and spiritual condition, as a result of the defendant's actions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-40
Author(s):  
Anwita Fauziah M ◽  
Ridho Mubarak ◽  
Wessy Trisna

Minor criminal acts are regulated in Article 352 of the Indonesian Criminal Code, which is a maltreatment that does not cause illness or is prevented from doing office or daily work. Type of normative juridical research. The nature of the research is analytical descriptive is a study that describes, examines, explains and analyzes a legal regulation and describes the results of the data received based on the data source and also by analyzing related cases based on sample cases seen from the Medan District Court Decision in a criminal offense of minor maltreatment . The application of criminal law against criminal offenses of mild persecution in Decision Number: 178 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN Mdn is the perpetrators violating Article 351 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, namely: first, legally proven and convincing guilty of committing a criminal offense, secondly, sentenced to prison for 3 (three) months and 15 (fifteen) days, third, stipulates the period of arrest and detention that has been served by the Defendant deducted entirely from the criminal convicted, fourth, orders the Defendant to remain in custody, fifth, imposes case costs to The defendant is Rp. 2,000, - (two thousand rupiah).


2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 426-431
Author(s):  
Marianna Meriani

Purpose This paper aims to explain the pros and cons of the crime of self-laundering and of the voluntary discovery rule in light of the recent reform of the Italian criminal law system. More specifically, it focuses on the Italian anti-money laundering legislation as introduced by law no. 186 of 15 December 2014 that has dismissed the privilege of self-laundering. Design/methodology/approach To reach such an aim, a comparative approach has been adopted, focusing first on the crime of money laundering as previously described by Article 648 bis of the Italian Criminal Code and on the reasons underlying the adoption of the so-called privilege clause and, subsequently focusing on its discipline in a common law system, the USA. Afterwards, there is the analysis of the above mentioned reform, focusing on the ratio of the new crime of self-laundering to tackle financial crimes and allow capital return from abroad. Nevertheless, considering how recent the reform is, the absence of case law on the subject has made it difficult to well evaluate its implications. Findings The analysis shows how Article 648 bis of the Italian Criminal Code has been the safeguard against self-laundering incriminations. Originality/value Therefore, it points out the importance of the reform in light of the concerns stemming from the privilege of self-laundering (for example, propagating the effects of the crime of self-laundering). In addition, it highlights the importance of a strict interpretation of the new crime to assure its compatibility with the criminal law principles of legality and fragmentation.


Author(s):  
Ivan Kozachenko

The creation of the Guiding Principles on the Criminal Law of the RSFSR of 1919 is studied taking into account extremely complicated internal and external political situation in the country at the beginning of the twentieth century. Using the methods of analysis, synthesis, as well as comparative and historical method, the author determines the significance of the Guiding Principles in the law system of the young Soviet state. Some key norms of the document are examined. In particular, the definition of criminal law is analyzed and its advantages and disadvantages are identified. It is noted that the definition of a crime was formulated too broadly, and more significant steps in criminalization of different acts were made with the adoption of the RSFSR Criminal Code of 1922. It is indicated which persons were not punished according to the Guidelines. Attention is drawn to the way in which such a method of protection as necessary defense was set forth in this act. The Guiding Principles are not without certain disadvantages: for example, the institution of complicity is not sufficiently disclosed, there is lexical redundancy in the definition of the concept «planning the offence». However, the discrepancies between the main provisions covered in the Guidelines are explainable and excusable, taking into account the historical situation at the time of their adoption. The analyzed document became the basis for Russian criminal law, and some of its provisions are still relevant.


