scholarly journals TINJAUAN YURIDIS TENTANG GABUNGAN TINDAK PIDANA SEBAGAI HAL YANG MEMBERATKAN PIDANA Studi Kasus: Putusan Perkara Nomor:141/Pid.B/2018/PN Mrj (Pencurian)

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-226
Author(s):  
Failin Failin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
District Court ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Family ◽  
Sense Of Justice

In criminal law there is no penalty if there is no wrongdoing, this basis is about the accountability of a person for the actions he has done. Therefore, in criminal law there are exceptions to such criminal liability, for example contained in Articles 48, 49, 50 and so forth. In addition, there are burdensome things that will be imposed on the accused for crimes committed, such as samenloop, recidive and so on. In the Muaro Sijunjung District Court there is one case concerning a combination of criminal acts, namely theft crimes accompanied by violence and moreover this theft is carried out among families (theft in the family). In this case the judge has decided the prison sentence for 6 (six) Years. But according to the analysis of the author there is no sense of justice for the victim because this perpetrator is the husband of the victim's child so that there is no deterrent effect for the perpetrator, the reason that there is no more theft in this family because no matter how small the crime committed by a person must be taken action in order to obtain justice and legal certainty. In principle, judges have the freedom to determine the measure of punishment to be imposed on the perpetrators of crimes, as long as it does not exceed the maximum provisions specified in the Criminal Code. Therefore, the sentencing of the accused for a combination of crimes committed by means of pure absorption Stelsel that is If a person commits several acts that are several delik each threatened with a different kind of criminal

KONSEP DIYAT SEBAGAI SOLUSI KESEJAHTERAAN KELUARGA KORBAN PEMBUNUHAN DAYA PAKSA (OVERMACHT)

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 101-120
Author(s):  
M Iqbal
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Coercive Power ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Law ◽  
Sense Of Justice

In discussing criminal liability, we will talk about the perpetrator of a criminal act, namely someone who has committed an act that is expressly prohibited and threatened with criminality by law, ideally that person should be convicted or punished. Likewise, the perpetrators of murder are threatened with imprisonment in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Code. However, the perpetrators of criminal acts are not always punished because the Criminal Code provides several reasons that can erase a person's guilt so that they are free from all punishments. One of them is coercive power which is regulated in Article 48 of the Criminal Code. However, the problem is that there is no formulation of coercion in the Criminal Code so that judges in deciding cases of murder due to coercion are only based on the judge's considerations and beliefs. Islamic law in comparing the existing arrangements in the Criminal Code is because Islam prioritizes protection and compensation charged to the perpetrator against the family of the murder victim, both intentional and unintentional murder. Meanwhile, the existing criminal policies in the Criminal Code have not met the principles of legal certainty and a sense of justice in society. The concept of Diyat is a welfare solution for the families of victims of murder by force, because this sanction provides benefits that can have an impact on the future. This is what is called maqshid sharia, where the law was created aiming to maintain 5 things, namely religion, reason, soul, lineage, and treasure. And the concept of diyat at least maintains 2 things, namely descent and treasure.

scholarly journals ANALISIS PUTUSAN NOMOR 559/PID.B/2017/PN.BYW. PENGADILAN NEGERI BANYUWANGI TENTANG PENYEBARAN AJARAN KOMUNISME/MARXISME-LENINISME SECARA MELAWAN HUKUM BERDASARKAN PASAL 107A KUHP

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1108
Author(s):  
Andreas Purba ◽  
Firman Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Basic Element ◽  
District Court ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
State Security ◽  
Individual Accountability

Budi Pego was charged with violating Article 107a of Law Number 27 of 1999 concerning Amendment to the Criminal Law Code relating to crimes against State security, because of. Because of these accusations, Budi Pego was charged with a 10-month prison sentence in the Banyuwangi District Court. The problem faced is how criminal liability on the perpetrators of the spread of the teachings of communism in terms of Article 107A of the Criminal Code (case study of decision No. 559 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN.Byw)? The research method used is normative legal research. The results showed that criminal liability on the perpetrators of the spread of the teachings of communism in terms of Article 107A of the Criminal Code in Decision No. 559 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN.Byw. it is inappropriate if this criminal liability model is applied to criminal liability to individuals. Considering that individual accountability still requires actions and mistakes as a basic element of accountability. That is, without any deeds and mistakes, there is no criminal liability. Regarding the Budi Pego case, the policy of criminalizing the ideology of Communism/Marxism-Leninism was decriminalized. If this cannot be done, then the legislators need to revise Law No. 27 of 1999 with the concept of eliminating articles containing formal offenses and replacing them with the formulation of material offenses and in the formulation of the weight of sanctions.

scholarly journals Overmacht Dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Yang Menyebabkan Korban Meninggal Dunia Perspektif Fiqh JinÂyah

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-335
Author(s):  
Muhammad Riza Fahmi
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Self Defense ◽  
Conditional Sentence

Abstract: The Judge’s ruling in the legal decition of the Lamongan District Court No. 164/Pid.B/2013/PN.LMG on the crime of persecution that causes the death of the victim is regarded true since it has been fulfilled all elements as required by Article 351 Paragraph (3) of Criminal Code as indicted by the public prosecutor. In deciding this case, the judge also considered the testimony of witnesses, the information from the defendant, the facts revealed at the hearing as well as the things that burdensome and relieve the defendant. Therefore, the defendant shall be sentenced for 5 months in prison and does not have to go through due to the imposed conditional sentence. In Islamic criminal law, the case is equated with a semi-deliberate murder and sanctioned by diyât and kafârat in the form of ta’zîr. In this case, the defendant can not be punished because of his self-defense. So that the defendant is free from a criminal liability in Islam.Keywords: Persecution, victim died, Islamic law. Abstrak: Putusan hukum hakim Nomor: 164/Pid.B/2013/PN.LMG tentang tindak pidana penganiayaan yang mengakibatkan korban meninggal dunia berdasarkan telah terpenuhinya semua unsur-unsur dari pasal 351 ayat (3) KUHP seperti yang didakwakan oleh jaksa penuntut umum. Dalam memutuskan perkara ini hakim juga mempertimbangkan keterangan saksi, keterangan terdakwa, fakta-fakta yang terungkap di persidangan, serta hal yang memberatkan dan meringankan terdakwa. Oleh karena itu, terdakwa dipidana dengan 5 bulan penjara dan tidak perlu menjalaninya dikarenakan dikenakan hukuman bersyarat. Dalam fiqh jinâyah, perkara ini disamakan dengan pembunuhan semi sengaja. Untuk sanksinya yaitu membayar diyat dan kafârat, sedangkan untuk hukuman penggantinya berupa hukuman ta’zîr. Dalam kasus ini, para terdakwa meskipun telah melakukan perbuatan tersebut, namun tidak bisa dikenakan hukuman tersebut, karena adanya unsur pembelaan diri, sehingga terbebas dari pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam Islam.Kata Kunci: Penganiayaan,  meninggal dunia, Hukum Islam. 

ACTUAL PROBLEMSOF QUALIFICATION OF CRIME BY THE ART. 109 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF UKRAINE

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hryhoriy Kraynik ◽  
◽  
Vitaliy Perzhul ◽  
Keyword(s):  
National Security ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Constitutional Order ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Media ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Important Object

This article is devoted to the analysis of the relevant Criminal Code of Ukraine, namely Art. 109 on the subject of legal certainty of its individual formulations, resulting on numerous problems that face relevant state bodies during the qualification of acts under this the norm. This article provides the criminal liability for the acts, aimed at forcible change or overthrow of the constitutional order, or seizure of state power. Along with this, article focused on the issue of increasing of criminal liability, when these acts are committed with the use of the media. It was figured out the specific judicial practice and demonstrated that the problems that arose in practice were not due to poor efficiency of the relevant state bodies, but due to the presence in the formulation of the content of the Art. 109 of Criminal Code of Ukraine of a large number of assessments in terminology. By resolving these criminal law conflicts of terminology and concept within crimes against the foundations of national security under Art. 109, it seems to be appropriate the replacement of ambiguous concepts on clear and specific provisions and their official interpretation directly in the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Deserves attention also the fact that the foundations of national security are particularly important object of protection by criminal law, as noted in Art. 17 of the Соnstitution of Ukraine, the protection of these foundations is the most important function of the state and the deal of the entire Ukrainian people. Therefore, we believe that the rules that ensure the protection of these goods must be clear and act on performance of tasks on protection of national security and other tasks of the Criminal code of Ukraine specified in its Art. 1.

scholarly journals Criminal Influence and Feasibility of its Preservation in New Criminal Code of Ukraine

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 44-51
Author(s):  
Artem Nikitin
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Scientific Community ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Original Form ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Definition Of

The concept of criminal influence, which was introduced into the Criminal Code of Ukraine in June 2020, has been highly criticized by the scientific community and practitioners, among other things, for violation of the principle of legal certainty and the rule of law. This article defines the main disadvantages of the provisions that establish criminal liability for acts related to criminal influence and analyzes the feasibility of preservation of these provisions in their original form in the Criminal Code of Ukraine and the possibility of their transfer to the draft of the new Criminal Code of Ukraine. It is concluded that the mentioned norms should be at least substantially revised, with taking into account comments of the Ukrainian scientists, and cannot be transferred into the new criminal law as they are currently defined. Moreover, introduction of specific amendments to other laws is also required in this regard.The Working Group on the development of criminal law, as the author of the draft of the new Criminal Code, reasonably refused from the existing concept of the criminal influence. At the same time, they defined criminally punishable acts, which can be considered as a certain equivalent of the criminal influence (socalled “criminal leadership”). Provisions developed by the Working Group differ from the current by the more precise definition of specific actions, which constitute corpus delicti of criminal leadership, avoidance of jargon formulations, decrease of the terms of imprisonment for committing the relevant crimes, and diversification of criminal legal measures that can be applied to offender besides the punishment. In general, it appears that the Working Group avoided the main mistakes which are present in the current legislation. However, it is too early to draw conclusions regarding the acceptability of the proposed article of the new criminal law. Only after the draft of the new Criminal Code of Ukraine has been finished and its provisions can be analyzed altogether, final conclusions regarding the mentioned norms can be drawn.