Author(s):  
Zarina Khisamova ◽  
Ildar Begishev

The humanity is now at the threshold of a new era when a widening use of artificial intelligence (AI) will start a new industrial revolution. Its use inevitably leads to the problem of ethical choice, it gives rise to new legal issues that require urgent actions. The authors analyze the criminal law assessment of the actions of AI. Primarily, the still open issue of liability for the actions of AI that is capable of self-learning and makes a decision to act / not to act, which is qualified as a crime. As a result, there is a necessity to form a system of criminal law measures of counteracting crimes committed with the use of AI. It is shown that the application of AI could lead to four scenarios requiring criminal law regulation. It is stressed that there is a need for a clear, strict and effective definition of the ethical boundaries in the design, development, production, use and modification of AI. The authors argue that it should be recognized as a source of high risk. They specifically state that although the Criminal Code of the Russian Fe­deration contains norms that determine liability for cybercrimes, it does not eliminate the possibility of prosecution for infringements committed with the use of AI under the general norms of punishment for various crimes. The authors also consider it possible to establish a system to standardize and certify the activities of designing AI and putting it into operation. Meanwhile, an autonomous AI that is capable of self-learning is considerably different from other phenomena and objects, and the situation with the liability of AI which independently decides to undertake an action qualified as a crime is much more complicated. The authors analyze the resolution of the European Parliament on the possibility of granting AI legal status and discuss its key principles and meaning. They pay special attention to the issue of recognizing AI as a legal personality. It is suggested that a legal fiction should be used as a technique, when a special legal personality of AI can be perceived as an unusual legal situation that is different from reality. It is believed that such a solution can eliminate a number of existing legal limitations which prevent active involvement of AI into the legal space.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-226
Author(s):  
Failin Failin

In criminal law there is no penalty if there is no wrongdoing, this basis is about the accountability of a person for the actions he has done. Therefore, in criminal law there are exceptions to such criminal liability, for example contained in Articles 48, 49, 50 and so forth. In addition, there are burdensome things that will be imposed on the accused for crimes committed, such as samenloop, recidive and so on. In the Muaro Sijunjung District Court there is one case concerning a combination of criminal acts, namely theft crimes accompanied by violence and moreover this theft is carried out among families (theft in the family). In this case the judge has decided the prison sentence for 6 (six) Years. But according to the analysis of the author there is no sense of justice for the victim because this perpetrator is the husband of the victim's child so that there is no deterrent effect for the perpetrator, the reason that there is no more theft in this family because no matter how small the crime committed by a person must be taken action in order to obtain justice and legal certainty. In principle, judges have the freedom to determine the measure of punishment to be imposed on the perpetrators of crimes, as long as it does not exceed the maximum provisions specified in the Criminal Code. Therefore, the sentencing of the accused for a combination of crimes committed by means of pure absorption Stelsel that is If a person commits several acts that are several delik each threatened with a different kind of criminal


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-154
Author(s):  
Muchammad Chasani

The regulation of corporate criminal liability in Indonesia's criminal justice system is basically a new and still debatable issue. It is said that because in the Criminal Code is not recognized and regulated explicitly about the corporation as a subject of criminal law. This is a natural thing since the WvS Criminal Code still adheres to the principle of "societas delinquere non potest" or "non-potest university delinquere", that is, a legal entity can not commit a crime. Thus, if in a society there is a criminal offense, then the criminal act is deemed to be done by the board of the corporation concerned. Regarding the corporate criminal responsibility system in Indonesia, in the corruption law Article 20 paragraph (1), if the corporation committed a criminal act of corruption, then those responsible for the criminal act shall be the corporation only, the management only, or the corporation and its management. Thus, it can be said that the regulation of corporate criminal liability in the legal system in Indonesia is expressly only regulated in special criminal legislation, because the Criminal Code of WvS still adheres to the principle of "societas delinquere nonpotest" so it is not possible to enforce corporate criminal liability in it.


Author(s):  
Biljana Gavrilović ◽  

The subject of the analysis is security measures according to the Yugoslav Criminal Code from 1929. Namely, the importance of the analysis of security measures from the Criminal Code from 1929 is reflected in the fact that it made a turning point in the development of criminal law in Serbia, given that it for the first time had prescribed security measures in the register of criminal sanctions. Therefore, the goal is to point out the bases on which the current system of criminal sanctions is built, through the analysis of security measures from the Criminal Code from 1929.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document