scholarly journals Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Perbuatan Mark-up Oleh Panitia Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Dalam Proyek Pemerintah

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-96
Author(s):  
Rika Susilawaty ◽  
Triono Eddy ◽  
Alpi Sahari
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Literature Searches

The influence of the development of the strategic environment as well as the influence of the actors' motivational aspects, policy aspects or aspects of law enforcement, has influenced the increase in smuggling, both smuggling imports and export smuggling, increasing cases of smuggling, particularly smuggling of imports, has caused various impacts, especially the decline in the competitiveness of domestic production in the market which will ultimately also affect the improvement of the national economy. The research conducted is a descriptive study with a normative legal approach (normative juridical) conducted by means of literature study. Data collection tools used in this study are data in the form of document studies and literature searches. which become the knife of analysis in this study are theories of legal certainty, theories of criminal liability, and theories of criminal law policy. Sanctions given by the Panel of Judges against the defendant do not describe justice and order in the community, because the sentence tends to be mild and does not give a deterrent effect on the perpetrators of corruption. Efforts to deal with crime with criminal law (a means of punishment) and more emphasis on the nature of "Represive" (repression / eradication / suppression) after a crime or crime occurred.

scholarly journals Criminal Influence and Problems of its Definition in the Criminal Code of Ukraine

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 46-56
Author(s):  
Artem Nikitin
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
High Probability ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Abstract Concepts ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The article researches the term “criminal influence” which was introduced to the Criminal Code of Ukraine (hereinafter – the CC of Ukraine) by the Law of Ukraine “On amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine regarding liability for crimes committed by criminal community”, and its correlation with the institute of complicity in a crime, in particular with objective elements of accomplices in a crime, as well as with illegal influence. The author concludes that there may be one narrow and two broad types of understanding of this term. Moreover, criminal influence may be considered not only from the criminal legal but also from the criminological point of view. Criminal influence is a part of the broader term of illegal influence. However, in contrast to other types of illegal influence, criminal influence, due to its social danger, is limited by the state specifically by the means of criminal law.The term of criminal influence introduced to the Ukrainian criminal legislation has serious gaps, so that it is extremely poor and practically inapplicable. Moreover, not only this term defined in the note to Art. 255 of the CC of Ukraine, but also corpus delicti provided for in Art. 255-1 of the CC of Ukraine (intentional establishment or dissemination of the criminal influence in society) should be substantially revised. The usage of general formulations and abstract concepts in the disposition of Art. 255-1 of the CC of Ukraine, as well as non-exhaustive lists of objective and subjective elements in the definition of the term of criminal influence violates the principle of legal certainty as a part of a broader rule of law principle. Bringing individuals to the criminal liability for committing crimes related to the criminal influence (intentional establishment or dissemination of the criminal influence in society and request for its application) or conviction of individuals for these crimes with a high probability will cause substantial violations of fundamental principles of criminal law and human rights.

MAIN SPECIFICATIONS OF ASSESSING ACTIVITIES OF MINOR IMPORTANCE OF IN MODERN CRIMINAL LAW

Law and World ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-95
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Other ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Minor Importance ◽  
Detailed Review

The research includes the full and the detailed overview of assessing activities of minor importance in Georgian Criminal Law. The Article 7 of the Criminal Code of Georgia states the following: a crime shall not be an action that, although formally containing the signs of a crime, has not produced, for minor importance, the prejudice that would require criminal liability of its perpetrator, or has not created the risk of such harm. The research includes the main criteria of defining activities as activities of minor importance. The detailed review of Georgian case law is also introduced, as well as, legislation, judicial literature and experience of the other European countries.

Killing through negligence and its distinction with other kinds of murder

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Myslivyy ◽  
Angelina Mykyta
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The State ◽  
Sufficient Information ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Common Features ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
The Common

Problem setting. According to Art. 27 of the Constitution of Ukraine, everyone has an inalienable right to life, no one can be arbitrarily deprived of life, and the state, in turn, is obliged to protect human life. Protection of a person’s life, as a duty of the state, is manifested in the establishment of criminal liability, enshrined in Section II “Criminal offenses against life and health of a person” of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, who commit socially dangerous acts. whether there are criminal offenses and what punishments they should be committed. The distinction between crimes such as premeditated murder and negligent deprivation of another’s life is important, as criminal law theory still does not have sufficient information on this issue and does not have a complete list of features of the above crimes, but we tried to identify them in our article. Target of research. Deepening their knowledge on the caution of a person’s life due to inconsistency and drawing the line between possible offenses and conditional authority, clarifying the special characteristics of the perpetrator and the victim, outlining the essential features of the perpetrator and the victim, and researching the regulation of negligent proposal of a new version of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Analysis of resent researches and publications. The theoretical basis for the study of the problem of murder through negligence are the works of legal scholars, in particular, M. Bazhanov, V. Borisov, S. Borodin, V. Glushkov, O. Gorokhovskaya, I. Zinchenko , V. Tyutyugin, O. Us, E. Kisilyuk, V. Kuts, M. Yefimov, S. Likhova, V. Stashis, V. Shablisty and others. Article’s main body. According to Art. 3 of the Constitution of Ukraine, man, his life and health, honor and dignity, inviolability and security are recognized in Ukraine as the highest social value. Given this constitutional provision, the legislator should pay special attention to the criminal law protection of human life and health as the most important public relations. So it is no coincidence that considering such encroachments as one of the most dangerous in the criminal law dimension, the legislator established criminal liability for their commission in Section II “Criminal offenses against life and health” of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Due to the high public danger and the high prevalence of criminal offenses against human life and health, criminal law theory and law enforcement practice are under increasing scrutiny. Thus, the analysis of judicial practice in recent years shows that, for example, among all murders (Articles 117-119 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) the number of persons convicted of deprivation of life due to negligence is about 15 percent annually. In our opinion, it is also advisable to analyze the concept of “murder” by comparing the common and distinctive features of the offenses referred to in Art. Art. 115 and 119 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. According to scientific results, we can conclude that these offenses have many common features. It is possible to understand the common features and preconditions for the spread of these types of offenses. Conclusions and prospects for the development. A study of issues related to the criminal law analysis of murder through negligence and its difference from other types of murder, shows that these acts encroach on the identical object, which is “human life as a set of social relations.” Unfortunately, nowadays the dynamics of offenses committed in Art. Art. 115 and 119 is intensifying, so consideration of their delimitation and characterization of their features is very important. The study examines the main features of these types of crimes, as well as analyzes some provisions of national law and proposes some adjustments to them.

Suspended Sentence and Placement in a Special Educational Institution: Features of Application and Correlation in the Context of the Systematic Nature of Criminal Law

2021 ◽  
pp. 267-271
Author(s):  
Vаleria A. Terentieva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Educational Institution ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Punishment ◽  
Simultaneous Application ◽  
Closed Type ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Law Regulation

The systematic nature of criminal law forms the main features of the industry, namely: normativity, universalism, that is, the absence of casuistry and obligation. The strict consistency of both the entire industry and its individual institutions allows avoiding the redundancy of criminal law regulation, clearly determining the legal status of a person in conflict with the law. However, the norms of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation do not always meet these requirements due to defects in legal technology, and, sometimes, gaps in regulation. In practice, the courts, in an effort to minimize the above defects, sometimes resort to excessive criminal law regulation; as an example, the article gives the ratio of the application of suspended sentence and placement in a special educational institution of a closed type. The article analyzes sentences to minors in which Art. 73 and Part 2 of Art. 92 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation were simultaneously applied in one sentence for the same act. For a comprehensive study, the article analyzed sentences to minors held in special educational institutions of a closed type for the period from 2014 to 2020, criminal statistics posted on the website of the Judicial Department of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, as well as various points of view of leading legal scholars. The research methods of static observation, analysis and synthesis, the system-structural method, as well as a number of factographic methods, were used. The study develops from the general to the specific, i.e., first, systematicity is analyzed as a property of the branch of criminal law and then as a property of a legal institution, namely, the release of minors from criminal liability. Consistency as a property of the institution of exemption from criminal punishment presupposes the impossibility of intersecting elements within one institution. Special attention is paid to the legal nature of suspended sentence as the most common punishment measure for minors, and its effectiveness. Then the cases of the simultaneous application of Art. 73 and Part 2 of Art. 92 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation are analyzed. In the course of the study, the author examines the features of suspended sentence and placement in a special educational and educational institution of a closed type, compares these two forms of criminal liability, and highlights the differences. The conclusion is that the simultaneous placement in a special educational institution of a closed type and suspended sentence are a redundancy of criminal law regulation. The article raises the question of the need to improve the Criminal Code in terms of the development of placement in a special educational and educational institution of a closed type as a type of exemption from criminal punishment: the court is to be provided with the opportunity to control the juvenile offender’s correctional process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document